Are foundation doctors equipped with the skills necessary for the assessment and referral of a patient presenting with a suspected facial skin malignancy?

BACKGROUND: The incidence of skin cancer (SC) has increased in recent years with it being the most common cancer within the UK. The management of SC requires a multidisciplinary approach involving dermatologists and surgical specialities. OBJECTIVES: To assess the confidence of current foundation trainees (FTs) in the assessment of facial SC and referral for surgical management and reconstruction. METHODS: An online survey was distributed via social media and completed by 142 FTs across 13 deaneries. Two higher training respondents were excluded. RESULTS: We found that 50% (71/142) of trainees had only examined one or two patients with SC and 25.3% (36/142) had no experience in SC assessment. Most FTs were not confident in performing a full skin examination (90.2%, 119/132), formulating differential diagnoses for a pigmented facial lesion (45.3%, 64/141) or investigating a facial SC (87.9%, 124/141). Facial defects requiring reconstruction (87.3%, 124/142) were more likely to be referred to plastic surgery. CONCLUSIONS: FTs were not confident in performing full skin examinations nor formulating diagnoses for pigmented lesions. This is concerning given that the majority of FTs will enter general practice and therefore exposure to SC will be common. This may in turn place greater burden on secondary care services such as dermatology and allied surgical specialities resulting in a greater caseload in an already stretched service in the UK. The integration of the British Association of Dermatology undergraduate syllabus into the medical school curriculum should improve confidence in the detection and management of SC at both undergraduate and postgraduate levels.

The Reconstruction of Mandible Defects in War Injuries: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Study Design: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Objective: There has been an increasing trend in maxillofacial injuries associated with combat trauma. Within the maxillofacial complex, the mandible is the most likely structure to be damaged during combat. The structural deficits as a result can be reconstructed with many options. These include vascularised bone grafts (VBGs), non-vascularised bone grafts (NVBGs), alloplastic implants, reconstruction bars and distraction osteogenesis. This study aimed to determine the common modality and efficacy of mandibular reconstruction in combat trauma-related defects. Methods: A literature search was conducted on Pubmed, Prospero, Dynamed, DARE, EMBASE, COCHRANE and BMJ databases. Results: A total of six articles met the inclusion criteria identifying 165 patients requiring mandibular reconstruction. Non-vascularised iliac bone graft (n = 137) was the most common method followed by ileac crest bone chips harvest using Dacron urethran osteomesh tray (n = 24) and frontoparietal grafts (n = 4). Meta-analysis of five out of six trials demonstrated an overall success rate of 85% (95% CI 79-90; I2 = 59%). A total of 13% (n = 22) of reconstructions failed either completely or partially and 21% (n = 34) of patients suffered postoperative complications. Conclusions: NVBGs are a practical, cost-effective and favourable method of war zone management of mandibular defects with success rates comparable to those reported in the civilian literature. However, general trauma principles take precedence to rule out life-threatening injuries. Due consideration of patient factors, surgical factors, and available resources are required in the first-line management of combat-related mandibular defects.

What are the concerns of second-degree medical students entering specialty OMFS training?

Oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) applicants are faced with numerous challenges. Previous research has demonstrated that financial burden, length of OMFS training, and impact on personal life are cited as major drawbacks to pursuing the specialty, with trainees having concerns about the Membership of the Royal College of Surgeons (MRCS) examinations. The current study aimed to explore second-degree medical students' concerns about obtaining a specialty training post in OMFS. An online survey was distributed via social media to second-degree students across the United Kingdom and 106 responses were received. A lack of publications and lack of involvement in research (54%) as well as attaining accreditation with the Royal College of Surgeons (27%) were cited as the primary and secondary concerns in relation to securing a higher training post. Seventy-five per cent of respondents had no first-author publications, 93% expressed concerns about passing the MRCS examination, and 73% had more than 40 OMFS procedures within their logbook. Second-degree medical students reported having ample clinical and operative experience in OMFS. Their main concerns were about research and MRCS examinations. To alleviate these concerns, BAOMS could provide educational initiatives and dedicated mentorship programmes for second-degree students, and could adopt a collaborative approach with discussion with major postgraduate training stakeholders.

