Converting to reverse shoulder arthroplasty from primary anatomic shoulder arthroplasty and fracture hemiarthroplasty: a radiographic and clinical outcome analysis at 8-years.

INTRODUCTION: Revision shoulder arthroplasty can be challenging. One of the main considerations for surgeons is the type of implant that was placed in the initial surgery. Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty (ASA) is used for cases of osteoarthritis as well as for fractures of the humeral head. Hemiarthroplasty can be used for complex proximal humerus fractures. The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a difference in clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients that failed primary fracture hemiarthroplasty (FHA), or ASA for osteoarthritis and then required reoperation with a conversion to reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). METHODS: Patients with failed anatomic shoulder replacement, who had undergone conversion to RSA, were enrolled after a mean follow-up of 107 (85-157) months. Two different groups, one with failed ASA implanted for osteoarthritis and one with failed FHA, were created. At follow-up patients were assessed with standard radiographs and clinical outcome scores. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (f = 17, m = 12; 51%) suffered from a failed ASA (Group A), while the remaining 28 patients (f = 21, m = 74; 49%) had been revised due to a failed FHA (Group B). Patients of Group B had a poorer Constant score (Group A: 60 vs. Group B: 46; p = 0.02). Abduction (Group A: 115° vs. Group B: 89°; p = 0.02) was worse after conversion of a failed FHA to RSA in comparison to conversions of failed ASA. The mean bone loss of the lateral metaphysis was higher in patients with failed FHA (Group A: 5 mm vs. Group B: 20 mm; p = 0.0). CONCLUSION: The initial indication for anatomic shoulder arthroplasty influences the clinical and radiological outcome after conversion to RSA. Conversion of failed FHA to RSA is related to an increased metaphyseal bone loss, decreased range of motion and poorer clinical outcomes when compared to conversions of failed ASA implanted for osteoarthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III Retrospective Cohort Comparison Study.

Treatment of proximal humerus fractures using reverse shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical outcome and tuberosity healing?

INTRODUCTION: The employment of reverse shoulder arthroplasty for dislocated proximal humerus fractures of elderly patients becomes increasingly relevant. The standard inclination angle of the humeral component was 155°. Lately, there is a trend towards smaller inclination angles of 145° or 135°. Additionally, there has been an increased focus on the lateralization of the glenosphere. This retrospective comparative study evaluates clinical and radiological results of patients treated for proximal humerus fractures by reverse shoulder arthroplasty with different inclination angles of the humeral component, which was either 135° or 155°. Additionally, a different lateral offset of the glenosphere, which was either 0 mm or 4 mm, was used. METHODS: For this retrospective comparative analysis, 58 out of 66 patients treated by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures were included. The minimum follow-up was 24 months. Thirty (m = 3, f = 27; mean age 78 years; mean FU 35 months, range 24-58 months) were treated with a standard 155° humeral component and a glenosphere without lateral offset (group A), while 28 patients (m = 2, f = 26; mean age 79 years; mean FU 30 months, range 24-46 months) were treated with a 135° humeral component and a glenosphere with a 4 mm lateral offset (group B). We determined range of motion, Constant score, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder score as clinical outcomes and evaluated tuberosity healing as well as scapula notching. RESULTS: Neither forward flexion (A = 128°, B = 121°; p = 0.710) nor abduction (A = 111°, B = 106°; p = 0.327) revealed differences between the groups. The mean Constant Score rated 63 in group A, while it was 61 in group B (p = 0.350). There were no differences of the ASES Score between the groups (A = 74, B = 72; p = 0.270). There was an increased risk for scapula notching in group A (47%) in comparison to group B (4%, p = 0.001). Healing of the greater tuberosity was achieved in 57% of group A and in 75% of group B (p = 0.142). The healing rate of the lesser tuberosity measured 33% in group A and 71% in group B (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Both inclination angles of the humeral component are feasible options for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients. Neither the inclination angle nor the lateral offset of the glenosphere seem to have a relevant influence on the clinical outcome. The healing rate of the lesser tuberosity was higher in implants with a decreased neck-shaft angle. There is an increased risk for scapula notching, if a higher inclination angle of the humeral component is chosen. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. Retrospective comparative study.

Treating cuff tear arthropathy by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical and the radiological outcome?

