Aerosol measurement identifies SARS-CoV 2 PCR positive adults compared with healthy controls.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 is spread primarily through droplets and aerosols. Exhaled aerosols are generated in the upper airways through shear stress and in the lung periphery by 'reopening of collapsed airways'. Aerosol measuring may detect highly contagious individuals ("super spreaders or super-emitters") and discriminate between SARS-CoV-2 infected and non-infected individuals. This is the first study comparing exhaled aerosols in SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals and healthy controls. DESIGN: A prospective observational cohort study in 288 adults, comprising 64 patients testing positive by SARS CoV-2 PCR before enrollment, and 224 healthy adults testing negative (matched control sample) at the University Hospital Frankfurt, Germany, from February to June 2021. Study objective was to evaluate the concentration of exhaled aerosols during physiologic breathing in SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive and -negative subjects. Secondary outcome measures included correlation of aerosol concentration to SARS-CoV-2 PCR results, change in aerosol concentration due to confounders, and correlation between clinical symptoms and aerosol. RESULTS: There was a highly significant difference in respiratory aerosol concentrations between SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive (median 1490.5/L) and -negative subjects (median 252.0/L; p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences due to age, sex, smoking status, or body mass index. ROC analysis showed an AUC of 0.8918. CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of respiratory aerosols were significantly elevated in SARS-CoV-2 positive individuals, which helps to understand the spread and course of respiratory viral infections, as well as the detection of highly infectious individuals.

[Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Role of Aerosol Transmission in SARS-CoV-2 Infections]. / Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven zur Bedeutung der Aerosolübertragung für das Infektionsgeschehen von SARS-CoV-2.

The relevance of aerosols for the transmission of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is still debated. However, over time, in addition to distancing and hygiene rules, aerosol physics-based measures such as wearing face masks and ventilating indoor spaces were found to be efficient in reducing infections. In an interdisciplinary workshop "Aerosol & SARS-CoV-2" of the Association for Aerosol Research (GAeF) in cooperation with the German Society for Pneumology and Respiratory Medicine (DGP), the Professional Association of General Air Technology of the VDMA, the German Society for Virology (GfV), the Health Technology Society (GG) and the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine (ISAM) under the auspices of the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) in March 2021, the need for research and coordination on this topic was addressed. Fundamental findings from the various disciplines as well as interdisciplinary perspectives on aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and infection mitigation measures are summarized here. Finally, open research questions and needs are presented.

Nebulised budesonide using a novel device in patients with oral steroid-dependent asthma.

This phase 2/3 randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial investigated oral corticosteroid (OCS)-sparing efficacy, safety and tolerability of nebulised budesonide (Bud) administered with a novel computer-controlled, compressor-driven inhalation system (AKITA) as add-on therapy to Global Initiative for Asthma step 5. Patients (18-65 years) with OCS-dependent asthma were randomised (2:1:1:1) to receive 18-week, twice-daily, double-blind treatment with AKITA inhaled corticosteroid (AICS)-Bud 1 mg, AICS-Bud 0.5 mg, AICS-placebo or open-label Bud 1 mg administered by conventional nebuliser (CN-Bud). OCS doses were tapered until week 14. 199 patients started treatment. More AICS-Bud 1 mg (80.0%) than placebo-treated (62.5%) patients had daily OCS doses reduced ≥50%, with clinical stability to week 18 (one-sided p=0.02; treatment difference: 17.5% (95% CI 0.1-34.9%), two-sided p=0.04). Mean±sd forced expiratory volume in 1 s improved (from baseline to week 18) for AICS-Bud 1 mg (239±460 mL, p<0.001) and AICS-Bud 0.5 mg (126±345 mL, p=0.01) but not placebo (93±419 mL, p=0.36) or CN-Bud (137±459 mL, p=0.18). Fewer AICS-Bud 1 mg-treated patients experienced asthma exacerbations (7.5%) compared with placebo (17.5%) or CN-Bud (22.5%). All treatments were well tolerated. Budesonide applied with AKITA allowed significant meaningful OCS reduction in OCS-dependent asthma patients while improving pulmonary function and maintaining exacerbation control.

