Heterogeneity of colorectal cancer (CRC) in reference to KRAS proto-oncogene utilizing WAVE technology.

BACKGROUND: New drugs targeting specific genes required for unregulated growth and metastases have improved survival rates for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Resistance to monoclonal antibodies specific for the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been attributed to the presence of activating point mutations in the proto-oncogene KRAS. The use of EGFR inhibitor monotherapy in patients that have KRAS wild type has produced response rates of only 10-20%. The molecular basis for clinical resistance remains poorly understood. We propose two possible explanations to explain these low response rates; 1) levels of resistant CRC cells carrying mutated KRAS are below the sensitivity of standard direct sequencing modalities (<5%) or 2) the standard practice of analyzing a single area within a heterogeneous tumor is a practice that can overlook areas with mutated KRAS. METHODS: In a collaborative effort with the surgical and molecular pathology departments, 3 formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue blocks of human CRC were obtained from the human tissue bank maintained by the Lifespan Pathology Department and/or the human tissue bank maintained by the Molecular Pathology Core of the COBRE for Cancer Research Development. The three specimens previously demonstrated KRAS mutations detected by the Applied Biosystems Kit. The Wave system 4500 (high performance ion-pairing liquid chromatography (IP-HPLC)) was utilized to evaluate tissue for the presence of KRAS proto-oncogene mutations at codons 12 and 13. RESULTS: Initially, the sensitivity of WAVE technology was compared with direct sequencing by evaluating a dilutional series. WAVE detected mutant alleles at levels of 2.5% compared to 20% performed with standard direct sequencing. Samples from three patients were evaluated by WAVE technology. Eight samples from patient 1 were analyzed. In two of eight samples, no mutations were detected at concentrations as low as 5%. In one sample a mutation was noted by WAVE and not by direct sequencing. All four samples from patient 2 tested positive for Exon 12/13 mutations. Of the seven samples from patient 3, five were positive for Exon 12/13 mutations and two were negative for Exon 12/13 mutations. CONCLUSION: In these studies the analysis of three patients' colorectal cancer tissues were analyzed utilizing the WAVE technology. Results demonstrated a greater degree of sensitivity in mutation detection when compared to standard sequencing. These studies also demonstrated heterogeneity of expression of KRAS mutations between areas of the tissue samples at a genomic level. The low clinical response rates to EGFR inhibition might be explained by the variation in mutation presence, which was dependent upon the region examined. The heterogeneity demonstrated in these studies provides another phenotypic variant that will impact clinical care.

A randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 study of ganitumab (AMG 479) or conatumumab (AMG 655) in combination with gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of ganitumab (a mAb antagonist of insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor) or conatumumab (a mAb agonist of human death receptor 5) combined with gemcitabine in a randomized phase 2 trial in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a previously untreated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤1 were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to i.v. gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) (days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle) combined with open-label ganitumab (12 mg/kg every 2 weeks [Q2W]), double-blind conatumumab (10 mg/kg Q2W), or double-blind placebo Q2W. The primary end point was 6-month survival rate. Results In total, 125 patients were randomized. The 6-month survival rates were 57% (95% CI 41-70) in the ganitumab arm, 59% (42-73) in the conatumumab arm, and 50% (33-64) in the placebo arm. The grade ≥3 adverse events in the ganitumab, conatumumab, and placebo arms, respectively, included neutropenia (18/22/13%), thrombocytopenia (15/17/8%), fatigue (13/12/5%), alanine aminotransferase increase (15/5/8%), and hyperglycemia (18/2/3%). CONCLUSIONS: Ganitumab combined with gemcitabine had tolerable toxicity and showed trends toward an improved 6-month survival rate and overall survival. Additional investigation into this combination is warranted. Conatumumab combined with gemcitabine showed some evidence of activity as assessed by the 6-month survival rate.

