Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Infect Dis ; 225(5): 768-776, 2022 03 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34850051

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We determined the burden of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in air and on surfaces in rooms of patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and investigated patient characteristics associated with SARS-CoV-2 environmental contamination. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal swabs, surface, and air samples were collected from the rooms of 78 inpatients with COVID-19 at 6 acute care hospitals in Toronto from March to May 2020. Samples were tested for SARS-CoV-2 ribonucleic acid (RNA), cultured to determine potential infectivity, and whole viral genomes were sequenced. Association between patient factors and detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in surface samples were investigated. RESULTS: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 RNA was detected from surfaces (125 of 474 samples; 42 of 78 patients) and air (3 of 146 samples; 3 of 45 patients); 17% (6 of 36) of surface samples from 3 patients yielded viable virus. Viral sequences from nasopharyngeal and surface samples clustered by patient. Multivariable analysis indicated hypoxia at admission, polymerase chain reaction-positive nasopharyngeal swab (cycle threshold of ≤30) on or after surface sampling date, higher Charlson comorbidity score, and shorter time from onset of illness to sampling date were significantly associated with detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in surface samples. CONCLUSIONS: The infrequent recovery of infectious SARS-CoV-2 virus from the environment suggests that the risk to healthcare workers from air and near-patient surfaces in acute care hospital wards is likely limited.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Nasofaringe/virologia , Aerossóis e Gotículas Respiratórios , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Adulto , Idoso , Microbiologia do Ar , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/transmissão , Teste de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , Canadá/epidemiologia , Exposição Ambiental , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2/genética
2.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 42(8): 1001-1003, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33203496

RESUMO

To compare sensitivity of specimens for COVID-19 diagnosis, we tested 151 nasopharyngeal/midturbinate swab pairs from 117 COVID-19 inpatients using reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Sensitivity was 94% for nasopharyngeal and 75% for midturbinate swabs (P = .0001). In 88 nasopharyngeal/midturbinate pairs with matched saliva, sensitivity was 86% for nasopharyngeal swabs and 88% for combined midturbinate swabs/saliva.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Teste para COVID-19 , Humanos , Nasofaringe , Saliva , Manejo de Espécimes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA