Quality control of involved field radiotherapy in patients with early-favorable (HD10) and early-unfavorable (HD11) Hodgkin's lymphoma: an analysis of the German Hodgkin Study Group.

PURPOSE: The German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) set up a radiotherapy (RT) reference center within the Department of Radiation Oncology at the University of Cologne to undertake quality assurance of the group's clinical studies. In the HD10 trial (early-favorable stages) and HD11 trial (early-unfavorable stages) all patients received involved field (IF)-RT (30 Gy vs. 20 Gy) within a combined-modality approach. For these patients a central prospective review of all diagnostic imaging was performed by expert radiation oncologists to control disease extension and to define IF treatment volume. METHODS AND MATERIALS: On the basis of simulation films, verification films, and radiotherapy case report form (CRF) an expert panel evaluated retrospectively the adequacy of irradiated IF treatment portals according to the RT prescription, applied radiation doses, treatment time, and technical parameters. RESULTS: Between 1999 and 2006 a total of 825 of 1370 randomized patients of the HD10 trial (60%) and 954 of 1422 patients of the HD11 trial (67%) were evaluated by the panel. Radiotherapy was rated as suboptimal in 47% of all reviewed cases. Although the participating RT centers received a precise RT prescription, most difficulties occurred in the adequate coverage of the IF (40%), followed by technical faults (12%). Deviations from the prescribed single daily dose (1.8-2 Gy), weekly dose, and total reference dose were rare (1%). CONCLUSIONS: As a consequence of these findings, radiation oncologists were trained on the definition of IF-RT at GHSG meetings and at the annual meetings of the German Society for Therapeutic Radiation Oncology. Possible correlations between RT quality and relapse rate will be investigated.

A Contribution to solve the problem of the need for consolidative radiotherapy after intensive chemotherapy in advanced stages of Hodgkin's lymphoma--analysis of a quality control program initiated by the radiotherapy reference center of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG).

PURPOSE: The role of radiotherapy (RT) after intensive chemotherapy in patients with advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) is still unclear. The German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) randomized HD12 trial was designed to test whether consolidative RT in the region of initial bulky disease and of residual disease is necessary after effective chemotherapy. A quality control program based on a multidisciplinary panel of radiation oncologists, radiologists, and medical oncologists who reviewed all patients' staging and restaging imaging was initiated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 1661 patients aged 16 to 65 years with HL in Stage IIB (large mediastinal mass and/or E-lesions) or Stage III to IV were randomized from January 1999 to January 2003 according to a factorial design between: 8 esc.BEACOPP + RT (arm A), 8 esc.BEACOPP non-RT (arm B), 4+4BEACOPP + RT (arm C), 4+4BEACOPP non-RT (arm D). RESULTS: In the fifth interim analysis, 1449 patients were eligible for the arm comparison with regard to RT. After a median observation time of 48 months the FFTF rate was 86% and the OS 92%. The FFTF was 95% in the RT arms A+C and 88% in the non-RT arms B+D: no sequential significant difference. One thousand and eighty four patients were evaluated by the panel. The panel defined initial bulky disease in 800 patients and residual disease in 600 patients. The panel recommended continuation of therapy according to the randomization for 934 of 1084 patients and additive RT independently from the randomization arm for 145 of 1084 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that RT can be reduced substantially after effective chemotherapy. However, because of the irradiation of 10% of patients in the non-RT arms, equivalent effectiveness of a non-RT strategy cannot be proved. A substantial limitation of consolidative RT according to expert panel recommendations appears to be possible without reducing effectiveness.

Biophysical analysis of the acute toxicity of radiotherapy in Hodgkin's lymphoma--a comparison between extended field and involved field radiotherapy based on the data of the German Hodgkin Study Group.

PURPOSE: To determine biophysical parameters from the complication probability data during and after radiotherapy of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), based on the number of gastrointestinal side effects that were found in the multicenter HD8 trial of the German Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1993 and 1998, 1204 patients with newly diagnosed, histology-proven HL in clinical Stages I/IIA/IIB with defined risk factors and stage IIIA without risk factors were enrolled into the multicenter HD8 study. Patients were randomized to receive two cycles of COPP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone) alternating with two cycles of ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) followed by radiotherapy (RT) of 30 Gy extended field plus 10 Gy to bulky disease (Arm A) or 30 Gy involved field plus 10 Gy to bulky disease (Arm B). For 910 patients, the rates of acute gastrointestinal side effects during and after RT could be determined. Comparison showed differences between Arms A and B (Grade 1-2: 16.6 vs. 3.9; Grade 3-4: 0.9 vs. 0.2; p < 0.001). From the dose-volume histograms for a "standard patient" (volume intestine 2300 cm3), we determined the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) (V, D, m, n, TD50), the biophysical parameter TD50, and n (volume dependent) in such a manner that the observed NTCP in Arm A in cases of supradiaphragmatic involvement only and in cases of infradiaphragmatic involvement correlated with the calculated values. RESULTS: Of 1,204 patients randomized, 1,064 patients were informative for the comparison of study arms. The median observation time was 54 months. The overall survival for all eligible patients was 91%, and freedom from treatment failure was 83%. Survival rates at 5 years after start of RT revealed no differences in terms of freedom from treatment failure (85.8% in Arm A, 84.2% in Arm B) and overall survival (90.8% and 92.4%). There were also no differences between the two arms in terms of complete remission, progressive disease, relapse, death, and secondary neoplasias. In contrast, acute side effects, including leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, gastrointestinal toxicity, and pharyngeal toxicity, were more frequent in the extended field arm. Concerning gastrointestinal toxicity, the different radiation treatment volumes resulted in different NTCPs. On the basis of these findings, values of n = 0.09 and TD50 = 32 Gy were derived. However, this biophysical model is sensitive to variations of the parameters. A deviation of 1% of TD50 results in a deviation of 10% of the NTCP. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy volume reduction from extended field to involved field after two cycles of COPP/ABVD chemotherapy gives similar results and less toxicity in patients with early-stage, unfavorable HL. Biophysical parameters could be determined from the complication probability data after RT of HL. Because of the exponential dependence, this biophysical model is unstable. It represents a "start model" until further data can be incorporated.

