The Comparison of FLOT and DCF Regimens as Perioperative Treatment for Gastric Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Locoregional gastric cancer is a still serious problem and perioperative treatments may improve the success of management. Different regimens were examined. The present study purposed to compare the efficacy of fluorouracil-leucovorin-oxaliplatin-docetaxel (FLOT) and docetaxel-cisplatin-fluorouracil (DCF) regimens. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study assessed the patients with locoregional gastric cancer. There are 240 patients (137 DCF, 103 FLOT). Survival rates were compared. RESULTS: Demographic features were similar between the two groups, but the time period was different. The FLOT group had 7.8% pathological complete response, while the DCF group did not. Disease-free survival was longer in the FLOT than in the DCF group (median not reached - 13.94 months, respectively). Median overall survival was similar (30.9 vs. 37.8 months), but median follow-up affected the analysis. Survival for 36 months was 63% for the FLOT group and 40% for the DCF group (log-rank; p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: FLOT regimen was superior to DCF regimen for response and survival rates. DCF is a historical approach. Long-term follow-up period is needed for FLOT treatment.

Cabozantinib-induced heart failure.

INTRODUCTION: Cabozantinib is a multikinase inhibitor agent used in the treatment of hepatocellular, renal, and thyroid cancers. The development of heart failure after cabozantinib initiation is an extremely rare side effect, with only four case reports published in the literature. We describe a case of cabozantinib-induced cardiac failure in a patient with thyroid cancer refractory to standard treatment. CASE REPORT: Fifty-seven-year-old woman had no history of cardiovascular disease. Echocardiography prior to chemotherapy revealed normal cardiac function. However, she developed pretibial edema and shortness of breath after 2 months of cabozantinib treatment. Ejection fraction was found to be 30% in the echocardiography of the patient, and global hypokinesia was detected in cardiac functions. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: Cabozantinib treatment of the patient was discontinued. After discontinuation of treatment, the patient's cardiac functions did not return to normal. Heart failure due to cabozantinib treatment was thought to be permanent. DISCUSSION: There are only four cases on this subject in the literature. Although the use of cabozantinib rarely causes heart failure, this side effect can have extremely serious consequences. Even if it is a rare condition, cardiological evaluations should be performed before and after cabozantinib therapy because it can be reversible after discontinuation of the treatment.

Osseous metastases of uterine leiomyosarcoma: Analysis of survival & surgical management.

BACKGROUND: Uterine leiomyosarcoma represents a seldom-encountered subset within the spectrum of uterine malignancies. Occurrences of appendicular skeletal metastases in uterine leiomyosarcomas are infrequent. In this study, we examined patient surveys to elucidate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of individuals with uterine leiomyosarcoma exhibiting metastatic dissemination to these anatomical regions. We hypothesized that palliative surgical treatment would have no effect on survival in patients diagnosed with uterine leimyosarcoma with appendicular bone metastases. METHODS: One hundred fourteen patients diagnosed with uterine leiomyosarcoma and treated at the Department of Oncologic Orthopedics at XXX hospital from 2004 to 2021 met the criteria for inclusion in this retrospective cohort study. The study specifically encompassed patients with histopathologically confirmed appendicular bone metastases secondary to uterine leiomyosarcoma, who underwent either surgical intervention or conservative treatment. Exclusion criteria involved patients with exclusive vertebral bone metastases, as well as those lacking essential examination and follow-up data. Notably, the study included nine follow-up patients with at least 2 years of follow-up who developed appendicular skeletal metastases during the follow-up period. RESULTS: Of the 9 patients, 3 had humeral metastases, 2 had femoral metastases, 1 had femoral and diffuse pelvic metastases, and the other 3 had pelvic metastases. Bone metastases occurred at a mean of 33.3 ± 32.4 months (range 3 - 108) after the diagnosis. After bone metastasis, 6 patients died after an average of 40.3 ± 26.7 months (range 12-84 months). One patient with a pathologic fracture in the proximal humerus underwent resection arthroplasty, 1 patient with metastases in the proximal femur underwent resection arthroplasty, 2 patients with metastases to the femoral shaft underwent curettage-cementation (C&C) and intramedullary nailing, and 1 patient with persistent pelvic pain underwent C&C. No surgery was performed in the other patients. CONCLUSION: In patients diagnosed with uterine leiomyosarcomas, survival did not differ between palliative surgery and conservative treatment after appendicular bone metastases. Patient assessment should be individualized, and overall health should be evaluated before palliative surgery is performed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Comparison of the second-line treatment efficacy in advanced gastric cancer patients previously treated with taxane-based triplet chemotherapy: a Turkish Oncology Group Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI and paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) who were previously treated with first-line modified docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil (mDCF), or 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, docetaxel (FLOT). METHODS: Patients who received a triplet regimen in the first line setting and were treated with FOLFIRI or paclitaxel in the second-line treatment were included. RESULTS: The study included 198 patients, with 115 receiving FOLFIRI and 83 receiving paclitaxel. The median age was 58 (range = 24-69). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 5.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 4.4-5.5] months in the FOLFIRI arm, and 4.1 (95% CI = 3.3-4.6) months in the paclitaxel arm (p = .007). The median overall survival (mOS) was 9.4 (95% CI = 7.4-10.5) months in the FOLFIRI arm and 7.2 (95% CI = 5.6-8.3) months in the paclitaxel arm (p = .008). Grade 3-4 neuropathy was higher in patients receiving paclitaxel compared to those receiving FOLFIRI (p = .04). Grade 3-4 diarrhea was 8% in the FOLFIRI arm and 2.4% in the paclitaxel arm (p = .02). CONCLUSION: Beyond progression with docetaxel-based triplet chemotherapy, FOLFIRI may be preferred as a second-line treatment over paclitaxel due to its longer mPFS and mOS.

Effect of HER2/CEP17 ratio on survival in metastatic HER2-positive gastric cancer, multicenter study.

AIM: HER2-positive metastatic gastric cancer is still a highly fatal disease despite advances. We aimed to investigate the relationship between HER2/CEP17 ratio and survival in patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastric cancer. METHODS: A total of 99 patients from 8 different centers in Turkey were included in the study. Patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastric cancer and whose HER2/CEP17 ratio was examined were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to HER2/CEP17 values, and survival analysis was performed. RESULTS: The median age was 64 (24-83) years. There were 74 (74.8%) male and 25 (25.2%) female patients. OS in the high HER2/CEP17 ratio group was 21.97 months (95% CI: 16.36-27.58), and in the low ratio group was 16.17 months (95% CI: 10.95-21.38) (p = 0.015). OS was 17.7 months (95% CI: 7.02-28.37) in the high HER2 gene copy number group and 10.13 months (5.55-14.71) in the group with low copy number (p = 0.03). PFS was 10.94 months (95% CI: 7.55-14.33) in the group with high HER2 gene copy number and 7.56 months (4.62-10.49) in the low copy number group (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Patients with both high HER2 gene amplification and high HER2/CEP17 ratio had better OS. The PFS of the group with high HER2 gene amplification was also better. To our knowledge, this is the first study in the literature showing that the HER2/CEP17 ratio affects survival in patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

Efficacy and Safety of Switching to Azathioprine for Mycophenolate-Induced Diarrhea in Renal Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Diarrhea is a common adverse effect of mycophenolate treatment in renal transplant recipients. In patients with mycophenolate-induced diarrhea, one option is to switch to mycophenolate to azathioprine. In this study, we aimed to define the safety and efficacy of switching from mycophenolate to azathioprine for mycophenolate-related diarrhea in renal transplant recipients. METHODS: A total of 177 patients, 59 of whom were switched to azathioprine because of diarrhea and 118 of whom comprised a matched control group without diarrhea and continued mycophenolate treatment participated in this study. We analyzed the effect of switching to azathioprine from mycophenolate on amelioration of diarrhea and graft survival. RESULTS: We observed that 89.8% of patients who switched to azathioprine because of diarrhea had improved diarrhea complaints. Patients switched to azathioprine because of diarrhea had lower glomerular filtration rates (P < .001) and higher proteinuria (P < .001) compared with the control group before the switch. Patients switched to azathioprine compared with a subgroup of 59 control patients were matched to patients switched to azathioprine in terms of baseline renal function and proteinuria in addition to demographic parameters had higher 10-year graft loss compared with patients who continued mycophenolate (P = .03). Particularly in patients with a glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min at the time of conversion, the risk of early graft loss was high. CONCLUSIONS: Although switching from mycophenolate to azathioprine was an effective approach to improve diarrhea, this approach is associated with increased risk of graft loss.