Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Ano de publicação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS One ; 10(7): e0131571, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26148007

RESUMO

METHODS: In an observer blind, phase 2 trial, 55 adults were randomized to receive one dose of Ad35.CS.01 vaccine followed by two doses of RTS,S/AS01 (ARR-group) or three doses of RTS,S/AS01 (RRR-group) at months 0, 1, 2 followed by controlled human malaria infection. RESULTS: ARR and RRR vaccine regimens were well tolerated. Efficacy of ARR and RRR groups after controlled human malaria infection was 44% (95% confidence interval 21%-60%) and 52% (25%-70%), respectively. The RRR-group had greater anti-CS specific IgG titers than did the ARR-group. There were higher numbers of CS-specific CD4 T-cells expressing > 2 cytokine/activation markers and more ex vivo IFN-γ enzyme-linked immunospots in the ARR-group than the RRR-group. Protected subjects had higher CS-specific IgG titers than non-protected subjects (geometric mean titer, 120.8 vs 51.8 EU/ml, respectively; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: An increase in vaccine efficacy of ARR-group over RRR-group was not achieved. Future strategies to improve upon RTS,S-induced protection may need to utilize alternative highly immunogenic prime-boost regimens and/or additional target antigens. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01366534.


Assuntos
Vacinas Antimaláricas/imunologia , Malária/imunologia , Malária/prevenção & controle , Esporozoítos/imunologia , Anticorpos Antiprotozoários/imunologia , Formação de Anticorpos/imunologia , Linfócitos T CD4-Positivos/imunologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Imunização Secundária/métodos , Imunoglobulina G/imunologia , Testes Imunológicos/métodos , Interferon gama/imunologia , Vacinação/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA