Plasma proteomic analysis on neuropathic pain in idiopathic peripheral neuropathy patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Why only half of the idiopathic peripheral neuropathy (IPN) patients develop neuropathic pain remains unknown. By conducting a proteomics analysis on IPN patients, we aimed to discover proteins and new pathways that are associated with neuropathic pain. METHODS: We conducted unbiased mass-spectrometry proteomics analysis on blood plasma from 31 IPN patients with severe neuropathic pain and 29 IPN patients with no pain, to investigate protein biomarkers and protein-protein interactions associated with neuropathic pain. Univariate modeling was done with linear mixed modeling (LMM) and corrected for multiple testing. Multivariate modeling was performed using elastic net analysis and validated with internal cross-validation and bootstrapping. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis, 73 proteins showed a p-value <.05 and 12 proteins showed a p-value <.01. None were significant after Benjamini-Hochberg adjustment for multiple testing. Elastic net analysis created a model containing 12 proteins with reasonable discriminatory power to differentiate between painful and painless IPN (false-negative rate 0.10, false-positive rate 0.18, and an area under the curve 0.75). Eight of these 12 proteins were clustered into one interaction network, significantly enriched for the complement and coagulation pathway (Benjamini-Hochberg adjusted p-value = .0057), with complement component 3 (C3) as the central node. Bootstrap validation identified insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 2 (IGFBP2), complement factor H-related protein 4 (CFHR4), and ferritin light chain (FTL), as the most discriminatory proteins of the original 12 identified. INTERPRETATION: This proteomics analysis suggests a role for the complement system in neuropathic pain in IPN.

A crisis in US drug pricing: Consequences for patients with neuromuscular diseases, physicians and society, part 1.

Drug prices in the United States have reached astounding heights, negatively impacting patients and society. The vast majority of prescription drug spending is on brand name drugs, which are protected from typical market pressures by FDA exclusivity and intellectual property patents. Drugs to treat "orphan" diseases, of particular relevance to neuromuscular clinicians, are some of the most expensive in all of medicine. The Orphan Drug Act's original intent was to incentivize the creation of drugs that would otherwise provide little economic payoff. While it has facilitated incredible, life-changing drugs for our patients, it has also become a source of abuse. Many expensive drugs approved under the Orphan Drug Act were previously available for compassionate use or for another indication at much lower prices. As patients increasingly face high drug prices, it is important for clinicians to understand a drug's risk for inducing financial toxicity, as the financial and emotional consequences of an overpriced low-value drug may outweigh its intended benefit.

A crisis in US drug pricing: Consequences for patients with neuromuscular diseases, physicians, and society, part 2.

Escalating drug costs place patients at risk for financial toxicity and demand that physicians understand and act on the ethical and economic principles related to drug pricing. This manuscript reviews these principles and provides clinicians with a framework to think about the value of the drugs prescribed for patients with neuromuscular diseases. A key component of addressing the drug pricing crisis will be establishing a value based (benefit/cost) drug pricing framework. Determining the value of a drug is difficult and requires estimating the benefit and costs to patients and society while integrating indirect and contextual variables. Other considerations in drug pricing include "externality," the value to society derived from innovation. The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) is a leading independent research organization providing clinicians with value-based price "benchmarks." All physicians must educate themselves in drug pricing principles and be prepared to have conversations regarding individual and societal value with the patients they serve.

Validation of the triple timed up-and-go test in Lambert-Eaton myasthenia.

INTRODUCTION: There are no validated, practical, and quantitative measures of disease severity in Lambert-Eaton myasthenia (LEM). METHODS: Data from the Effectiveness of 3,4-Diaminopyridine in Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome (DAPPER) trial were analyzed to assess triple timed up-and-go (3TUG) reproducibility and relationships between 3TUG times and other measures of LEM severity. RESULTS: The coverage probability technique showed ≥0.90 probability for an acceptable 3TUG difference of ≤0.2, indicating that it is reproducible in LEM patients. The correlation between 3TUG times and lower extremity function scores was significant in subjects who continued and in those who were withdrawn from 3,4-diaminopyridine free base. Worsening patient-reported Weakness Self-Assessment Scale and Investigator Assessment of Treatment Effect scores corresponded with prolongation of 3TUG times. DISCUSSION: The 3TUG is reproducible, demonstrates construct validity for assessment of lower extremity function in LEM patients, and correlates with changes in patient and physician assessments. These findings, along with prior reliability studies, indicate 3TUG is a valid measure of disease severity in LEM.

Peripheral Neuropathy Research Registry: A prospective cohort.

The Peripheral Neuropathy Research Registry (PNRR) is a prospective cohort of peripheral neuropathy (PN) patients focused on idiopathic axonal peripheral neuropathy. Patients with diabetic, human immunodeficiency virus-, and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathies are enrolled as comparison groups. The PNRR is a multi-center collaboration initiated and funded by the Foundation for Peripheral Neuropathy (FPN) with the objective to recruit a well characterized cohort of patients with different phenotypes and symptoms in each diagnostic category, and to advance research through development of biomarkers and identification of previously unknown causes of PN. The overall goal of the initiative is to find disease-altering treatments and better symptom relief for patients. We present the study design, types of data collected, and characteristics of the first 1150 patients enrolled. We also discuss ongoing analyses on this dataset, including untargeted-omics methodologies.

