Targeted Temperature Management in Postresuscitation Care After Incorporating Results of the TTM2 Trial.

Cardiac arrest still accounts for a substantial proportion of cardiovascular related deaths and is associated with a tremendous risk of neurological injury and, among the few survivors, poor quality of life. Critical determinants of survival and long-term functional status after cardiac arrest are timely initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and use of an external defibrillator for patients with a shockable rhythm. Outcomes are still far from satisfactory, despite ongoing efforts to improve cardiac arrest response systems, as well as elaborate postresuscitation algorithms. Targeted temperature management at the wide range between 32 °C and 36 °C has been one of the main therapeutic strategies to improve neurological outcome in postresuscitation care. This recommendation has been mainly based on 2 small randomized trials that were published 20 years ago. Most recent data derived from the TTM2 (Targeted Hypothermia Versus Targeted Normothermia After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest) trial, which included 1861 patients, challenge this strategy. It showed no benefit of targeted hypothermia at 33 °C over normothermia at 36 °C to 37.5 °C with fever prevention. Because temperature management at lower temperatures also correlated with an increased risk of side effects without any benefit in the TTM2 trial, a modification of the guidelines with harmonizing temperature management to normothermia might be necessary.

Telemedical cardiac risk assessment by implantable cardiac monitors in patients after myocardial infarction with autonomic dysfunction (SMART-MI-DZHK9): a prospective investigator-initiated, randomised, multicentre, open-label, diagnostic trial.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac autonomic dysfunction after myocardial infarction identifies patients at high risk despite only moderately reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. We aimed to show that telemedical monitoring with implantable cardiac monitors in these patients can improve early detection of subclinical but prognostically relevant arrhythmic events. METHODS: We did a prospective investigator-initiated, randomised, multicentre, open-label, diagnostic trial at 33 centres in Germany and Austria. Survivors of acute myocardial infarction with left ventricular ejection fraction of 36-50% had biosignal analysis for assessment of cardiac autonomic function. Patients with abnormal periodic repolarisation dynamics (≥5·75 deg2) or abnormal deceleration capacity (≤2·5 ms) were randomly assigned (1:1) to telemedical monitoring with implantable cardiac monitors or conventional follow-up. Primary endpoint was time to detection of serious arrhythmic events defined by atrial fibrillation 6 min or longer, atrioventricular block class IIb or higher and fast non-sustained (>187 beats per min; ≥40 beats) or sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02594488. FINDINGS: Between May 12, 2016, and July 20, 2020, 1305 individuals were screened and 400 patients at high risk were randomly assigned (median age 64 years [IQR 57-73]); left ventricular ejection fraction 45% [40-48]) to telemedical monitoring with implantable cardiac monitors (implantable cardiac monitor group; n=201) or conventional follow-up (control group; n=199). During median follow-up of 21 months, serious arrhythmic events were detected in 60 (30%) patients of the implantable cardiac monitor group and 12 (6%) patients of the control group (hazard ratio 6·33 [IQR 3·40-11·78]; p<0·001). An improved detection rate by implantable cardiac monitors was observed for all types of serious arrhythmic events: atrial fibrillation 6 min or longer (47 [23%] patients vs 11 [6%] patients; p<0·001), atrioventricular block class IIb or higher (14 [7%] vs 0; p<0·001) and ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (nine [4%] patients vs two [1%] patients; p=0·054). INTERPRETATION: In patients at high risk after myocardial infarction and cardiac autonomic dysfunction but only moderately reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, telemedical monitoring with implantable cardiac monitors was highly effective in early detection of subclinical, prognostically relevant serious arrhythmic events. FUNDING: German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) and Medtronic Bakken Research Center.

Effect of acute altitude exposure on ventilatory thresholds in recreational athletes.

PURPOSE: High altitude (HA) training is frequently used in endurance sports and recreational athletes increasingly participate in cross mountain competitions. At high altitude aerobic physiology changes profoundly. Ventilatory thresholds (VTs) are measures for endurance performance but the impact of exposure to acute altitude (AA) on VTs in recreational athletes has been insufficiently explored to date and most studies investigated effects under normobaric hypoxia. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study we investigated the effects of AA exposure at 2650 m/715 mbar on anerobic threshold (VT1) and respiratory compensation point (VT2) in a graded cycling test in 14 recreational athletes (4 female, 10 male) compared to baseline levels (521 m, 949 mbar). RESULTS: At VT1, a decline in power output (PO) from median 115.5 W to 105.0 W (median -12.3 %, p = 0.032; Wilcoxon test) during exposure to HA was observed. VO2/body weight and VO2/heart rate decreased markedly (- 9.5 %, p = 0.016; -10.5 %, p = 0.012). At VT2 we found a significant decline of PO from 184.5-170.5 W (-13.1 %, p = 0.0014), of VO2/body weight and of VO2/heart rate (-10.1 %, p = 0.0015; -8.7 %, p = 0.002) compared to baseline values. Absolute VO2 decreased (-9.5 %, p = 0.0014 and -10.1 %, p = 0.0002) while minute ventilation and heart rates remained unchanged at both thresholds. CONCLUSION: Our data allows a quantification of performance loss at HA in recreational athletes and demonstrates that VT-guided training intensities and workloads need to be adapted for training at HA.

Cognitive Impairment is Associated with Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of cognitive impairment in hemodialysis patients is notably high. In previous studises performed in the general population, cognitive impairment has been associated with increased mortality. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the relationship between global cognitive function tested by a short screening instrument and mortality in hemodialysis patients. METHODS: Cognitive testing was performed in 242 maintenance hemodialysis patients under standardized conditions at baseline using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).Cognitive impairment was defined as a MoCA test score ≤24 points, as published previously. All-cause mortality was monitored during a median follow-up of 3.54 years. Kaplan-Meier plot and Cox regression model adjusted for known risk factors for mortality in hemodialysis patients were used to examine a possible association between global cognitive function and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A MoCA test score ≤24 points resulted in a significant almost 3-fold higher hazard for all-cause mortality (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 2.812; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.683-4.698; p < 0.001). After adjustment, this association was attenuated but remained significant (adjusted HR: 1.749; 95% CI: 1.007-3.038; p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: Impairment of global cognitive function measured by a short screening instrument was identified for the first time as an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in hemodialysis patients. Thus, implementing the MoCA test in clinical routine could contribute to a better risk stratification of this patient population.