Taste alterations and oral discomfort in patients receiving chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Taste alterations (TA) and oral discomfort in cancer patients are neglected side effects of the disease and treatments. They contribute to poor appetite, decrease food intake and affect quality of life, leading to adverse outcomes such as malnutrition and depression. The study aimed to explore TAs in relation to other oral conditions causing discomfort in cancer patients. Additionally, the correlation between patients' acidity of saliva and experienced TAs and oral discomfort was evaluated. METHODS: A case study including 100 patients diagnosed with cancer receiving chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Data were collected using two questionnaire forms: the Chemotherapy-induced Taste Alteration Scale (CiTAS) and an additional information questionnaire. Saliva samples were collected for each patient and measured with a pocket pH meter. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and comparisons were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis H test, Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: The prevalence of reported TAs was 93%. Patient age, oral discomfort and swallowing difficulty were found to be significant factors for experienced TAs (p < 0.05). No correlation between patients' acidity of saliva and reported TAs and oral discomfort was found. CONCLUSION: CiTAS proved to be a convenient tool to collect information about TAs in cancer patients. Using the CiTAS tool, a high prevalence (93%) of reported TAs in cancer patients receiving chemo- or immunotherapy was found. CiTAS provides a fast and cheap recognition of symptoms and causes of TAs that can be addressed.

Zoom in on Antibody Aggregates: A Potential Pitfall in the Search of Rare EV Populations.

High-resolution flow cytometers (hFCM) are used for the detection of extracellular vesicles (EV) in various biological fluids. Due to the increased sensitivity of hFCM, new artifacts with the potential of interfering with data interpretation are introduced, such as detection of antibody aggregates. The aim of this study was to investigate the extent of aggregates in labels commonly used for the characterization of EVs by hFCM. Furthermore, we aimed to compare the efficacy of centrifugation and filtering treatments to remove aggregates, as well as to quantify the effect of the treatments in reducing aggregates. For this purpose, we labeled phosphate buffered saline (PBS) with fluorescently conjugated protein labels and antibodies after submitting them to 5, 10, or 30 min centrifugation, filtering or washed filtering. We investigated samples by hFCM and quantified the amount of aggregates found in PBS labeled with untreated and pre-treated labels. We found a varying amount of aggregates in all labels investigated, and further that filtering is most efficient in removing all but the smallest aggregates. Filtering protein labels can reduce the extent of aggregates; however, how much remains depends on the specific labels and their combination. Therefore, it is still necessary to include appropriate controls in a hFCM study of EVs.

BLTR1 and CD36 Expressing Microvesicles in Atherosclerotic Patients and Healthy Individuals.

Aims: Monocytes/macrophages play a crucial role in the development, progression, and complication of atherosclerosis. In particular, foam cell formation driven by CD36 mediated internalization of oxLDL leads to activation of monocytes and subsequent release of microvesicles (MVs) derived from monocytes (MMVs). Further, pro-inflammatory leukotriene B4 (LTB4) derived from arachidonic acid promotes atherosclerosis through the high-affinity receptor BLTR1. Thus, we aimed to investigate the correlation between different MMV phenotypes (CD14+ MVs) on the one hand, and arachidonic acid and eicosapentaenoic acid contents in different compartments including atherosclerotic plaques, plasma, and granulocytes on the other. Methods and Results: Samples from patients with femoral atherosclerosis and healthy controls were analyzed on an Apogee A60 Micro-PLUS flow cytometer. Platelet-poor plasma was labeled with lactadherin-FITC, anti-CD14-APC, anti-CD36-PE, and anti-BLTR1-AF700. Eicosapentaenoic acid and arachidonic acid content in different compartments in patients were analyzed using gas chromatography. Compared to controls, patients had lower levels of BLTR1+ MVs (p = 0.007), CD14+BLTR1+ MVs (p = 0.007), and CD14+BLTR1+CD36+ MVs (p = 0.001). Further, in patients CD14+ MVs and CD14+CD36+ MVs correlated inversely with arachidonic acid in granulocytes (r = -0.302, p = 0.039 and r = -0.322, p = 0.028, respectively). Moreover, CD14+CD36+ MVs correlated inversely with arachidonic acid in plasma phospholipids in patients (r = -0.315, p = 0.029), and positively with triglyceride in both patients (r = 0.33, p = 0.019) and controls (r = 0.46, p = 0.022). Conclusion: This is the first study of its kind and thus the results are explorative and only indicative. BLTR1+ MVs and CD14+CD36+ MVs has potential as markers of atherosclerosis pathophysiology, but this needs further investigation.