Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Fusion With Facet Cages to Augment High-Risk Anterior Cervical Arthrodesis: A Case Series.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and results of minimally invasive posterior cervical fusion with facet cages as an augment to high-risk patients and patients status post multilevel anterior cervical decompression and fusion. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with symptomatic cervical stenosis with high risk for pseudoarthrosis underwent circumferential cervical decompression and fusion via staged anterior and posterior approach. Anterior cervical decompression and fusion was performed first by means of the standard anterior approach, with the patient supine on the operating table. The patients were subsequently flipped into a prone position and minimally invasive posterior cervical facet fusion with DTRAX was performed. The patients were then followed in the outpatient clinic for an average of 312.71 days. Postoperative patient satisfaction scores were obtained via the visual analogue scale (VAS). Preoperative VAS scores were compared with postoperative VAS scores in order to evaluate patient outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 35 patients evaluated, minimum follow-up was 102 days, with a maximum follow-up of 839 days. Average preoperative and postoperative VAS scores were 7.6 and 2.8, respectively (P < .0001), with an average improvement of 4.86 points. This was an average improvement of 64.70% from preoperative to postoperative. Seventeen patients had excellent outcomes, with a postoperative VAS score ≤2. Seven patients achieved a postoperative VAS score of 0, with 100% improvement of preoperative pain and symptoms. Average blood loss was 70.38 mL. Average length of stay was 1.03 days. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that minimally invasive posterior cervical decompression and fusion with facet cages, when combined with standard anterior cervical decompression and fusion, is an effective means of obtaining circumferential cervical fusion while simultaneously improving patient outcomes.

Revision open anterior approaches for spine procedures.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Anterior exposure has become an increasingly popular procedure for the general and vascular surgeon due to the increased use of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and artificial disc replacement for the treatment of many spinal problems. PURPOSE: Because of this increase, revision operations have become increasing necessary. Despite this, there is almost no literature dealing with the issues related to these complex revision operations. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of charts was performed on patients operated on from April 2002 until October 2004 in two tertiary care hospitals. METHODS: In total, 218 open exposures for anterior lumbar spinal approaches were performed of which 9 patients required revision lumbar spinal operations. Seven patients were approached again anteriorly (78%), and 2 (22%) patients required a combined anterior and posterior approach. RESULTS: The nine cases were the number of revision procedures performed over the 16-month period of this study. The average age was 44 overall (range, 25-89) and 53 (33-73) for the revision operations, p>.05. All revision operations attempted were successful. Seven (78%) of the secondary procedures could be approached retroperitoneally whereas 2 (22%) patients required transperitoneal approaches owing to the degree of adhesions. The average length until revision surgery was 13 months (range 6-24). No patients required early revision defined as surgery within 30 days from the primary surgery. Early complications occurred in 4 patients (44%), and included dural tear, median nerve dysthesia, left common femoral nerve palsy further complicated by prolonged postoperative ileus and retrograde ejaculation. Late complications occurred in one patient and consisted of a deep venous thrombosis and urinary tract infection. The average length of stay was 6 days (SD 2.7 days) (range 4-12) compared with 4 days (SD 2.3 days) (range 2-22) for the index operations, p>.05. CONCLUSION: Revision anterior open exposure to the lumbar and lumbosacral vertebral bodies can be performed safely, but is associated with an increased rate of early complications. Nonetheless, these complications are self-limited and highlight the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in maximizing the various surgical skills of spine (orthopedic and neurosurgical) and exposure (vascular and general) surgeons in reducing serious complications in revision anterior lumbar spinal surgery.

Lumbar total disc arthroplasty in patients older than 60 years of age: a prospective study of the ProDisc prosthesis with 2-year minimum follow-up period.

