Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia Self-Management Mobile Apps: A Review of Efficacy and Quality.

Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is the recommended treatment for insomnia, yet multiple barriers limit utilization. Digital CBT-I may present a solution, though related reviews have focused on Internet-based delivery rather than app use. The high utilization of health apps and prevalence of sleep apps indicate the need to equip clinicians with app-specific research. Toward this end, we reviewed efficacy and quality data on self-management CBT-I smartphone apps, revealing efficacy research on eleven apps, five of which were publicly available. While preliminary, these efficacy studies showed consistent positive findings. When examining quantitative quality indicators for the five publicly available apps, two had consistent data. Overall, two apps, CBTi Coach and Insomnia Coach, had positive, empirical findings across all efficacy and quality assessment approaches. We provide recommendations to guide clinician decision making regarding CBT-I self-management apps based on the literature and publicly available methods of app evaluations.

Reducing the Impacts of Mental Health Stigma Through Integrated Primary Care: An Examination of the Evidence.

The reduction of mental health stigma (MHS) was an expected benefit of integrating behavioral health in primary care (IPC). However, unlike other barriers discussed in agency reports on IPC, discussions of MHS lack research support. To fill this gap, the authors conducted a literature review identifying seven studies. Given the dearth of research, we also examine general IPC research on probable indicators of MHS reduction in IPC, as well as, facets of IPC potentially influencing MHS related factors negatively associated with help-seeking. Using the data from these three types of research, the evidence suggests the potential of IPC to reduce MHS impact on care utilization, but indicates it is premature to draw firm conclusions. Given the possible benefits of primary care and the known benefits of decreased MHS, this review highlights the importance of further research examining this question and provides specific research and program development recommendations.

Military Mental Health Personnel Deployment Survey: A Secondary Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Military mental health personnel (MMHP) have increasingly engaged in deployment-related roles in closer proximity to combat environments. Although studies examining deployment-related outcomes among military health care personnel have found combat exposure (CE) positively related to psychological problems, no studies of MMHP have investigated CE or its association with psychological outcomes. This study seeks to provide descriptive data on CE and perceived impacts associated with deployment, as well as explore how CE, perceptions of preparedness for deployment, difficulties during deployment (DDD), and meaningful work during deployment relate to appraisal of problems after deployment (ie, sleep problems, interpersonal withdrawal, depressive symptoms, and work problems). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Archival postdeployment survey data from 113 U.S. Air Force MMHP previously deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan were utilized to determine descriptive statistics on CE and other factors. Additionally, hierarchical linear regression was utilized to test relationships between CE, DDD, preparation for deployment, and meaningful work with reports of sleep problems, interpersonal withdrawal, work problems, and depression symptoms. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the U.S. Air Force Academy. RESULTS: MMHP reported an average of 1.58 (standard deviation = 1.03) combat-related events and DDD included: (1) being away from family/close friends (62%), (2) uncertain redeployment date (35%), (3) difficulty adapting to a new situation (35%), and (4) working long hours (31%), with 66% endorsing two or more areas of difficulty. Most MMHP reported feeling prepared for deployment both professionally (91%) and personally (87%), as well as that their family was prepared (83%). Additionally, nearly all reported at least one meaningful work experience while deployed (96%) with positive impacts on their clients, being the most frequent (89%). Furthermore, CE predicted both sleep difficulties and interpersonal withdrawal. MMHP who perceived their deployment experience as difficult also had higher rates of postdeployment difficulties. Finally, we found no relationship between perceived deployment preparation and postdeployment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study of MMHP reporting CE rates and examining relationships between perceived outcomes and CE, deployment preparation, difficulties during deployment, and meaningful work. The vast majority of MMHP were exposed to more than one combat-related event; however, this rate of CE appears lower than what has been reported among a similar sample of military health care personnel. Although CE predicted difficulties, appraisals of difficulties during deployment experience predicted the highest rates of postdeployment difficulties, accounting for nearly a quarter or more of the outcome variance. The lack of relationship between deployment preparation and meaningful work is inconsistent with prior research and may be because of the limited response range in our sample. Additionally, other methodological limitations include: (1) cross-sectional study design, (2) lack of validated measures, and (3) the long-term retrospective nature of the assessment. Future research should incorporate more rigorous methodologies and assess constructs absent in this archival data set. Despite these limitations, this study provides important preliminary data to support future research development and funding. Additionally, the results may be used to normalize associated impacts and promote help seeking among MMHP.

Psychiatric History, Deployments, and Potential Impacts of Mental Health Care in a Combat Theater.

