RESUMO
The characteristics of spontaneous aerobic Gram-negative bacillary meningitis (AGNBM) were determined in 40 adults requiring admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) during a 16-year period in ten French ICUs. Eight infections were hospital-acquired and most patients had predisposing factors, mainly chronic alcoholism and an immunocompromised status. Three immunosuppressed patients had disseminated strongyloidiasis. Gram's stain, cerebrospinal fluid and blood cultures were positive for 85%, 98% and 80% of cases, respectively. Escherichia coli (57%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (17%) were the most frequent pathogens. In-ICU mortality was 38%. Spontaneous AGNBM is a rare complication of bacteraemia in adults. The severity of predisposing underlying diseases might explain the poor prognosis despite appropriate antimicrobial therapy.
Assuntos
Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/etiologia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Meningites Bacterianas/etiologia , Adulto , Aerobiose , Alcoolismo , Bacteriemia/complicações , Líquido Cefalorraquidiano/microbiologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas , Infecção Hospitalar/etiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/mortalidade , Suscetibilidade a Doenças , Escherichia coli/isolamento & purificação , Feminino , França , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/diagnóstico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/microbiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/mortalidade , Humanos , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Masculino , Meningites Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Meningites Bacterianas/microbiologia , Meningites Bacterianas/mortalidade , Mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estrongiloidíase/complicaçõesRESUMO
Fever is a common symptom of sepsis usually believed to predict better survival. Experimental data suggest that body temperature elevation may slow micro-organism growth and enhance host immune responses. In patients with sepsis, however, the high energy cost of fever may exacerbate the life-threatening situation. Fever control is widely used in the ICU, mainly in patients with infections. The efficacy of antipyretic drugs in lowering body temperature remains uncertain, however, and all antipyretics have well known adverse effects. Surface cooling methods are efficient but require sedation to avoid the harmful effects of shivering. A recent controlled trial in patients with septic shock suggests that external cooling for fever control may diminish vasopressor requirements and improve early survival. In this review, we examine the benefits and risks of fever and of controlled normothermia. The fever control modalities that provide the best risk/benefit ratio in sepsis are discussed.
Assuntos
Antipiréticos/uso terapêutico , Febre/etiologia , Sepse/complicações , Antipiréticos/efeitos adversos , Febre/fisiopatologia , Febre/terapia , Humanos , Imunidade/fisiologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Sepse/microbiologia , Sepse/fisiopatologia , Sepse/terapiaAssuntos
Doenças dos Nervos Cranianos/etiologia , Legionelose/complicações , Abscesso Pulmonar/etiologia , Idoso , Doenças dos Nervos Cranianos/complicações , Doenças dos Nervos Cranianos/diagnóstico , Infecção Hospitalar/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Legionelose/diagnóstico , Abscesso Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Paralisia/complicações , Paralisia/diagnóstico , Paralisia/etiologiaRESUMO
Renal-replacement therapies are among the most invasive techniques used in the intensive-care units. An increased security of these methods can be expected from interventions on several areas. Teaching and training are probably the more important due to the complexity of both techniques and devices. The interest and the limits of the monitoring techniques need to be known as well as the guidelines for an optimal ordering. As often, a set of written procedures must ideally be constructed by the ICU team then learned and periodically revised.
Assuntos
Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/normas , Terapia de Substituição Renal/normas , Gestão da Segurança/normas , Injúria Renal Aguda/terapia , Cateterismo/normas , Protocolos Clínicos , Edema/diagnóstico , Edema/etiologia , Edema/prevenção & controle , Fibrinolíticos/administração & dosagem , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Controle de Formulários e Registros , França , Soluções para Hemodiálise/administração & dosagem , Soluções para Hemodiálise/normas , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/organização & administração , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Prontuários Médicos/normas , Membranas Artificiais , Recursos Humanos em Hospital/educação , Prescrições , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Terapia de Substituição Renal/efeitos adversos , Terapia de Substituição Renal/instrumentação , Terapia de Substituição Renal/métodos , Medição de Risco , Gestão da Segurança/organização & administração , Sociedades Médicas , UltrafiltraçãoRESUMO
A case of limbic encephalitis in a patient who had undergone prolonged immunosuppressive treatment with i.v. cyclophosphamide and oral prednisolone for a microscopic polyangeitis is reported. A brain MRI scan revealed symmetric mesial temporal lobe lesions. Studies of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) revealed a positive PCR for varicella-zoster virus (VZV) DNA in 2 separate samples. Owing to a delay in diagnosis, intravenous acyclovir was initiated only after 11 d of symptoms. PCR of CSF for VZV DNA became negative on day 14 of treatment while brain lesions had resolved on subsequent MRI scans. Limbic encephalitis is a novel form of VZV infection. When brain imaging is suggestive of limbic encephalitis in an immunocompromised patient, PCR of CSF for VZV DNA should be performed, as early antiviral treatment may improve the outcome.
Assuntos
Encefalite por Varicela Zoster/diagnóstico , Herpesvirus Humano 3/isolamento & purificação , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Encefalite Límbica/diagnóstico , Aciclovir/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , DNA Viral/líquido cefalorraquidiano , Encefalite por Varicela Zoster/líquido cefalorraquidiano , Encefalite por Varicela Zoster/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Encefalite Límbica/líquido cefalorraquidiano , Encefalite Límbica/tratamento farmacológico , MasculinoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hydroxyethylstarch used for volume restoration in brain-dead kidney donors has been associated with impaired kidney function in the transplant recipients. We undertook a multicentre randomised study to assess the frequency of acute renal failure (ARF) in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock treated with hydroxyethylstarch or gelatin. METHODS: Adults with severe sepsis or septic shock were enrolled prospectively in three intensive-care units in France. They were randomly assigned 6% hydroxyethylstarch (200 kDa, 0.60-0.66 substitution) or 3% fluid-modified gelatin. The primary endpoint was ARF (a two-fold increase in serum creatinine from baseline or need for renal replacement therapy). Analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: 129 patients were enrolled over 18 months. Severity of illness and serum creatinine (median 143 [IQR 88-203] vs 114 [91-175] micromol/L) were similar at baseline in the hydroxyethylstarch and gelatin groups. The frequencies of ARF (27/65 [42%] vs 15/64 [23%], p=0.028) and oliguria (35/62 [56%] vs 23/63 [37%], p=0.025) and the peak serum creatinine concentration (225 [130-339] vs 169 [106-273] micromol/L, p=0.04) were significantly higher in the hydroxyethylstarch group than in the gelatin group. In a multivariate analysis, risk factors for acute renal failure included mechanical ventilation (odds ratio 4.02 [95% CI 1.37-11.8], p=0.013) and use of hydroxyethylstarch (2.57 [1.13-5.83], p=0.026). INTERPRETATIONS: The use of this preparation of hydroxyethylstarch as a plasma-volume expander is an independent risk factor for ARF in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.
Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/induzido quimicamente , Gelatina/efeitos adversos , Derivados de Hidroxietil Amido/efeitos adversos , Substitutos do Plasma/efeitos adversos , Sepse/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Hidratação/efeitos adversos , Hidratação/métodos , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Estudos Prospectivos , Risco , Sepse/complicações , Sepse/mortalidade , Choque Séptico/complicações , Choque Séptico/mortalidade , Choque Séptico/terapia , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
CONTEXT: Invasive life-support techniques are a major risk factor for nosocomial infection. Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) can be used to avoid endotracheal intubation and may reduce morbidity among patients in intensive care units (ICUs). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the use of NIV is associated with decreased risk of nosocomial infections and improved survival in everyday clinical practice among patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or hypercapnic cardiogenic pulmonary edema (CPE). DESIGN AND SETTING: Matched case-control study conducted in the medical ICU of a French university hospital from January 1996 through March 1998. PATIENTS: Fifty patients with acute exacerbation of COPD or severe CPE who were treated with NIV for at least 2 hours and 50 patients treated with mechanical ventilation between 1993 and 1998 (controls), matched on diagnosis, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Logistic Organ Dysfunction score, age, and no contraindication to NIV. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of nosocomial infections, antibiotic use, lengths of ventilatory support and of ICU stay, ICU mortality, compared between cases and controls. RESULTS: Rates of nosocomial infections and of nosocomial pneumonia were significantly lower in patients who received NIV than those treated with mechanical ventilation (18% vs 60% and 8% vs 22%; P<.001 and P =.04, respectively). Similarly, the daily risk of acquiring an infection (19 vs 39 episodes per 1000 patient-days; P =.05), proportion of patients receiving antibiotics for nosocomial infection (8% vs 26%; P =.01), mean (SD) duration of ventilation (6 [6] vs 10 [12] days; P =.01), mean (SD) length of ICU stay (9 [7] vs 15 [14] days; P =.02), and crude mortality (4% vs 26%; P =.002) were all lower among patients who received NIV than those treated with mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: Use of NIV instead of mechanical ventilation is associated with a lower risk of nosocomial infections, less antibiotic use, shorter length of ICU stay, and lower mortality. JAMA. 2000;284:2361-2367.
Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/etiologia , Pneumopatias Obstrutivas/terapia , Respiração com Pressão Positiva , Edema Pulmonar/terapia , APACHE , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estado Terminal , Infecção Hospitalar/complicações , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Tempo de Internação , Pneumopatias Obstrutivas/complicações , Pneumopatias Obstrutivas/mortalidade , Masculino , Máscaras , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Respiração com Pressão Positiva/efeitos adversos , Respiração com Pressão Positiva/métodos , Edema Pulmonar/complicações , Edema Pulmonar/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Risco , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
Poor hemodynamic tolerance of intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) is a common problem for patients in an intensive care unit (ICU). New dialysis strategies have been adapted to chronic hemodialysis patients with cardiovascular insufficiency. To improve hemodynamic tolerance of IHD, specific guidelines were progressively implemented into practice through the year 1996 in our 26-bed medical ICU. To evaluate the efficiency of these guidelines we retrospectively compared all IHD performed during the years before (1995) and after (1997) implementation of these recommendations. Forty-five patients underwent 248 IHD sessions in 1995 and 76 patients underwent 289 IHD sessions in 1997. The two populations were similar for age, sex, chronic hemodialysis (26% versus 17%), and secondary acute renal failure. In 1997, patients were more severely ill with a higher SAPS II (50 +/- 17 versus 59 +/- 24; p = 0.036), and more patients required epinephrine or norepinephrine infusion before dialysis sessions (16% versus 34%; p < 0.0001). The compliance to guidelines was high, inducing a significant change in IHD modalities. As a result, hemodynamic tolerance was significantly better in 1997, with less systolic blood pressure drop at onset (33% versus 21%, p = 0. 002) and during the sessions (68% versus 56%, p = 0.002). IHD with hypotensive episode or need for therapeutic interventions were less frequent in 1997 (71% versus 61%, p = 0.015). The ICU mortality was similar (53.3% in 1995 versus 47.3% in 1997; p = 0.52) but death rate in 1997, but not in 1995, was significantly less than predicted from SAPS II (47.3% versus 65.6%; p = 0.02). Length of ICU stay was also reduced for survivors in 1997 (p = 0.04). Implementation of practice guidelines for intermittent hemodialysis in ICU patients lessens hemodynamic instability and may improve outcome.
Assuntos
Estado Terminal/terapia , Hemodinâmica , Diálise Renal , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como AssuntoRESUMO
CONTEXT: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is widely used in the belief that it may reduce the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory insufficiency. OBJECTIVE: To compare the physiologic effects and the clinical efficacy of CPAP vs standard oxygen therapy in patients with acute hypoxemic, nonhypercapnic respiratory insufficiency. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Randomized, concealed, and unblinded trial of 123 consecutive adult patients who were admitted to 6 intensive care units between September 1997 and January 1999 with a PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio of 300 mm Hg or less due to bilateral pulmonary edema (n = 102 with acute lung injury and n = 21 with cardiac disease). INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive oxygen therapy alone (n = 61) or oxygen therapy plus CPAP (n = 62). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Improvement in PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio, rate of endotracheal intubation at any time during the study, adverse events, length of hospital stay, mortality, and duration of ventilatory assistance, compared between the CPAP and standard treatment groups. RESULTS: Among the CPAP vs standard therapy groups, respectively, causes of respiratory failure (pneumonia, 54% and 55%), presence of cardiac disease (33% and 35%), severity at admission, and hypoxemia (median [5th-95th percentile] PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio, 140 [59-288] mm Hg vs 148 [62-283] mm Hg; P =.43) were similarly distributed. After 1 hour of treatment, subjective responses to treatment (P<.001) and median (5th-95th percentile) PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratios were greater with CPAP (203 [45-431] mm Hg vs 151 [73-482] mm Hg; P =.02). No further difference in respiratory indices was observed between the groups. Treatment with CPAP failed to reduce the endotracheal intubation rate (21 [34%] vs 24 [39%] in the standard therapy group; P =.53), hospital mortality (19 [31%] vs 18 [30%]; P =.89), or median (5th-95th percentile) intensive care unit length of stay (6.5 [1-57] days vs 6.0 [1-36] days; P =.43). A higher number of adverse events occurred with CPAP treatment (18 vs 6; P =.01). CONCLUSION: In this study, despite early physiologic improvement, CPAP neither reduced the need for intubation nor improved outcomes in patients with acute hypoxemic, nonhypercapnic respiratory insufficiency primarily due to acute lung injury. JAMA. 2000;284:2352-2360.