Transversus abdominis release (TAR) for ventral hernia repair: open or robotic? Short-term outcomes from a systematic review with meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare early postoperative outcomes after transversus abdominis release (TAR) for ventral hernia repair with open (oTAR) and robotic (rTAR) approach. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS and Web of Science databases was conducted to identify comparative studies until October 2020. A meta-analysis of postoperative short-term outcomes was performed including complications rate, operative time, length of stay, surgical site infection (SSI), surgical site occurrence (SSO), SSO requiring intervention (SSOPI), systemic complications, readmission, and reoperation rates as measure outcomes. RESULTS: Six retrospective studies were included in the analysis with a total of 831 patients who underwent rTAR (n = 237) and oTAR (n = 594). Robotic TAR was associated with lower risk of complications rate (9.3 vs 20.7%, OR 0.358, 95% CI 0.218-0.589, p < 0.001), lower risk of developing SSO (5.3 vs 11.5%, OR 0.669, 95% CI 0.307-1.458, p = 0.02), lower risk of developing systemic complications (6.3 vs 26.5%, OR 0.208, 95% CI 0.100-0.433, p < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (SMD - 4.409, 95% CI - 6.000 to - 2.818, p < 0.001) but longer operative time (SMD 53.115, 95% CI 30.236-75.993, p < 0.01) compared with oTAR. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of SSI, SSOPI, readmission, and reoperation rates. CONCLUSION: Robotic TAR improves recovery by adding the benefits of minimally invasive procedures when compared to open surgery. Although postoperative complications appear to decrease with a robotic approach, further studies are needed to support the real long-term and cost-effective advantages.

Harmonic Focus Versus Conventional Electrocautery for Femoral Artery Exposure: a "Direct" Comparison on the Same Patients.

Surgical access complications during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) are reported relatively frequent. HARMONIC FOCUS® (HF; Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio, USA) is a device developed to improve bleeding control and reduce heat-related damage stemming from surgical preparation. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes and safety of HF versus conventional haemostasis with electrocautery, both techniques used in the same patient. Five patients developed bilateral wound's thickening (13.9%) demonstrated at the CT scan, two of whom had no clinical manifestation while in three cases the thickening was associated with lymphocele (4.54%), 2 of which were in the side where the EC was used (5.5%), and 1 case (2.7%), in the HF applied side. One isolated lymphocele occurred at the left groin (2.7%) (tables n.2-3). A Fisher's exact test was conducted between EC and HF on the occurrence of wound healing complications (3/36 for EC and 1/36 for HF) that resulted statistically significant at p<0.05. Focus Harmonic Scalpel has certain advantages than conventional haemostasis in avoiding surgical access complications.

Pooled data analysis of primary ventral (PVH) and incisional hernia (IH) repair is no more acceptable: results of a systematic review and metanalysis of current literature.

PURPOSE: Primary (PVHs) and incisional (IHs) ventral hernias represent a common indication for surgery. Nevertheless, most of the papers presented in literature analyze both types of defect together, thus potentially introducing a bias in the results of interpretation. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to highlight the differences between these two entities. METHODS: Methods MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were reviewed to identify studies evaluating the outcomes of both open and laparoscopic repair with mesh of PVHs vs IHs. Search was restricted to English language literature. Risk of bias was assessed with MINORS score. Primary outcome was recurrence, and secondary outcomes were baseline characteristics and intraoperative and postoperative data. Fixed effects model was used unless significant heterogeneity, assessed with the Higgins I square (I2), was encountered. RESULTS: The search resulted in 783 hits, after screening; 11 retrospective trials were selected including 38,727 patients. Mean MINORS of included trials was 15.2 (range 5-21). The estimated pooled proportion difference for recurrence was - 0.09 (- 0.11; - 0.07) between the two groups in favor of the PVH group. On metanalysis, PVHs were smaller in area and diameters, affected younger and less comorbid patients, and were more frequently singular; the operative time and length of stay was quicker. Other complications did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: Our paper supports the hypothesis that PVH and IH are different conditions with the latter being more challenging to treat. Accordingly, EHS classifications should be adopted systematically as well as pooling data analysis should be no longer performed in clinical trials.

Intraoperative radiochromoguided mapping of sentinel lymph node in colon cancer.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to assess the feasibility of sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection in colon cancer using a radiochromoguided technique. The regional lymph node status is crucial for colorectal cancer staging and the stage of disease at the time of diagnosis is the main factor influencing therapeutic decision-making and patient survival. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: Between April and June 2001 eight patients with colon cancer were studied by radiochromoguided sentinel lymph node mapping. At the time of surgery 2 ml of patent blue dye was injected around the tumor, followed after 10 minutes by 2 ml of 99mTc-labeled albumin. After 30 minutes the SLN was identified by a gamma probe. Surgery was completed by standard resection. The SLN was processed for permanent hematoxylin and eosin staining and for immunohistochemical examination with anti-CEA and anti-cytokeratin antibodies. RESULTS: SLNs were identified in six patients; two were negative for metastasis by hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemical examination, two were positive for metastasis by both methods, and two were negative for metastasis by hematoxylin-eosin but positive by immunohistochemical examination. There were no false negative SLNs and no complications occurred. CONCLUSION: The actual utility of SLN detection for prognostic purposes is still unknown, but intraoperative radiochromoguided SLN mapping is technically feasible in colon cancer, although it is associated with more technical difficulties than in breast cancer and malignant melanoma.

[Recent developments in the medical treatment of emergency cirrhotic hemorrhage. Vasopressin and glipressin, prostaglandins, somatostatin, propranolol, cimetidine and ranitidine]. / Recenti acquisizioni in tema di trattamento medico nelle urgenze emorragiche da cirrosi. Vasopressina e glipressina, prostaglandine, somatostatina, propanololo, cimetidina e ranitidina.

Haemorrhages in the course of cirrhosis and portal hypertension are surgical emergencies. Nevertheless medical treatment may be necessary both to revive the patient and temporarily to check the haemorrhaging itself. Some views are presented on the use of drugs, both those already in clinical use and others at the experimental stage, which appear to be effective in the treatment of haemorrhaging in portal hypertension (Vasopressin, glypressin, prostaglandin, somatostatin, propranolol, cimetidine and ranitidine).

[Hemorrhage of esophageal varices: conservative or emergency treatment?]. / Le emorragie da varici esofagee: trattamento conservativo o intervento d'urgenza?

The emergency treatment of bleeding esophageal varices still remain a very difficult problem. In this report results obtained with conservative and operative procedures will be compared. In particular 32 patients underwent transhepatic occlusion of the gastric vessels feeding varices, and 8 patients (total experience 27 cases) to emergency esophageal transection with the EEA stapler instrument. The conclusion is that both methods represent useful alternatives, in selected cases, rather than being antagonists.

Beneficial effects of fibrin glue (Quixil) versus Lichtenstein conventional technique in inguinal hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: In inguinal hernia repair, many complications are due to mesh fixation technique. Therefore, new types of atraumatic methods of fixation have been proposed. In this article, we present the results of a prospective multicentric parallel randomized controlled trial aiming to compare two mesh fixation techniques: fibrin sealant (QUIXIL(®), Omrix Biopharmaceuticals S.A., Belgium) and Lichtenstein technique. METHOD: Adult patients with primary uncomplicated inguinal hernia were randomized in two groups: fibrin sealant group (FSG) and Lichtenstein group (LTG). The two groups underwent a follow-up of 15 months. Operative time is the primary outcome. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Moreover, a differential cost analysis was performed. Patients and evaluators (with exception of the surgeon who treated the patient) were blinded. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients, 50 in FSG and 52 in LTG, were enrolled from January 2009 to June 2010, and two patients were lost to follow-up at the twelfth month. No significant differences in baseline and clinical characteristics were observed in the two groups. Operative time was longer in LTG (median/ interquartile range: 35 min/30-42.5 min vs. 31 min/28-35 min; effect size: 0.65/95% CI 0.50-0.91; p < 0.05). No differences in intraoperative complications were observed. No significant differences were observed in early complication rate (RR = 0.62; p > 0.05). Numbness rate was lower in the FSG at 1 week (RR = 0.43; p < 0.01) and at 1 month (RR = 0.17; p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed after 6 months. Postoperative pain was lower in the FSG at 1 week (0/0-1 vs. 1/0-2; p < 0.05) and at 1 month (0/0-0 vs. 0/0-1; p < 0.05). Pain disappeared in all patients after 6 months. Analgesic assumption rate was lower in the FSG (RR = 0.42; p < 0.05). Twenty per cent of FSG and 9.62% of LTG patients were discharged within 12 h; 78% of FSG and 90.38% of LTG patients were discharged within 24 h. The only one recurrence we observed was in FSG group. About costs, although fibrin sealant needed for one mesh fixation is about 10 times more costly than the needed sutures, the total costs of the two procedures did not change significantly. This was mainly due to reduction in operative time. CONCLUSIONS: The use of fibrin sealant determined a significant reduction in short-term numbness rate and postoperative pain. There was no relevant difference in total costs per patient between the two procedures.