Acute pancreatitis associated with pembrolizumab-induced hypertriglyceridemia.

INTRODUCTION: Acute pancreatitis (AP) following drug-induced hypertriglyceridemia is a rare clinical phenomenon. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized treatment for a variety of solid organ and hematological malignancies. Pembrolizumab is a programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitor that has shown promising responses in many advanced cancers. However, a constellation of immune-related adverse events has also been described. There are reports of pembrolizumab-induced hypertriglyceridemia, but AP as a result of this side effect remains an exceedingly rare clinical sequela. CASE REPORT: We delineate a case of a patient with stage IVB non-small-cell lung cancer who developed progressive abdominal pain and nausea following administration of pembrolizumab for four months. Laboratory studies revealed increased serum lipase and triglyceride levels at 12,562 IU/L and 16,901 mg/dL, respectively. The diagnosis of AP was made based on the revised Atlanta classification criteria. After ruling out alternative causes, pembrolizumab-induced hypertriglyceridemia was considered the likely etiology of AP. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: The patient was transferred to the medical intensive care unit for close monitoring. Treatment was initiated with intravenous fluids, pain medications, and an insulin infusion. However, her hypertriglyceridemia levels remained persistently elevated, necessitating therapeutic apheresis. She recovered well with no complications after triglyceride apheresis. DISCUSSION: AP following pembrolizumab-associated hypertriglyceridemia remains a rare clinicopathologic entity. Given the widespread clinical use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, knowledge of such rare adverse events is crucial. Evaluation of serum triglyceride levels before and after initiating pembrolizumab therapy may be mandated, especially in patients with metabolic comorbidities.

Ibrutinib combination therapy for advanced gastrointestinal and genitourinary tumours: results from a phase 1b/2 study.

BACKGROUND: Ibrutinib, a first-in-class inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase, is approved for the treatment of various B-cell malignancies and chronic graft-versus-host disease. Based on encouraging preclinical data, safety and efficacy of ibrutinib combined with companion drugs for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), gastric/gastroesophageal junctional adenocarcinoma (GC), and colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC) were evaluated. METHODS: Ibrutinib 560 mg or 840 mg once daily was administered with standard doses of everolimus for RCC, docetaxel for GC, and cetuximab for CRC. Endpoints included determination of the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of ibrutinib in phase 1b and efficacy (overall response rate [ORR] for GC and CRC; progression-free survival [PFS] for CRC) in phase 2. RESULTS: A total of 39 (RCC), 46 (GC), and 50 (RCC) patients were enrolled and received the RP2D. Safety profiles were consistent with the individual agents used in the study. Confirmed ORRs were 3% (RCC), 21% (GC), and 19% (CRC). Median (90% CI) PFS was 5.6 (3.9-7.5) months in RCC, 4.0 (2.7-4.2) months in GC, and 5.4 (4.1-5.8) months in CRC. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically meaningful increases in efficacy were not observed compared to historical controls; however, the data may warrant further evaluation of ibrutinib combinations in other solid tumours. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02599324.

Pancytopenia after administration of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with mitomycin-C: local therapy and systemic toxicity.

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) coupled with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has become the standard of treatment for many cancers with peritoneal metastasis. Mitomycin-C (MMC), the most common chemotherapy utilized with HIPEC, is associated with neutropenia but the degree of hematologic toxicity is unclear when splenectomy is included as part of CRS with MMC. We present an interesting case of pancytopenia following treatment with HIPEC using MMC and comment on the possible role of splenectomy in exacerbating its cytotoxic effects. Our unique case highlights potential hematologic toxicity following MMC-HIPEC and splenectomy. It suggests that spleen removal may enhance toxicity profiles of chemotherapy such as MMC. Because MMC is the preferred agent of choice used in CRS-HIPEC, future studies should investigate optimal MMC dosing and patient selection when splenectomy is performed to balance survival benefit with hematologic toxicities.

From Screening to Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a devastating malignancy, associated with a grim prognosis, due to its silent presentation and lack of diagnostic tests. In addition, treatment options are limited to few agents, such as 5-FU, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel. METHODS: We performed a literature search for relevant published clinical trials, abstracts of trials in progress and ongoing or planned trials for the treatment of APC using Pubmed.com, ClinicalTrials.gov and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) abstract search as sources. We present an in-depth analysis of the phase I-III clinical trials determining the role and efficacy of different modalities. We also describe rationale for future investigation. DISCUSSION: Despite advances in first-line and second-line therapies for APC, median OS remains short of a year. We need collaborative efforts between the cooperative groups, institutions, community practices and industry to work together in enrolling these patients in clinical trials. In addition to use new technologies, such as organoids, we must pay attention to the palliative aspect of care for these patients from the beginning including nutritionist, social worker and supportive care health providers to assist with goals of care, symptom management and end of life discussions.

Survival Benefits and Disparities in Adjuvant Radiation Therapy for Patients with Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The effects of adjuvant radiation therapy on pancreatic cancer outcomes after resection are not well defined in the literature. METHODS: We abstracted data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database to explore the impact of adjuvant radiation on cancer-specific survival in pancreatic cancer patients who received surgical resection. RESULTS: A total of 10,224 patients met our inclusion criteria with 6768 (66.2%) patients treated with surgery only and 3456 (33.8%) treated with surgery plus adjuvant radiation. Surgery followed by adjuvant radiation was associated with significantly improved survival (HR: 0.753, CI: 0.718-0.789, p<0.001). Additionally, female gender and married status were both independently associated with better survival (p<0.05), while advanced age, Caucasian race, higher TNM stage, and higher grade had worse survival outcomes (p<0.05) Asian and Spanish-Hispanic-Latino patients were less likely to receive adjuvant radiotherapy (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant radiation was associated with significantly improved survival after resection for pancreatic cancer. There are significant differences in the patient populations who receive adjuvant radiation.

Treatment options in BRAF-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer.

B-type Raf kinase (BRAF) mutations occur in approximately 10% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC). Tumors harboring this mutation have a unique molecular profile and clinical phenotype. Response rate to systemic chemotherapy is poor and associated with shorter survival rate. Although BRAF inhibition dramatically changed treatment for melanoma patients, similar clinical responses were not observed in BRAF-mutant CRC, proposing a distinct mechanism of carcinogenesis. The aggressive biology of BRAF-mutated mCRC has underlined the importance of developing new therapeutic agents to improve outcomes in these patients. Despite numerous attempts, chemotherapy regimens are limited for this population. Reactivation of mitogen activated protein kinase pathway may explain the resistance to monotherapy, thus different combinations to target the pathway at different levels have been studied. This article will describe most suitable treatment options for CRC patients with BRAF mutation and discuss new emerging agents.

New Developments in the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer: Highlights from the 44th ASCO Annual Virtual Meeting, May 29-31, 2020.

Pancreatic cancer has the worst survival of any solid tumor. Overall, pancreatic cancer accounts for about 3% of all cancers in the US and about 7% of all cancer deaths. The American Cancer Society's estimates that 57,600 people (30,400 men and 27,200 women) will be diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in the United States for 2020 and approximately 47,050 people (24,640 men and 22,410 women) will die of this disease. FOLFIRINOX, or the combination of gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel remain to be the major treatment options for these patients for both local and metastatic disease. This slow progress is a result of partly the complex pathogenesis of this disease, and partly the fact that window of opportunity to treat these patients is short as majority of them are diagnosed at an advanced stage. This is a real challenge but also provides an opportunity for new ideas and novel approaches. In this paper, we will present few interesting studies presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2020 virtual Annual Meeting.

Management of Pancreatic Cancer During COVID-19 Pandemic: To Treat or Not to Treat?

Pancreatic cancer is a very aggressive disease and survival remains dismal even with treatment. Currently, management of patients with pancreatic cancer has been complicated by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Medical oncologists face the dilemma of whether to treat or to not treat these patients who are at high-risk of complications and even death from COVID-19. No current guidelines are available and our limited experience at this time makes it more difficult to manage these patients. Although we have general strategies available from experience in Italy, we need more treatment specific strategies to help mitigate risks of complications and toxicities from chemotherapy in order to protect our patients from COVID-19 as much as possible.

Is There any Survival Benefit of Maintenance Chemotherapy Following Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Resected Pancreatic Cancer Patients with Post-Surgery Elevated CA 19-9?

BACKGROUND: Pancreatectomy offers only potential for cure but is only possible in a minority of patients. Even in those patients who receive adjuvant chemotherapy, majority of them succumb to death due to metastases. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9704 showed that post-surgery CA 19-9 levels are an important predictor of survival. European study group for pancreatic cancer-3 showed that completion of all 6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor. Any survival benefit of an intensified chemotherapy strategy has not been demonstrated in patients with persistently elevated CA 19-9 following surgery. The object of this study was to investigate any benefit of maintenance chemotherapy following adjuvant in these patients. METHODS: Twenty patients with R0 surgery of pancreatic cancer who received adjuvant chemotherapy with post-surgery elevated CA 19-9 but no radiographic evidence of cancer was identified from 2005-2017. Either biopsy or positron emission tomography scan determined recurrence of cancer. Efficacy endpoints including overall survival and disease-free survival were assessed. RESULTS: Maintenance and additional chemotherapeutic agents included 5-FU, capecitabine, platinum agents, irinotecan and nab-paclitaxel. CA 19-9 normalized in 3 patients while 22 persisted to be elevated or had further increase in the marker. Two patients underwent metastatectomy. Median disease-free survival was 14.5m (9-18), OS 29m (19-96) and OS rates were 80%, 50% at 1 and 2 years respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that the longer overall survival of our patients with elevated CA 19-9 post-surgery was due to maintenance and additional chemotherapy following planned 6-months of adjuvant therapy, close monitoring with monthly CA 19-9 and 3-monthly computed tomography scans. Our study also underlines importance of collecting pre-surgery CA 19-9 and complete staging including chest. Prospective study aiming to evaluate role of maintenance or intensified chemotherapy or targeted agents are indicated.

Open-label study to evaluate trifluridine/tipiracil safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics in patients with advanced solid tumours and hepatic impairment.

AIMS: Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) prolongs survival in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, but limited data exist on its use in patients with hepatic impairment. This Phase I, open-label, nonrandomized study investigated the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of FTD/TPI in patients with advanced solid tumours (except breast cancer) and varying degrees of hepatic impairment, to provide dosing recommendations. METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years with advanced solid tumours and normal hepatic function, or mild, moderate or severe hepatic impairment according to National Cancer Institute criteria, were planned to be enrolled. Patients received FTD/TPI 35 mg/m2 orally twice daily on days 1-5 and 8-12 of each 28-day cycle. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled to the normal hepatic function (n = 8) and mild (n = 10) and moderate (n = 6) hepatic impairment cohorts. Overall, 12 patients (50.0%) had at least 1 adverse event leading to study discontinuation. In the moderate hepatic impairment cohort, 5 of 6 patients experienced grade ≥ 3 elevation in bilirubin. No patients with severe hepatic impairment were enrolled. FTD area under the curve at steady state decreased by 18% and 22% in the mild and moderate cohorts, respectively; however, no clear change was observed in TPI area under the curve. CONCLUSIONS: FTD/TPI can be safely administered in patients with normal hepatic function and mild hepatic impairment, with no initial dose adjustment. FTD/TPI is not recommended for use in patients with moderate hepatic impairment because of findings of grade 3 or 4 increased blood bilirubin. Therefore, FTD/TPI is not recommended for patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment.

Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement Therapy: A Concise Review.

Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy is safe and effective at treating pancreatic exocrine insufficiency. There are multiple causes of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency including chronic pancreatitis, cystic fibrosis and pancreatic cancer. Testing fecal elastase-1 level is useful for the diagnosis of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency. Starting doses of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy should be at least 30-40,000 IU with each meal and 15-20,000 IU with snacks. pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy should be taken in divided doses throughout meals. Patients who do not respond to initial dosages should be evaluated for alternative etiologies and pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy optimized. Despite ease of use and benefit of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy, challenges still remain clinically and this review hopes to provide a concise guide for clinicians.

Simplified/Same Day(s)-GOLF as First-line Treatment of Metastatic Carcinoma of Unknown Primary (CUP), Suggestive of Pancreatobiliary Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Carcinoma of unknown primary represents a therapeutic challenge in oncological practice. Evidence lacks to support particular chemotherapy selection and empirical therapies are commonly extrapolated from data on patients where primary tumor site is known. Gemcitabine, Oxaliplatin, Leucovorin and 5-Fluorouracil was previously developed to treat pancreatic cancer. These agents have also demonstrated activities in other gastrointestinal malignancies. Considering promising anti-tumor effects of GOLF, we performed a retrospective study to investigate anti-tumor activity and safety of a simplified Gemcitabine, Oxaliplatin, Leucovorin and 5-Fluorouracil in patients with Carcinoma of unknown primary in whom immunohistostaining was suggestive of either upper gastrointestinal cancers or pancreatobiliary cancers. METHODS: This retrospective study included 18 patients recorded to have a diagnosis of Carcinoma of unknown primary between Aug 2010-Dec 2015, who received biweekly G 1000 mg/m2, O 85 mg/m2, L 200 mg/m2 and F 2400 mg/m2 over 46-h on day 1 with pegfilgrastim on day 3 every 14 days. IHC staining pattern favored upper GI origin, including stomach, bile duct or pancreas. Tumor assessments were repeated every 8 weeks. RESULTS: Median age was 67 years (range: 46-76), with ECOG PS<2, and 50% were women. Median number of cycles was 4 (range: 3-14). 7 partial responses were obtained (RR: 39%) and 7 achieved stable disease with overall disease control of 78%. Median time to tumor progression was 4 months (range: 2-9). 8 (44%) patients received liver-directed therapy and 1 underwent HIPEC (5%). Median survival time was 10.5 months (range: 6.7-14.5) and 1-year overall survival rate was 35%. Grade 3-4 toxicities included neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, diarrhea, mucositis and oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy. CONCLUSION: Simplified Gemcitabine, Oxaliplatin, Leucovorin and 5-Fluorouracil regimen appears to be feasible with promising activity for Carcinoma of unknown primary and deserves to be evaluated in future trials.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation following imatinib therapy: A comparative review of 9 cases.

Patients undergoing cytotoxic or immunosuppressive therapy for cancer have an established predilection for hepatitis B virus reactivation; however, the risk associated with newer molecularly targeted agents has not been well investigated. Imatinib, a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor, induces rapid and sustained clinical benefit by inhibiting a number of signaling pathways, including BCR-ABL and c-KIT. We report the case of a patient who developed hepatitis B virus reactivation while receiving imatinib therapy for gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Furthermore, a structured literature search of the medical databases consisting of MEDLINE and PubMed was performed using the terms "hepatitis B", "reactivation", and "imatinib". The search identified nine case reports only. The data on patients' characteristics, epidemiology, clinical features, comorbid conditions, diagnosis, and management are summarized. Imatinib-associated hepatitis B virus reactivation was reported in seven patients with chronic myeloid leukemia, one with desmoid tumor, and one with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. This review serves to outline our current understanding of the epidemiology, risk factors, and pathophysiology of chronic hepatitis B virus reactivation secondary to imatinib therapy as well as the current approaches to diagnosis and management of this condition. We aim to increase awareness about this possible association and advocate for hepatitis B virus screening prior to imatinib therapy, especially in patients who are at increased risk for chronic hepatitis B virus infection.

Cutaneous Metastasis of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (GEP-Nets).

BACKGROUND: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are neoplasms commonly found within the gastrointestinal tract that originate from endocrine cells. These are slow progressive tumors and often metastasize to other elements of the gastrointestinal tract including the liver. Consequently, these tumors release hormones including serotonin and/or histamine that are responsible for the symptoms including intermittent flushing and diarrhea. Metastasis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, although rare, is possible and may extend to local lymph nodes and viscera. CASE REPORT: Our patient was a 69-year-old female who initially presented with postprandial abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and later was diagnosed with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors following surgical resection in 2014. Restaging after surgery showed regional lymph node involvement and hepatic metastasis. Of note she did not have a pre-operative computed tomography scan. She was started on octreotide, and later switched to lanreotide. In the interim, she did not have any positive findings on serial octreoscans depicting the skin lesion that was performed in the interim period every six months. However, she noticed a cutaneous mass in the upper right flank mass in 2016, which was followed up by a dermatologist. In 2017, the mass grew in size and hence biopsied which showed neuroendocrine tumors consistent with her primary tumor. DISCUSSION: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors often metastasize to lymph nodes and liver but rarely can involve the skin and present as firm papules as found in our patient. Cutaneous metastasis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors often has high morbidity and mortality and is usually associated with a primary lesion in the bronchopulmonary system. However, as demonstrated in this case report, cutaneous metastasis can originate from the gastrointestinal tract, including the small intestine as well.

Association of RETN C-420G single nucleotide polymorphism with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Pakistani Punjabi Rajput population.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of human resistin gene RETN C-420G single nucleotide polymorphism with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a specific ethnic population.. METHODS: The controlled study was conducted from June 2012 to January 2015 at Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, Army Medical College, Rawalpindi, and the Institute of Biomedical and Genetic Engineering, Islamabad, Pakistan. Patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy controls belonging to Pakistani Punjabi Rajput ethnic group were genotyped for human resistin gene RETNC-420G single nucleotide polymorphism. Serum resistin, serum insulin, fasting blood sugar, lipid profile, body mass index and insulin resistance was determined and correlated with genotypes. SPSS 18 was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Of the 789 subjects, 539(68%) were diabetics and 250(32%) were controls. Serum resistin levels were significantly higher in diabetics than controls (p<0.05). The frequency of GG, GC and CC was 15(2.8%), 322(59.75%) and 202(37.5%) in diabtics. This single nucleotide polymorphism was associated with diabetes (p<0.02).Human resistin gene RETN C-420G single nucleotide polymorphism was not associated with serum resistin, insulin, body mass index, insulin resistance and dyslipidaemia in both groups (p<0.05 each). CONCLUSIONS: Human resistin gene RETN C-420G single nucleotide polymorphism was found to be a risk factor for type 2 diabetes in Pakistani Punjabi Rajput population..

Emergency use of uridine triacetate for the prevention and treatment of life-threatening 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine toxicity.

BACKGROUND: Increased susceptibility to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/capecitabine can lead to rapidly occurring toxicity caused by impaired clearance, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency, and other genetic variations in the enzymes that metabolize 5-FU. Life-threatening 5-FU overdoses occur because of infusion pump errors, dosage miscalculations, and accidental or suicidal ingestion of capecitabine. Uridine triacetate (Vistogard) was approved in 2015 for adult and pediatric patients who exhibit early-onset severe or life-threatening 5-FU/capecitabine toxicities or present with an overdose. Uridine triacetate delivers high concentrations of uridine, which competes with toxic 5-FU metabolites. METHODS: In 2 open-label clinical studies, patients who presented with a 5-FU/capecitabine overdose or an early onset of severe toxicities were treated. Patients received uridine triacetate as soon as possible (most within the first 96 hours after 5-FU/capecitabine). Outcomes included survival, resumption of chemotherapy, and safety. Their survival was compared with the survival of a historical cohort of overdose patients who received only supportive care. RESULTS: A total of 137 of 142 overdose patients (96%) treated with uridine triacetate survived and had a rapid reversal of severe acute cardiotoxicity and neurotoxicity; in addition, mucositis and leukopenia were prevented, or the patients recovered from them. In the historical cohort, 21 of 25 patients (84%) died. Among the 141 uridine triacetate-treated overdose patients with a diagnosis of cancer (the noncancer patients included 6 intentional or accidental pediatric overdoses), 53 resumed chemotherapy in < 30 days (median time after 5-FU, 19.6 days), and this indicated a rapid recovery from toxicity. Adverse reactions in patients receiving uridine triacetate included vomiting (8.1%), nausea (4.6%), and diarrhea (3.5%). CONCLUSIONS: In these studies, uridine triacetate was a safe and effective lifesaving antidote for capecitabine and 5-FU overexposure, and it facilitated the rapid resumption of chemotherapy. Cancer 2017;123:345-356. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

New therapeutic directions for advanced pancreatic cancer: cell cycle inhibitors, stromal modifiers and conjugated therapies.

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a devastating malignancy with an extremely poor prognosis. These tumors progress rapidly and somewhat silently with few specific symptoms and are relatively resistant to chemotherapeutic agents. Many agents, including cell cycle inhibitors, are under development for the treatment of this cancer for which there are disappointingly few treatment options. Areas covered: Here we outline the existing approved treatments for advanced pancreatic disease and discuss a range of novel therapies currently under development including cell cycle inhibitors, stromal modifiers and conjugated therapies. We also describe the current state of the pancreatic cancer therapeutics market both past and future. Expert opinion: Despite the recent explosion of novel therapies with an array of unique targets, the core treatment of pancreatic cancer still with traditional cytotoxic agents with a few exceptions. However, as these novel treatments move through the pipeline, we are hopeful that there will soon be a number of effective options for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Diabetes Type 2 and Pancreatic Cancer: A History Unfolding.

Pancreatic Cancer is the fourth cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Up to 80% of pancreatic cancer patients present with either new-onset type 2 diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance at the time of diagnosis. Recent literature suggests that diabetes mellitus type 2 is a risk factor, a manifestation and a prognostic factor for pancreatic cancer. This article is intended to clarify the evidence about diabetes as a risk factor for pancreatic cancer.