Controlled randomized study comparing the cardiovascular profile of everolimus with tacrolimus in renal transplantation.

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) regression after kidney transplantation may be influenced by immunosuppression. In a 24-month open-label, multicenter, phase-IV study, 71 kidney allograft recipients without previous acute rejection, showing eGFR >40 ml/min and proteinuria <500 mg/day and between 6 months and 3 years post-transplantation, were randomized to receive everolimus (EVR) + mycophenolic acid (MPA) or were maintained on tacrolimus (TAC) + MPA. The aim was to assess whether the conversion to EVR could reduce left ventricular mass index (LVMi) at month-24. LVMi at month-24 decreased without differences between groups (TAC: 54.0 vs. 48.2 g/m2.7 ; EVR: 53.4 vs. 49.4 g/m2.7 ). The LVH prevalence at baseline and month-24 was 59.4% and 40.6% in TAC group and 57.1% and 50.0% in EVR group. EVR conversion was associated with nearly disappearance of concentric LVH and concentric remodeling pattern. The procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide at month-24 showed greater reduction in EVR group (51.6 vs. 58.2 mg/l; P = 0.004). Conversion from TAC to EVR was associated with a significant improvement of eGFR (P = 0.0315, ancova). Adverse events were similar between groups without rejection episode or graft loss. Conversion from TAC to EVR did not further reduce LVMi after 24 months, although its effect on concentric LVH deserves further investigation (NCT01169701).

Clinical assessment and determinants of chronic allograft nephropathy in maintenance renal transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Current knowledge about the natural history, treatment and physicians' perception of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is limited. The present study evaluated the prevalence and determinants of CAN in renal transplant patients. METHODS: Epidemiological, cross-sectional multi-centre study conducted in Spain. A total of 872 renal transplant recipients with a functioning graft and at least 2 years of post-transplant data on renal function were consecutively included. CAN diagnosis was recorded based on physician's clinical criteria and on laboratory criteria (serum creatinine ≥ 2 mg/dL and/or glomerular filtration rate ≤ 50 mL/min). RESULTS: The mean time from transplantation until the time of this study was 8.2 years. CAN was diagnosed in 35% of patients (n = 305) according to the physician's criteria (31% of whom with histological assessment) and in 55.5% (n = 482) according to laboratory objective criteria. An older donor age, lack of induction therapy, cyclosporine use, lower tacrolimus levels at 1 year, acute rejection, hypertension and worse initial renal function were associated with CAN development. Time from transplant to biopsy was greater in patients with anti-proteinuric treatment. Immunosuppression was modified in 46.9% of patients with CAN diagnosis [calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) reduction alone in 18.9% of cases; CNI reduction and mycophenolate modification in 17.8% and CNI reduction or withdrawal with introduction of proliferation signal inhibitors in 12.9%). CONCLUSIONS: After ~8 years from renal transplantation, 55.5% of patients presented CAN, which was considerably underestimated by physicians. An older donor age and less initial immunosuppression seemed to be related to CAN development.

Sequential quadruple immunosuppression including sirolimus in extended criteria and nonheartbeating donor kidney transplantation.

The aim was to evaluate feasibility and safety of calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression in high-risk donor kidney transplantation with sequential sirolimus introduction. Kidney transplant patients (n=76) with a donor aged >60 years, donor with acute renal failure, or a nonheartbeating donor were included. Immunosuppression consisted of antithymocyte globulin or basiliximab, mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone, and sequential introduction of sirolimus. One-year patient survival was 96.2% and 95.8%; graft survival was 94.2% and 91.7%; acute rejection rates were 21.2% and 12.4%; delayed graft function was 21.2% and 66.7%; and creatinine clearance was 58+/-20 mL/min and 56+/-21 mL/min for the brain-dead donor group and the nonheartbeating donor group, respectively. Most adverse events were infections, but also three lymphoceles, three urinary fistulas, three wound seromas. Sequential sirolimus introduction in high-risk donor kidney transplantation was found to lead to good patient and graft survival and incidence of acute rejection and delayed graft function.

The influence of innate immunity gene receptors polymorphisms in renal transplant infections.

BACKGROUND: Genetically defined deficiencies in key components of the innate immune system have been associated with a greater risk of infection. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of genetic variability of innate immune receptors (mannose-binding lectin [MBL], mannose-associated serine-protease-2 [MASP-2], and Toll-like receptors [TLR4]) in the risk of infections after a kidney transplantation. METHODS: All patients undergoing a kidney or kidney-pancreas transplantation during a 3-year period were included. Functionally relevant mutations in MBL2, MASP2, and TLR4 genes were determined by DNA sequencing. The incidence of major bacterial infections, asymptomatic cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, and CMV disease were compared among groups. RESULTS: There were no differences regarding major transplant characteristics among groups. Older age, requirements for posttransplant hemodialysis, and pretransplant diabetes, but not gene polymorphisms, were associated with a greater number of bacterial infections. In univariate analysis, low-MBL genotypes were associated with CMV disease in pretransplant CMV seropositive patients (P=0.015), whereas the TLR4 mutation was associated with higher risk of CMV primary infection (P=0.024). TLR4 mutation was an independent factor associated with CMV disease (odds ratio 5.84, 95% confidence interval 1.35-25.20, P=0.018). CONCLUSION: Polymorphisms of innate immunity receptors, especially TLR4 mutation, were associated with higher risk of CMV disease, while susceptibility to other infectious disorders was not observed.

Clinical approach to kidney disease in kidney recipients in Spain.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In the present study, clinical criteria used by Spanish nephrologists when approaching chronic kidney disease (CKD) in kidney recipients, as well as their level of maintenance and control of renal function, were evaluated. METHODS: An epidemiological, observational, multicenter, nation-wide, prospective study was carried out, with a 6-month follow-up period. Three hundred and sixty-eight adult patients with stage3 kidney disease after a 24-month or longer post-transplantation follow-up period were included. Visits schedule included a retrospective visit, a baseline visit, an optional mid-term visit, and a final visit at month6. RESULTS: Mean time since kidney transplantation was 8.2±5.4years. Most common pre-transplant cardiovascular risk factors were high blood pressure (80.2%), followed by high cholesterol levels (61.7%). Serum creatinine levels showed a statistically significant decrease from baseline visit to 6-month visit (0.06±0.22; P<.0001), and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) reduction was -1.03±6.14 (P=0.0014). Significant independent prognostic factors for GFR worsening were: higher 24-hour proteinuria (OR=1.001 per mg; P=.020), longer time since transplantation (OR=1.009 per month; P=.017), and lower hemoglobin levels (OR=1.261 per g/dl; P=.038). Donor age also had some negative influence (OR=1.021 per year; P=.106). Biopsies were obtained in only 8% of kidney transplant recipients with stage 3 CKD with an intervention being carried out in 25.4% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary markers and factors resulting in CKD progression, particularly anemia, are still frequently uncontrolled after kidney transplantation. Only about 2% of patients benefit from a therapeutic intervention based on a biopsy. Clinical perception differs from objective measures, which results in an obvious clinical inertia regarding risk factor control in such patients.

Acute renal failure secondary to imatinib mesylate treatment in chronic myeloid leukemia.

A 58-year-old woman with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and previous intolerance to interferon was treated with the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase protein inhibitor imatinib mesylate. Coincidentally, with the start of treatment, the patient developed acute renal failure, with acute tubular necrosis being observed on histopathology. Imatinib was stopped and three hemodialysis sessions were performed, which was followed by a progressive improvement of the renal function and normalization of the urine output. One year later the patient still has mild chronic renal failure and remains in chronic phase of CML on hydroxyurea treatment.

Harmful effects of viral replication in seropositive hepatitis C virus renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Seropositivity for hepatitis C virus (HCV) predicts lower patient and graft survival after renal transplantation (RT). However, the influence of viral replication at transplantation on long-term outcome remains to be determined. METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted in four Spanish hospitals, from 1997 to 2006. Data of all patients with RT, who displayed HCV+ (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), and with negative viremia at RT (NEG group) were collected (n=41). For each NEG patient enrolled, data of two patients with RT nearest in time, HCV+, and positive viremia (POS group) were also collected (n=78). RESULTS: The POS group showed a higher incidence of long-term liver disease (56.4% vs. 24.4%, P=0.0009) and episodes of transaminase elevation (38.5% vs. 7.3%, P=0.0003) and worse renal function (serum creatinine [sCr], 3.0 [2.7] vs. 1.9 [1.6] mg/dl, P=0.032; glomerular filtration rate, 43.7 [22.4] vs. 56.9 [27.9] ml/min, P=0.075). Noteworthy, 24.4% of NEG patients reactivated after RT, showing a worse patient survival (P=0.039). Active viral replication at RT and dialysis requirement in the first week remained as independent predictors of lower graft survival (death censored): hazards ratio, 3.11 (95% confidence interval, 1.34-7.19; P=0.009) and hazards ratio 3.13 (95% confidence interval, 1.53-6.37; P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that active viral replication at transplantation is an independent risk factor for graft failure in patients with positive serology for HCV.

Actitud clínica frente a la disfunción renal en receptores de un trasplante renal en España / Clinical approach to kidney disease in kidney recipients in Spain

Antecedentes y objetivos: El presente estudio ha evaluado el criterio clínico que utilizan los nefrólogos españoles frente a la disfunción renal crónica (DRC) en receptores de trasplante renal (TR), y el grado de mantenimiento y control de la disfunción renal. Métodos: Estudio observacional, epidemiológico, multicéntrico, nacional y prospectivo, con un período de seguimiento de 6 meses. Se incluyeron 368 pacientes adultos con disfunción renal de grado3 con un período mínimo de evolución posterior al trasplante de 24meses. La programación de las visitas incluyó una visita retrospectiva, una visita inicial, una visita intermedia opcional y una visita final al sexto mes. Resultados: El tiempo medio desde el TR fue de 8,2±5,4años. La hipertensión (80,2%), seguida por la hipercolesterolemia (61,7%), fueron los factores de riesgo cardiovascular previos al trasplante más frecuentes. Las concentraciones de creatinina sérica entre la visita inicial y la visita de los 6meses mostraron una diferencia estadísticamente significativa de 0,06±0,22 (p<0,0001), y la diferencia del filtrado glomerular (FG) fue de −1,03±6,14 (p=0,0014). Los factores pronósticos independientes significativos del empeoramiento del FG fueron: proteinuria a 24h más alta (OR=1,001 por cada mg; p=0,020), más tiempo desde el trasplante (OR=1,009 por cada mes; p=0,017) y concentraciones bajas de hemoglobina (OR=1,261 por cada g/dl; p=0,038). También se observó cierta influencia negativa de la edad del donante (OR=1,021 por cada año; p=0,106). Solo se realizó biopsia en el 8% de los casos de receptores de TR con DRC de grado 3, suponiendo alguna intervención en el 25,4% de los casos. Conclusiones: Con frecuencia los marcadores secundarios y los factores de progresión de la DRC siguen sin estar controlados después del TR, principalmente la anemia. Solo aproximadamente el 2% de pacientes se benefician de una intervención terapéutica basada en una biopsia. Existe una disparidad entre la percepción clínica y los parámetros objetivos, que conduce a una clara inercia clínica del control de los factores de riesgo de estos pacientes (AU)

Background and objectives: In the present study, clinical criteria used by Spanish nephrologists when approaching chronic kidney disease (CKD) in kidney recipients, as well as their level of maintenance and control of renal function, were evaluated. Methods: An epidemiological, observational, multicenter, nation-wide, prospective study was carried out, with a 6-month follow-up period. Three hundred and sixty-eight adult patients with stage3 kidney disease after a 24-month or longer post-transplantation follow-up period were included. Visits schedule included a retrospective visit, a baseline visit, an optional mid-term visit, and a final visit at month6. Results: Mean time since kidney transplantation was 8.2±5.4years. Most common pre-transplant cardiovascular risk factors were high blood pressure (80.2%), followed by high cholesterol levels (61.7%). Serum creatinine levels showed a statistically significant decrease from baseline visit to 6-month visit (0.06±0.22; P<.0001), and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) reduction was −1.03±6.14 (P=0.0014). Significant independent prognostic factors for GFR worsening were: higher 24-hour proteinuria (OR=1.001 per mg; P=.020), longer time since transplantation (OR=1.009 per month; P=.017), and lower hemoglobin levels (OR=1.261 per g/dl; P=.038). Donor age also had some negative influence (OR=1.021 per year; P=.106). Biopsies were obtained in only 8% of kidney transplant recipients with stage 3 CKD with an intervention being carried out in 25.4% of cases. Conclusions: Secondary markers and factors resulting in CKD progression, particularly anemia, are still frequently uncontrolled after kidney transplantation. Only about 2% of patients benefit from a therapeutic intervention based on a biopsy. Clinical perception differs from objective measures, which results in an obvious clinical inertia regarding risk factor control in such patients (AU)

Influence of sirolimus on proteinuria in de novo kidney transplantation with expanded criteria donors: comparison of two CNI-free protocols.

BACKGROUND: The contribution of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors to proteinuria is controversial. The aim was to analyse proteinuria in suboptimal kidney calcineurin inhibitor-(CNI) free de novo immunosuppression. METHODS: All patients from our centre with donors >60 years and CNI-free treatment were included (n = 108). Patients were divided into two groups: (i) SRL group: sirolimus (SRL) + prednisone + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) + antiCD25; (ii) MMF group: prednisone + MMF w/ or w/o antiCD25 (n = 75). Follow-up was 12 months. RESULTS: Donors were slightly younger in the SRL group (68 vs 71 years; P < 0.05), receptor age (67 vs 65 years) was not significantly different. Patient survival in the MMF group was 88 vs 94% in the SRL group, however, these differences did not reach statistical significance. One-year graft survival censored for death was 83% in the MMF group and 94% in the SRL group. Acute rejection rate was 45% in the MMF and 15% in the SRL group (P < 0.01). The incidence of CNI introduction was higher in the MMF-group (35 vs 5; P < 0.05). The intention-to-treat analysis revealed significant differences of proteinuria [SRL vs MMF at 12 months: 461 (163-6988) vs 270 (53-3029) mg/day], which did not exist in the on-therapy (OT) analysis [SRL vs MMF at 12 months: 357 (199-1428) vs 279 (53-3029) mg/day]. New onset nephrotic range proteinuria seemed to occur slightly more frequently in SRL patients (3/33 vs 1/75; P = 0.049), however, all four cases occurred in a context of recurrent disease, or previous drug-independent damage or non-adherence. All of these patients were converted to CNI. CONCLUSION: SRL-based compared with MMF-based treatment in kidney transplantation with advanced age donors is associated with an acceptable outcome, however, with increased proteinuria in the intention-to-treat analysis. A large subgroup of the patients in the MMF group experienced acute rejection and required conversion to CNI.