Aerosolized GLP-1 for treatment of diabetes mellitus and irritable bowel syndrome.

Diabetes is a global burden and the prevalence of the disease, in particular diabetes mellitus type 2 is rapidly increasing worldwide. After introduction of insulin into clinical therapy about 90 years ago a major number of pharmaceuticals has been developed for treatment of diabetes mellitus type 2. One of these, the incretin glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), like insulin, needs subcutaneous administration causing inconvenience to patients. However, administration of GLP-1 plays also a role for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). To improve patient convenience inhaled insulin (Exubera(®)) was developed and approved but failed market acceptance some years ago. Recently, another inhalative insulin (Afrezza(®)) received market approval and GLP-1 may serve as another candidate drug for inhalative administration. This review analyzes the current literature investigating alternative administration of GLP-1 and GLP-1 analogs focusing on inhalation. Several formulations for inhalative administration of GLP-1 and analogs were investigated in animal studies, whereas there are only few clinical data. However, feasibility of GLP-1 inhalation has been shown and should be further investigated as such type of drug administration may serve for improvement of therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus or irritable bowel syndrome.

Exhaled aerosols among PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2-infected children.

Background: Available data on aerosol emissions among children and adolescents during spontaneous breathing are limited. Our aim was to gain insight into the role of children in the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and whether aerosol measurements among children can be used to help detect so-called superspreaders-infected individuals with extremely high numbers of exhaled aerosol particles. Methods: In this prospective study, the aerosol concentrations of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive and SARS-CoV-2 PCR-negative children and adolescents (2-17 years) were investigated. All subjects were asked about their current health status and medical history. The exhaled aerosol particle counts of PCR-negative and PCR-positive subjects were measured using the Resp-Aer-Meter (Palas GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) and compared using linear regression. Results: A total of 250 children and adolescents were included in this study, 105 of whom were SARS-CoV-2 positive and 145 of whom were SARS-CoV-2 negative. The median age in both groups was 9 years (IQR 7-11 years). A total of 124 (49.6%) participants were female, and 126 (50.4%) participants were male. A total of 81.9% of the SARS-CoV-2-positive group had symptoms of viral infection. The median particle count of all individuals was 79.55 particles/liter (IQR 44.55-141.15). There was a tendency for older children to exhale more particles (1-5 years: 79.54 p/L; 6-11 years: 77.96 p/L; 12-17 years: 98.63 p/L). SARS-CoV-2 PCR status was not a bivariate predictor (t = 0.82, p = 0.415) of exhaled aerosol particle count; however, SARS-CoV-2 status was shown to be a significant predictor in a multiple regression model together with age, body mass index (BMI), COVID-19 vaccination, and past SARS-CoV-2 infection (t = 2.81, p = 0.005). COVID-19 vaccination status was a highly significant predictor of exhaled aerosol particles (p < .001). Conclusion: During SARS-CoV-2 infection, children and adolescents did not have elevated aerosol levels. In addition, no superspreaders were found.

COVID-19 symptoms are reduced by targeted hydration of the nose, larynx and trachea.

Dehydration of the upper airways increases risks of respiratory diseases from COVID-19 to asthma and COPD. We find in human volunteer studies involving 464 human subjects in Germany, the US, and India that respiratory droplet generation increases by up to 4 orders of magnitude in dehydration-associated states of advanced age (n = 357), elevated BMI-age (n = 148), strenuous exercise (n = 20) and SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 87), and falls with hydration of the nose, larynx and trachea by calcium-rich hypertonic salts. We also find in a protocol of exercise-induced airway dehydration that hydration of the airways by calcium-rich salts increases oxygenation relative to a non-treatment control (P < 0.05). In a random control study of COVID-19 positive subjects (n = 40), thrice-a-day delivery of the calcium-rich hypertonic salts (active) suppressed respiratory droplet generation by 51% ± 11% and increased oxygen saturation over three days of treatment by 48.08% ± 9.61% (P < 0.001), while no changes were observed in the nasal-saline control group. Self-reported symptoms significantly declined in the active group and did not decline in the control group. Hydration of the upper airways appears promising as a non-drug approach for reducing risks of respiratory diseases such as COVID-19.