Introduction: Increasing numbers of U.S. service members access mental health care while deployed and at home station. Multiple deployments carry with them a higher risk of exposure to combat as well as the impact of cumulative stressors associated with separation from family, hostile environments, and high operations tempo. However, mental health care resources continue to be underutilized, potentially because of higher levels of stigma regarding mental health care and concerns about career impact among service members. Some studies indicate that service members who have previously sought mental health care are likely to continue to do so proactively as needed. This study examined the associations between prior deployments, prior mental health treatment, and subsequent career-impacting recommendations (e.g., duty limitations and medical evacuation) among deployed service members seeking mental health care. Materials and. Methods: This study is a retrospective review of clinical records from three U.S. military Combat and Operational Stress Control units in Afghanistan. Data were drawn from the mental health records of 1,639 Army service members presenting for outpatient mental health services while deployed in Afghanistan from years 2006 to 2008. Results: In an unadjusted logistic regression model, service members with at least one prior deployment had a 38% greater odds (odds ratio [OR] = 1.38, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.06, 1.80; p < 0.05) of receiving career-impacting recommendations than those without a prior deployment. However, after adjusting for demographics (age, gender, marital status, rank, and military status), there was no association between prior deployments and career-impacting recommendations (OR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.78, 1.43; p = 0.716). In the second unadjusted model, service members with prior mental health treatment had a 57% lower odds (OR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.34, 0.56; p < 0.001) of receiving career-impacting recommendations than those without prior mental health treatment. After adjusting for demographics and number of prior deployments, service members with prior mental health treatment had a 58% lower odds (OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.33, 0.56; p < 0.001) of receiving career-impacting recommendations than those without prior mental health treatment. Conclusion: Among service members who had a clinical mental health encounter, prior deployment was not associated with career-impacting recommendations and prior mental health treatment appeared to be protective against career-impacting recommendations. These results are in line with research indicating that service members who have previous experience with mental health care tend to seek help sooner than those without prior treatment. Those service members who had previously sought care were more likely to express decreased stigma and seek mental health care while deployed. Consequently, service members who have prior mental health treatment may seek care before their concerns become marked enough to warrant duty-limiting recommendations to command. These findings have important implications for campaigns to reduce stigma and promote early help-seeking among service members. Efforts should continue to study and respectively make known the rates of career impact with the goal of increased early service utilization and increased ability to sustain service members' military readiness and personal functioning.

Outpatient Mental Health Treatment Utilization and Military Career Impact in the United States Marine Corps.

Service members (SM) are at increased risk of psychiatric conditions, including suicide, yet research indicates SMs believe seeking mental health treatment may negatively impact their military careers, despite a paucity of research examining actual career impacts. This study examined the link between seeking outpatient mental health (MH) treatment and military career impacts within the United States Marine Corps. In Phase 1, a retrospective medical record review of outpatient MH treatment-seeking Marines (N = 38) was conducted. In Phase 2, a sample of outpatient MH treatment-seeking Marines (N = 40) was matched to a non-treatment-seeking sample of Marines (N = 138) to compare career-progression. In Phase 1, there were no significant links between demographic, military, and clinical characteristics and referral source or receipt of career-affecting treatment recommendations. In Phase 2, MH treatment-seeking Marines in outpatient settings were more likely than matched controls to be separated from the military (95.0% versus 63.0%, p = 0.002), but no more likely to experience involuntary separation. MH treatment-seeking Marines were more likely to have documented legal action (45.0% versus 23.9%, p = 0.008) and had a shorter time of military service following the index MH encounter than matched controls (p < 0.001). Clinical, anti-stigma, and suicide prevention policy implications are discussed.

A multisite study of Air Force outpatient behavioral health treatment-seeking patterns and career impact.

This study examined 1,068 cases of active duty Air Force service members seen in eight Air Force outpatient mental health clinics during a 1-year period. Age, gender, rank, marital status, special duty status, diagnostic category, treatment completion, and recommendations to the member's unit were examined across referral sources (i.e., self-referred, supervisor-referred, or commander-directed). Results showed significant differences across all variables, with self-referred members being more likely to be older, single, higher ranking, and without special duty status, as well as to have a less significant axis I diagnosis. Self-referred members were less likely to have confidentiality broken and to have career-affecting recommendations made. The implications of these findings, in terms of targeting interventions to increase self-initiated help-seeking behavior, and recommendations for future research are discussed.

Air Force Critical Incident Stress Management outreach with Pentagon staff after the terrorist attack.

This article describes the Critical Incident Stress Management outreach to Pentagon staff conducted after the terrorist attack by a team of Air Force mental health and chaplain personnel. Also discussed are lessons learned from the author's experience while leading the mental health component and working in a larger tri-service outreach. Finally, the observed impacts of the outreach effort are examined along with recommendations for future postcritical incident outreach efforts.

Career impacts and referral patterns: Army mental health treatment in the combat theater.

This study examined the relationships between referral source, career impacts, and diagnostic severity among service members seeking mental health intervention in a deployed setting. Data were drawn from the mental health records of 1,640 Army service members presenting for outpatient mental health services while deployed in Afghanistan. Results suggested that self-referrals were significantly less likely to have contact made with their command or to experience potentially career impacting recommendations. Overall, greater than 80% of military personnel were returned to duty with no limits and 60% were assigned either no diagnosis or a mild/moderate diagnosis. These findings indicate that seeking psychological services is much less likely to impact a service member's career when self-initiated. Given the significant concerns about career impacts among many service members in need of psychological services, these findings should be incorporated in information campaigns to promote early help seeking.