Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 179(2): 479-489, 2020 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31650347

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate patient-reported cosmetic satisfaction in women treated with radiation therapy for breast cancer and to determine the association between dissatisfaction and quality of life (QoL) and depression. METHODS: Within the prospective UMBRELLA breast cancer cohort, all patients ≥ 1 year after breast conserving treatment or mastectomy with immediate reconstruction were selected. Self-reported cosmetic satisfaction was measured on a 5-point Likert scale. QoL, social functioning, and emotional functioning were measured using EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 at 1, 2, and 3 years after inclusion. Mixed model analysis was performed to assess the difference in different domains of QoL between patients with good versus poor self-reported cosmetic satisfaction over time after adjustment for potential confounders. Depression scores were collected by means of the HADS-NL questionnaire. Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used to assess the difference in proportions of HADS score ≥ 8, indicating increased depression risk, between satisfied and dissatisfied patients. RESULTS: 808 patients were selected for analysis. Respectively one, two, and three years after surgery, 8% (63/808), 7% (45/626), and 8% (31/409) of patients were dissatisfied with their cosmetic outcome. Poor patient-reported cosmetic satisfaction was independently associated with impaired QoL, body image, and lower emotional and social functioning. Scores ≥ 8 on the HADS depression subscale were significantly more common in dissatisfied patients. CONCLUSIONS: Dissatisfaction with cosmetic outcome was low after breast cancer surgery followed by radiation therapy during 3 years follow-up. Knowing the association between dissatisfaction with cosmetic outcome and QoL and depression could help to improve the preoperative counseling of breast cancer patients.


Assuntos
Imagem Corporal , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Satisfação Pessoal , Qualidade de Vida , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Terapia Combinada , Emoções , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Satisfação do Paciente , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Br J Surg ; 105(6): 637-644, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29493785

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ileostomy construction is a common procedure but can be associated with morbidity. The stoma is commonly secured to the skin using transcutaneous sutures. It is hypothesized that intracutaneous sutures result in a tighter adherence of the peristomal skin to the stoma plate to prevent faecal leakage. The study aimed to compare the effect of intracutaneous versus transcutaneous suturing of ileostomies on faecal leakage and quality of life. METHODS: This randomized trial was undertaken in 11 hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients scheduled to receive an ileostomy for any reason were randomized to intracutaneous or transcutaneous suturing (IC and TC groups respectively). The primary outcome was faecal leakage. Secondary outcomes were stoma-related quality of life and costs of stoma-related materials and reinterventions. RESULTS: Between April 2011 and February 2016, 339 patients were randomized to the IC (170) or TC (169) group. Leakage rates were higher in the IC than in the TC group (52·4 versus 41·4 per cent respectively; risk difference 11·0 (95 per cent c.i. 0·3 to 21·2) per cent). Skin irritation rates were high (78·2 versus 72·2 per cent), but did not differ significantly between the groups (risk difference 6·1 (95 per cent c.i. -3·2 to 15·10) per cent). There were no significant differences in quality of life or costs between the groups. CONCLUSION: Intracutaneous suturing of an ileostomy is associated with more peristomal leakage than transcutaneous suturing. Overall stoma-related complications did not differ between the two techniques. Registration number: NTR2369 ( http://www.trialregister.nl).


Assuntos
Ileostomia/métodos , Estomas Cirúrgicos , Técnicas de Sutura , Técnicas de Fechamento de Ferimentos , Feminino , Humanos , Ileostomia/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estomas Cirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Técnicas de Sutura/efeitos adversos , Técnicas de Fechamento de Ferimentos/efeitos adversos
3.
Colorectal Dis ; 19(8): 739-749, 2017 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28192627

RESUMO

AIM: Morbidity in patients with an ostomy is high. A new care pathway, including perioperative home visits by enterostomal therapists, was studied to assess whether more elaborate education and closer guidance could reduce stoma-related complications and improve quality of life (QoL), at acceptable cost. METHOD: Patients requiring an ileostomy or colostomy, for any inflammatory or malignant bowel disease, were included in a 15-centre cluster-randomized 'stepped-wedge' study. Primary outcomes were stoma-related complications and QoL, measured using the Stoma-QOL, 3 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes included costs of care. RESULTS: The standard pathway (SP) was followed by 113 patients and the new pathway (NP) by 105 patients. Although the overall number of stoma-related complications was similar in both groups (SP 156, NP 150), the proportion of patients experiencing one or more stoma-related complications was significantly higher in the NP (72% vs 84%, risk difference 12%; 95% CI: 0.3-23.3%). Although in the NP more patients had stoma-related complications, QoL scores were significantly better (P < 0.001). In the SP more patients required extra care at home for their ostomy than in the NP (60.6% vs 33.7%, respectively; risk difference 26.9%, 95% CI: 13.5-40.4%). Stoma revision was done more often in the SP (n = 11) than in the NP (n = 2). Total costs in the SP did not differ significantly from the NP. CONCLUSION: The NP did not reduce the number of stoma-related complications but did lead to improved quality of care and life, against similar costs. Based on these results the NP, including perioperative home visits by an enterostomal therapist, can be recommended.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Clínicos/normas , Enterostomia/reabilitação , Visita Domiciliar , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Idoso , Análise por Conglomerados , Colostomia/reabilitação , Feminino , Humanos , Ileostomia/reabilitação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade , Projetos de Pesquisa , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 30(9): 1185-92, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26054385

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although stoma closure is considered a simple surgical intervention, the interval between construction and reversal is often prolonged, and some ileostomies may never be reversed. We evaluated possible predictors for non-reversal and prolonged interval between construction and reversal. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a cohort study of ileostomy patients treated in a large teaching hospital, we collected data from the surgical complication and enterostomal therapists' registries between January 2001 and December 2011. Parameters responsible for morbidity, mortality, length of stay and time interval between construction and reversal were analysed. RESULTS: Of 485 intentionally temporary ileostomies, 359 were reversed after a median of 5.6 months (IQR 3.8-8.9 months), while 126 (26%) remained permanent. End ileostomy and intra-abdominal abscess independently delayed reversal. Age, end ileostomy, higher body mass index and preoperative radiotherapy were independent factors for non-reversal. Median duration of hospitalisation for reversal was 7.0 days (5-13 days). Morbidity and mortality were 31 and 0.9%, respectively. In 20 patients (5.5%), re-ileostomy was necessary. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of ileostomies that are intended to be temporary will never be reversed. If reversed, the interval between construction and reversal is longer than anticipated, while morbidity after reversal and duration of hospitalisation are considerable. Besides a temporary ileostomy, there are two other options: no diversion or a permanent colostomy. Shared decision-making is to be preferred in these situations.


Assuntos
Abscesso Abdominal/complicações , Técnicas de Fechamento de Ferimentos Abdominais/efeitos adversos , Ileostomia/efeitos adversos , Enteropatias/cirurgia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Índice de Massa Corporal , Feminino , Humanos , Enteropatias/radioterapia , Longevidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Probabilidade , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Recidiva , Reoperação , Fatores de Tempo
5.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 115(5): 1181-1191, 2023 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36402357

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to assess the prevalence of patient-reported symptoms of local late toxicity in patients with irradiated breast cancer and determine the association between late toxicity and quality of life. METHODS: Within the prospective Utrecht cohort for Multiple BReast cancer intErvention studies and Long-term evaluation cohort, a survey on self-reported late toxicity was sent to all patients with breast cancer with ≥12 months interval since radiation therapy treated with curative intent. Patients were treated with hypofractionated radiation therapy of 40 Gy/15 fractions or 42.5 Gy/16 fractions, with or without a simultaneous integrated boost. Symptoms of late toxicity were evaluated on a 4-point Likert scale. Late toxicity was defined as moderate-severe breast or chest wall pain combined with at least 1 other mild-severe late toxicity symptom, that is, breast or arm/hand lymphedema, firmness of the breast, or impaired arm movement. Physical, role, and social functioning were measured before, during, and after the late toxicity survey using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core questionnaire-C30 and compared with a Dutch normative population. RESULTS: In the study, 1613/2248 patients (72%) were included. Of those, 16% (n = 265) reported late toxicity. The median time interval between radiation therapy and survey was 38 months (interquartile range, 21-55). Moderate/severe firmness of the breast, chest wall pain, and breast pain were reported by, respectively, 18% (n = 295), 14% (n = 225), and 10% (n = 140) of all patients. Physical, role, and social functioning were below the clinical threshold (ie, clinically relevant impairment) in 13% to 52% of patients with late toxicity and 2% to 26% of patients without late toxicity. Patients with late toxicity significantly more often received analgesics, physiotherapy, and lymphedema therapy compared with patients without late toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided insight into the prevalence of patient-reported late toxicity after hypofractionated radiation therapy and the influence of late toxicity on quality of life after breast cancer. These results may help health care professionals to inform their patients about long-term effects of breast cancer treatment including hypofractionated radiation therapy.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Linfedema , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Dor , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente
6.
Trials ; 21(1): 980, 2020 Nov 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33246494

