RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Global trends in mitral valve surgery (MVSx) suggest increasing repair compared with replacement, especially in the United States and European countries. The relative use, and outcomes of, MV repair and replacement in Australia are unknown. METHODS: New South Wales residents who underwent isolated MVSx between 2001 and 2017 were identified from the Admitted-Patient-Data-Collection database. Mortality outcomes were tracked to 31 Dec 2018 and adjusted based on age, sex, urgency of operation, and comorbidity status. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 5,693 patients: 2020 (35%) underwent repair (MVr), 1,656 (29%) underwent mechanical replacement (mech.MVR), and 2017 (35%) underwent bioprosthetic replacement (bio.MVR). Respective median ages [interquartile range] were 67 yo [59-75 yo], 64 yo [55-71 yo], and 75 yo [68-80 yo] (p<0.001 across groups). Between 2001 and 2017, total MVSx increased steadily with population growth. Whereas the relative use of MVr remained static (34% to 38%), that for bio.MVR (22% to 50%) and mech.MVR (45% to 13%) changed significantly. MVr had the best outcome with 1.2% in-hospital, 2.5% 1-year, and 21.6% total cumulative mortality during a median follow-up of 6.5 years. Compared to MVr, the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for mech.MVR and bio.MVR for long-term mortality were 1.41 (95% confidence interval [CI]=1.24-1.61) and 1.73 (95% CI=1.53-1.95), respectively. Heart failure and sepsis were the main cardiovascular and noncardiovascular causes of death in all groups. CONCLUSION: In this statewide Australian cohort examined over 17 years, MVr is potentially underutilised despite having superior outcomes to MVR. Access to quality dataset which provides the indication for MVSx and quantitative clinical factors is critical to further improve MVr coverage and outcome MVSx.
Assuntos
Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Austrália/epidemiologia , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Data regarding optimal electrode positioning for direct current cardioversion (DCCV) of atrial fibrillation (AF) has been inconsistent. This meta-analysis was conducted to systematically compare the efficacy of anteroposterior (AP) versus anterolateral (AL) electrode placement for DCCV of AF. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing AP versus AL electrode positioning in patients undergoing DCCV for AF. Primary endpoints were first-shock success and overall DCCV success. Subgroup analysis was performed by defibrillator waveform (monophasic versus biphasic). Meta-regression analyses were performed to assess for significant moderators. RESULTS: Twelve (12) RCTs, including a total of 2,046 patients, met inclusion criteria. Neither first-shock success (relative risk [RR] 0.92; 95% CI 0.79-1.07; p=0.28) nor overall DCCV success (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.96-1.05; p=0.78) were significantly different with AP versus AL electrode positioning. The mean number of shocks (mean difference [MD] 0.3, 95% CI -0.4 to 0.9), energy level of first successful shock (MD 3 joules; 95% CI -20 to 27) and cumulative energy delivered (MD 39 joules; 95% CI -168 to 246) were similar in AP versus AL arms. In subgroup analysis of six RCTs using biphasic defibrillators, improvement in first-shock success (RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.69-1.03; p=0.10) and overall DCCV success (RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.93-1.01; p=0.09) with AL electrode positioning did not reach statistical significance. Meta-regression analyses identified older age, higher body mass index, and longer AF duration as significant moderators favouring AL electrode positioning. CONCLUSIONS: Pooled analysis of randomised data overall does not show a significant difference in efficacy between AP versus AL electrode positioning. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses suggest that, in contemporary practice with use of biphasic defibrillators, there may be a subset of AF patients in whom AL electrode positioning improves efficacy of DCCV.
Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Cardioversão Elétrica , Humanos , Fibrilação Atrial/terapia , Índice de Massa Corporal , Eletrodos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
Cardiovascular disease is the number 1 cause of death globally, with elevated blood pressure (BP) being the single largest risk factor. Hence, BP is an important physiological parameter used as an indicator of cardiovascular health. Noninvasive cuff-based automated monitoring is now the dominant method for BP measurement and irrespective of whether the oscillometric or the auscultatory method is used, all are calibrated according to the Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2019), which requires two trained operators to listen to Korotkoff K1 sounds for SBP and K4/K5 sounds for DBP. Hence, Korotkoff sounds are fundamental to the calibration of all NIBP devices. In this study of 40 lightly sedated patients, aged 64.1â±â9.6âyears, we compare SBP and DBP recorded directly by intra-arterial fluid filled catheters to values recorded from the onset (SBP-K) and cessation (DBP-K) of Korotkoff sounds. We demonstrate that whilst DBP-K measurements are in good agreement, with a mean difference of -0.3â±â5.2âmmHg, SBP-K underestimates true intra-arterial SBP (IA-SBP) by an average of 14â±â9.6âmmHg. The underestimation arises from delays in the re-opening of the brachial artery following deflation of the brachial cuff to below SBP. The reasons for this delay are not known but appear related to the difference between SBP and the pressure under the cuff as blood first begins to flow, as the cuff deflates. Linear models are presented that can correct the underestimation in SBP resulting in estimates with a mean difference of 0.2â±â7.1âmmHg with respect to intra-arterial SBP.
Assuntos
Determinação da Pressão Arterial , Hipertensão , Humanos , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Determinação da Pressão Arterial/métodos , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Artéria Braquial/fisiologia , AuscultaçãoRESUMO
There is little quantitative clinical data available to support blood pressure measurement accuracy during cuff inflation. In this study of 35 male and 5 female lightly anaesthetized subjects aged 64.1â±â9.6âyears, we evaluate and compare the performance of both the oscillometric ratio and gradient methods during cuff deflation and cuff inflation with reference to intra-arterial measurements. We show that the oscillometric waveform envelopes (OWE), which are key to both methods, exhibit significant variability in both shape and smoothness leading to at least 15% error in the determination of mean pressure (MP). We confirm the observation from our previous studies that K1 Korotkoff sounds underestimate systolic blood pressure (SBP) and note that this underestimation is increased during cuff inflation. The estimation of diastolic blood pressure (DBP) is generally accurate for both the ratio and the gradient method, with the latter showing a significant increase during inflation. Since the gradient method estimates SBP and DBP from points of maximum gradient on each OWE recorded, it may offer significant benefits over the ratio method. However, we have shown that the ratio method can be optimized for any data set to achieve either a minimum mean error (ME) of close to 0 mmHg or minimum root mean square error (RMSE) with standard deviation (SD) of <5.0âmmHg. We conclude that whilst cuff inflation may offer some advantages, these are neither significant nor substantial, leaving as the only benefit, the potential for more rapid measurement and less patient discomfort.
Assuntos
Determinação da Pressão Arterial , Pressão Sanguínea , Oscilometria , Humanos , Masculino , Determinação da Pressão Arterial/métodos , Determinação da Pressão Arterial/instrumentação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Oscilometria/métodos , Idoso , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate mortality and morbidity outcomes following open-heart isolated tricuspid valve surgery (TVSx) with medium to long-term follow-up. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: New South Wales public and private hospital admissions between 1 January 2002 and 30 June 2018. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 537 patients underwent open isolated TVSx during the study period. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was all-cause mortality tracked from the death registry to 31 December 2018. Secondary morbidity outcomes, including admission for congestive cardiac failure (CCF), new atrial fibrillation (AF), infective endocarditis (IE), pulmonary embolism (PE) and insertion of a permanent pacemaker (PPM) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), were tracked from the Admitted Patient Data Collection database. Independent mortality associations were determined using the Cox regression method. RESULTS: A total of 537 patients underwent open isolated TVSx (46% male): median age (IQR) was 63.5 years (43.9-73.8 years) with median length of stay of 16 days (10-31 days). Main cardiovascular comorbidities were AF (54%) and CCF (42%); 67% had rheumatic tricuspid valve. In-hospital and total mortality were 7.4% and 39.3%, respectively (mean follow-up: 4.8 years). Cause-specific deaths were evenly split between cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular causes. Predictors of mortality included a history of CCF (HR=1.78, 95% CI 1.33 to 2.38, p<0.001) and chronic pulmonary disease (HR=2.66, 95% CI 1.63 to 4.33, p<0.001). In-hospital PPM rate was 10.0%. At 180 days, 53 (9.9%) patients were admitted for CCF, 25 (10.1%) had new AF, 7 (1.5%) had new IE and <1% had PE, post-discharge PPM or ICD insertion. CONCLUSION: Open isolated TVSx carries significant mortality risk, with decompensated CCF and new AF the most common morbidities encountered after surgery. This report forms a benchmark to compare outcomes with newer percutaneous tricuspid interventions.
