Diffusion-weighted MRI of peritoneal tumors: comparison with conventional MRI and surgical and histopathologic findings--a feasibility study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the utility of single-shot spin-echo echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using a b value of 400-500 s/mm(2) for depicting peritoneal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four consecutive oncology patients underwent preoperative abdominal and pelvic MRI for tumor staging. MRI included breath-hold DWI with a b value of 400-500 s/mm(2), T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo, T2-weighted fast spin-echo, and 0- and 5-minute delayed gadolinium-enhanced imaging. At three separate sessions, two observers independently reviewed images for peritoneal tumors at 16 anatomic sites. First DWI alone was reviewed, followed by conventional MRI alone, and then conventional MRI, including DWI, was reviewed. Results of laparotomy and histopathologic evaluation were compared with MRI results. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for DWI, conventional MRI, and combined DWI and conventional MRI for peritoneal tumor depiction. RESULTS: Two-hundred fifty-five sites of peritoneal tumor were proven by surgical and histopathologic findings. The combination of DWI and conventional MRI was most sensitive and accurate for peritoneal tumors, depicting 230 and 214 tumor sites for the two observers (sensitivity, 0.90, 0.84; and accuracy, 0.91, 0.88) compared with DWI alone, which depicted 182 and 182 tumor sites with sensitivity (0.71, 0.71; and accuracy, 0.81, 0.81), and conventional MRI alone, which depicted 185 and 132 tumor sites (sensitivity, 0.73, 0.52; and accuracy, 0.81, 0.72). Peritoneal tumor showed restricted diffusion on DWI and ascites was of low signal intensity, increasing tumor conspicuity. CONCLUSION: Adding DWI to routine MRI improves the sensitivity and specificity for depicting peritoneal metastases. Breath-hold DWI is now routinely used in all oncology patients referred for abdominal MRI at our institution.

Crohn disease with endoscopic correlation: single-shot fast spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging.

PURPOSE: To compare T2-weighted breath-hold single-shot fast spin-echo (SE) and gadolinium-enhanced spoiled gradient-echo (GRE) MR imaging with contrast material administered orally and rectally for evaluating patients with Crohn disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with Crohn disease received 2% barium sulfate and water enema. The abdomen and pelvis were imaged with transverse and coronal single-shot fast SE and gadolinium-enhanced spoiled GRE MR imaging. Two radiologists reviewed the two types of images for bowel disease. The extent, severity, and conspicuity of the disease were determined. Proof of bowel disease at MR imaging was compared with that at endoscopy, barium study, and surgery. Statistical analysis was performed with the McNemar test. RESULTS: Twenty-five of 28 patients had proven abnormal bowel segments. The per-patient sensitivity of gadolinium-enhanced spoiled GRE MR imaging for the two radiologists was 100% and 96% versus 60% and 60% (P <.05) with single-shot fast SE MR imaging. Gadolinium-enhanced spoiled GRE MR images depicted more segments (54 and 52 of 61 segments; sensitivity, 89% and 85%, respectively) of the diseased bowel than did single-shot fast SE MR images (31 and 32 of 61 segments; sensitivity, 51% and 52%, respectively; P <.001). Severity of Crohn disease was correctly depicted at gadolinium-enhanced spoiled GRE imaging in 93% of patients versus in 43% of patients at single-shot fast SE imaging. CONCLUSION: In patients with Crohn disease, gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed spoiled GRE MR imaging better depicted the extent and severity of intestinal disease compared with single-shot fast SE imaging.