RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Breast-conserving therapy is the standard of care for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Debate on what constitutes a satisfactory margin persists. This study aimed to identify predictors of residual disease at re-excision. METHODS: This is a population-based retrospective cohort study of women with DCIS who underwent a lumpectomy between 2007 and 2017 in Manitoba, with close (≤2 mm) or positive margins that led to re-excision. RESULTS: The DCIS re-excision rate was 29.3% for 1001 patients. 63.2% of patients were found to have residual disease on re-excision. On univariable analysis, the size, margin status, number of positive margins, type of second surgery, and Van Nuys Prognostic Index score were associated with residual disease on re-excision. The size of DCIS and the number of positive margins remained statistically significant on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Re-excision should be rationalized by considering the predictors of residual disease in conjunction with other factors.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante , Margens de Excisão , Mastectomia Segmentar , Neoplasia Residual , Humanos , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasia Residual/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Mastectomia Segmentar/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/cirurgia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/patologia , Idoso , Prognóstico , Adulto , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Intravascular imaging has become an integral part of the diagnostic and management strategies for intracoronary pathologies. In this White Paper we summarize current evidence and its implications on the use of intravascular imaging in interventional cardiology practice. The areas addressed are planning and optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention, management of stent failure, and evaluation of ambiguous coronary lesions and myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary disease. The findings presented followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system in an expert consensus process that involved a diverse writing group vetted by a review group. Expert consensus was achieved around 9 statements. Use of intravascular imaging in guiding percutaneous revascularization is supported by high-quality evidence, particularly for lesions with increased risk of recurrent events or stent failure. Specific considerations for intravascular imaging guidance of intervention in left main lesions, chronic occlusion lesions, and in patients at high risk of contrast nephropathy are explored. Use of intravascular imaging to identify pathologies associated with stent failure and guide repeat intervention, resolve ambiguities in lesion assessment, and establish diagnoses in patients who present with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary disease is supported by moderate- to low-quality evidence. Each topic is accompanied by clinical pointers to aid the practicing interventional cardiologist in implementation of the White Paper findings. The findings presented in this White Paper will help to guide the use of intravascular imaging toward situations in which the balance of efficacy, safety, and cost are most optimal.