Randomized phase 2 trial of tremelimumab and durvalumab in combination versus sequentially in recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated limited responses in recurrent ovarian cancer; however, 30%-40% of patients achieve stable disease. The primary objective was to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) after sequential versus combination cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 and programmed death ligand 1 ICIs in patients with platinum-resistant high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). METHODS: Patients were randomized to a sequential arm (tremelimumab followed by durvalumab on progression) or a combination arm (tremelimumab plus durvalumab, followed by durvalumab) via a Bayesian adaptive design that made it more likely for patients to be randomized to the more effective arm. The primary end point was immune-related PFS (irPFS). RESULTS: Sixty-one subjects were randomized to sequential (n = 38) or combination therapy (n = 23). Thirteen patients (34.2%) in the sequential arm received durvalumab. There was no difference in PFS in the sequential arm (1.84 months; 95% CI, 1.77-2.17 months) compared with the combination arm (1.87 months; 95% CI, 1.77-2.43 months) (p = .402). In the sequential arm, no responses were observed, although 12 patients (31.6%) demonstrated stable disease. In the combination arm, two patients (8.7%) had partial response, whereas one patient (4.4%) had stable disease. Adverse events were consistent with those previously reported for ICIs. Patient-reported outcomes were similar in both arms. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in irPFS for combination tremelimumab plus durvalumab compared to tremelimumab alone (administered as part of a sequential treatment strategy) in a heavily pretreated population of patients with platinum-resistant HGSOC. Response rates were comparable to prior reports, although the combination regimen did not add significant benefit, as has been previously described.

Comparative analysis of hormonal therapy in low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the disease course of patients with low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS) and compare oncologic outcomes associated with hormonal therapy in primary and recurrent disease. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients with LG-ESS who underwent active treatment between January 2000 and July 2023. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimator and modeled via Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: A total of 221 patients were included; 58 % of patients (91/157) were stage I, 12 % (19/157) stage II, 13 % (20/157) stage III, and 17 % (27/157) stage IV. Surgery was the primary treatment for 98 % (213/218). Only 79 patients received hormonal adjuvant therapy, 58 % (46/79) Megace, 24 % (19/79) Letrozole, and 18 % (14/79) received other hormonal therapy. There was no significant difference in RFS (p = 0.159) and OS (p = 0.167) between patients receiving Megace versus Letrozole as adjuvant therapy. At first recurrence, patients given Megace had a similar RFS to those on Letrozole (p = 0.302), but a better OS (27 vs 10 months, p = 0.018).  Negative status of estrogen, smooth muscle actin, and desmin were associated with lower RFS (p = 0.039, p = 0.002, and p = 0.015, respectively) and OS (p = 0.008, p = 0.012, and p = 0.013, respectively). Lymphovascular invasion was associated with lower RFS (p = 0.033), and negative status of progesterone was associated with lower OS (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in oncologic outcomes between Megace and Letrozole in patients who received adjuvant therapy for LG-ESS. Megace may have potential survival advantage in recurrent disease. Further study is warranted to determine the most effective agents and their sequence in the treatment of LG-ESS.

Perioperative outcomes in gynecologic pelvic exenteration before and after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery program.

OBJECTIVES: To compare perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies before and after implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols. METHODS: We performed an institutional retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies before (1/1/2006-12/30/2014) and after (1/1/2015-6/30/2023) ERAS implementation. We described ERAS compliance rates. We compared outcomes up to 60 days post-exenteration. Complication grades were defined by the Clavien-Dindo system. RESULTS: Overall, 105 women underwent pelvic exenteration; 74 (70.4%) in the pre-ERAS and 31 (29.5%) in the ERAS cohorts. There were no differences between cohorts in age, body mass index, race, primary disease site, type of exenteration, urinary diversion, or vaginal reconstruction. All patients had complications, with at least one grade II+ complication in 94.6% of pre-ERAS and 90.3% of ERAS patients. The ERAS cohort had more grade I-II gastrointestinal (61.3% vs 21.6%, p < 0.001) and hematologic (61.3% vs 36.5%, p = 0.030) and grade III-IV renal (29.0% vs 12.2%, p = 0.048) and wound (45.2% vs 18.9%, p = 0.008) complications compared to the pre-ERAS cohort. ERAS patients had a higher rate of ileus (38.7% vs 10.8%, p = 0.002), urinary leak (22.6% vs 5.4%, p = 0.014), pelvic abscess (35.5% vs 10.8%, p = 0.005), postoperative bleeding requiring intervention (61.3% vs 28.4%, p = 0.002), and readmission (71.4% vs 46.5%, p = 0.025). Median ERAS compliance was 60%. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic exenteration remains a morbid procedure, and complications were more common in ERAS compared to pre-ERAS cohorts. ERAS protocols should be optimized and tailored to the complexity of pelvic exenteration compared to standard gynecologic oncology ERAS pathways.

Efficacy, safety, and feasibility of Apixaban for postoperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis following open gynecologic cancer surgery at a comprehensive cancer center.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate safety, efficacy, and feasibility of apixaban for postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis following open gynecologic cancer surgery at a comprehensive cancer center. METHODS: This retrospective, cohort study included patients with gynecologic cancer who underwent open surgery between 3/2021 and 3/2023 and received 28-day postoperative VTE prophylaxis. Patients on therapeutic anticoagulation preoperatively were excluded. Predictors of 90- and 30-day VTE and 30-day bleeding events were determined using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for known confounders. RESULTS: 452 patients were included in the cohort: 348 received apixaban and 104 received enoxaparin. Those who received enoxaparin were more likely to be American Society of Anesthesiologists class III/IV (compared to I/II) (p = 0.033), current or former smokers (p = 0.012) and have a higher BMI (p < 0.001), Charlson Comorbidity Index (p = 0.005), and age (p = 0.046). 30-day VTE rate was significantly lower in the apixaban group (0.6%) compared to the enoxaparin group (6.2%) (adjusted OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03-0.56; p = 0.006). 90-day VTE rate was 2.7% and 6.2% in the apixaban and enoxaparin groups, respectively (adjusted OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.38-1.92; p = 0.704). Major bleeding complications (2.4% vs. 2.0%) and minor bleeding complications (0.9% vs. 3.0%) were similar in the apixaban and enoxaparin groups, respectively, on multivariate analyses. The median patient out of pocket cost was $10 (IQR 0.0-40.0) for apixaban and $20 (IQR 3.7-67.7) for enoxaparin (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings along with previously published data suggest that apixaban should be considered the standard of care for VTE prophylaxis in patients undergoing open surgery for gynecologic malignancies.

Comprehensive molecular characterization of early stage grade 3 endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The treatment for stage IB grade 3 endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma is challenging with variable practice. Molecular characterization may help identify adjuvant therapy strategies beyond stage. We aimed to better understand the molecular features of these tumors by characterizing them by ProMisE classification, mutational signature, and commonly mutated genes. METHODS: Patients with stage IB grade 3 EEC at two institutions were included. Immunohistochemistry and whole exome sequencing were performed on archival FFPE tissue sections to determine ProMisE classification. Personal Cancer Genome Reporter was used for somatic variant annotation, and mutational signatures were generated based on COSMIC single base substitution mutational signatures. RESULTS: 46 patients were included with variable adjuvant treatment. Nine patients recurred (19.6%), most with extra-abdominal disease (n = 5, or 55.6%). 10 had POLE mutations (21.7%), 18 were MMR deficient (39.1%), 6 had abnormal p53 (13.0%), and 12 were p53 wildtype (26.1%). There were no recurrences in the POLE subgroup. A dominant mutational signature was identified in 38 patients: 17 SBS5 signature (44.7%), 10 SBS15 or SBS44 signature (26.3%), 7 SBS10a or SBS10b signature (18.4%), 3 SBS14 signature (7.9%), and 1 SBS40 signature (2.6%). The six patients that recurred had a SBS5 signature. Frequently mutated genes included ARID1A (n = 30, 65%), PTEN (n = 28, 61%), MUC16 (n = 27, 59%), and PIK3CA (n = 25, 54%). CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive evaluation found a molecularly diverse cohort of tumors, despite the same histology, stage and grade. Mutational signature SBS5 correlated with a high risk of recurrence. Further refining of endometrial cancer classification may enable more precise patient stratification and personalized treatment approaches.