Multiinstitutional phase II trial of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and concurrent radiation therapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Combined modality therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has produced promising results. A multiinstitutional phase II clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the activity and toxicity of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and concurrent radiation therapy on patients with locally advanced NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty previously untreated patients with inoperable locally advanced NSCLC entered onto a phase II study from March 1995 to December 1996. On an outpatient basis for 7 weeks, patients received paclitaxel 50 mg/m2 weekly over 1 hour; carboplatin at (area under the curve) AUC 2 weekly; and radiation therapy of 66 Gy in 33 fractions. After chemoradiation therapy, patients received an additional two cycles of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 over 3 hours and carboplatin at AUC 6 every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were eligible for the study. The survival rates at 12 months were 56.3%, and at 24 months, 38.3%, with a median overall survival of 20.5 months. The progression-free survival rates at 12 months were 43.6%, and at 24 months, 34.7%, with a median progression-free survival of 9.0 months. Two patients did not receive more than 2 weeks of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and were not assessable for toxicity and response. The overall response rate (partial plus complete response) of 37 assessable patients was 75.7%. The major toxicity was esophagitis. Seventeen patients (46%) developed grade 3 or 4 esophagitis. However, only two patients developed late esophageal toxicity with stricture at 3 and 6 months posttreatment. CONCLUSION: Combined modality therapy with paclitaxel, carboplatin, and radiation is a promising treatment for locally advanced NSCLC that has a high response rate and acceptable toxicity and survival rates. A randomized trial will be necessary to fully evaluate the usefulness of these findings.

Phase I trial of outpatient weekly paclitaxel and concurrent radiation therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities of paclitaxel administered weekly on an outpatient basis with concurrent thoracic radiation to patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase I clinical trial, paclitaxel was administered as a 3-hour intravenous (IV) infusion, repeated every week for 6 weeks. The starting dose of paclitaxel was 10 mg/m2. Doses were escalated at 10-mg/m2 increments in successive cohorts of three new patients if tolerated. Unacceptable toxicity was defined as grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity, excluding nausea and vomiting, and grade 4 hematologic toxicity according to Cancer and Leukemia Group B expanded common toxicity criteria. Radiation was administered to the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes (40 Gy) followed by a boost to the tumor (20 Gy). RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were entered onto this study through seven dose escalations (from 10 mg/m2/wk to 70 mg/m2/wk for 6 weeks). Severe esophagitis occurred at 70 mg/m2 (two patients with grade 4 disease and one patient with grade 2). One of six patients at 60 mg/m2 developed grade 3 esophagitis and three of seven patients had grade 2 esophagitis. One of 27 patients developed a hypersensitivity reaction. One of 27 patients developed grade 3 neutropenia. CONCLUSION: Esophagitis is the principle dose-limiting toxicity of weekly paclitaxel and thoracic radiation in the outpatient setting. A phase II trial using concurrent radiation and paclitaxel at the MTD of 60 mg/m2/wk is underway.

Paclitaxel and concurrent radiation for locally advanced pancreatic and gastric cancer: a phase I study.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities, and potential antitumor activity of weekly paclitaxel with concurrent radiation (RT) for locally advanced pancreatic and gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas or stomach were studied. The initial dose of paclitaxel was 30 mg/m2 by 3-hour intravenous (I.V.) infusion repeated every week for 6 weeks with 50 Gy RT. Doses were escalated at 10-mg/m2 increments in successive cohorts of three new patients until dose-limiting toxicity was observed. RESULTS: The dose-limiting toxicities at 60 mg/m2/wk were abdominal pain within the RT field, nausea, and anorexia. Of 23 patients with assessable disease, 11 (seven with gastric, four with pancreatic cancer) had objective responses for an overall response rate of 48%. CONCLUSION: Concurrent paclitaxel with upper abdominal RT is well tolerated at dosages that have substantial activity. A phase II trial of neoadjuvant paclitaxel and RT at the MTD of 50 mg/m2/wk is underway.

Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus tipifarnib compared with gemcitabine plus placebo in advanced pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine whether addition of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib (Zarnestra, R115777; Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium) to standard gemcitabine therapy improves overall survival in advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared gemcitabine + tipifarnib versus gemcitabine + placebo in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma previously untreated with systemic therapy. Tipifarnib was given at 200 mg bid orally continuously; gemcitabine was given at 1,000 mg/m(2) intravenously weekly x 7 for 8 weeks, then weekly x 3 every 4 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival; secondary end points included 6-month and 1-year survival rates, progression-free survival, response rate, safety, and quality of life. RESULTS: Six hundred eighty-eight patients were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two treatment arms. No statistically significant differences in survival parameters were observed. The median overall survival for the experimental arm was 193 v 182 days for the control arm (P =.75); 6-month and 1-year survival rates were 53% and 27% v 49% and 24% for the control arm, respectively; median progression-free survival was 112 v 109 days for the control arm. Ten drug-related deaths were reported for the experimental arm and seven for the control arm. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia grade > or = 3 were observed in 40% and 15% in the experimental arm versus 30% and 12% in the control arm. Incidences of nonhematologic adverse events were similar in two groups. CONCLUSION: The combination of gemcitabine and tipifarnib has an acceptable toxicity profile but does not prolong overall survival in advanced pancreatic cancer compared with single-agent gemcitabine.

Phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel and concurrent radiation therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

We conducted a prospective Phase II study to determine the response rate, toxicity, and 2-year survival rate of concurrent weekly paclitaxel and radiation therapy (RT) for locally advanced unresectable non-small cell lung cancer. The weekly paclitaxel regimen was designed to optimize the radiosensitizing properties of paclitaxel. Thirty-three patients with unresectable stage IIIA and IIIB non-small cell lung cancer from six institutions were entered into the study between March 1994 and February 1995. Weekly i.v. paclitaxel (60 mg/m2; 3-h infusion) plus concurrent chest RT (60 Gy over 6 weeks) was delivered for 6 weeks. Twenty-nine patients were evaluable for response. Three patients achieved a complete response (10%), and 22 patients (76%) achieved a partial response, for an overall response rate of 86% (95% confidence interval, 68-96%). One patient progressed during the therapy, and three patients had stable disease. Esophagitis was the principal toxicity. Grade 3 or 4 esophagitis occurred in 11 patients (37%). One patient died of pneumonia after completion of therapy. Additional grade > or =3 toxicities included pneumonitis (12%) and neutropenia (6%). One patient had a grade 3 hypersensitivity reaction. The median overall survival duration for all 33 patients who entered the study was 20 months, and 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates were 60.6%, 33.3%, and 18.2%, respectively. The median progression-free survival duration for all 33 patients was 10.7 months, and 1-, 2-, and 3-year progression-free survival rates were 39.4%, 12.1%, and 6.1%, respectively. Weekly paclitaxel plus concurrent RT is a well-tolerated outpatient regimen. The survival outcome from this regimen is encouraging and seems to be at least equivalent to that of other chemotherapy/radiation trials. These findings warrant further clinical evaluation of weekly paclitaxel/RT in Phase II trials in the neoadjuvant setting and in combination with other cytotoxic agents.

Role of p53 and p16 gene alterations in determining response to concurrent paclitaxel and radiation in solid tumor.

Molecular genetic alterations that disturb cell cycle regulation in tumor cells can affect their response to chemotherapeutic agents and radiation. Many genes that regulate the critical cell cycle checkpoint at G1S are altered in human tumors. These genetic changes can result in uncontrolled cellular proliferation, genetic instability, and altered response to radiation and chemotherapy. The p53 tumor suppressor gene serves a critical role at the G1S transition, where it can either block entry into S phase or activate programmed cell death (apoptosis) in response to DNA damage. p53 Gene mutations are common in human tumors and interfere with the activation of apoptosis in response to most chemotherapeutic agents. Paclitaxel is a potent chemotherapeutic agent that interferes with mitotic spindle function to block cells at G2M, the most radiosensitive phase of the cell cycle. Utilization of paclitaxel as a radiation sensitizer in vivo to treat aggressive, locally advanced neoplasms has resulted in high response rates and acceptable toxicity in protocols for non-small cell lung carcinoma, upper gastrointestinal tract carcinoma, and other malignancies. Recent evidence suggests that paclitaxel is unique in its ability to activate apoptosis in tumor cells with p53 mutations in vitro and in vivo. The p16(INK4a) (MTS-1, CDKN2) gene product acts in the same pathway as p53 to inhibit cell cycle progression at G1/S. p16(INK4a) is deleted and/or mutated in a significant fraction of human tumors, including pancreatic carcinoma. The effects of p16(INK4a) alterations in response to paclitaxel/radiation and the risk of systemic relapse are currently being evaluated. Information about molecular genetic alterations in individual tumors ultimately may be a critical factor in choosing between therapeutic options.

Paclitaxel and concurrent radiation therapy for locally advanced adenocarcinomas of the pancreas, stomach, and gastroesophageal junction.

An effective locoregional therapy is needed for adenocarcinomas of the pancreas, stomach, and gastroesophageal junction. Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) may enhance the effect of radiation therapy (RT). Paclitaxel synchronizes cells at G2/M, a relatively radiosensitive phase of the cell cycle. We have shown that response to paclitaxel and concurrent RT (paclitaxel/RT) was not affected by p53 mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. This finding suggested that paclitaxel/RT was a rational treatment approach for other malignancies that frequently harbor p53 mutations, such as upper gastrointestinal malignancies. We completed a phase I study of paclitaxel/RT for locally advanced pancreatic and gastric cancer. The maximum tolerated dose of paclitaxel was 50 mg/m2/wk for 6 weeks with abdominal RT. The dose-limiting toxicities were abdominal pain within the radiation field, nausea, and anorexia. Phase II studies are now under way. Twenty-five patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer have been entered at the phase II dose level of paclitaxel 50 mg/m2/wk with concurrent RT (total dose, 50 Gy). Thus far, the only grade 3/4 toxicities have been hypersensitivity reactions (n = 2), asymptomatic grade 4 neutropenia (n = 3), and nonneutropenic biliary sepsis (n = 1). Of the first 18 assessable patients with pancreatic cancer treated on the phase II study, six obtained a partial response, for a preliminary response rate of 33%. In the phase II study for locally advanced gastric cancer, 20 patients have been enrolled. Of the first 19 patients who have completed treatment, nine (47%) had grade 3/4 toxicities, including nausea, anorexia, esophagitis, and gastritis. Of the first 16 patients with gastric cancer, complete and partial responses have been observed in one and eight patients, respectively, for a preliminary response rate of 56%. We have also completed treatment on 24 patients with potentially resectable adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction with neoadjuvant paclitaxel 60 mg/m2 and cisplatin 25 mg/m2, weekly for 4 weeks, with concurrent RT (total dose, 40 Gy) followed by surgical resection. Ten patients (41%) had grade 3/4 toxicities, including neutropenia, nausea, and dehydration. Of 24 patients, four complete responses (17%) and 14 partial responses (58%) were observed, for an overall response rate of 75%. Severe esophagitis was uncommon, making this a well-tolerated outpatient regimen for adenocarcinomas of the distal esophagus. These findings demonstrate that paclitaxel-based chemoradiation for locally advanced upper gastrointestinal malignancies is well-tolerated with substantial activity.

Chemoradiotherapy for advanced inoperable head and neck cancer: A phase II study.