Assuntos
Valva Tricúspide , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Valva Tricúspide/cirurgia , New South Wales/epidemiologia , Adulto , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Insuficiência da Valva Tricúspide/cirurgia , Insuficiência da Valva Tricúspide/mortalidadeRESUMO
Conventional sphygmomanometry with cuff deflation is used to calibrate all noninvasive BP (NIBP) instruments and the International Standard makes no mention of calibrating methods specifically for NIBP instruments, which estimate systolic and diastolic pressure during cuff inflation rather than cuff deflation. There is however increasing interest in inflation-based NIBP (iNIBP) instruments on the basis of shorter measurement time, reduction in maximal inflation pressure and improvement in patient comfort and outcomes. However, we have previously demonstrated that SBP estimates based on the occurrence of the first K1 Korotkoff sounds during cuff deflation can underestimate intra-arterial SBP (IA-SBP) by an average of 14â±â10âmmHg. In this study, we compare the dynamics of intra-arterial blood pressure (IABP) measurements with sequential measurement of Korotkoff sounds during both cuff inflation and cuff deflation in the same individual. In 40 individuals aged 64.1â±â9.6âyears (range 36-86âyears), the overall dynamic responses below the cuff were similar, but the underestimation error was significantly larger during inflation than deflation, increasing from 14â±â10 to 19â±â12âmmHg ( P â<â0.0001). No statistical models were found which could compensate for this error as were found for cuff deflation. The statistically significant BP differences between inflation and deflation protocols reported in this study suggest different behaviour of the arterial and venous vasculature between arterial opening and closing which warrant further investigation, particularly for iNIBP devices reporting estimates during cuff inflation. In addition, measuring Korotkoff sounds during cuff inflation represents significant technical difficulties because of increasing pump motor noise.
Assuntos
Determinação da Pressão Arterial , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Determinação da Pressão Arterial/métodos , Determinação da Pressão Arterial/instrumentação , Adulto , Feminino , Masculino , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Esfigmomanômetros , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Pressão Arterial/fisiologia , Artéria Braquial/fisiologiaRESUMO
Most non-invasive blood pressure (BP) measurements are carried out using instruments which implement either the Ratio or the Maximum Gradient oscillometric method, mostly during cuff deflation, but more rarely during cuff inflation. Yet, there is little published literature on the relative advantages and accuracy of these two methods. In this study of 40 lightly sedated individuals aged 64.1 ± 9.6âyears, we evaluate and compare the performance of the oscillometric ratio (K) and gradient (Grad) methods for the non-invasive estimation of mean pressure, SBP and DBP with reference to invasive intra-arterial values. There was no significant difference between intra-arterial estimates of mean pressure made via Korotkoff sounds (MP-OWE) or the gradient method (MP-Grad). However, 17.7% of MP-OWE and 15% of MP-Grad were in error by more than 10âmmHg. SBP-K and SBP-Grad underestimated SBP by 14 and 18âmmHg, whilst accurately estimating DBP with mean errors of 0.4â±â5.0 and 1.7â±â6.1âmmHg, respectively. Relative to the reference standard SBP-K, SBP-Grad and DBP-Grad were estimated with a mean error of -4.5â±â6.6 and 1.4â±â5.6âmmHg, respectively, noting that using the full range of recommended ratios introduces errors of 12 and 7âmmHg in SBP and DBP, respectively. We also show that it is possible to find ratios which minimize the root mean square error (RMSE) and the mean error for any particular individual cohort. We developed linear models for estimating SBP and SBP-K from a range of demographic and non-invasive OWE variables with resulting mean errors of 0.15â±â5.6 and 0.3â±â5.7âmmHg, acceptable according to the Universal standard.