Vulvar Cancer, Version 3.2024, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Vulvar cancer is annually diagnosed in an estimated 6,470 individuals and the vast majority are histologically squamous cell carcinomas. Vulvar cancer accounts for 5% to 8% of gynecologic malignancies. Known risk factors for vulvar cancer include increasing age, infection with human papillomavirus, cigarette smoking, inflammatory conditions affecting the vulva, and immunodeficiency. Most vulvar neoplasias are diagnosed at early stages. Rarer histologies exist and include melanoma, extramammary Paget's disease, Bartholin gland adenocarcinoma, verrucous carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, and sarcoma. This manuscript discusses recommendations outlined in the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for treatments, surveillance, systemic therapy options, and gynecologic survivorship.

2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIA endometrial cancer: oncologic outcomes based on involvement of adnexa, serosa, or both.

OBJECTIVE: To assess clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes of patients with endometrial carcinoma involving adnexal, full-thickness serosal, or combined involvement. METHODS: This international, multi-institutional, retrospective study examined patients with 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIA endometrial cancer and tumors involving the uterine serosa and/or adnexa, who were surgically staged between 2000 and 2019. Patients with sarcoma histology, concurrent endometrial/ovarian malignancy, neoadjuvant treatment, positive lymph nodes, or peritoneal disease were excluded. RESULTS: Of 185 patients identified, 139 had tumors with adnexal-only, 40 with serosal-only, and six with combined adnexal/serosal involvement. Median age at diagnosis was 60 years (range 23-89). Among tumors of endometrioid histology, 12 (48%) with serosal-only and 17 (19%) with adnexal-only involvement were FIGO grade 3 (p=0.007). Twenty-three tumors with serosal-only (64%) and 50 with adnexal-only (37%) involvement had lymphovascular invasion (p=0.004). Non-endometrioid histology was present in five tumors (83%) with combined adnexal/serosal, 15 (38%) with serosal-only, and 50 (36%) with adnexal-only involvement.Median follow-up was 77 months (range 0.6-254). Five-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates for all patients with stage IIIA disease were 73.8% (SE 3.5%) and 81.0% (SE 3.1%), respectively. For patients with adnexal-only, serosal-only, and combined adnexal/serosal involvement, 5-year progression-free survival rates were 80% (SE 3.8%), 61% (SE 8.3%), and 33% (SE 19.2%), respectively (p<0.01); 5-year overall survival rates were 85% (SE 3.3%), 70% (SE 7.8%), and 60% (SE 21.9%), respectively (p=0.09). On univariate analysis, tumors having serosal involvement with/without adnexal involvement, non-endometrioid histology, and lymphovascular invasion were significantly associated with progression. On multivariate analysis, tumors having serosal involvement with/without adnexal involvement remained significantly associated with recurrence (adjusted HR=2.2, 95% CI 1.2 to 4.3; p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with 2009 FIGO stage IIIA endometrial cancer have distinct survival outcomes depending upon adnexal and/or serosal involvement. Progression-free survival was worse for patients with serosal involvement after adjusting for histology, adjuvant treatment, and lymphovascular space invasion.

Patient Engagement With Early Stage Advance Care Planning at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.

BACKGROUND: Establishing care preferences and selecting a prepared medical decision-maker (MDM) are basic components of advance care planning (ACP) and integral to treatment planning. Systematic ACP in the cancer setting is uncommon. We evaluated a systematic social work (SW)-driven process for patient selection of a prepared MDM. METHODS: We used a pre/post design, centered on SW counseling incorporated into standard-of-care practice. New patients with gynecologic malignancies were eligible if they had an available family caregiver or an established Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA). Questionnaires were completed at baseline and 3 months to ascertain MPOA document (MPOAD) completion status (primary objective) and evaluate factors associated with MPOAD completion (secondary objectives). RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty patient/caregiver dyads consented to participate. One hundred and sixteen (32%) had MPOADs at baseline. Twenty (8%) of the remaining 244 dyads completed MPOADs by 3 months. Two hundred and thirty-six patients completed the values and goals survey at both baseline and follow-up: at follow-up, care preferences were stable in 127 patients (54%), changed toward more aggressive care in 60 (25%), and toward the focus on the quality of life in 49 (21%). Correlation between the patient's values and goals and their caregiver's/MPOA's perception was very weak at baseline, improving to moderate at follow-up. Patients with MPOADs by study completion had statistically significant higher ACP Engagement scores than those without. CONCLUSION: A systematic SW-driven intervention did not engage new patients with gynecologic cancers to select and prepare MDMs. Change in care preferences was common, with caregivers' knowledge of patients' treatment preferences moderate at best.

Isolated vaginal recurrence in women with stage I endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical and pathologic characteristics of women with surgical stage I endometrial carcinoma by location of first recurrence and describe characteristics of isolated vaginal recurrence. METHODS: Patients with 2009 International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) stage I endometrial carcinoma treated at two large cancer centers from 1/1/2009-12/31/2017 were identified. Sarcoma histology was excluded. Recurrences were grouped into isolated vaginal or extravaginal. Isolated vaginal recurrences were localized by anatomic location within the vaginal vault. Clinical and pathologic variables were compared with chi-square analysis, and Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests. RESULTS: Of 2815 women identified, 278 (10%) experienced a recurrence. Sixty-one patients (2%) had an isolated vaginal recurrence, including 42 (69%) at the vaginal apex; 217 (8%) had an extravaginal recurrence, including 18 with a vaginal component. Median time to recurrence was 11 months (range, 1-68) for isolated vaginal recurrence and 20 months (range, 1-98) for extravaginal recurrence (P < .004). Of 960 patients (34%) treated with adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy (VBT), 156 (16%) recurred; 19 (2%) had an isolated vaginal recurrence, including 16 (84%) at the vaginal apex. Three-year PFS rates for isolated vaginal recurrence were 97.6% (SE ± 0.4%) with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus 96.9% (SE ± 1.1%) with open (P = .8), and for extravaginal recurrence were 91.8% (SE ± 0.7%) with MIS versus 90.8% (SE ± 1.8%) with open (P = .8). CONCLUSIONS: Isolated vaginal recurrences in stage I endometrial cancer are detected earlier than non-vaginal recurrences. Surgical approach does not appear to impact recurrence. Adjuvant VBT after primary surgery carries a 1%-2% risk of isolated vaginal apex recurrence.

Uterine Neoplasms, Version 1.2023, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium (also known as endometrial cancer, or more broadly as uterine cancer or carcinoma of the uterine corpus) is the most common malignancy of the female genital tract in the United States. It is estimated that 65,950 new uterine cancer cases will have occurred in 2022, with 12,550 deaths resulting from the disease. Endometrial carcinoma includes pure endometrioid cancer and carcinomas with high-risk endometrial histology (including uterine serous carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, carcinosarcoma [also known as malignant mixed Müllerian tumor], and undifferentiated/dedifferentiated carcinoma). Stromal or mesenchymal sarcomas are uncommon subtypes accounting for approximately 3% of all uterine cancers. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Uterine Neoplasms focuses on the diagnosis, staging, and management of pure endometrioid carcinoma. The complete version of the NCCN Guidelines for Uterine Neoplasms is available online at NCCN.org.

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Cervical Cancer, Version 1.2024.

The NCCN Guidelines for Cervical Cancer provide recommendations for all aspects of management for cervical cancer, including the diagnostic workup, staging, pathology, and treatment. The guidelines also include details on histopathologic classification of cervical cancer regarding diagnostic features, molecular profiles, and clinical outcomes. The treatment landscape of advanced cervical cancer is evolving constantly. These NCCN Guidelines Insights provide a summary of recent updates regarding the systemic therapy recommendations for recurrent or metastatic disease.

Hormone receptor status and the role of oophorectomy in uterine leiomyosarcoma.

OBJECTIVE: Uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULMS) is an aggressive malignancy for which hysterectomy is often the primary treatment approach. Due to the rarity of these tumors, the role of oophorectomy in the management of ULMS is not clearly established. This study aimed to describe the impact of oophorectomy and estrogen/progesterone (ER/PR) receptor status on clinical outcomes and survival. METHODS: Women with ULMS treated between 1/2013 and 1/2018 were retrospectively identified. Clinical data was collected; descriptive statistics were performed and predictors of overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) were analyzed using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier methodology. RESULTS: 189 patients were included. Median age was 53 years (20-84 years). The majority of patients had stage IB (58%) and grade 3 (94%) tumors. On pathologic analysis, ER/PR expression was positive in 41% and 33%, respectively. The majority of patients (179, 94.7%) underwent surgery as their primary treatment approach, of which 51 (28.5%) had ovarian conservation. 59.0% were treated with chemotherapy, while 9.9% received radiation therapy. 84.6% of patients experienced a recurrence, but there was no difference in EFS or OS by oophorectomy status, including among those with uterine confined disease. Additionally, ER/PR status was not independently associated with EFS/OS (p = 0.14, p = 0.07) nor did it impact survival among those with ovaries left in situ. CONCLUSIONS: Oophorectomy did not influence OS, even though many tumors were hormone receptor positive. ER/PR status was not independently associated with survival, including in the subset of women with uterine confined disease and those who had undergone oophorectomy.