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer treatment with radiotherapy can induce late radiation toxicity, characterized by pain, fibrosis, edema, impaired arm mobility, and poor cosmetic outcome. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been proposed as treatment for late radiation toxicity; however, high-level evidence of effectiveness is lacking. As HBOT is standard treatment and reimbursed by insurers, performing classic randomized controlled trials is difficult. The "Hyperbaric OxygeN therapy on brEast cancer patients with late radiation toxicity" (HONEY) trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of HBOT on late radiation toxicity in breast cancer patients using the trial within cohorts (TwiCs) design. METHODS: The HONEY trial will be conducted within the Utrecht cohort for Multiple BREast cancer intervention studies and Long-term evaluation (UMBRELLA). Within UMBRELLA, breast cancer patients referred for radiotherapy to the University Medical Centre Utrecht are eligible for inclusion. Patients consent to collection of clinical data and patient-reported outcomes and provide broad consent for randomization into future intervention studies. Patients who meet the HONEY in- and exclusion criteria (participation ≥ 12 months in UMBRELLA, moderate/severe breast or chest wall pain, completed primary breast cancer treatment except hormonal treatment, no prior treatment with HBOT, no contraindications for HBOT, no clinical signs of metastatic or recurrent disease) will be randomized to HBOT or control group on a 2:1 ratio (n = 120). Patients in the control group will not be informed about participation in the trial. Patients in the intervention arm will undergo 30-40 HBOT treatment sessions in a high pressure chamber (2.4 atmospheres absolute) where they inhale 100% oxygen through a mask. Cohort outcome measures (i.e., physical outcomes, quality of life, fatigue, and cosmetic satisfaction) of the HBOT group will be compared to the control group at 3 months follow-up. DISCUSSION: This pragmatic trial within the UMBELLA cohort was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of HBOT on late radiation toxicity in breast cancer patients using the TwiCs design. Use of the TwiCs design is expected to address issues encountered in classic randomized controlled trials, such as contamination (i.e., HBOT in the control group) and disappointment bias, and generate information about acceptability of HBOT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT04193722 . Registered on 10 December 2019.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Mel , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica , Lesões por Radiação , Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Feminino , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Lesões por Radiação/diagnóstico , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Lesões por Radiação/terapia
7.
Breast ; 48: 45-53, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31493582

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate patient-reported work ability of breast cancer patients, to compare scores with the Dutch general population, and to identify determinants of reduced work ability in breast cancer patients. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, we identified 939 patients <67 years. Employed patients filled out the Work Ability Index (WAI) questionnaire before the start of radiotherapy treatment (baseline) and at 6, 18, and 30 months. Work ability was compared with a matched Dutch cancer-free population (n=3,641). The association between (clinical) characteristics and work ability over time was assessed using mixed-effects models. RESULTS: At baseline, 68% (n=641) of the respondents were employed and 64% (n=203) were employed at 30 months. Moderate or poor work ability was reported by 71% of patients at baseline, by 24% of the patients at 30 months and by 14% of the general population. Axillary lymph node dissection, (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and locoregional radiotherapy were associated with reduced work ability. After 30 months, 18% of employed patients reported to have reduced their working hours, made substantial modifications to their work or were unable to work. CONCLUSION: Patient-reported work ability is strongly reduced during breast cancer treatment. Thirty months after treatment the proportion of women reporting poor or moderate work ability remains higher compared to the general population. Even though the proportion of women with paid employment is rather stable over time, substantial amendments in work are needed in 18% of patients. These findings emphasize the importance of informing patients on potential changes in work ability to allow shared decision making.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/psicologia , Sobreviventes de Câncer/psicologia , Emprego , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Autorrelato , Avaliação da Capacidade de Trabalho
8.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg ; 44(1): 125-131, 2018 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28755132