Breathing Is Enough: For the Spread of Influenza Virus and SARS-CoV-2 by Breathing Only.

Background: The transmission of respiratory viruses such as influenza and corona viruses from one person to another is still not fully understood. Methods: A literature search showed that there is a strong scientific rationale and evidence that viruses are very efficiently spread through aerosols by the patient's breathing only. It is not necessary for the patient to cough or sneeze. Results: The exhaled aerosol particles are generated by normal breathing in the deep lung through reopening of collapsed small airways during inspiration. These mucus/surfactant aerosols (size range between 0.2 and 0.6 µm) can transport viruses out of the lungs of patients and be present in the room air for hours. Conclusion: These aerosol particles are difficult to filter out of the air; because of their physical properties, new strategies must be developed to protect people from these virus aerosols.

Regional Lung Deposition: In Vivo Data.

The method section of this chapter on in vivo regional lung deposition highlights a nonradioactive method to measure regional deposition, which uses a photometer to quantify inhaled and exhaled particles and in that way is able to estimate the lung region from which the particles are exhaled and to what amount. The radioactive methods cover the measurement of clearance of the deposited particles as well as different imaging techniques to determine regional deposition. The result section reviews in vivo trials in human subjects. It also addresses different parameters that influence the regional deposition in the lungs: particle size, inhalation maneuver, carrier gas, disease, and inhalation device. All of these factors can affect regional deposition significantly. By choosing specific values of these parameters, it should be feasible to target different regions of the lungs for the therapy of different diseases.

Deposition, retention, and translocation of ultrafine particles from the central airways and lung periphery.

RATIONALE: Little is known about clearance of ultrafine carbon particles from the different regions of the human lung. These particles may accumulate and present a health hazard because of their high surface area. OBJECTIVES: Technetium Tc 99m ((99m)Tc)-radiolabeled 100-nm-diameter carbon particles were inhaled by healthy nonsmokers, asymptomatic smokers, and by patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: Using a bolus inhalation technique, particle deposition was targeted either to the airways or to the lung periphery, and retention, clearance, and translocation were measured using retained radiotracer imaging. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In vitro studies revealed that mean leaching of soluble (99m)Tc-radiotracer from the carbon particles was 4.1 (2.6 [SD]) % after 24 hours. Cumulative (99m)Tc activity in urine at 24 hours was 1.1 (1.3) % of activity deposited in the lungs. In the lung periphery, particle retention was not affected by smoking or pulmonary disease; retention was 96 (3) % after 24 hours. The small amount of clearance could be attributed to leaching of the (99m)Tc label, suggesting negligible particle clearance. In healthy nonsmokers, retention of particles targeted to the airways was 89 (6) and 75 (10) % after 1.5 and 24 hours, respectively. Radiolabel activity did not accumulate in the liver. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of detection of our experimental system, most inhaled ultrafine carbon particles are retained in the lung periphery and in the conducting airways without substantial systemic translocation or accumulation in the liver at 48 hours. Repeated exposure may result in significant pulmonary accumulation of ultrafine particles.

Targeting intracellular signaling as an antiviral strategy: aerosolized LASAG for the treatment of influenza in hospitalized patients.

Influenza has been a long-running health problem and novel antiviral drugs are urgently needed. In pre-clinical studies, we demonstrated broad antiviral activity of D, L-lysine-acetylsalicylate glycine (LASAG) against influenza virus (IV) in cell culture and protection against lethal challenge in mice. LASAG is a compound with a new antiviral mode of action. It inhibits the NF-κB signal transduction module that is essential for IV replication. Our goal was to determine whether aerosolized LASAG would also show a therapeutic benefit in hospitalized patients suffering from severe influenza. The primary endpoint was time to alleviation of clinical influenza symptoms. The primary analysis was based on the modified intention-to-treat (MITT) population. This included all patients with confirmed influenza virus infection who received at least one treatment. The per protocol (PP) analysis set included all subjects from the MITT population who underwent at least 13 inhalations. In the MITT group, 48 (41.7%) participants (29 LASAG; 19 placebo) had severe influenza. The mean time to symptom alleviation was 56.2 h in the placebo group and 43.0 h in the LASAG group. The PP set consisted of 41 patients (24 LASAG; 17 placebo). The mean time to symptom alleviation in the LASAG group (38.3 h; P = 0.0365) was lower than that in the placebo group (56.2 h). In conclusion, LASAG improved the time to alleviation of influenza symptoms in hospitalized patients. The present phase II proof-of-concept (PoC) study demonstrates that targeting an intra-cellular signaling pathway using aerosolized LASAG improves the time to symptom alleviation compared to standard treatment.