PURPOSE: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is widely used for the treatment of cuff tear arthropathy. Standard implants consist of a humeral component with an inclination angle of 155° and a glenosphere without lateral offset. Recently, lower inclination angles of the humeral component as well as lateralized glenospheres are implanted to provide better rotation of the arm and to decrease the rate of scapular notching. This study investigates the clinical and radiological results of a standard reverse total shoulder in comparison with an implant with an inclination angle of 135° in combination with a 4 mm lateralized glenosphere in context of cuff tear arthropathy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For this retrospective comparative analysis 42 patients treated by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy were included. Twenty-one patients (m = 11, f = 10; mean age 76 years; mean follow-up 42 months) were treated with a standard 155° humeral component and a standard glenosphere with caudal eccentricity (group A), while twenty-one patients (m = 5, f = 16; mean age 72 years; mean follow-up 34 months) were treated with a 135° humeral component and 4 mm lateral offset of the glenosphere (group B). At follow-up patients of both groups were assessed with plain X-rays (a.p. and axial view), Constant Score, adjusted Constant Score, the subjective shoulder value and the range of motion. RESULTS: The clinical results were similar in both groups concerning the Constant Score (group A = 56.3 vs. group B = 56.1; p = 0.733), the adjusted CS (group A = 70.4% vs. group B = 68.3%; p = 0.589) and the SSV (group A = 72.0% vs. group B = 75.2%; p = 0.947). The range of motion of the operated shoulders did not differ significantly between group A and group B: Abduction = 98° versus 97.9°, p = 0.655; external rotation with the arm at side = 17.9° versus 18.7°, p = 0.703; external rotation with the arm positioned in 90° of abduction = 22.3° versus 24.7°, p = 0.524; forward flexion = 116.1° versus 116.7°, p = 0.760. The rate of scapular notching was higher (p = 0.013) in group A (overall: 66%, grade 1: 29%, grade 2: 29%, grade 3: 10%, grade 4: 0%) in comparison to group B (overall: 33%, grade 1: 33%, grade 2: 0%, grade 3: 0%, grade 4: 0%). Radiolucency around the humeral component was detected in two patients of group B. Stress shielding at the proximal humerus was observed in six patients of Group A (29%; cortical thinning and osteopenia in zone M1 and L1) and two patients of group B (10%; cortical thinning and osteopenia in zone M1 and L1). Calcifications of the triceps origin were observed in both groups (group A = 48% vs. group B = 38%). CONCLUSION: Theoretically, a lower inclination angle of the humeral component and an increased lateral offset of the glenosphere lead to improved impingement-free range of motion and a decreased rate of scapular notching, when compared to a standard reverse total shoulder implant. This study compared two different designs of numerous options concerning the humeral component and the glenosphere. In comparison to a standard-fashioned implant with a humeral inclination of 155° and a standard glenosphere, implants with a humeral inclination angle of 135° and a 4 mm lateralized glenosphere lead to comparable clinical results and rotatory function, while the rate of scapular notching is decreased by almost 50%. While the different implant designs did not affect the clinical outcome, our results indicate that a combination of a lower inclination angle of the humeral component and lateralized glenosphere should be favored to reduce scapular notching. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Complications in TLIF spondylodesis-do they influence the outcome for patients? A prospective two-center study.

PURPOSE: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a widely accepted surgical procedure for degenerative disk disease. While numerous studies have analyzed complication rates and risk factors this study investigates the extent to which complications after TLIF spondylodesis alter the clinical outcome regarding pain and physical function. METHODS: A prospective clinical two-center study was conducted, including 157 patients undergoing TLIF spondylodesis with 12-month follow-up (FU). Our study classified complications into three subgroups: none (I), minor (IIa), and major complications (IIb). Complications were considered "major" if revision surgery was required or new permanent physical impairment ensued. Clinical outcome was assessed using visual analog scales for back (VAS-B) and leg pain (VAS-L), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). RESULTS: Thirty-nine of 157 patients (24.8%) had at least one complication during follow-up. At FU, significant improvement was seen for group I (n = 118) in VAS-B (-50%), VAS-L (-54%), and ODI (-48%) and for group IIa (n = 27) in VAS-B (-40%), VAS-L (-64%), and ODI (-47%). In group IIb (n = 12), VAS-B (-22%, P = 0.089) and ODI (-33%, P = 0.056) improved not significantly, while VAS-L dropped significantly less (-32%, P = 0.013) compared to both other groups. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that major complications with need of revision surgery after TLIF spondylodesis lead to a significantly worse clinical outcome (VAS-B, VAS-L, and ODI) compared to no or minor complications. It is therefore vitally important to raise the surgeon´s awareness of consequences of major complications, and the topic should be given high priority in clinical work.

Predictors of shoulder level after spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: For patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, shoulder balance influences their treatment satisfaction and psychological well-being. Several parameters are known to affect postoperative shoulder balance, but few prognostic models are as yet available. PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify independent predictive factors that can be used to assess preoperatively which patients are at risk of postoperative shoulder elevation, and to build a linear prediction model. METHODS: N = 102 patients with all Lenke types were reviewed radiographically before surgery and 1 year afterward. The outcome measures were coracoid height difference (CHD), clavicular angle (CA), and clavicle-first rib intersection difference (CiRID). Predictive factors commonly used in the literature were investigated using correlation analysis and statistical testing. Significant contributing factors were included in three multiple linear regression models (for CHD, CA, and CiRID). RESULTS: The mean shoulder level (CHD) significantly changed from a lower left shoulder value of -8.5 mm before surgery to 3.3 mm at the follow-up examination. A high preoperative left shoulder level by CiRID, a large amount of Cobb angle correction of the distal thoracic curve, a low preoperative Cobb angle in the lumbar curve, and a structural proximal thoracic curve proved to be determinants and thus risk factors for left-sided shoulder elevation after surgery. The three models predicting CHD, CA, and CiRID at the follow-up examination included these four risk factors and were significant. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative variables have the strongest influence on shoulder level after spinal instrumentation. Additionally, extensive correction of the distal thoracic curve can cause elevation of the left shoulder.

German validation of the quality of life profile for spinal disorders (QLPSD).

BACKGROUND: The Quality of Life Profile for Spine Deformities (QLPSD) is a self-reporting questionnaire designed for studying patients with spinal deformities. PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to systematically translate the QLPSD into German (G-QLPSD) and to test its reliability and validity. Special emphasis was intended to be given to patients with different Cobb angles and ages. METHODS: The QLPSD was systematically translated into German and was responded to in a web-based online survey by patients with idiopathic scoliosis and by healthy control individuals to carry out a matched-pair analysis. Participants aged 14 years and older were included. All participants answered a battery of validated questionnaires (SRS 22-r, PHQ-9, PANAS, FKS, WHO-5, BFI-S, PTQ). Reliability testing included Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability (retest 8 weeks after initial testing). Factorial, convergent, divergent, concurrent, and discriminant validity were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 255 scoliosis patients (age 30.0 ± 16.7 years, Cobb angle 43.5° ± 20.9°) and 189 matched healthy control individuals were finally included. Cronbach's alpha for the G-QLPSD total score was 0.93 and the test-retest reliability was 0.84. The G-QLPSD total score correlated with the SRS 22-r total score (r = -0.86). All concurrently applied scores showed strong correlations with the G-QLPSD (e.g., depression score PHQ-9: r = 0.70). The matched-pair analysis of 189 pairs showed strong discriminant validity (Cohen's d = 0.78). Patients with more severe Cobb angles (≥40°) and those ≥18 years of age had significantly poorer results than patients with minor curves and younger patients. CONCLUSION: The G-QLPSD proved to be a highly reliable and valid instrument that can be recommended for clinical use in scoliosis patients.

Effects of multilevel posterior ligament dissection after spinal instrumentation on adjacent segment biomechanics as a potential risk factor for proximal junctional kyphosis: a biomechanical study.