Use of biomaterials in the reconstruction of posterior lamellar eyelid defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eyelid defects can occur secondary to tumours, trauma, burns, and congenital factors. Among the most challenging aspects of eyelid reconstruction is the rebuilding of a tarsal substitute due to its delicate and multi-layered tissue composition. Attempts to use biomaterials for posterior lamellar reconstruction are intended to provide an alternative to traditional autograft reconstructions. In this review, we aimed to assess the types of biomaterials used for the reconstruction of the posterior lamella associated with eyelid defects and the associated clinical outcomes. A literature search was conducted on Pubmed, Prospero, Dynamed, DARE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE databases. A total of 15 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria, and 129 patients with 142 eyelids reconstructed, using artificial grafts, were included in the review. Acellular dermis allograft (AlloDerm®, LifeCell) (n = 49) was the most common artificial graft used. A meta-analysis was performed, which demonstrated a pooled success rate of artificial grafts of 99% (95% CI 96-100, p = 0.05; I2 = 40%, total complications seen 39% (95% CI 96-100, p = 0.05; I2 = 40%) and re-operation rates of 5.6% (n = 8). The biomaterials used demonstrated an overall success rate of 99%, which is similar if not greater than that reported with the use of traditional autograft reconstruction techniques, with similar complications and fewer re-operations than autografts. This suggests that clinicians should consider the clinical use of artificial grafts for posterior lamellar reconstruction.

Can we support second degree students by incorporating non-surgical facial aesthetics into undergraduate dentistry during the first degree?

Non-surgical facial aesthetics (NSFA) are cosmetic procedures intended to reduce signs of ageing and provide facial rejuvenation. There is currently no recommendation for NSFA to be included in the undergraduate dental curriculum globally. This study aims to gain the views of final year dental students about pursuing a career in NSFA. An online survey was completed by 114 final year dental students across two English Universities. A total of 67% (77/114) of students would pursue a career in NSFA. A total of 76% (87/114) and 75% (86/114) of students were not aware of the complications associated with the administration of dermal fillers and Botox injections, respectively. Most students considered NSFA upon graduation. NSFA provides a transferable skillset and useful anatomical knowledge. Incorporation of NSFA in undergraduate education could financially support oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) trainees within their second degree. This may in turn promote retention within the speciality with high financial costs associated with OMFS training.

Reconstruction of head and neck oncological soft tissue defects post-resection using robotic surgery: a systematic review of the current literature.

Head and neck cancer (HNC) resection often leaves soft tissue defects and exposure of vital structures. In recent years, there has been an increase in the use of robotic surgery for HNC resections. This allows for achieving smaller defects by using a tissue-sparing approach. However, this poses a challenge for reconstruction with less space available to perform microsurgery. We reviewed the efficacy of robotic surgery in the reconstruction of HNC defects by assessing the impact on flap success and complication rates. A literature search was conducted on Pubmed, Prospero, Dynamed, DARE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE databases. A total of 14 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria with 96 patients aged mean (range) 60.7 (29-87) years, undergoing robotic reconstruction. The radial forearm flap was the most commonly used flap for robot-assisted reconstruction (n = 47). Robotic graft inset was performed in 94 cases and robotic assisted microvascular anastomoses for 25 vessels. One hundred per cent of flaps survived with a total of 25 (26.0%) complications (wound healing (n = 7), fistula formation (n = 2), haematoma (n = 4), dehiscence (n = 10), and wound infection (n = 2). Seven (12.2%) patients required additional surgery for managing complications and revision of the flap. Fewer complications were seen in patients undergoing robotic-assisted microvascular anastomoses compared with open anastomoses (4.0% versus 34.2%, p < 0.05). Robot-assisted reconstruction in HNC defects demonstrates 100% success rate with minor associated complications. Our results also support feasibility in both flap inset and microvascular anastomoses. Our results also demonstrate feasibility in both flap inset and microvascular anastomoses. Significantly fewer complications were seen with robotic-assisted microvascular anastomoses compared with open anastomoses.

Attitude of clinical medical students to Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery as a career: a perspective from two English Medical Schools.

