RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) may represent a diagnostic challenge, since its clinical picture overlaps with other dementia. Two toolkits have been developed to aid the clinician to diagnose DLB: the Lewy Body Composite Risk Score (LBCRS) and the Assessment Toolkit for DLB (AT-DLB). We aim to evaluate the reliability of these two questionnaires, and their ability to enhance the interpretation of the international consensus diagnostic criteria. METHODS: LBCRS and AT-DLB were distributed to 135 Italian Neurological Centers for Cognitive Decline and Dementia (CDCDs), with the indication to administer them to all patients with dementia referred within the subsequent 3 months. We asked to subsequently apply consensus criteria for DLB diagnosis, to validate the diagnostic accuracy of the two toolkits. RESULTS: A total of 23 Centers joined the study; 1854 patients were enrolled. We found a prevalence of possible or probable DLB of 13% each (26% total), according to the consensus criteria. LBCRS toolkit showed good reliability, with a Cronbach alpha of 0.77, stable even after removing variables from the construct. AT-DLB toolkit Cronbach alpha was 0.52 and, after the subtraction of the "cognitive fluctuation" criterion, was only 0.31. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were higher for LBCRS vs. AT-DLB. However, when simultaneously considered in the logistic models, AT-DLB showed a better performance (p < 0.001). Overall, the concordance between LBCRS positive and AT-DLB possible/probable was of 78.02% CONCLUSIONS: In a clinical setting, the LBCRS and AT-DLB questionnaires have good accuracy for DLB diagnosis.
Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer , Doença por Corpos de Lewy , Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Itália , Doença por Corpos de Lewy/diagnóstico , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Patients with advanced Parkinson disease (PD) are at increased risk for asymptomatic leg deep venous thrombosis (DVT) because of severe motor fluctuations. Protracted immobility in the absence of antiparkinsonian therapy during stereotactic surgery may further increase the risk for venous thrombosis. Our aim was to determine the incidence of asymptomatic DVT of leg veins in PD patients undergoing subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS). METHODS: 41 consecutive PD patients undergoing stereotactic surgery for STN-DBS were investigated by ultrasound compression sonography of leg veins and D-dimer measurement in the week preceding surgery. After surgery, D-dimer measurements were repeated and when the value exceeded the normal range, ultrasound compression sonography was repeated to confirm or exclude DVT. RESULTS: Doppler ultrasonographic examinations demonstrated that 2 patients (4.9%) developed asymptomatic DVT shortly after surgery (8.5 days) despite the fact that none of the 41 patients submitted to STN-DBS had DVT before surgery and that a specific prophylaxis was applied during surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that advanced PD patients are at risk for developing asymptomatic leg DVT following stereotactic surgery performed for STN-DBS. A strict clinical monitoring in the perioperative period is advisable in order to ensure early detection of DVT and prevent further thrombo-embolic complications.