Assuntos
Determinação da Pressão Arterial , Pressão Sanguínea , Oscilometria , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Determinação da Pressão Arterial/métodos , Masculino , Feminino , Oscilometria/métodos , Idoso , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologiaRESUMO
Noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) devices are calibrated against validated auscultation sphygmomanometers using Korotkoff sounds. This study aimed to investigate the timing of Korotkoff sounds in relation to pulse appearance in the brachial artery and values of intra-arterial blood pressure. Experiments were carried out on 15 participants, (14 males, 64.3 ± 10.4 years; one female, 86 yo), undergoing coronary angiography. A conventional occluding cuff, with a microphone for Korotkoff sounds, was placed on the upper arm (on the brachial artery). Intra-arterial blood pressure (IABP) was measured below the cuff with a fluid-filled catheter inserted via the radial artery and an external transducer. Finger photoplethysmography was used to measure brachial pulse wave velocity (PWV). Korotkoff sounds were processed electronically and custom algorithms identified the cuff pressure (CP) at which the first and last Korotkoff sounds were heard. PWV and max slope of the IABP pressure pulse were recorded to estimate arterial stiffness. The brachial artery closed at a CP of 132.0 ± 17.1 mmHg. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) were 147.6 ± 14.3 and 72.7 ± 10.1 mmHg; mean pressure (MP, 100.1 ± 10.4 mmHg) was similar to MP derived from the peak of the oscillogram (98.5 ± 13.6 mmHg). Difference between IABP and CP recorded at first and last occurrence of Korotkoff sounds were, SBP: 19.0 ± 8.3 (range 2-29) mmHg, DBP: 4.0 ± 4.3 (range 2-12) mmHg. SBP derived from the onset of Korotkoff sounds can underestimate IABP by up to 19 mmHg. Since Korotkoff sounds are the recommended method mandated by the universal standard for the validation of blood pressure measuring devices, these errors are propagated through to all NIBP measurement devices irrespective of whether they use auscultatory or oscillometric methods.
Assuntos
Determinação da Pressão Arterial , Análise de Onda de Pulso , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Esfigmomanômetros , Auscultação/métodosRESUMO
Giant coronary artery aneurysms are a rare manifestation of coronary artery disease and are defined by an aneurysmal diameter of >20 mm. Multimodal invasive and noninvasive imaging is required for accurate assessment We describe a case of multivessel giant coronary artery aneurysms noted during angiography for myocardial infarction. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).
RESUMO
Introduction: It is unknown if the Fontan circulation has an impact on sexual health in men. This study assessed self-reported sexual health and fertility in men with a Fontan circulation. Aims: In this prospective, cross-sectional study, Australian men ≥18 years enrolled in the Fontan Registry of Australia and New Zealand were invited to complete the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), alongside questions assessing fertility. These data were compared to historical, age-matched controls. Results: Of 227 eligible men, 54 completed the survey; of those 37 were sexually active and included in the final analysis. Mean age was 28 ± 3 years, age at Fontan was 5 ± 3 years. Fontan type was extra-cardiac conduit in 15 (41%), lateral tunnel in 12 (32%), and atriopulmonary connection (APC) in 10 (27%). Ventricular function was normal in 24 (83%), and all were New York Heart Association Class I (23 patients, 79%) and II (six patients, 21%). Nine participants (24%) had erectile dysfunction (IIEF-EF score ≤25). The severity was mild (IIEF 22-24) in six (16%), mild-moderate (IIEF 17-21) in two (5%), and moderate (IIEF 11-16) in one (3%). Baseline characteristics and current medication usage were similar in those with and without erectile dysfunction. Compared with historical control values, erectile function was not significantly impaired in the Fontan population (p =0.76). Men with a Fontan circulation had decreased levels of sexual desire and overall satisfaction (p < 0.001). There was no correlation between the presence of erectile dysfunction and any assessed parameter. Eleven (30%) of the cohort reported a pregnancy with a prior partner. Conclusion: In our cohort, overall erectile function was comparable between men with a Fontan circulation and historical controls, however sexual desire and overall satisfaction were reduced. There was no correlation between study parameters and the presence of erectile dysfunction. The proportion of the cohort who had a prior pregnancy was congruent with population data.