Common fear molecules induce defensive responses in marine prey across trophic levels.

Predator-prey interactions are a key feature of ecosystems and often chemically mediated, whereby individuals detect molecules in their environment that inform whether they should attack or defend. These molecules are largely unidentified, and their discovery is important for determining their ecological role in complex trophic systems. Homarine and trigonelline are two previously identified blue crab (Callinectes sapidus) urinary metabolites that cause mud crabs (Panopeus herbstii) to seek refuge, but it was unknown whether these molecules influence other species within this oyster reef system. In the current study, homarine, trigonelline, and blue crab urine were tested on juvenile oysters (Crassostrea virginica) to ascertain if the same molecules known to alter mud crab behavior also affect juvenile oyster morphology, thus mediating interactions between a generalist predator, a mesopredator, and a basal prey species. Oyster juveniles strengthened their shells in response to blue crab urine and when exposed to homarine and trigonelline in combination, especially at higher concentrations. This study builds upon previous work to pinpoint specific molecules from a generalist predator's urine that induce defensive responses in two marine prey from different taxa and trophic levels, supporting the hypothesis that common fear molecules exist in ecological systems.

Induced defenses as a management tool: Shaping individuals to their environment.

Many prey species can adjust morphology to reduce predation risk in response to predator cues. Enhancing prey defenses using predator cues may improve survival of cultivated species and enhance species restoration efforts, but assessment of such benefits at industrially relevant scales is needed. We examined how raising a model foundation species, oysters (Crassostrea virginica), under commercial hatchery conditions with cues from two common predator species can improve survival across a variety of predator regimes and environmental conditions. Oysters responded to predators by growing stronger shells than controls, but had subtle variations in shell characteristics depending on the predator species. Predator-induced changes significantly increased oyster survival up to 600% and survivorship was maximized when cue source was matched with local predator regime. Overall, our findings demonstrate the utility of using predator cues to enhance the survival of target species across landscapes and highlight the opportunity to employ nontoxic methods to control pest-based mortality.

Pursuing multifaceted-disciplinarity to enrich the future of justice in sustainability science.

Although sustainability issues disproportionately affect disenfranchised populations, justice considerations are often left to social scientists in sustainability research. As early-career researchers pursuing doctoral degrees in diverse disciplines focusing on sustainability, we reflect on the unintentional exclusion of justice in sustainability research. Building on our individual and collective research experiences, we propose a critical multifaceted-disciplinary perspective, advocating for the holistic creation of interdisciplinary academic teams involving scholars from diverse racial, social, cultural, and economic contexts. By embracing multifaceted-disciplinarity, we can step toward establishing and nurturing spaces that enrich justice considerations in sustainability science, forming a more comprehensive understanding of sustainability predicaments and building sustainable and humane futures for all.