Evidence blocks for effective presentation of genomic findings at molecular tumor boards: Single institution experience.

Genomic profiling, or molecular profiling of the tumor, is becoming a key component of therapeutic decision making in clinical oncology, and is typically carried out via next generation sequencing. However, the interpretation of the results and evaluation of rationale for targeting the uncovered alterations is challenging and requires a deep understanding of cancer biology, genetics, genomics and oncology. Multidisciplinary molecular tumor boards represent a promising strategy in the facilitation of molecularly-informed therapeutic decisions, and usually consist of specialists with various fields of expertise. To effectively communicate the biological and clinical significance of genomic findings, as well as to make molecular tumor board discussions more productive, we developed and implemented evidence blocks into case discussions in our center. We found that this approach facilitated clinicians' understanding of the results of genomic profiling, and resulted in shorter yet more efficient case discussions within the molecular tumor board. Here, we discuss our experience with evidence blocks and how their implementation influenced the molecular tumor board practice.

Utility of public knowledge bases for the interpretation of comprehensive tumor molecular profiling results.

With the growing use of comprehensive tumor molecular profiling (CTMP), the therapeutic landscape of cancer is rapidly evolving. NGS produces large amounts of genomic data requiring complex analysis and subsequent interpretation. We sought to determine the utility of publicly available knowledge bases (KB) for the interpretation of the cancer mutational profile in clinical practice. Analysis was performed across patients who previously underwent CTMP. Independent interpretation of the CTMP was performed manually, and then, the recommendations were compared to ones present in KBs (OncoKB, CIViC, CGI, CGA, VICC, MolecularMatch). A total of 222 CTMP reports from 222 patients with 932 genomic alterations (GA) were identified. For 368 targetable GA identified in 171 (77%) of the patients, 1381 therapy recommendations were compiled. Except for CGA, therapy ESCAT LOE I, II, IIIA and IIIB therapy options were equally represented in the majority of KB. Personalized treatment options with ESCAT LOE I-II were provided for 35 patients (16%); MolecularMatch/CIViC allowed to collect ESCAT I-II treatment options for 34 of them (97%), OncoKB/CGI-for 33 of them (94%). Employing VICC and CGA 6 (17%) and 20 (57%) of patients were left without ESCAT I or II treatment options. For 88 patients with ESCAT level III-B therapy recommendations: only 2 (2%), 3 (3%), 4 (5%) and 6 (7%) of patients were left without options with CIViC, MolecularMatch, CGI and OncoKB, and with VICC-12 (14%). Highest overlap ratio was observed for IIIA (0.81) biomarkers, with the comparable results for LOE I-II. Meanwhile, overlap ratio for ESCAT LOE IV was 0.22. Public KBs provide substantial information on ESCAT-I/R1 biomarkers, but the information on ESCAT II-IV and resistance biomarkers is underrepresented. Manual curation should be considered the gold standard for the CTMP interpretation.

A Risk-benefit Analysis of Prophylactic Anticoagulation for Patients with Metastatic Germ Cell Tumours Undergoing First-line Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear which patients with metastatic germ cell tumours (mGCTs) need prophylactic anticoagulation to prevent venous thromboembolic events (VTEs). OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk and onset of VTEs stratified by risk factors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multi-institutional retrospective dataset included mGCT patients treated with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. INTERVENTION: Patients with prophylactic anticoagulation were excluded. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: A regression analysis was performed to select risk factors for VTEs. The simulated number needed to treat (NNT) and the number needed to harm (NNH) with prophylactic anticoagulation were calculated based on the cumulative incidences retrieved from this study and hazard rates of recently published trials describing the efficacy of prophylactic anticoagulation to prevent VTEs and the risk of bleeding events. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: From 1120 patients, 121 (11%) had a VTE, which occurred prior to chemotherapy in 49 (4%) and on or after chemotherapy in 72 (6%). Six patients (<1%) had a bleeding event without anticoagulation. After backward regression, the one risk factor for a VTE during or after chemotherapy was the use of a venous access device. The simulated cumulative VTE incidence from prophylactic anticoagulation for patients on or after chemotherapy would translate into an NNT of 45 (95% confidence interval [CI] 36-56) and an NNH of 186 (95% CI 87-506). Limitations are mainly related to the retrospective nature of the study. CONCLUSIONS: The mGCTs associated VTEs are most common before and during, but not after, chemotherapy. Avoiding venous access device and/or prophylactic anticoagulation with an acceptable risk-benefit profile may decrease VTE occurring on chemotherapy. PATIENT SUMMARY: We found that venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) occur rarely after chemotherapy. Based on experience of prophylactic anticoagulation in other cancers, we conclude that the risk of VTE in men undergoing chemotherapy for metastatic germ cell tumours can be decreased by thromboprophylaxis with a reasonable risk-benefit profile and by avoidance of venous access devices.

Efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy and prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer with homologous recombination deficiency: comparative analysis of published clinical studies.

The aim of our study was to determine the effect of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) on prognosis and efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC). We performed PubMed and Embase database queries. We included 4 studies into the meta-analysis and 16 studies in the systematic review. Our systematic analysis showed that the average weighted median overall survival (OS) in patients with HRD with advanced PC was 19.8 and 15.6 months in patients without HRD. With platinum-based chemotherapy, the average weighted median OS in patients with HRD was 23.8 and 17.1 months in patients without HRD. Without platinum-based chemotherapy, the average weighted median OS in patients with HRD was 8.3 and 12.0 months in patients without HRD. For resected PC, our meta-analysis demonstrated that HRD status did not affect the prognosis (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.46 to 2.33), but results were rather heterogeneous (I2=83%, p=0.003). Our systematic analysis showed that the average weighted median OS in patients with HRD was 34.6 and 27.0 months in patients without HRD. With platinum-based chemotherapy, the average weighted median OS in patients with HRD was 46.1 and 36.3 months in patients without HRD. Without platinum-based chemotherapy, the average weighted median OS in patients with HRD was 24.2 and 42.9 months in patients without HRD. Results of our meta-analysis and systematic review support the idea of platinum use in patients with HRD both in resected and metastatic PCs, although a randomised trial is warranted to make a more reliable conclusion. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019121914.

Agreement between PDL1 immunohistochemistry assays and polymerase chain reaction in non-small cell lung cancer: CLOVER comparison study.

The goal of the CLOVER study was to perform a pairwise comparison of four tests based on the same patient population with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): three validated PDL1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays (Ventana SP142, Ventana SP263, Dako 22C3) and one PCR test. Four hundred seventy-three NSCLC samples were obtained from a biobank and were stained using PDL1 IHC assays. Four trained pathologists independently evaluated the percentage of tumor cells (TC) and immune cells (IC) that stained positive at any intensity. PDL1 transcripts were quantified in 437 patients by a standard Taqman RT-PCR assay using SDHA as a reference gene. A concordance analysis was performed to assess (1) the correlation of TC and IC between different assays and (2) the predictive properties of one test for another. "High" RNA expression was detected in 187 of 437 (43%) patients. The percentage of PDL1-positive cells (≥1%) was higher among the IC than the TC in all IHC three assays. The Pearson correlation coefficients (PCC) for TC were 0.71, 0.87, and 0.75 between 22C3/SP142, 22C3/SP263, and SP263/SP142, respectively. The PCC for IC were 0.45, 0.61, and 0.68 for the same pairs. A low correlation was observed between the PCR test and each of the three IHC assays; however, if a patient tested low/negative by PCR, then they were likely to test negative by any single IHC test with a high probability (92-99%). Among patients who tested positive by PCR, only 9-45% tested positive by IHC assays. There was excellent positive and negative agreement (>91%) between 22C3 and SP263 staining using the recommended individual cutoffs for first-line treatment. PCR RNA expression analysis is not equivalent to IHC. However, this method may have some potential for the identification of PDL1-negative tumors. 22C3 could be considered as a substitute for SP263 in first-line treatment.

Large retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy and increased risk of venous thromboembolism in patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for metastatic germ cell tumors: A study by the global germ cell cancer group (G3).

BACKGROUND: Metastatic germ cell tumor (mGCT) patients receiving chemotherapy have increased risk of life-threatening venous thromboembolism (VTE). Identifying VTE risk factors may guide thromboprophylaxis in this highly curable population. METHODS: Data were collected from mGCT patients receiving first-line platinum-based chemotherapy at 22 centers. Predefined variables included International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) risk classification, long-axis diameter of largest retroperitoneal lymph node (RPLN), Khorana score, and use of indwelling vascular access device (VAD). VTE occurring at baseline, during chemotherapy and within 90 days, was analyzed. RESULTS: Data from 1135 patients were collected. Median age was 31 years (range 10-74). IGCCCG risk was 64% good, 20% intermediate, and 16% poor. VTE occurred in 150 (13%) patients. RPLN >3.5 cm demonstrated highest discriminatory accuracy for VTE (AUC 0.632, P < .001) and was associated with significantly higher risk of VTE in univariable analysis (22% vs 8%, OR 3.0, P < .001) and multivariable analysis (OR 1.8, P = .02). Other significant risk factors included, Khorana score ≥3 (OR 2.6, P = .008) and VAD use (OR 2.7, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Large RPLN and VAD use are independent risk factors for VTE in mGCT patients receiving chemotherapy. VAD use should be minimized in this population and thromboprophylaxis might be considered for large RPLN.

Intratumoral Heterogeneity of SMAD4 Immunohistochemical Expression and Its Role in Prediction of Recurrence Pattern in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to evaluate consistency of SMAD4 expression in different tumor areas and its correlation with recurrence pattern in patients after resection for pancreatic cancer (PC). METHODS: Records of patients who underwent resection for nonmetastatic PC between 2001 and 2015 were analyzed. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections from different areas of primary tumor and lymph node metastases were analyzed immunohistochemically (IHC) for SMAD4 expression using TMA technology. RESULTS: SMAD4 expression was assessed in 356 tissue sections obtained from 91 patients. SMAD4 expression was positive in all assessed tumor slides only in 7 of 26 patients (26.9%). There were 54 recurrences (9 locoregional, 41 distant, and 4 both local and distant) with median follow-up of 21.7 months. There was no correlation between SMAD4 expression and locoregional recurrence pattern (p = 0.30). SMAD4 status influenced neither distant recurrence-free survival (p = 0.99) nor overall survival (p = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Different areas inside primary tumor and lymph node metastases express SMAD4 heterogeneously. SMAD4 IHC expression is not a biomarker of the recurrence pattern after surgical resection for PC.

RUSSCO-RSP comparative study of immunohistochemistry diagnostic assays for PD-L1 expression in urothelial bladder cancer.

In this collaborative study by the Russian Society of Clinical Oncology and the Russian Society of Pathology, we assessed the concordance among three validated, commercially available PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays for patients with urothelial cancer. Tumors from 100 urothelial cancer patients were stained with the antibody clones 22C3 (Agilent), SP142 (Ventana Medical Systems), and SP263 (Ventana Medical Systems), which are used in clinical trials of second-line therapy with checkpoint inhibitors. Four trained pathologists independently evaluated the percentages of tumor cells (TC) and tumor-infiltrating immune cells (IC) that were stained at any intensity by each of the antibodies. The test-specific cutoffs for the proportions of stained cells in a positive sample were pre-specified as TC + IC ≥ 10% or TC ≥ 10% for 22C3, IC ≥ 5% for SP142, and TC ≥ 25% or IC ≥ 25% for SP263. Three hundred immunohistochemistry slides were scored. The percentages of PD-L1 staining in the three assays without using any cutoff were higher in the IC than in the TC (55% versus 24% for 22C3, 45% versus 8% for SP142, and 72% versus 27% for SP263, respectively). The Pearson correlation coefficients for anti-PD-L1 staining in the IC were 0.5, 0.69, and 0.85 with 22C3/SP142, 22C3/SP263, and SP142/SP263, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficients for PD-L1 staining in the TC were 0.93, 0.99, and 0.91 for the same pairs. Among the patients who were negative for PD-L1 staining by one test, 91-100% were also negative by the other tests. Among the patients who were positive by one test, 43-100% were also positive by the other tests. Our data indicate that repeated testing can be avoided as a patient with urothelial cancer who is classified as negative for PD-L1 expression by one of the three single tests using the corresponding cutoff rule is highly likely (91-100%) to be classified as negative by either of the other tests.