Centralized radiation oncologic review of cross-sectional imaging of Hodgkin's disease leads to significant changes in required involved field-results of a quality assurance program of the German Hodgkin Study Group.

PURPOSE: To guarantee the treatment quality of involved-field radiotherapy (IF-RT) of patients in the Hodgkin's disease (HD)10 and HD11 trials of the German Hodgkin Study Group, with 460 participating study centers, a quality assurance program was conducted. It was based on a central prospective radiation oncologic review of all patients' entire diagnostic imaging and clinical findings. An individual RT prescription was provided for every study patient. The purpose of the present investigation was to assess the feasibility of such a procedure and its impact on the final definition of disease extension and patient treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1998 and 2002, 1371 patients were enrolled into the HD10 trial (early-stage disease) and 1570 patients into the HD11 trial (intermediate-stage disease). The HD10 trial tested four cycles of Adriamycin (doxorubicin), bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) against two cycles of ABVD followed by 20 Gy of IF-RT vs. 30 Gy of IF-RT (four study arms). The HD11 trial compared four cycles of ABVD with four cycles of BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone) baseline followed by 20 Gy IF-RT vs. 30 Gy IF-RT in a four-arm design. All study centers were required to score disease involvement at a total of 34 possible anatomic sites on case report forms and send them, together with all diagnostic imaging, to the RT reference center in Cologne, Germany. Images were reviewed there by a panel of expert radiation oncologists and radiologists and compared with the case report form. Differences between the disease involvement documented by the participating center and the reference center were recorded. Subsequently, an individualized treatment proposal was compiled. Complete sets of documentation were submitted to the reference center for 89% of the patients in both HD10 and HD11. RESULTS: A considerable proportion of involved sites were incorrectly recorded on the corresponding case report form by the participating center. For patients with early-stage HD (HD10), there was a correction of disease involvement in 49% (593 of 1214 patients) and for patients with intermediate-stage HD (HD11) in 67% (936 of 1397 patients). Most discrepancies were seen in the lower mediastinum (23%), infraclavicular (17%), upper cervical (16%), supraclavicular (13%), and pulmonary hilar region (13%). This resulted in a change of disease stage in 41 of those 1,529 patients whose documented disease involvement had to be corrected (2.7%). Ninety-three patients had to be treated in a different protocol, because of changes in stage and risk factors. Owing to incorrect lymph node documentation of the participating centers, the RT treatment volume had to be enlarged in 891 (34%) and reduced in 82 (3%) of 2,611 patients. CONCLUSION: A central prospective review of patient data and consecutive prescription of individual RT treatment volume is feasible within large multicenter trials for HD. Such a procedure has a significant impact on the correctness of stage definition, allocation to treatment groups, and extent of the IF treatment volume.

Lymphocyte-predominant and classical Hodgkin's lymphoma: a comprehensive analysis from the German Hodgkin Study Group.

PURPOSE: Lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin's lymphoma (LPHL) is rare and differs in histologic and clinical presentation from classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (cHL). To shed more light on the prognosis and outcome of LPHL, we reviewed all LPHL patients registered in the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) database, comparing patient characteristics and treatment outcome with cHL patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed retrospectively 8,298 HL patients treated within the GHSG trials HD4 to HD12, of whom 394 had LPHL and 7,904 had cHL. RESULTS: Complete remission and unconfirmed complete remission after first-line treatment was achieved in 91.6% v 85.9% of patients in early favorable stages, 85.7% v 83.3% of patients in early unfavorable stages, and 76.8% v 77.8% of patients in advanced stages of LPHL compared with cHL, respectively. Tumor control (freedom from treatment failure [FFTF]) for LPHL and cHL patients at a median observation of 50 months was 88% and 82% (P = .0093) and overall survival (OS) was 96% and 92%, respectively (P = .0166). In LPHL patients, negative prognostic factors were advanced stage (P = .0092), Hb less than 10.5 g/dL (P = .0171), and lymphopenia (P = .010) for FFTF. Age >or= 45 years (P = .0125), advanced stage (P = .0153), and Hb less than 10.5 g/dL (P = .0014) were negative prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSION: The better prognosis of LPHL as compared with cHL might allow different treatment strategies, particularly for early-stage LPHL patients.