OBJECT: The authors conducted a prospective longitudinal study to obtain outcome (minimum follow-up period 2 years) regarding the safety and efficacy of single-level lumbar disc (ProDisc prosthesis) replacement in patients 60 years of age or older. METHODS: This prospective analysis involved 22 patients treated in whom the lumbar ProDisc prosthesis was used for total disc arthroplasty. All patients presented with disabling discogenic low-back pain (LBP) with or without radicular pain. The involved segments ranged from L-2 to S-1. Patients in whom there was no evidence of radiographic circumferential spinal stenosis and with minimal or no facet joint degeneration were included. Patients were assessed preoperatively and outcome was evaluated postoperatively at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months by administration of standardized tests (the visual analog scale [VAS], Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], and patient satisfaction). Secondary parameters included analysis of pre- and postoperative radiographic results of disc height at the affected level, adjacent-level disc height and motion, and complications. Twenty-two (100%) fulfilled all follow-up criteria. The median age of all patients was 63 years (range 61-71 years). There were 17 single-level cases, four two-level cases, and one three-level case. Statistical improvements in VAS, ODI, and patient satisfaction scores were observed at 3 months postoperatively. These improvements were maintained at 24-month follow-up examination. Patient satisfaction rates were 94% at 24 months (compared with 95% reported in a previously reported ProDisc study). Radicular pain also decreased significantly. Patients in whom bone mineral density was decreased underwent same-session vertebroplasty following implantation of the ProDisc device(s). There were two cases involving neurological deterioration: unilateral foot drop and loss of proprioception and vibration in one patient and unilateral foot drop in another patient. Both deficits occurred in patients in whom there was evidence preoperatively of circumferential spinal stenosis. There were two cases of implant subsidence and no thromboembolic phenomena. CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvements in patient satisfaction and ODI scores were observed by 3 months postoperatively and these improvements were maintained at the 2-year follow-up examination. Although the authors' early results indicate that the use of ProDisc lumbar total disc arthroplasty in patients older than 60 years of age reduces chronic LBP and improves clinical functional outcomes, they recommend the judicious use of artificial disc replacement in this age group. Until further findings are reported, the authors cautiously recommend the use of artificial disc replacement in the treatment of chronic discogenic LBP in patients older than age 60 years in whom bone quality is adequate in the absence of circumferential spinal stenosis.

The open anterior paramedian retroperitoneal approach for spine procedures.

HYPOTHESIS: With the advent of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and artificial disk replacement as common procedures for the treatment of many spinal problems, anterior exposure has become an increasingly popular procedure for general, thoracic, urologic, and vascular surgeons. Despite this, the body of literature describing this procedure, especially the general and vascular surgery literature, is lacking. DESIGN: A retrospective review of medical records was performed for patients operated on from April 2002 to March 2004. SETTING: Tertiary care university hospital. PATIENTS: In total, 64 open retroperitoneal exposures for anterior spinal approaches were performed. Thirty-five (55%) were performed on men and 29 (45%) on women. INTERVENTIONS: Fifty patients (78%) required lumbosacral approaches, and 14 (22%) required access to purely lumbar disk spaces. Forty-three patients underwent single-disk approaches, and 21 required access to either 2 or 3 levels. Forty patients (63%) underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion, and 22 (34%) had a Prodisc disk replacement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We analyzed intraoperative and early postoperative complications. RESULTS: The average age was 43 years (range, 25-89 years), 42 and 44 years for men and women, respectively. Ninety-seven percent of all attempted retroperitoneal exposures were successful. Intraoperative complications occurred in 5 patients (8%) and included inability to mobilize the iliac veins, injury to the iliac vein, and ureteral tear. The postoperative course was complicated in 8 patients (14%) and included fever, urinary retention, spinal headache, Clostridium difficile colitis, and ileus. CONCLUSION: Open retroperitoneal exposure to the lumbar and lumbosacral vertebral bodies can be performed safely with a multidisciplinary approach that maximizes the various surgical skills of the orthopedic and vascular or general surgeon, reducing complication rates in anterior spinal surgery.

Necrotizing infection of the spine.

STUDY DESIGN: Case report of multifocal necrotizing fasciitis with lumbar involvement. OBJECTIVES: To raise awareness of an unusual, but potential, focus of a multifocal necrotizing infection in a diabetic patient. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Necrotizing fasciitis is a rapidly spreading infection of the soft tissue and fascia. These infections can be polymicrobial, are challenging to treat, and often have grave consequences. The spine may rarely be involved in such infections. METHODS: We describe a patient with long-standing diabetic foot ulcers, which evolved to a necrotizing infection. This infection spread hematogenously to several noncontiguous locations, including the lumbar spine, and was heralded by gas production at the sites of involvement. The spine was treated aggressively and infection eradicated at this site. RESULTS: Despite eradicating the spinal component of this infection, other sites were challenging to clear, and the patient went on to die of multisystem organ failure. CONCLUSIONS: Necrotizing infections rarely involve the spine. Heightened awareness of this potential focus of infection may facilitate its detection. As with other sites, aggressive surgical debridement of this potentially fatal condition is imperative.

Lumbar total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis in smokers versus nonsmokers: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized clinical series. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of ProDisc lumbar artificial disc replacement (ADR) in smokers versus nonsmokers. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Smoking is a negative predictor in fusion surgery. To date, a prospective study of the treatment of incapacitating discogenic low back pain using ADR in smokers versus nonsmokers has not been described. METHODS: A prospective analysis was performed on 104 patients with disabling discogenic low back pain treated with single-level lumbar ProDisc total disc arthroplasty. Smokers and nonsmokers were assessed before surgery and after surgery using patient satisfaction, Oswestry, and Visual Analog Scores. Additionally, preoperative and postoperative neurologic, radiographic, and pain medication assessments were performed at similar postoperative intervals. RESULTS: Oswestry, Visual Analog Scores, and patient satisfaction scores revealed statistical improvement beginning 3 months after surgery and were maintained at minimum 2-year follow-up. Patient satisfaction scores were higher in smokers (94%) than in nonsmokers (87%) at 2-year follow-up (P = 0.07). Radiographic analysis revealed an affected disc height increase from 4 mm to 13 mm (P < 0.05) and an affected disc motion from 3 degrees to 7 degrees (P < 0.05). No cases of loosening, dislodgment, mechanical failure, infection, or fusion of the affected segment occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study indicate that smokers do equally well compared with nonsmokers when ProDisc ADR is used in the treatment of debilitating lumbar spondylosis. Patient outcome and radiographic scores showed significant improvement compared with preoperative levels. Although not evident in our series, additional surveillance for intraoperative and postoperative vascular spasm and occlusion may be warranted in smokers.

Industry support and correlation to study outcome for papers published in Spine.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of articles published in the journal Spine. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate potential correlations between research sponsorship and study outcome. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Industry sponsorship has traditionally been associated with more positive results than non-funded or peer-reviewed funded projects in other areas of medicine. The association of such sponsorship and study outcome has not been addressed previously in spine research. METHODS: Articles from the journal Spine from January 2002 to July 2003 were reviewed. These were examined for the subject evaluated, type of study design, funding source, and conclusion reached. RESULTS: Of 1143 articles, 527 met inclusion criteria of having abstract, materials/methods, and conclusion sections. Industry support was reported for 84 (15.9%), foundation support for 67 (12.7%), government support for 54 (10.2%), institution support for 17 (3.2%), and no funding was reported for 304 (57.9%). The odds ratio of industry funded reporting positive results was 3.3 times that of studies with any other funding sources (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Industry funded studies demonstrated a statistically greater likelihood to report positive results than studies with other funding sources. Potential explanations for this are biased study design, biased experimental technique, biased result interpretation, or publication bias. Although the expense of research and limited funding sources have forced an increased reliance on industry support for funding basic science and clinical spine research, this does introduce the potential for bias and must be recognized by the reader.

The treatment of disabling multilevel lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal minimum 2-year follow-up. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of the Prodisc implant in patients with disabling multilevel discogenic low back pain (LBP). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few, if any, alternatives have been proposed to treat recalcitrant and debilitating multilevel lumbar discogenic low back pain. To date, a prospective study specifically examining the use of multilevel Prodisc total disc arthroplasty has not been described. METHODS: A prospective analysis was performed on 25 patients (63 prostheses) treated with multilevel lumbar ProDisc total disc arthroplasty. Minimum follow-up was 2 years. Patients 18 to 60 years of age with disabling discogenic low back pain and minimal radicular pain secondary to multiple level lumbar spondylosis from L1 to S1 were included. Preoperative and postoperative disability and pain scores were measured using Oswestry and visual analog scores. Preoperative and postoperative neurologic, radiographic, and pain medication assessments were also performed at similar postoperative intervals. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients (72 prostheses) were enrolled in the prospective analysis. Twenty-five patients (63 prostheses) fulfilled all follow-up criteria and are included for final analysis. Fifteen bisegmental and 10 trisegmental level cases were performed. Visual analog pain, Oswestry, and patient satisfaction scores were significantly reduced at the 3-month as well as at 48-month follow-up. Radiographic analysis revealed an affected disc height increases from 5 mm to 12 mm (P < 0.05) and affected disc motions from 3 degrees to 7 degrees (P < 0.05). No change in adjacent level disc heights was seen. Complications included a single case of subsidence of the inferior endplate of the L4-L5 segment in a bisegmental L4-L5/L5-S1 case. We also report a delayed case of anterior extrusion of a polyethylene component in a patient who had sustained a fall of a bicycle. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data on multisegmental ProDisc lumbar total disc arthroplasty appear to be a safe and efficacious treatment method for debilitating lumbar spondylosis without significant facet arthropathy. In our select (non-Workers Compensation and/or medical legal) cohort of patients, we demonstrate a patient satisfaction rate of 93%. Careful and appropriate patient selection is essential in ensuring optimal surgical outcomes.

The treatment of disabling single-level lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the Prodisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal minimum 2-year follow-up. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of the Prodisc implant in patients with disabling single-level discogenic low back pain (LBP). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The treatment of debilitating discogenic LBP has been controversial and varied. To date, a longitudinal prospective study of the treatment of single-level incapacitating discogenic LBP using the Prodisc total disc arthroplasty technique has not been described. METHODS: A prospective analysis was performed on 118 patients treated with single-level lumbar Prodisc total disc arthroplasty. Patients 18 to 60 years of age with disabling and recalcitrant discogenic LBP with or without radicular pain secondary to single-level discogenic LBP from L3 to S1 were included. Patients were assessed before surgery, and outcome measurements were after surgery administered at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients (88%) fulfilled all follow-up criteria. The median age of all patients was 47 years (range, 36-60 years). Statistical improvements in VAS, Oswestry, and patient satisfaction scores occurred 3 months postoperatively. These improvements were maintained at the 24-month follow-up. Radicular pain also decreased significantly. Full-time and part-time work rates increased from 10% to 35% and 3% to 24%, respectively. No additional fusion surgeries were necessary either at the affected or unaffected levels. Radiographic analysis revealed an affected disc height increase from 4 mm to 13 mm (P < 0.001) and an affected disc motion from 3 degrees to 7 degrees (P < 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Single-level Prodisc lumbar total disc arthroplasty is a safe and efficacious treatment method for debilitating lumbar discogenic LBP. Significant improvements in patient satisfaction and disability scores occurred after surgery by 3 months and were maintained at the 2-year follow-up. No device-related complications occurred. Patients with severe to moderate disc height loss as well as those with symptomatic posterior anular defects with minimal disc height loss achieve functional gains and significant pain relief. Careful and appropriate patient selection is essential in ensuring optimal surgical outcomes.