Increased Blood Pressure Variability Contributes to Worse Outcome After Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Background and Purpose- Increased systolic blood pressure variability (BPV) is associated with worse outcome after acute ischemic stroke and may also have a negative impact after intracerebral hemorrhage. We sought to determine whether increased BPV was detrimental in the ATACH-2 (Antihypertensive Treatment of Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage II) trial. Methods- The primary outcome of our study was a 3-month follow-up modified Rankin Scale of 3 to 6, and the secondary outcome was a utility-weighted modified Rankin Scale. We calculated blood pressure mean and variability using systolic blood pressure from the acute period (2-24 hours postrandomization) and subacute period (days 2, 3, and 7). Results- The acute period included 913 patients and the subacute included 877. For 5 different statistical measures of systolic BPV, there was a consistent association between increased BPV and worse neurological outcome in both the acute and subacute periods. This association was not found for systolic blood pressure mean. Conclusions- In this secondary analysis of ATACH-2, we show that increased systolic BPV is associated with worse long-term neurological outcome. Additional research is needed to find techniques that allow early identification of patients with an expected elevation of BPV and to study pharmacological or protocol-based approaches to minimize BPV.

3,4-diaminopyridine base effectively treats the weakness of Lambert-Eaton myasthenia.

INTRODUCTION: 3,4-diaminopyridine has been used to treat Lambert-Eaton myasthenia (LEM) for 30 years despite the lack of conclusive evidence of efficacy. METHODS: We conducted a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled withdrawal study in patients with LEM who had been on stable regimens of 3,4-diaminopyridine base (3,4-DAP) for ≥ 3 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was >30% deterioration in triple timed up-and-go (3TUG) times during tapered drug withdrawal. The secondary endpoint was self-assessment of LEM-related weakness (W-SAS). RESULTS: Thirty-two participants were randomized to continuous 3,4-DAP or placebo groups. None of the 14 participants who received continuous 3,4-DAP had > 30% deterioration in 3TUG time versus 72% of the 18 who tapered to placebo (P < 0.0001). W-SAS similarly demonstrated an advantage for continuous treatment over placebo (P < 0.0001). Requirement for rescue and adverse events were more common in the placebo group. DISCUSSION: This trial provides significant evidence of efficacy of 3,4-DAP in the maintenance of strength in LEM. Muscle Nerve 57: 561-568, 2018.

Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome: Epidemiology and therapeutic response in the national veterans affairs population.

INTRODUCTION: One nationwide study (The Netherlands) of Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) has been published. We report LEMS epidemiology and its therapeutic response in the United States Veterans Affairs (VA) population. METHODS: Medical records for all active patients (12.5 million) in the VA health system were queried for relevant ICD-9 codes for the period October 1, 1999 to September 30, 2013. Clinical, electrophysiologic, and serologic features were evaluated to confirm diagnosis; epidemiologic and treatment data were collected. RESULTS: Point prevalence was estimated at 2.6 per 1,000,000 (confirmed cases) and 3.3 per 1,000,000 (combined confirmed and probable cases). Crude prevalence was similarly estimated at 9.2 and 10.9 per 1,000,000 respectively. A total of 18 of 48 (38%) patients received 3,4-diaminopyridine (3,4-DAP); 14 of 18 (78%) improved. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation was a large North American epidemiologic study of LEMS. LEMS prevalence in the national VA population was found to be similar to previously published rates in other large international populations. Most patients experienced improvement with therapy, including a majority with 3,4-DAP. Muscle Nerve 56: 421-426, 2017.

Content validity of symptom-based measures for diabetic, chemotherapy, and HIV peripheral neuropathy.

INTRODUCTION: No treatments for axonal peripheral neuropathy are approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Although patient- and clinician-reported outcomes are central to evaluating neuropathy symptoms, they can be difficult to assess accurately. The inability to identify efficacious treatments for peripheral neuropathies could be due to invalid or inadequate outcome measures. METHODS: This systematic review examined the content validity of symptom-based measures of diabetic peripheral neuropathy, HIV neuropathy, and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. RESULTS: Use of all FDA-recommended methods to establish content validity was only reported for 2 of 18 measures. Multiple sensory and motor symptoms were included in measures for all 3 conditions; these included numbness, tingling, pain, allodynia, difficulty walking, and cramping. Autonomic symptoms were less frequently included. CONCLUSIONS: Given significant overlap in symptoms between neuropathy etiologies, a measure with content validity for multiple neuropathies with supplemental disease-specific modules could be of great value in the development of disease-modifying treatments for peripheral neuropathies. Muscle Nerve 55: 366-372, 2017.