RESUMO

PURPOSE: In patients following severe trauma sometimes the physiological condition or soft tissue status may not allow definitive fixation of a femoral fracture. In these patients, an external fixator can be placed to temporarily stabilise the fracture, after which definitive fixation can be performed in a second procedure. The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative wound infection and union rates of patients treated with direct intramedullary nailing (IMN) and patients treated with the 'two-stage treatment'. METHODS: All patients with high-energy femoral fractures treated with IMN between 2000 and 2016 in a single Level 1 trauma centre were eligible. Electronic charts were reviewed for patient and surgical characteristics; furthermore, the development of complications was noted. A propensity score analysis was performed to assess the attributed risk of the external fixator on the development of postoperative wound infections. RESULTS: A total of 149 patients were included in this study; 93 underwent direct IMN and 56 underwent the two-stage treatment. Patients who underwent two-stage treatment were more severely injured, reflected by lower EMV and higher ISS on admission. Patients in the two-stage treatment group had a significant higher risk of postoperative wound infections (OR: 4.698, 95% CI: 1.203-18.339) but not a higher risk on deep postoperative wound infections (OR 2.345, 95% CI: 0.439-12.540). Union rate did not differ between the two groups (94% vs 94% NS). CONCLUSIONS: The two-stage treatment is a safe treatment option in patients with a high-energy femoral fracture in terms of postoperative wound infections. Union rates are also comparable between the two treatment groups.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/métodos , Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Reoperação , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Adulto , Feminino , Fraturas do Fêmur/epidemiologia , Fraturas do Fêmur/fisiopatologia , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Pontuação de Propensão , Reoperação/efeitos adversos , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Centros de Traumatologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
9.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) ; 47(5): 557-61, 2006 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17033603

RESUMO

AIM: In the literature, the behavior of the aneurysm sac after endovascular grafting has been the subject of significant speculation. It has been suggested that shrinkage of the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is different for various endografts. This study was undertaken to evaluate endograft-specific differences in aneurysm sac shrinkage and to evaluate other factors that may influence AAA shrinkage. METHODS: Forty patients with an AAA treated with endovascular grafts with a complete 18 months follow-up and complete CT angiography (CTA) follow-up were available for analysis. All patients with a persistent endoleak, endograft migration or any other reason for intervention or conversion were excluded from this analysis. Shrinkage was defined as a reduction in the AAA diameter of 5 mm or more. Chi-squared tests were used to test whether shrinkage was different for the kind of stent graft used (Gore Excluder vs Cook-Zenith), preexistent AAA diameter (<65 mm vs =or>65 mm), and AAA status (ruptured vs non-ruptured) (two-sided; a= 0.05). RESULTS: At 18 months after treatment, shrinkage was observed in 14 patients (52%) of the 27 patients treated with a Gore Excluder endograft and in 8 patients (62%) of the 13 patients treated with a Cook Zenith endograft (P=0.74). In 31 patients with a diameter <65 mm, shrinkage was observed in 19 patients (61%) whereas of the 9 patients with a diameter =or>65 mm, shrinkage was observed in 3 patients (33%) (P=0.253). Of the 34 patients with a non-ruptured AAA, shrinkage was observed in 18 patients (53%) versus of the 6 patients with a ruptured AAA shrinkage was observed in 4 patients (66%) (P=0.673). CONCLUSIONS: From this study can be concluded that the influence of the endograft on shrinkage of the AAA sac might be less prominent than suggested in the literature. Furthermore, our study shows that other factors such as preexistent AAA diameter may influence AAA shrinkage after endovascular repair.


Assuntos
Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/métodos , Idoso , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Aortografia/métodos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
Rev Neurol ; 58(7): 335-6, 2014 Apr 01.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24677157

RESUMO

TITLE: El torvisco (Daphne gnidium L.): un timbo ancestral europeo.


Assuntos
Curare , Indígenas Sul-Americanos , Plantas Tóxicas , Venenos , Animais , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA