Acute Extremity Compartment Syndrome and the Role of Fasciotomy in Extremity War Wounds.

Acute compartment syndrome (CS) is a frequent and potentially devastating complication of blunt and penetrating extremity injuries. Extremity war injuries are particularly susceptible to CS due to associated vascular injuries; high Injury Severity Score; extensive bone and soft tissue injury; and frequent transportation that may limit close monitoring of the injured extremity. Treatment consists of prompt fasciotomy of all compartments in the involved segment, over their full length. Delayed or incomplete fasciotomy is associated with worse outcomes, including muscle necrosis, infection, and amputation. Enhanced pre-deployment training of surgeons decreases the need for revision fasciotomy at higher echelons of care and should be continued in future conflicts. We recommend the liberal use of prophylactic fasciotomy prior to aeromedical evacuation and after limb reperfusion. For leg fasciotomy, we recommend a two-incision approach as it is more reproducible and allows easy vascular exposure when necessary.

Rehabilitation of the Combat Casualty: Lessons Learned from Past and Current Conflicts.

The field of rehabilitation is deeply rooted in military medicine, especially in promoting the restoration of function and community reintegration of injured service members returning from war. Since military operations began in Iraq and Afghanistan over a decade ago, rehabilitative care programs have been integral in supporting the Military Healthcare System in providing high quality comprehensive care for combat casualties and their families, particularly those with complex blast injuries resulting in conditions such as amputation and other limb dysfunction, traumatic brain injury, and spinal cord injury. Fundamental to a successful rehabilitation program is the coordination of interdisciplinary care that not only crosses multiple medical specialties and disciplines, but also promotes ongoing education, research, quality improvement and readiness. This brief article is intended to highlight some of the most important lessons learned from current and past conflicts in delivering the highest quality rehabilitative care to our nation's heroes.

Transformation of Mental Health Care for U.S. Soldiers and Families During the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars: Where Science and Politics Intersect.

The cumulative strain of 14 years of war on service members, veterans, and their families, together with continuing global threats and the unique stresses of military service, are likely to be felt for years to come. Scientific as well as political factors have influenced how the military has addressed the mental health needs resulting from these wars. Two important differences between mental health care delivered during the Iraq and Afghanistan wars and previous wars are the degree to which research has directly informed care and the consolidated management of services. The U.S. Army Medical Command implemented programmatic changes to ensure delivery of high-quality standardized mental health services, including centralized workload management; consolidation of psychiatry, psychology, psychiatric nursing, and social work services under integrated behavioral health departments; creation of satellite mental health clinics embedded within brigade work areas; incorporation of mental health providers into primary care; routine mental health screening throughout soldiers' careers; standardization of clinical outcome measures; and improved services for family members. This transformation has been accompanied by reduction in psychiatric hospitalizations and improved continuity of care. Challenges remain, however, including continued underutilization of services by those most in need, problems with treatment of substance use disorders, overuse of opioid medications, concerns with the structure of care for chronic postdeployment (including postconcussion) symptoms, and ongoing questions concerning the causes of historically high suicide rates, efficacy of resilience training initiatives, and research priorities. It is critical to ensure that remaining gaps are addressed and that knowledge gained during these wars is retained and further evolved.