BACKGROUND: Spinous processes and posterior ligaments, such as inter- and supraspinous ligaments are often sacrificed either deliberately to harvest osseous material for final spondylodesis e.g. in deformity corrective surgery or accidentally after posterior spinal instrumentation. This biomechanical study evaluates the potential destabilizing effect of a progressive dissection of the posterior ligaments (PL) after instrumented spinal fusion as a potential risk factor for proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). METHODS: Twelve calf lumbar spines were instrumented from L3 to L6 (L3 = upper instrumented vertebra, UIV) and randomly assigned to one of the two study groups (dissection vs. control group). The specimens in the dissection group underwent progressive PL dissection, followed by cyclic flexion motion (250 cycles, moment: + 2.5 to + 20.0 Nm) to simulate physical activity and range of motion (ROM) testing of each segment with pure moments of ±15.0 Nm after each dissection step. The segmental ROM in flexion and extension was measured. The control group underwent the same loading and ROM testing protocol, but without PL dissection. RESULTS: In the treatment group, the normalized mean ROM at L2-L3 (direct adjacent segment of interest, UIV/UIV + 1, PJK-level) increased to 104.7%, 107.3%, and 119.4% after dissection of the PL L4-L6, L3-L6, and L2-L6, respectively. In the control group the mean ROM increased only to 103.2%, 106.7%, and 108.7%. The ROM difference at L2-L3 with regard to the last dissection of the PL was statistically significant (P = 0.017) and a PL dissection in the instrumented segments showed a positive trend towards an increased ROM at UIV/UIV + 1. CONCLUSIONS: A dissection of the PL at UIV/UIV + 1 leads to a significant increase in ROM at this level which can be considered to be a risk factor for PJK and should be definitely avoided during surgery. However, a dissection of the posterior ligaments within the instrumented segments while preserving the ligaments at UIV/UIV + 1 leads to a slight but not significant increase in ROM in the adjacent cranial segment UIV/UIV + 1 in the used experimental setup. Using this experimental setup we could not confirm our initial hypothesis that the posterior ligaments within a long posterior instrumentation should be preserved.

The influence of isolated thoracoplasty on the evolution of pulmonary function after treatment of severe thoracic scoliosis.

INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE: Isolated thoracoplasty (iTP) on the convex side is performed long time after scoliosis surgery has been performed. ITP is thought to cause a further decline in pulmonary function (PF); however, the amount of decline is ill defined. The objectives of this study were to examine the influence of iTP on the postoperative evolution of PF and rib hump reduction in patients that previously undergone scoliosis surgery. METHODS: Over an 11-year period, 75 patients underwent iTP. The authors performed a retrospective case series review. Patients with data from PF tests performed preoperatively and at the last follow-up were included. Minimum follow-up was 12 months. The PF value reported was predicted FVC (FVC%). According to the American Thoracic Society, pulmonary impairment was classified as no impairment (FVC: >80-100%), mild (FVC: >65 ≤80%), moderate (FVC: >50 ≤65), and severe (FVC ≤50%). The outcome was studied using validated measures (SRS-24 score, COMI, and the COPD Assessment Test (CAT)). The CAT is stratified into mild impairment (<10 pts), moderate impairment (10-20 pts), severe impairment (>20-30 pts), and disabled (>30 pts). RESULTS: Twenty-six patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The patients' average age was 28 years at surgery with iTP, and 22 were females; the average BMI was 23, and the average follow-up was 76 months. Twenty of the patients had AIS, and six had congenital scoliosis. The time between scoliosis correction and iTP averaged 39 months. The mean number of resected rib segments was 7, and the mean blood loss was 834 ml. FVC% was 66% preoperatively and 57% at follow-up, with a significant change of 9% (p < .02). Fourteen patients had a FVC% change between preoperation and follow-up that was ≥5%; this change was not dependent on the preoperative FVC%. PF showed a slight but non-significant improvement with longer follow-up. At the time of iTP, the thoracic curve averaged 67°, and thoracic kyphosis averaged 46°. Rib hump height was 34 mm before iTP and 15 mm at follow-up (p < .03). At follow-up, the SRS-24 score was 81, the COMI score was 4 points, and the CAT score was 8 points. Eight patients had a CAT >10. Two patients had a major complication. A comparison of patients with pulmonary impairment preoperation vs. follow-up found 4 vs. 1 patients had no PF impairment, 8 vs. 4 patients had mild impairment, 10 vs. 13 patients had moderate impairment, and 4 vs. 8 patients had severe impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated TP was shown an effective technique for rib hump resection. Six years after iTP, the FVC% declined by an average of 9%. Several patients had long-lasting effects in terms of %FVC decline. iTP should be reserved for patients with significant rib hump deformity.

German validation of the BIDQ-S questionnaire on body image disturbance in idiopathic scoliosis.

PURPOSE: The Body Image Disturbance Questionnaire-Scoliosis (BIDQ-S) is a seven-item questionnaire inquiring into patients' worries about back shape and associated problems at school, at work, with friends or family, and whether the patients are avoiding certain activities. The aim of this study was to translate the BIDQ-S into German (G-BIDQ-S), test its reliability, and establish its convergent, divergent, concurrent, and discriminant validity. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, 259 patients with idiopathic scoliosis (mean age 30.2; 221 female; mean Cobb angle 43.8°) completed the G-BIDQ-S; Scoliosis Research Society 22-r (SRS 22-r); Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9); Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS); Questionnaire on Body Dysmorphic Symptoms (FKS); and WHO-5 Well-Being Index. Healthy control individuals matched by age, sex and BMI (n = 149; mean age 36.1; 133 female; BMI = 23.0) answered the same questions to establish discriminant validity. Discriminant statistics, and Pearson and Spearman correlations were calculated. RESULTS: The G-BIDQ-S proved to be one-factorial, internally consistent (Cronbach alpha = 0.87), and stable over time (total score 2.22 vs. 2.21 during retest; retest reliability r = 0.79, P < 0.001). It correlated significantly with the mean SRS 22-r (r = -0.72, P < 0.001) and with Cobb angles (r = 0.30, P < 0.001)-convergent validity; much less with body mass index (r = 0.19, P < 0.001)-divergent validity; and with the PANAS (r = 0.55, P < 0.001), PHQ-9 (r = 0.53, P < 0.001), FKS (r = 0.67, P < 0.001), and WHO-5 (r = -0.54, P < 0.001)-concurrent validity. The G-BIDQ-S also showed discriminant validity, with a strong difference between the scoliosis group (total score 2.19) and the control group (total score 1.13; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The G-BIDQ-S showed good internal consistency, reliability, and convergent, divergent, concurrent, and discriminant validity. This questionnaire is the first one inquiring into patients' body image disturbances that has been validated and is available in German.

Surgical correction of scoliosis in patients with severe cerebral palsy.

INTRODUCTION: There is a lack of data in the literature on surgical correction of severe neuromuscular scoliosis in patients with serious extent of cerebral palsy. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to analyze the radiological and clinical results after posterior-only instrumentation (group P) and combined anterior-posterior instrumentation (group AP) in severe scoliosis in patients with Gross Motor Function Classification System grades IV and V. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All eligible patients who underwent surgery in one institution between 1997 and 2012 were analyzed, and charts, surgical reports, and radiographs were evaluated with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were included (35 in group P, 22 in group AP), with a median follow-up period of 4.1 years. The preoperative mean Cobb angles were 84° (34 % flexibility) in group P and 109° (27 % flexibility) in group AP. In group P, the Cobb angle was 39° (54 % correction) at discharge and 43° at the final follow-up, while in group AP the figures were 54° (50 % correction) at discharge and 56° at the final follow-up. Major complications occurred in 23 vs. 46 % of the patients, respectively. Preoperative curve flexibility was an important predictor for relative curve correction, independently of the type of surgery. CONCLUSION: Posterior-only surgery appears to lead to comparable radiological results, with shorter operating times and shorter intensive-care unit and hospital stays than combined surgery. The duration of surgery was a relevant predictor for complications.

Surgery for adult spondylolisthesis: a systematic review of the evidence.

Surgery for isthmic and degenerative spondylolisthesis (SL) in adults is carried out very frequently in everyday practice. However, it is still unclear whether the results of surgery are better than those of conservative treatment and whether decompression alone or instrumented fusion with decompression should be recommended. In addition, the role of reduction is unclear. Four clinically relevant key questions were addressed in this study: (1) Is surgery more successful than conservative treatment in relation to pain and function in adult patients with isthmic SL? (2) Is surgery more successful than conservative treatment in relation to pain and function in adult patients with degenerative SL? (3) Is instrumented fusion with decompression more successful in relation to pain and function than decompression alone in adult patients with degenerative SL and spinal canal stenosis? (4) Is instrumented fusion with reduction more successful in relation to pain and function than instrumented fusion without reduction in adult patients with isthmic or degenerative SL? A systematic PubMed search was carried out to identify randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials on these topics. Papers were analyzed systematically in a search for the best evidence. A total of 18 studies was identified and analyzed: two for question 1, eight for question 2, four for question 3, and four for question 4. Surgery appears to be better than conservative treatment in adults with isthmic SL (poor evidence) and also in adults with degenerative SL (good evidence). Instrumented fusion with decompression appears to be more successful than decompression alone in adults with degenerative SL and spinal stenosis (poor evidence). Reduction and instrumented fusion does not appear to be more successful than instrumented fusion without reduction in adults with isthmic or degenerative SL (moderate evidence).

Factors influencing radiographic and clinical outcomes in adult scoliosis surgery: a study of 448 European patients.

INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE: In adult scoliosis surgery (AS) delineation of risk factors contributing to failure is important to improve patient care. Treatment goals include deformity correction resulting in a balanced spine and horizontal lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) in fusions not ending at S1. Therefore, the study objectives were to determine predictors for deformity correction, complications, revision surgery, and outcomes as well as to determine predictors of postoperative evolution of the LIV-take-off angle (LIV-TO) and symptomatic adjacent segment disease (ASD). METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective analysis of 448 patients who had AS surgery. Patients' age averaged 51 years, BMI 26, and follow-up of 40 months. According to the SRS adult scoliosis classification, 51 % of patients had major lumbar curves, 24 % each with single thoracic or double major curves. 54 % of patients had stable vertebra at L5 and 34 % of patients had fusion to S1. The mean number of posterior fusion levels was eight and implant density 73 %. Among standard radiographic measures of deformity the LIV-TO was assessed on neutral and bending/traction-films (bLIV-TO). Clinical outcomes were assessed in 145 patients with degenerative-type AS using validated measures (ODI, COMI and SF-36). Prediction analysis was conducted with stepwise multiple regression analyses. RESULTS: Preoperative thoracic curve (TC) was 53° and 33° at follow-up. Preoperative lumbar curve (LC) was 43° and 24° at follow-up. Curve flexibility was low (TC 34 %/LC 38 %). TC-correction (38 %) was predicted by preoperative TC (r = 0.9) and TC-flexibility (r = 0.8). LC-correction (50 %) was predicted by preoperative LC (r = 0.8), LC-flexibility (r = 0.8) and screw density (r = 0.7). Preoperative LIV-TO was 18.2° and at follow-up 9.4° (p < 0.01). 20 % of patients had a non-union (18 % at L5-S1). The risk for non-union at L5-S1 increased with age (p = 0.04), low screw density (p = 0.03), and postoperative sagittal imbalance [(T9-tilt (p = 0.01), C7-SVA (p = 0.01), LL (p = 0.01) and PI-LL mismatch (p = 0.01)]. 32 % of patients had revision surgery. Risk for revision was increased in fusions to S1 (p < 0.01), increased BMI (p < 0.01), sagittal imbalance (C7-SVA, p < 0.01), age (p = 0.02), and disc wedging distal to the LIV (p < 0.01). To a varying extent, clinical outcomes negatively correlated (p < 0.05) with revision, ASD, perioperative complications, age, low postoperative TC- and LC-correction, and sagittal and coronal imbalance at follow-up (C7-SVA, PT, and C7-CSVL). 59 patients had ASD, which correlated with preoperative and postoperative sagittal and coronal parameters of deformity. In a multivariate model, preoperative bLIV-TO (p < 0.01) and preoperative LIV-TO (p < 0.01) demonstrated the highest predictive strength for follow-up LIV-TO. CONCLUSION: In the current study, the magnitude of deformity correction in the sagittal and coronal planes was shown to have significant impact on radiographic and clinical outcomes as well as revision rates. Findings indicate that risks for complications might be reduced by restoration of sagittal balance, appropriate deformity correction and advanced lumbosacral fixation. The use of preoperative LIV-TO and LIV-TO on bending/traction-films were shown to be useful for surgical planning, selection of the LIV and prediction of follow-up-TO, respectively. Parameters of sagittal balance rather than coronal deformity predicted ASD.

Using ultrasound to assess the thickness of the transversus abdominis in a sling exercise.

BACKGROUND: Activation of the deep stabilizing trunk muscle transversus abdominis (TrA) is important for trunk stabilization and spine stability. Sling exercises are used for the activation of trunk muscles, therefore we determined the thickness of the TrA in a standardized sling exercise in comparison to rest and abdominal press. Furthermore we propose a standardized measurement method, which can be used to compare relative muscle thickness levels in different exercises. METHODS: The main objective of the study was to assess and to compare the thickness of the TrA during different conditions; resting condition, sling exercise condition (non-voluntary contraction), and abdominal press condition (voluntary contraction) using a non-invasive ultrasound-based measurement method. Ultrasound measurement (USM; 8.9 MHz, B-mode) was employed to measure the thickness of the TrA in twenty healthy volunteers (13 m, 7 f), each one measured three times with breaks of 48 h. On each measurement day, the subjects were measured on three different conditions: resting condition (RC), sling condition (SC), and abdominal press condition (APC). The USM images were analyzed using a custom-made MatLab script, to determine the thickness of the TrA. RESULTS: A two-way repeated-measurements ANOVA was performed with a significant effect of the factor condition [F(2,38) = 47.82, p < 0.0001, η(2) = 0.72], no significant effect of the factor time [F(2.38) = 2.45, p = 0.1, η(2) = 0.11], and no significant interaction effect [F(4,76) = 0.315, p = 0.867, η(2) = 0.02]. Statistically corrected post-hoc t-tests revealed significant differences in TrA thickness showing that RC < SC (p < 0.001; η(2) = 0.19; d = 0.96), SC < APC (p < 0.0001; η(2) = 0.23; d = 1.10), RC < APC (p < 0.0001; η(2) = 0.53; d = 2.11). As for the test-retest reliability the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) yielded a value of 0.71, 0.54, and 0.29, on the conditions RC, SC, and APC, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that the investigated sling exercise can be used to significantly increase the TrA thickness, and that the TrA thickness was significantly different on the three conditions (RC, SC, APC) using the ultrasound-based method.

Publication rate of abstracts presented at European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society Annual Meetings, 2006 to 2008.

BACKGROUND: The quality of the abstracts presented at a conference reflects the scientific work and level of activity of the scientific association concerned. The aim of the present study was to determine the rate of publications of podium presentations and posters at the conferences of the European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society (EPOS) from 2006 to 2008 and to identify factors that favor publication in peer-reviewed journals. The results are compared with those of other international societies. METHODS: All 646 abstracts (including podiums, posters, and e-posters) presented at the EPOS conferences were investigated using the PubMed database to identify any corresponding published articles in the journals listed in the database. A period of 5 years before and after the relevant conference was used for the PubMed search. Factors influencing publication and the quality of the study, such as the type of presentation and the level of evidence, were also investigated. RESULTS: A publication rate of 36.7% was observed, corresponding to 237 publications of 646 abstracts. The period to publication showed a mean of 13.88 ± 1.34 months. It was found that abstracts of podium presentations were published significantly more often than poster abstracts (P<0.001). Experimental studies, with a publication rate of 50.9%, showed better results than clinical studies (36.0%). Overall, the articles were published in 61 different journals, with the largest number (n=50) appearing in the Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. In addition, the present study shows that abstracts with a higher level of evidence were associated with a higher publication rate. CONCLUSIONS: At 36.7%, the rate of publication of EPOS abstracts is within the range reached by other specialist orthopaedics societies, such as the German Society of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery (36%) and the British Orthopaedic Association (36%). However, it is lower than the publication rate of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA), at 50%. The high percentage of unpublished conference abstracts (63%), which did not go through a peer-reviewed process, casts doubts upon the practice of utilizing the citation of abstracts based purely on conference abstracts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Statistical study.

Postoperative Epidural Fibrosis: Challenges and Opportunities - A Review.

Postoperative epidural fibrosis (EF) is still a major limitation to the success of spine surgery. Fibrotic adhesions in the epidural space, initiated via local trauma and inflammation, can induce difficult-to-treat pain and constitute the main cause of failed back surgery syndrome, which not uncommonly requires operative revision. Manifold agents and methods have been tested for EF relief in order to mitigate this longstanding health burden and its socioeconomic consequences. Although several promising strategies could be identified, few have thus far overcome the high translational hurdle, and there has been little change in standard clinical practice. Nonetheless, notable research progress in the field has put new exciting avenues on the horizon. In this review, we outline the etiology and pathogenesis of EF, portray its clinical and surgical presentation, and critically appraise current efforts and novel approaches toward enhanced prevention and treatment.

Treatment Expectations-You Get What You Expect-and Depression Plays a Role.

Positive treatment expectations demonstrably shape treatment outcomes regarding pain and disability in patients with chronic low back pain. However, knowledge about positive and negative treatment expectations as putative predictors of interindividual variability in treatment outcomes is sparse, and the role of other psychological variables of interest, especially of depression as a known predictor of long-term disability, is lacking. We present results of the first prospective study considering expectations in concert with depression in a sample of 200 patients with chronic low back pain undergoing an inpatient interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy. We analyzed the characteristics of pain and disability, treatment expectation, and depression assessed at the beginning (T0), at the end of (T1), and at 3-month follow-up (T2) of interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy. Treatment expectations did emerge as a significant predictor of changes in pain intensity and disability, respectively, showing that positive expectations were associated with better treatment outcomes. Mediation analyses revealed a partially mediating effect of treatment expectations on the relation between depression and pain outcomes. PERSPECTIVE: These results expand knowledge regarding the role of treatment expectations in individual treatment outcome trajectories in chronic pain patients, paving the way for much-needed efforts toward optimizing patient expectations and personalized approaches in clinical settings.

Biomechanical comparison of vertebral augmentation with silicone and PMMA cement and two filling grades.

PURPOSE: Vertebral augmentation with PMMA is a widely applied treatment of vertebral osteoporotic compression fractures. Subsequent fractures are a common complication, possibly due to the relatively high stiffness of PMMA in comparison with bone. Silicone as an augmentation material has biomechanical properties closer to those of bone and might, therefore, be an alternative. The study aimed to investigate the biomechanical differences, especially stiffness, of vertebral bodies with two augmentation materials and two filling grades. METHODS: Forty intact human osteoporotic vertebrae (T10-L5) were studied. Wedge fractures were produced in a standardized manner. For treatment, PMMA and silicone at two filling grades (16 and 35 % vertebral body fill) were assigned to four groups. Each specimen received 5,000 load cycles with a high load range of 20-65 % of fracture force, and stiffness was measured. Additional low-load stiffness measurements (100-500 N) were performed for intact and augmented vertebrae and after cyclic loading. RESULTS: Low-load stiffness testing after cyclic loading normalized to intact vertebrae showed increased stiffness with 35 and 16 % PMMA (115 and 110 %) and reduced stiffness with 35 and 16 % silicone (87 and 82 %). After cyclic loading (high load range), the stiffness normalized to the untreated vertebrae was 361 and 304 % with 35 and 16 % PMMA, and 243 and 222 % with 35 and 16 % silicone augmentation. For both high and low load ranges, the augmentation material had a significant effect on the stiffness of the augmented vertebra, while the filling grade did not significantly affect stiffness. CONCLUSIONS: This study for the first time directly compared the stiffness of silicone-augmented and PMMA-augmented vertebral bodies. Silicone may be a viable option in the treatment of osteoporotic fractures and it has the biomechanical potential to reduce the risk of secondary fractures.

Pulmonary function after anterior double thoracotomy approach versus posterior surgery with costectomies in idiopathic thoracic scoliosis.

INTRODUCTION: The surgical approach in the treatment of idiopathic thoracic scoliosis depends on the type of curve involved. In anterior correction, the rib hump is corrected by derotating the thoracic spine. In posterior scoliosis surgery, additional rib hump resection is sometimes necessary to achieve an optimal cosmetic result. The aim of this study was to compare pulmonary function in these two patient groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients in the anterior group (A) were treated with standard double thoracotomy, with an anterior derotation spondylodesis and a primary stable dual-rod system. The posterior group (P) included 29 patients who were treated with a pedicle screw-based posterior instrumentation spondylodesis, with additional rib hump resection. Pulmonary function was evaluated preoperatively, on the 12th postoperative day, and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months during the follow-up. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 15 years in group A and 19 in group P with a standard deviation 8.7 years and a significant difference. With regard to body height or weight there were no significant differences between the two groups. In group A, the deterioration in pulmonary function immediately after the operation (from [Formula: see text] 75.3 %/71.3 % preoperatively to 38.5 %/36.1 % postoperatively) was clearer than in group P ([Formula: see text] 71.6 %/65.7 % preoperatively to 47.7 %/48.4 % postoperatively). During a follow-up period of 3 months, the values improved in both groups in comparison with the values immediately after the operation. Up to the 2 year follow-up, pulmonary function in the posterior and anterior groups corresponded to the preoperative values, with no significant differences. There was a trend toward moderately increased values in the posterior group and moderately decreased values in the anterior group at the 2-year follow-up examination, in comparison with the preoperative baseline, but without a statistically significant difference. Two major complications occurred in the anterior group, with reintubation and several bronchoscopy examinations due to atelectasis. CONCLUSION: The severe deterioration in group A is caused by the substantial trauma with double thoracotomy in contrast to rib hump resection. For patients with severe restrictive pulmonary distress, posterior instrumentation in combination with rib hump resection would be preferable to an anterior procedure involving double thoracotomy. Respiratory physiotherapy exercise should be administered in order to minimise postoperative pulmonary distress. In conclusion opening of the chest wall leads to deterioration of pulmonary function with improvement to the preoperative values after 6 months in the posterior and after 24 months in the anterior group.