Lung deposition of radiolabeled tiotropium in healthy subjects and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Lung deposition of 18 microg tiotropium administered via a dry-powder inhaler was investigated in 5 healthy subjects and patients with mild (n = 4), moderate (n = 6), and severe (n = 5) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease after 14 days of treatment with 18 microg tiotropium. On day 15, subjects inhaled 2 capsules of radiolabeled tiotropium, and lung deposition was assessed using gamma scintigraphy. Repeated plasma and urine collections were performed on days 14 and 15. Mean delivered dose from the dry-powder inhaler was 45.1%. Mean lung deposition relative to the delivered dose was 42% (19%, relative to nominal dose) with low intersubject variability (20%). Mean extrathoracic deposition was 57.5% (25.8%, relative to nominal dose). There were no significant differences in deposition among the subgroups. No significant correlation between individual tiotropium deposition and lung function was observed. These results suggest that all stages of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease may gain full therapeutic benefit from the drug.

Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics, and Antiviral Activity of BAY 81-8781, a Novel NF-κB Inhibiting Anti-influenza Drug.

Influenza is a respiratory disease that causes annual epidemics. Antiviral treatment options targeting the virus exist, but their efficiency is limited and influenza virus strains easily develop resistance. Thus, new treatment strategies are urgently needed. In the present study, we investigated the anti-influenza virus properties of D,L-lysine acetylsalicylate ⋅ glycine (BAY 81-8781; LASAG) that is approved as Aspirin i.v. for intravenous application. Instead of targeting the virus directly BAY 81-8781 inhibits the activation of the NF-κB pathway, which is required for efficient influenza virus propagation. Using highly pathogenic avian influenza virus strains we could demonstrate that BAY 81-8781 was able to control influenza virus infection in vitro. In the mouse infection model, inhalation of BAY 81-8781 resulted in reduced lung virus titers and protection of mice from lethal infection. Pharmacological studies demonstrated that the oral route of administration was not suitable to reach the sufficient concentrations of BAY 81-8781 for a successful antiviral effect in the lung. BAY 81-8781 treatment of mice infected with influenza virus started as late as 48 h after infection was still effective in protecting 50% of the animals from death. In summary, the data represent a successful proof of the novel innovative antiviral concept of targeting a host cell signaling pathway that is required for viral propagation instead of viral structures.

Patient Focus and Regulatory Considerations for Inhalation Device Design: Report from the 2015 IPAC-RS/ISAM Workshop.

This article reports on discussions at the 2015 workshop cosponsored by the International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation and Science (IPAC-RS) and the International Society for Aerosols in Medicine (ISAM), entitled "Regulatory and Patient Considerations for Inhalation Device Design, Development and Use." Key topics addressed at the workshop and presented here include patient-focused device design for orally inhaled products (OIPs), instructions for use (IFU), human factors, regulatory considerations in the United States and Europe, development of generic inhalers, quality-by-design, and change management of OIP devices. Workshop participants also identified several areas for further consideration and emphasized the need for increased focus on the patient to create therapeutic products (inclusive of device design, IFU, education, training) that support adherence with an individual patient's treatment regimen. Advances in patient-centric product development will require engagement and collaboration by industry, regulators, patients, physicians, and other stakeholders. The article includes summaries of presented talks as well as of panel and audience discussions.

Clinical perspectives on pulmonary systemic and macromolecular delivery.

The large epithelial surface area, the high organ vascularization, the thin nature of the alveolar epithelium and the immense capacity for solute exchange are factors that led the lung to serve as an ideal administration route for the application of drugs for treatment of systemic disorders. However, the deposition behaviour of aerosol particles in the respiratory tract depends on a number of physical (e.g. properties of the particle), chemical (e.g. properties of the drug) and physiological (e.g. breathing pattern, pulmonary diseases) factors. If these are not considered, it will not be possible to deposit a reproducible and sufficient amount of drug in a predefined lung region by means of aerosol inhalation. The lack of consideration of such issues led to many problems in inhalation drug therapy for many years mainly because physiological background of aerosol inhalation was not fully understood. However, over the last 20 years, there has been considerable progress in aerosol research and in the understanding of the underlying mechanisms of particle inhalation and pulmonary particle deposition. As a consequence, an increasing number of studies have been performed for the lung administration of drugs using a variety of different inhalation techniques. This review describes the physical and in part some of the physiological requirements that need to be considered for the optimization of pulmonary drug delivery to target certain lung regions.

Delivery of Alpha-1 Antitrypsin to Airways.

Treatment with exogenous alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT), a potent serine protease inhibitor, was developed originally for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease associated with AAT deficiency; however, other lung conditions involving neutrophilic inflammation and proteolytic tissue injury related to neutrophil elastase and other serine proteases may also be considered for AAT therapy. These conditions include bronchiectasis caused by primary ciliary dyskinesia, cystic fibrosis, and other diseases associated with an increased free elastase activity in the airways. Inhaled AAT may be a viable option to counteract proteolytic tissue damage. This form of treatment requires efficient drug delivery to the targeted pulmonary compartment. Aerosol technology meeting this requirement is currently available and offers an alternative therapeutic approach to systemic AAT administration. To date, early studies in humans have shown biochemical efficacy and have established the safety of inhaled AAT. However, to bring aerosol AAT therapy to patients, large phase 3 protocols in carefully selected patient populations (i.e., subgroups of patients with AAT deficiency, cystic fibrosis, or other lung diseases with bronchiectasis) will be needed with clinical end points in addition to the measurement of proteolytic activity in the airway. The outcomes likely will have to include lung function, lung structure assessed by computed tomography imaging, disease exacerbations, health status, and mortality.

The physical and biological doses of methacholine are different for Mefar MB3 and Jaeger APS sidestream nebulizers.

BACKGROUND: Within a study on respiratory symptoms in rural areas, we used the European Community Respiratory Health Survey methacholine challenge protocol. For quicker and more reliable handling, we had to change the nebulizer in the bronchial challenge system from Mefar model MB3 (Bovezzo, Italy) to Jaeger APS Sidestream (similar to Mefar; Würzburg, Germany). Therefore, we compared the physical properties of the two systems, adapted the challenge protocol, and compared the results of both systems in subjects with and without airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine. METHOD: The physical properties of both systems were characterized by the residual method indicating a similar particle size distribution and an average output of 6 muL/s for Mefar MB3 and 1.25 muL/s for APS Sidestream. In the comparison study, 34 subjects were included. Airway responsiveness was quantified by provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV(1). RESULTS: A significant difference was found between the two challenge systems (p =0.004, McNemar test). Nine subjects reached a 20% drop in FEV(1) with the APS Sidestream only. The FEV(1) dropped by > 20% using either system in eight subjects. In 17 subjects, none of the two systems caused a 20% decrease in FEV(1). CONCLUSION: Even if the physical dose is determined with elaborate methods, the biological dose may vary between two nebulizer systems, causing incomparable outcomes for subjects tested with different systems.

In vitro and in vivo dose delivery characteristics of large porous particles for inhalation.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo dose delivery characteristics of two large porous particle placebo formulations with different mass median aerodynamic diameters (MMAD approximately equal to 3 and 5 microm). In vitro dose delivery characteristics were measured using the multistage liquid impinger (MSLI). In vitro lung deposition was predicted by calculating the extrathoracic deposition using the ICRP model, with the remaining fraction assumed to deposit in the lungs. Healthy subjects were trained to inhale through the AIR delivery system at a target peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) of 60 l/min, The in vivo dose delivery of large porous particles were obtained by gamma-scintigraphy and was characterized by high ( approximately 90%), reproducible emitted doses for both the small and large MMAD powders. The mean in vivo lung deposition relative to the total metered dose were 59.0 and 37.3% for 3 and 5 microm MMAD powders, respectively. The AIR delivery system produced high in vivo lung deposition and low intersubject CVs (approximately 14%) across the range of PIFRs obtained in the study (50-80 l/min), This is relative to a variety of dry powder inhalers (DPI) that have been published in the literature, with in vivo lung deposition ranging from 13 to 35% with intersubject CVs ranging from 17 to 50%. The ICRP model provided a good estimate of the mean in vivo lung deposition for both powders. Intersubject variability was not captured by the ICRP model due to intersubject differences in the morphology and physiology of the oropharyngeal region. The ICRP model was used to predict the regional lung deposition, although these predictions were only considered speculative in the absence of experimental validation.

The inhalation manager: a new computer-based device to assess inhalation technique and drug delivery to the patient.

The rational choice of an inhalation device is a cornerstone in the effective management of asthma and COPD. In this publication, we describe the development of a new system, the Inhalation Manager, which, for the first time, offers the possibility to assess the entire inhalation maneuver of patients using original devices under everyday conditions. So far the Inhalation Manager allows the measurement of inspiratory maneuvers of patients through placebo inhalation devices of the most common breath-actuated CFC-free inhalers in the market for the three main glucocorticosteroids Budesonide [Turbohaler (TH), dry powder inhaler (DPI)], Beclomethasone dipropionate [Autohaler (AH), breath-actuated pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI)], and Fluticasone propionate [Diskus (DI), DPI] by means of a pneumotachometer. In addition, it allows allocation of the individual maneuver to the expected drug delivery values (mass output and particle size distribution) of these three devices. In a field trial, the inhalation technique of 628 (TH), 794 (AH), and 795 (DI) patients, respectively, was tested in 72 pulmonologist practices with the Inhalation Manager. For patients in the 18-59-year-old group, the Inhalation Manager detected the following percentages needing improvement: 1.5% for the Autohaler device, 16.7% for the Diskus, and 38.9% for the Turbohaler. In the 60-99-year-old group, percentages needing improvement were 1.5%, 31.5%, and 66.1% for the Autohaler, Diskus, and Turbohaler, respectively. Therefore, the Inhalation Manager could become an essential tool in asthma management by finding the most suitable inhaler for an individual patient and by training the optimal inhalation technique.

Targeting delivery of aerosols to different lung regions.

With the increasing use of aerosolized drugs, there is a need to understand the means by which these drugs can most effectively be targeted to desired regions of the lung. Several attempts have been made at targeting aerosols in the lung by changing particle sizes and breathing patterns with varying degrees of success. Recent use of such techniques as shallow, aerosol bolus delivery and extremely slow inhalations of aerosols in diagnostic lung tests may also prove beneficial for targeting drug delivery to the conducting airways. This review discusses the potential for utilizing aerosol delivery techniques for selectively targeting aerosol deposition along both serial and parallel pathways in the lung. Based on a review of previous studies concerning factors that determine aerosol and gas distribution in the lung, the potential for utilizing various breathing techniques in concert with variations in particle sizes are considered. Further research on the factors that determine distribution of aerosol in the diseased lung may help in designing successful targeting strategies for the future.

Bioequivalence of inhaled drugs: fundamentals, challenges and perspectives.

Interest in bioequivalence (BE) of inhaled drugs derives largely from the desire to offer generic substitutes to successful drug products. The complexity of aerosol dosage forms renders them difficult to mimic and raises questions regarding definitions of similarities and those properties that must be controlled to guarantee both the quality and the efficacy of the product. Despite a high level of enthusiasm to identify and control desirable properties there is no clear guidance, regulatory or scientific, for the variety of aerosol dosage forms, on practical measures of BE from which products can be developed. As more data on the pharmaceutical and clinical relevance of various techniques, as described in this review, become available, it is likely that a path to the demonstration of BE will become evident. In the meantime, debate on this topic will continue.