Study of Thoracic CT in COVID-19: The STOIC Project.

Background There are conflicting data regarding the diagnostic performance of chest CT for COVID-19 pneumonia. Disease extent at CT has been reported to influence prognosis. Purpose To create a large publicly available data set and assess the diagnostic and prognostic value of CT in COVID-19 pneumonia. Materials and Methods This multicenter, observational, retrospective cohort study involved 20 French university hospitals. Eligible patients presented at the emergency departments of the hospitals involved between March 1 and April 30th, 2020, and underwent both thoracic CT and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing for suspected COVID-19 pneumonia. CT images were read blinded to initial reports, RT-PCR, demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, and outcome. Readers classified CT scans as either positive or negative for COVID-19 based on criteria published by the French Society of Radiology. Multivariable logistic regression was used to develop a model predicting severe outcome (intubation or death) at 1-month follow-up in patients positive for both RT-PCR and CT, using clinical and radiologic features. Results Among 10 930 patients screened for eligibility, 10 735 (median age, 65 years; interquartile range, 51-77 years; 6147 men) were included and 6448 (60%) had a positive RT-PCR result. With RT-PCR as reference, the sensitivity and specificity of CT were 80.2% (95% CI: 79.3, 81.2) and 79.7% (95% CI: 78.5, 80.9), respectively, with strong agreement between junior and senior radiologists (Gwet AC1 coefficient, 0.79). Of all the variables analyzed, the extent of pneumonia at CT (odds ratio, 3.25; 95% CI: 2.71, 3.89) was the best predictor of severe outcome at 1 month. A score based solely on clinical variables predicted a severe outcome with an area under the curve of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.62, 0.66), improving to 0.69 (95% CI: 0.6, 0.71) when it also included the extent of pneumonia and coronary calcium score at CT. Conclusion Using predefined criteria, CT reading is not influenced by reader's experience and helps predict the outcome at 1 month. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04355507 Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Rubin in this issue.

Differentiating tracheobronchial involvement in granulomatosis with polyangiitis and relapsing polychondritis on chest CT: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In patients with tracheobronchial involvement, the differential diagnosis between granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and relapsing polychondritis (RP) can be challenging. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of airway abnormalities on chest computed tomography (CT) in patients with GPA or RP and to determine whether specific imaging criteria could be used to differentiate them. METHODS: GPA and RP patients with tracheobronchial involvement referred to a national referral center from 2008 to 2020 were evaluated. Their chest CT images were reviewed by two radiologists who were blinded to the final diagnosis in order to analyze the characteristics of airway involvement. The association between imaging features and a diagnosis of GPA rather than RP was analyzed using a generalized linear regression model. RESULTS: Chest CTs from 26 GPA and 19 RP patients were analyzed. Involvement of the subglottic trachea (odds ratio for GPA=28.56 [95% CI: 3.17; 847.63]; P=0.001) and extensive airway involvement (odds ratio for GPA=0.02 [95% CI: 0.00; 0.43]; P=0.008) were the two independent CT features that differentiated GPA from RP in multivariate analysis. Tracheal thickening sparing the posterior membrane was significantly associated to RP (odds ratio for GPA=0.09 [95% CI: 0.02; 0.39]; P=0.003) but only in the univariate analysis and suffered from only moderate interobserver agreement (kappa=0.55). Tracheal calcifications were also associated with RP only in the univariate analysis (odds ratio for GPA=0.21 [95% CI: 0.05; 0.78]; P=0.045). CONCLUSION: The presence of subglottic involvement and diffuse airway involvement are the two most relevant criteria in differentiating between GPA and RP on chest CT. Although generally considered to be a highly suggestive sign of RP, posterior tracheal membrane sparing is a nonspecific and an overly subjective sign.

AI-driven quantification, staging and outcome prediction of COVID-19 pneumonia.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emerged in 2019 and disseminated around the world rapidly. Computed tomography (CT) imaging has been proven to be an important tool for screening, disease quantification and staging. The latter is of extreme importance for organizational anticipation (availability of intensive care unit beds, patient management planning) as well as to accelerate drug development through rapid, reproducible and quantified assessment of treatment response. Even if currently there are no specific guidelines for the staging of the patients, CT together with some clinical and biological biomarkers are used. In this study, we collected a multi-center cohort and we investigated the use of medical imaging and artificial intelligence for disease quantification, staging and outcome prediction. Our approach relies on automatic deep learning-based disease quantification using an ensemble of architectures, and a data-driven consensus for the staging and outcome prediction of the patients fusing imaging biomarkers with clinical and biological attributes. Highly promising results on multiple external/independent evaluation cohorts as well as comparisons with expert human readers demonstrate the potentials of our approach.

Cardiac magnetic resonance for assessment of cardiac involvement in Takotsubo syndrome: Do we still need contrast administration?

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the ability of T1 and T2 mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonance to assess myocardial involvement in Takotsubo syndrome (TTS). We hypothesized that non-contrast mapping techniques can be accurate and sufficient. METHODS: We prospectively analysed 30 patients with TTS and 34 controls. CMR was performed a mean 5 days after the onset of symptoms and after a mean 3 month follow-up. RESULTS: On admission, compared to controls, TTS patients had significantly higher global T2 values (59 ± 8 ms vs 51 ± 4 ms, p < 0.001), native T1 (1053 ± 75 ms vs 960 ± 61 ms, p < 0.001) and extracellular volume (ECV) fraction (29% ± 5 vs 23% ±3, p < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity for T2 (cut off: 56 ms) were 62% and 97% respectively; for native T1: (cut off 1011 ms) were 72% and 91% respectively; and for ECV (cut off: 27%) were 72% and 97% respectively. Combining T2 and native T1 provided the best sensitivity (91.7%) with a good specificity (88.2%). No patients had late gadolinium enhancement. Segmental analysis showed that T2, native T1 and ECV values were significantly higher in regions with wall motion abnormalities (WMA) compared to normokinetic segments (62 ± 9 ms vs 55 ± 5 ms, p < 0.001; 1060 ± 65 ms vs 1025 ± 56 ms, p = 0.02; and 34% ± 5 vs 29% ± 1, p = 0.02). At follow up, native T1 and ECV values did not normalized. CONCLUSION: In TTS patients, a non-contrast mapping technique provides a high diagnostic accuracy allowing identification of acute and persistent myocardial injury. Segmental analysis showed that myocardial injury is preferably detected in segments with WMA.

COVID-19 pneumonia: Diagnostic and prognostic role of CT based on a retrospective analysis of 214 consecutive patients from Paris, France.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic performance of CT in patients referred for COVID19 suspicion to a French university hospital, depending on symptoms and date of onset. METHODS: From March 1st to March 28th, 214 patients having both chest CT scan and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT- PCT) within 24 h were retrospectively evaluated. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of first and expert readings were calculated together with inter reader agreement, with results of RT-PCR as standard of reference and according to symptoms and onset date. Patient characteristics and disease extent on CT were correlated to short-term outcome (death or intubation at 3 weeks follow-up). RESULTS: Of the 214 patients (119 men, mean age 59 ±â€¯19 years), 129 had at least one positive RT-PCR result. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values were 79 % (95 % CI: 71-86 %), 84 %(74-91 %), 72 %(63-81 %) and 88 % (81-93 %) for initial CT reading and 81 %(74-88 %), 91 % (82-96 %), 76 % (67-84 %) and 93 % (87-97 %), for expert reading, with strong inter-reader agreement (kappa index: 0.89). Considering the 123 patients with symptoms for more than 5 days, the corresponding figures were 90 %, 78 %, 80 % and 89 % for initial reading and 93 %, 88 %, 86 % and 94 % for the expert. Disease extent exceeded 25 % for 68 % and 26 % of severe and non-severe patients, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: CT sensitivity increased after 5 days of symptoms. A disease extent > 25 % was associated with poorer outcome.

Pre-test probability for SARS-Cov-2-related infection score: The PARIS score.

INTRODUCTION: In numerous countries, large population testing is impossible due to the limited availability of RT-PCR kits and CT-scans. This study aimed to determine a pre-test probability score for SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study (4 University Hospitals) included patients with clinical suspicion of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, and results of blood tests (complete white blood cell count, serum electrolytes and CRP) were collected. A pre-test probability score was derived from univariate analyses of clinical and biological variables between patients and controls, followed by multivariate binary logistic analysis to determine the independent variables associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: 605 patients were included between March 10th and April 30th, 2020 (200 patients for the training cohort, 405 consecutive patients for the validation cohort). In the multivariate analysis, lymphocyte (<1.3 G/L), eosinophil (<0.06 G/L), basophil (<0.04 G/L) and neutrophil counts (<5 G/L) were associated with high probability of SARS-CoV-2 infection but no clinical variable was statistically significant. The score had a good performance in the validation cohort (AUC = 0.918 (CI: [0.891-0.946]; STD = 0.014) with a Positive Predictive Value of high-probability score of 93% (95%CI: [0.89-0.96]). Furthermore, a low-probability score excluded SARS-CoV-2 infection with a Negative Predictive Value of 98% (95%CI: [0.93-0.99]). The performance of the score was stable even during the last period of the study (15-30th April) with more controls than infected patients. CONCLUSIONS: The PARIS score has a good performance to categorize the pre-test probability of SARS-CoV-2 infection based on complete white blood cell count. It could help clinicians adapt testing and for rapid triage of patients before test results.