The beneficial effects of chemotherapy in patients with advanced head and neck cancer remain controversial in terms of survival, but have shown some promise in improving locoregional control and quality of life. In an effort to improve locoregional control and survival, a prospective phase II study was initiated using paclitaxel and carboplatin with concurrent conventional fractionated external-beam radiotherapy. Paclitaxel and carboplatin have both shown excellent radiosensitization through two discrete mechanisms, cell blockage in G2/M phase and inhibition of DNA repair, respectively. Patients were stratified as either operable or inoperable. This report pertains to the inoperable patient group, who received eight cycles of weekly paclitaxel (60 mg/m2), carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve of 1) with conventional radiotherapy (72 Gy). Chemoradiotherapy was followed by neck dissection for those patients who presented with clinically palpable lymph nodes. Thirty-three patients were enrolled in this group (23 men and 10 women with a median age of 56 years). Eleven patients (33%) had stage III disease; 22 (67%), stage IV disease. The median follow-up period was 14 months. Clinical complete response occurred in 20 patients (60%) and partial response occurred in 10 (30%), for an overall response rate of 90%. Following completion of therapy, 18 patients have undergone biopsy at the primary tumor site and 17 were negative. Eight of the 16 patients with clinically palpable neck nodes at presentation underwent neck dissection; five (63%) had negative nodes. Mucositis was the most common toxicity. Grade 3 or 4 mucositis occurred in 30 of the 33 (90%) patients. Other grade 3 or 4 toxicities included skin (22%), candidiasis (19%), neutropenia (9%), and dehydration (6%). One patient with laryngeal carcinoma who had pathologic complete response developed cartilage necrosis and is undergoing hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Survival data are early but encouraging. Concurrent paclitaxel, carboplatin, and external-beam radiotherapy yielded excellent clinical and pathologic responses. Mucositis remains the most common and significant morbidity. The study will continue for necessary accrual.

Preoperative paclitaxel, carboplatin, and radiation therapy in advanced head and neck cancer (stage III and IV).

Preoperative chemotherapy and chemoradiation protocols are generally associated with high clinical response rates but limited pathologic responses for large primary tumors. We have initiated a prospective phase II study of weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin plus concurrent, fractionated external-beam radiation, followed by organ-preserving or function-restorative surgery (when applicable to maximize locoregional tumor control). Operable patients staged by triple endoscopy received a percutaneous gastrostomy and vigorous dental and nutritional support during therapy. Paclitaxel 60 mg/m2 and carboplatin at an area under the concentration-time curve of 1 were administered weekly with radiation therapy 45 Gy, with repeat biopsy of the primary site at 5 weeks. Patients with a positive biopsy had definitive surgery within 4 to 5 weeks. Patients with a negative biopsy received 3 additional weeks of radiation therapy, to a total dose of 72 Gy plus paclitaxel and carboplatin. Forty-three patients were enrolled, including 33 men and 10 women ranging in age from 37 to 81 years. Fourteen patients had stage III disease, 19 patients had stage IVA disease, and 10 patients had stage IVB disease. Sites of disease included the floor of the mouth (n = 8), tongue (n = 8), oropharynx (n = 5), hypopharynx (n = 4), larynx (n = 12), palate-tonsil (n = 2), unknown primary (n = 3), and nasal cavity (n = 1). Of 38 patients evaluable for primary response (two patients had unknown primary tumor, two patients failed to complete the chemoradiation protocol, and one patient was evaluable for toxicity only), 18 patients had a complete clinical response and 20 patients had a partial response; the overall clinical response rate was 100%. A pathologic clinical response at the primary site occurred in 25 of these 38 patients (66%), who subsequently received completion radiation (67 to 72 Gy). After induction chemoradiation, 36 patients with N1-N3 nodes had neck dissection; seven had positive nodes (19%). Fourteen patients had residual cancer at the primary site at the time of the repeat biopsy. Sites of the lesions were the floor of the mouth/mandible (n = 4), nasal cavity/maxilla (n = 2), base of tongue (n = 2), and larynx (n = 6). All were resected with function-preserving reconstruction (two patients required total laryngectomy and one patient refused surgery). At a median follow-up of more than 16 months, progression-free and overall survival rates were 64% and 68%, respectively. Preoperative paclitaxel, carboplatin, and radiation was associated with a high clinical response rate at the primary site and a high level of organ preservation or functional restoration, if ablation was performed.

Weekly paclitaxel as a radiation sensitizer for locally advanced gastric and pancreatic cancers: the Brown University Oncology Group experience.

