RESUMO
BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the health care workers (HCWs) at the frontline have been largely exposed to infected patients, running a high risk of being infected by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.Since limiting transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in health care setting is crucial to avoid the community spread of SARS-CoV-2, we want to share our experience as an early hit hospital where standard infection control practices have been conscientiously applied and effective. We believe that our example, as first and hardest hit country, might be a warning and aid not only for those who have been hit later, but also for a second fearful wave of contagion. In addition, we want to offer an insight on modifiable risk factors for HWs-related infection. METHODS: Demographic, lifestyle, work-related and comorbidities data of 1447 HCWs, which underwent a nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2, were retrospectively collected. For the 164 HCWs positive for SARS-CoV-2, data about safety in the workplace, symptoms and clinical course of COVID-19 were also collected. Cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was estimated. Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection were assessed using a multivariable Poisson regression. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among the screened HCWs was 11.33% (9.72-13.21). Working in a COVID-19 ward, being a former smoker (versus being a person who never smoked) and BMI was positively associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection, whereas being a current smoker was negatively associated with this variable. CONCLUSIONS: Assuming an equal accessibility and proper use of personal protective equipment of all the HCWs of our Hospital, the great and more prolonged contact with COVID-19 patients remains the crucial risk factor for SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, increased and particular care needs to be focused specifically on the most exposed HCWs groups, which should be safeguarded. Furthermore, in order to limit the risk of asymptomatic spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection, the HCWs mild symptoms of COVID-19 should be considered when evaluating the potential benefits of universal staff testing.
Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Recursos Humanos em Hospital , Adulto , Índice de Massa Corporal , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Teste de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Controle de Infecções , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Paciente para o Profissional/prevenção & controle , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , FumarRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: We compared the characteristics and outcomes of vaccinated and nonvaccinated patients hospitalized with COVID-19. DESIGN: We analyzed patients hospitalized in a COVID hub during three one-month periods: (i) October 15, 2020-November 15, 2020 (prevaccination peak); (ii) October 15, 2021-November 15, 2021 (Delta wave); (iii) December 15, 2021-January 15, 2022 (Omicron wave). To define the epidemiologic context, SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers was analyzed. RESULTS: SARS-CoV-2 infection incidence in healthcare workers was 146 cases per 1000 persons in 2020 (prevaccination) and 67 in 2021 (postvaccination, when the Omicron variant caused most infections). There were 420 hospitalized patients in the prevaccination period, 51 during the Delta wave (52.1% vaccinated) and 165 during the Omicron wave (52.9% vaccinated). During the Delta wave, a significantly higher number of nonvaccinated (29.2%) than vaccinated patients (3.7%) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) (p = 0.019). Nonvaccinated patients were younger and had a lower rate of concomitant medical conditions (53.2% vs 83.7%; p < 0.001) during the Omicron wave when 80% of patients admitted to ICU and all those who died were still infected by the Delta variant. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccine effectiveness in fragile individuals appears to be lower because of a faster immunity decline. However, the Omicron variant seems to cause less severe COVID-19.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Hospitalização , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
Vaccine breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection has been monitored in 3720 healthcare workers receiving 2 doses of BNT162b2. SARS-CoV-2 infection is detected in 33 subjects, with a 100-day cumulative incidence of 0.93%. Vaccine protection against acquisition of SARS-CoV-2 infection is 83% (95%CI: 58-93%) in the overall population and 93% (95%CI: 69-99%) in SARS-CoV-2-experienced subjects, when compared with a non-vaccinated control group from the same Institution, in which SARS-CoV-2 infection occurs in 20/346 subjects (100-day cumulative incidence: 5.78%). The infection is symptomatic in 16 (48%) vaccinated subjects vs 17 (85%) controls (p = 0.01). All analyzed patients, in whom the amount of viral RNA was sufficient for genome sequencing, results infected by the alpha variant. Antibody and T-cell responses are not reduced in subjects with breakthrough infection. Evidence of virus transmission, determined by contact tracing, is observed in two (6.1%) cases. This real-world data support the protective effect of BNT162b2 vaccine. A triple antigenic exposure, such as two-dose vaccine schedule in experienced subjects, may confer a higher protection.
Assuntos
Infecções Assintomáticas/epidemiologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidade , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/virologia , Teste de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Incidência , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , RNA Viral/genética , RNA Viral/isolamento & purificação , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
The frenzied rhythm of our times leads our patients not only to resource to diet integrators-remorselessly overcoming difficulties or prejudices-to fulfill increasingly frequent nutritional needs due to decreasingly "correct" eating habits, but also to fight against a myriad of skin conditions. The rationale of a combined approach for the antiaging treatment of skin is based on the synergic effect between functional substances applied locally, where the problem arises, and other agents working from the inside to correct a need, to restore altered functions or conditions and to guarantee the correct intake of nutrients or active substances. This work discusses the active ingredients mostly used in the oral treatment of skin aging, together with the scientific evidences that do or do not support their use.
Assuntos
Suplementos Nutricionais , Envelhecimento da Pele , Humanos , Protetores SolaresRESUMO
Imatinib mesylate is a drug that has been recently approved for the treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia. It acts as a potent and selective inhibitor of BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase. It also inhibits both c-kit and platelet-derived growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases. Hypopigmentation of the skin in patients receiving this drug has been recently reported. We report a 17-year-old Caucasian patient affected by chronic myeloid leukemia in therapy with imatinib mesylate who developed hypopigmented vitiligo-like patches and generalized lightening of the skin. In order to evaluate the lightening observed clinically, we measured the progressive skin color hypopigmentation by using a colorimeter over several months. The colorimetric evaluation confirmed the generalized and gradual lightening of patient's skin over treatment with imatinib mesylate. We believe that this is the first reported instance of vitiligo-like lesions in a pediatric patient treated with imatinib mesylate, and the second in a Caucasian patient.