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS) has been increasing in popularity amongst medicine first trainees. Despite this, there is still limited exposure at the undergraduate level. This study aimed to: evaluate the experience of medical students in the field of OMFS, the awareness of medical students to OMFS resources/societies and to determine the greatest motivators and deterrents for students in pursuing a career in OMFS. An online survey was distributed to 198 students spread across two English universities. 131 students (66.2%) were from University A and 67 (33.8%) students were from University B. A total of 61.1% of undergraduate medical students had no exposure to OMFS up until their current stage of training with no statistically significant differences in OMFS exposure between the year groups (p>0.05). 37% of students considered OMFS as a potential career path with dual qualification being the deterrent in 44% of cases. 97.0% of students were not able to state any organisations/resources available to support them in pursuing a career in OMFS. Within our cohort exposure to OMFS was greater than earlier reports, however; undergraduate exposure to OMFS is still very limited in UK medical schools. Conducting a dental degree following the primary medical qualification appears to be the greatest obstacle to students considering OMFS training. OMFS remains unknown to medical students and healthcare professionals. We need grass root changes at undergraduate level to improve the future of OMFS training.

Are medical students confident in assessing the patient presenting with a neck lump?

Neck lumps are a common clinical presentation in both primary care, the emergency department and in specialist clinics. Foundation doctors and final year medical students are often not confident in the assessment of patients presenting with head and neck symptoms. We evaluated medical students confidence in performing a systematic neck lump examination, formulation of differential diagnosis and presentation to senior colleagues. An online survey was completed by 185 medical students across two English Universities; 122 (66.0%) students were from University A and 63 (34.0%) students were from University B. Students were in their third-fifth year of medical school. 98.4% (n=182) of participants reported receiving formal teaching of neck lump examination during medical school for the 66.0% (n=122) of medical students were confident in examining a neck lump but 62.4% (n=115) were not confident in presenting examination findings to a senior colleague. Totals of 78.4% (n= 145) and 64.8% (n=120) did not feel confident in generating a list of differential diagnoses for a patient with an anterior or posterior neck lump, respectively. A total of Despite being able to examine neck lumps, medical students did not feel confident in presenting their examination findings or proposing differential diagnoses. This may be due to superficial understanding and poor knowledge translation into clinical practice. Use of a lymphadenopathy simulator, the teaching of common malignancies and corresponding head and neck lymph node drainage may improve diagnostic reasoning and aid early detection of cancer and other conditions.

Facial trauma education within two English medical schools.

Facial trauma accounts for 5%-10% of all presentations to emergency departments (ED) in the UK, and it is often referred to the oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) department by ED physicians. Undergraduate medical students often have limited exposure to OMFS, and this is likely to translate to reduced exposure to facial trauma. We investigated the exposure of undergraduate clinical medical students to facial trauma teaching and asked about their confidence to manage facial lacerations and their ability to diagnose common facial fractures. An online survey was completed by 237 medical students across two English universities, 154 (65%) from University A and 83 (35%) from University B. Of the students, 68% reported no exposure to any teaching in facial trauma up to their current year of medical school; no statistically significant differences were found among the year groups (p>0.05). The majority of facial fractures within our cohort were referred to ear, nose and throat (ENT) (43%), followed by OMFS (31%), and plastic surgery (12%). In total, 84% of students did not feel competent to manage facial lacerations, and 95% were not confident to present a facial injuries examination to a senior colleague. Exposure to facial trauma teaching remains poor. Future work should aim to devise a clear OMFS curriculum with objective teaching on facial trauma.

Are clinical medical students confident about their head and neck anatomy knowledge?

Anatomy is a pillar of medical knowledge and essential for safe medical and surgical practice. The literature highlights concerns regarding anatomy knowledge, and knowledge of the head and neck in particular, in medical students and newly qualified doctors. We investigated medical students' confidence to be assessed on head and neck anatomy, the amount of teaching they received, and its mode of delivery, through an online survey completed by 185 medical students across two English Universities (122 (66%) students from University A and 63 (34%) from University B). Students were in their third to fifth year of medical school. A total of 126 (68%) had received two to four sessions on head and neck anatomy, and 56 (30%) had received one or two sessions. A total of 113 (61%) had received prosection teaching, and 44 (24%) had received computer/virtual anatomy teaching. In total, 140 (76%) did not feel confident to be assessed on head and neck anatomy, and 137 (74%) did not feel they had received an adequate amount of head and neck anatomy teaching. Despite formal head and neck anatomy teaching most of our cohort did not feel confident to be assessed on the topic. Further work is required to integrate anatomy into the clinical years and to devise a national undergraduate curriculum to enhance an interest in head and surgery as a career.