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair has traditionally been performed in the subacromial space from the bursal side of the tendon. The undersurface rotator cuff repair technique involves the arthroscope remaining in the glenohumeral joint, thus viewing the tendon from its undersurface during repair without a bursectomy or acromioplasty. PURPOSE: To compare the clinical and structural outcomes of undersurface rotator cuff repair with bursal-side repair. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted on 2 cohorts of patients who had undergone arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with knotless suture anchors configured in a single-row formation using inverted mattress-style sutures from either the bursal side (n = 100) or undersurface (n = 165) of the supraspinatus tendon. Data were collected preoperatively, intraoperatively, and at 1 week, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 2 years postoperatively. At each time point, patients completed a modified L'Insalata questionnaire to assess patient-ranked pain scores and were clinically examined using standardized tests. Ultrasound examination was performed at 6 months and 2 years to assess the integrity of the repair. RESULTS: At 2 years postoperatively, patients in both cohorts had significantly less pain and less difficulty with overhead activities compared with preoperative levels (P < .001). The type of repair performed (bursal or undersurface) did not affect the ability to perform overhead activities at 2 years. At 2 years, both groups also had similar retear rates (21% for bursal side, 23% for undersurface). The mean operative time for the arthroscopic rotator cuff repair was 32 minutes when performed from the bursal side and 20 minutes when performed from the undersurface (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, whether performed from the subacromial space or glenohumeral joint, resulted in decreased levels of pain and difficulty with overhead activities at 2 years. The major difference between the 2 techniques was operative time, with the undersurface technique being performed significantly faster than the bursal-side repair technique.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Symptomatic rotator cuff tears are often treated surgically. However, there is a paucity of information regarding the outcomes of revision arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs. PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of revision arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery when compared with primary arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery in a large cohort of patients. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHOD: A consecutive series of 50 revision arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs performed by a single surgeon, with minimum 2-year follow-up, were retrospectively reviewed using prospectively collected data. As a comparison, 3 primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair cases (primary group; n = 310) were chosen immediately before each revision case, and 3 were chosen after. Standardized patient-ranked outcomes, examiner-determined assessments, and ultrasound-determined rotator cuff integrity were assessed preoperatively at 6 months and at a minimum of 2 years after surgery. RESULTS: The revision group was older (mean age, 63 years; range, 43-80 years) compared with the primary group (mean age, 60 years; range, 18-88 years) (P < .05) and had larger tear size (mean ± SEM) (4.1 ± 0.5 cm(2)) compared with the primary group (3.0 ± 0.2 cm(2)) (P < .05). Two years after surgery, the primary group reported less pain at rest (P < .02), during sleep (P < .05), and with overhead activity (P < .01) compared with the revision group. The primary group had better passive forward flexion (+13°; P < .05), abduction (+18°; P < .01), internal rotation (+2 vertebral levels; P < .001) and also significantly greater supraspinatus strength (+15 N; P < .001), lift-off strength (+9.3 N; P < .05), and adduction strength (+20 N; P < .01) compared with the revision group at 2 years. When compared with the primary group, the revision group was more satisfied with the overall shoulder function before surgery but was less satisfied with their shoulder function than the primary group at 2 years (P < .005). The retear rate for primary rotator cuff repair was 16% at 6 months and 21% at 2 years, while the retear rate for revision rotator cuff repair was 28% at 6 months and deteriorated to 40% at 2 years (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The short-term clinical outcomes of patients undergoing revision rotator cuff repair were similar to those after primary rotator cuff repair. However, these results did not persist, and by 2 years patients who had revision rotator cuff repair were twice as likely to have retorn compared with those undergoing primary repair. The increase in retear rate in the revision group at 2 years was associated with increased pain, impaired overhead function, less passive motion, weaker strength, and less overall satisfaction with shoulder function.