Many patients with cancer of the stomach or pancreas have locally advanced, unresectable disease at diagnosis or will develop an early local or regional recurrence despite potentially curative surgery. Effective local treatment could increase the proportion of patients able to undergo surgery and decrease locoregional recurrences, which should improve overall survival. External beam radiation (RT) by itself has little effect. Standard treatment, such as RT with concurrent administration of 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy as a radiation sensitizer, has, at best, a modest impact on locoregional recurrences and survival. The use of a more effective radiosensitizer might improve the efficacy of local treatment. Paclitaxel synchronizes cells at G2M, the phase of the cell cycle during which cells are most sensitive to the effects of ionizing radiation, and has been demonstrated to sensitize a variety of human cell lines to the effects of RT. In patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the Brown University Oncology Group (BrUOG) has demonstrated a high response rate to low-dose weekly paclitaxel with concurrent RT. In addition, we demonstrated that the response to paclitaxel/RT was not affected by mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene. This suggested that paclitaxel/RT would be a rational treatment approach for other malignancies with a high frequency of p53 mutations, such as gastric and pancreatic cancers. We have completed a phase I study of weekly paclitaxel and concurrent radiation for locally advanced gastric and pancreatic cancers. The maximum tolerated dose of paclitaxel was 50mg/m2/week for six weeks with 50 Gray (Gy) abdominal radiation. The dose limiting toxicities were abdominal pain, nausea and anorexia. Preliminary response data from ongoing phase II studies suggest that preoperative paclitaxel/RT has substantial activity in patients with locally advanced gastric and pancreatic cancers, though whether this will translate into improved disease-free and overall survival in these patients is not known.

Novel approaches in development for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic adenocarcinomas are among the most resistant neoplasms to conventional chemotherapeutics. This has prompted intense investigations of novel non-cytotoxic agents based on new understandings of the molecular pathobiology of human malignancies. This review will focus on the potential uses of three new classes of agents: farnesyl transferase (FTPase) inhibitors, matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors (MMPI's) and antibodies to the HER-2/neu oncogene. When used as single agents, FTPase inhibitors and MMPI's may be cytostatic, helping to delay the growth of these cancers. All three classes of agents may have the greatest benefit when used in conjunction with traditional anticancer modalities. The biology of these agents will reviewed.

Paclitaxel and concurrent radiation for locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

An effective local-regional therapy is needed for adenocarcinomas of the pancreas. Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton NJ) may enhance the effect of radiation therapy. Paclitaxel synchronizes cells at G2/M, a relatively radiosensitive phase of the cell cycle. We have shown that response to paclitaxel and concurrent radiation (paclitaxel/RT) was not affected by p53 mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This suggested that paclitaxel/RT was a rationale treatment approach for other malignancies which frequently harbor p53 mutations such as upper gastrointestinal malignancies. We have completed a phase I study of paclitaxel/RT for locally advanced pancreatic and gastric cancers. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel was 50 mg/m2/week for 6 weeks with abdominal radiation. The dose limiting toxicities were abdominal pain within the radiation field, nausea and anorexia. Twenty-five patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer have now completed treatment at the phase II dose level of paclitaxel 50 mg/m2/week with 50 Gy concurrent RT. Thus far, the only grade 3/4 toxicities have been hypersensitivity reactions in 2 patients, asymptomatic grade 4 neutropenia in 3 patients, and non-neutropenic biliary sepsis in 1 patient. Of the first 22 assessable patients treated at the phase II study, 8 obtained a partial response (PR) for a preliminary response rate of 36%. These findings demonstrate that paclitaxel/RT is well tolerated with substantial activity for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Preliminary analysis of a phase II study of weekly paclitaxel and concurrent radiation therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) is an attractive agent to combine with radiation for non-small cell lung cancer. We have been conducting clinical trials of weekly paclitaxel and concurrent radiation therapy. In a phase I study in non-small cell lung cancer, we determined the maximum tolerated dose of paclitaxel to be 60 mg/m2/wk with radiation. Patients received paclitaxel 60 mg/m2/wk as a 3-hour infusion for 6 weeks with radiation to the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes (40 Gy) followed by a boost to the tumor (20 Gy). From March 1994 to February 1995, 33 patients have been entered by the Clinical Oncology Group of Rhode Island. The overall response rate (complete plus partial responses) of 25 evaluable patients as of March 1995 was 84%, with a confidence interval of 68 to 96. The major toxicity was esophagitis. Twenty percent of patients had grade 4 esophagitis. Only 8% of patients had grade 3 neutropenia. Combined-modality therapy with paclitaxel and radiation is a promising treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer with a high response rate and acceptable toxicity.

Paclitaxel plus carboplatin and concurrent radiation therapy for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Previously untreated patients with stages IIIA or IIIB non-small cell lung cancer entered this phase II study to evaluate the activity and toxicity of combined paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) and carboplatin and concurrent radiation. Patients received paclitaxel 50 mg/m2/wk as a 1-hour infusion and carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve of 2/wk for 7 weeks with radiation to the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes (44 Gy) followed by a boost to the tumor (22 Gy). In addition, patients received two additional cycles of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve of 6) 3 weeks apart. From March 1995 to February 1996, 23 patients entered the study and their overall response rate (complete plus partial responses) was 82%. The major toxicity was esophagitis. Nine patients (45%) had experienced grades 3 or 4 esophagitis by the end of the 7-week concurrent phase. Seven of the nine patients recovered from the esophagitis within 2 weeks and received the additional two cycles of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve of 6). Only one patient (4%) had grade 4 pneumonitis; this patient also recovered within 2 weeks and received the final two doses of combined chemotherapy. Therapy with paclitaxel, carboplatin, and concurrent radiation is a promising treatment for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer; it has a high response rate and acceptable toxicity.

Weekly high-dose paclitaxel in metastatic and locally advanced breast cancer: a preliminary report.

The optimal dose and schedule for paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) in the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer are not known. Based on our phase I study in non-small cell lung cancer, in which the dose intensity of paclitaxel was successfully escalated by using a weekly schedule, we initiated a phase II study of weekly paclitaxel in previously untreated patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Treatment consists of weekly paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 intravenously over 3 hours for 6 weeks, followed by a 2-week break. Doses are modified for neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count < 1,500/microL), bilirubin levels greater than 1.5 times normal, or greater than grade 1 neuropathy. Patients with MBC continue treatment until disease progression. Patients with LABC receive one to two cycles before proceeding to surgery if resectable. Thus far, 15 patients, eight with MBC and seven with LABC, are assessable for response and/or toxicity. Most patients have required dose modification, with median delivery of 75% (cycle 1) and 50% (cycle 2) of the planned dose of paclitaxel. Neutropenia has been the most common cause of dose reductions, although only one patient required treatment for neutropenic fever. Six patients have developed grade 2/3 peripheral sensory neuropathy, but with dose reductions many have continued treatment with stable or improving neurologic symptoms. Objective responses have been seen in 12 of 14 assessable patients, including six with MBC (one complete response, five partial responses) and six with LABC (two complete responses, four partial responses), for an overall response rate of 86% (95% confidence interval, 66% to 96%). All responding LABC patients have been rendered free from disease at surgery. These preliminary results are very encouraging. Accrual to the study continues.

Weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced lung cancer: preliminary data from a phase II trial.

We conducted a phase II trial in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer to determine the efficacy of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) delivered at a maximum tolerated dose of 175 mg/m2 on an extended weekly schedule. Patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer were eligible if they had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2, had received no previous chemotherapy, demonstrated normal hematologic and hepatic function, and could provide informed consent. Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 was administered as an intravenous infusion weekly over 3 hours with standard premedication, for 6 weeks of an 8-week cycle. Doses were modified for absolute neutrophil count less than 1.5 x 10(9)/L or neuropathy greater than grade I on the day of therapy. Patients without progressive disease received subsequent cycles at the same dose. To date, 30 patients have been enrolled; data are available for 25. The median age was 65 years (range, 38 to 78 years), 23 patients were performance status 0 or 1, and 14 had received prior radiation. Sites of disease included the lung (23 patients), central nervous system (11), bone (seven), liver (one), kidney (one), and soft tissue (eight). Eighty-three percent, 75%, 58%, and 50% of intended doses were delivered during cycles 1 though 4, respectively. Grade 2/3 neuropathy occurred in nine patients, but improved in all nine following dose reduction. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 10 patients. Partial responses occurred in 14 of 25 patients (56%; 95% confidence interval, 46% to 66%). Median duration of response was 6.5 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 53%. The extended weekly paclitaxel schedule results in enhanced dose intensity, marked activity, and acceptable toxicity. Paclitaxel given weekly at maximum dose intensity may be more effective than conventional paclitaxel administration schedules.

Concurrent paclitaxel, carboplatin, and radiotherapy in advanced head and neck cancers: a phase II study--preliminary results.

Radiotherapy or surgery alone for advanced head and neck cancer generally yields poor results. Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) and carboplatin have both shown excellent radiosensitization through two discrete mechanisms, namely, blocking the cell cycle in the G2/M phase and inhibiting DNA repair. In an effort to improve locoregional control and survival, a prospective phase II study was initiated using paclitaxel 60 mg/ml and carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve of 1), each given as a single dose weekly with concurrent conventional fractionated external beam radiotherapy. Patients were stratified into two groups: operable and inoperable/unresectable. The operable and inoperable groups received 5 weeks (45 Gy) and 8 weeks (72 Gy) of chemoradiotherapy, respectively. Patients in the operable group were evaluated with repeat biopsies from the primary site after 5 weeks. Those with a positive biopsy underwent surgery; those with a negative biopsy received 3 additional weeks of chemoradiotherapy. Thirty-four patients were entered in the operable group (28 men and six women; 40 to 71 years of age; 12 stage III and 22 stage IV). Of 26 evaluable patients, 19 (73%) had a complete clinical response (95% confidence interval [CI], 52% to 88%) and six (23%) had a partial response (95% CI, 9% to 44%), for a total clinical response rate of 96% (95% CI, 80% to 100%). A pathologic complete response at the primary site (two had an unknown primary site) occurred in 17 of 24 (71%) patients (95% CI, 49% to 87%). Of 20 patients with N1-3 nodes who underwent neck dissection, 17 (85%) had pathologically negative lymph nodes. Seven patients with residual tumor at the primary site were resected (oral cavity, three; maxilla, one; base of tongue, one; and larynx, two). Grades 3 and 4 mucositis were seen in 19 (73%) patients; mucositis was the most common and significant morbidity. Accrual for the inoperable group continues. Concomitant paclitaxel, carboplatin, and external beam radiotherapy yielded excellent clinical responses, but produced significant grade 3/4 toxicity. In the operable group, the majority of responders had a complete pathologic response. These preliminary findings will be assessed in terms of response duration, organ preservation, and long-term survival.

Paclitaxel and concurrent radiation for gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the activity and toxicity of paclitaxel and concurrent radiation for gastric cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-seven patients were studied. Twenty-five had proximal gastric cancers, two had distal cancers. Eight had esophageal extension, 6 had celiac adenopathy, and 7 had retroperitoneal adenopathy. Patients received paclitaxel, 50 mg/m(2) by 3-hour intravenous (IV) infusion, weekly, on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29. Radiation was administered concurrently to a total dose of 45.0 Gy, in 1.80 Gy fractions, for 25 treatments. Patients who were medically or surgically inoperable received a sixth week of paclitaxel with a radiation boost to 50.4 Gy. RESULTS: Esophagitis and gastritis were the most important toxicities, Grade 3 in four patients (15%), and Grade 4 in three patients (11%). Five patients (19%) had Grade 3 nausea. The overall response rate was 56%, including three patients (11%) with a complete response. The 2-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 29% and 31%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Concurrent paclitaxel and radiation demonstrates substantial local-regional activity in gastric cancer. Future investigations combining paclitaxel and radiation with other local-regional and systemic treatments are warranted.