Adjuvant therapy in women with early stage uterine serous carcinoma: A multi-institutional study.

OBJECTIVE: Uterine serous carcinoma is a rare but aggressive subtype of endometrial adenocarcinoma. Our objective was to compare adjuvant treatment strategies for patients with early stage uterine serous carcinoma. METHODS: This multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study evaluated patients with early stage uterine serous carcinoma. Patients with FIGO Stage IA-II disease after surgery, whose tumors had serous or any mixed serous/non-serous histology were included. Patients with carcinosarcoma were excluded. Clinical data were abstracted from local medical records. Summary statistics, Fisher's exact, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to analyze demographic and clinical characteristics. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed for recurrence-free and overall survival. RESULTS: There were 737 patients included. Most patients had Stage IA disease (75%), 49% of which had no myometrial invasion. Only 164 (24%) tumors had lymphatic/vascular space invasion. Adjuvant treatment varied: 22% received no adjuvant therapy, 17% had chemotherapy alone, 19% had cuff brachytherapy, 35% had cuff brachytherapy with chemotherapy, and 6% underwent pelvic radiation. Adjuvant treatment was significantly associated with a decreased risk of recurrence (p = 0.04). Compared with no adjuvant therapy, patients who received brachytherapy or brachytherapy/chemotherapy had improved recurrence-free survival (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.40-0.86; HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.49-0.88, respectively) and overall survival (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.35-0.79; HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.35-0.69, respectively). Improved survival with brachytherapy and brachytherapy/chemotherapy persisted on multivariable analyses. Chemotherapy alone was also associated with improved overall survival compared with no adjuvant treatment (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.37-0.81). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant therapy was associated with a decreased risk of recurrence relative to observation alone. Adjuvant cuff brachytherapy with and without chemotherapy was associated with improved survival outcomes in patients with early stage uterine serous carcinoma.

Frailty repels the knife: The impact of frailty index on surgical intervention and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of frailty in patients with ovarian cancer on surgical procedures and outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with stage II-IV ovarian cancer from April 2013 to September 2017 was performed. Patients were triaged by laparoscopy to determine primary resectability. The adjusted modified frailty index score (amFI) was calculated and amFI ≥2 classified as high frailty. Clinical outcomes, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated. RESULTS: 592 patients met inclusion criteria; amFI of 0, 1 and ≥ 2 was noted in 57%, 29%, and 14%, respectively. Patients with high frailty were less likely to be offered laparoscopic assessment for primary surgery (49% v. 43% v. 28% for amFI = 0, 1, and ≥ 2, p = 0.004), and more likely to have a Fagotti score ≥ 8 (58%, 48%, and 34%, p = 0.04). Only 17% of the high frailty cohort had primary tumor reductive surgery compared to 26% and 34% in patients with amFI = 1 and amFI = 0 (p = 0.02). Furthermore, patients with higher amFI were less likely to undergo any tumor reductive surgery (85% v. 74% v. 59%, p < 0.001). Postoperative complications were more frequent in patients with higher amFI (44% v. 56% v. 64%, p = 0.01). Death within thirty days of treatment initiation was significantly higher in patients with high frailty (0.4% v. 2% v. 9%, p = 0.005). In multivariate analysis, high frailty was associated with worse PFS (p = 0.02) and OS (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative morbidity, PFS, and OS were worse in patients with high frailty scores. Quantification of frailty may be useful for clinical decision making in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer.

Update on MRI in Evaluation and Treatment of Endometrial Cancer.

Endometrial cancer is the second most common gynecologic cancer worldwide and the most common gynecologic cancer in the United States, with an increasing incidence in high-income countries. Although the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for endometrial cancer is a surgical staging system, contemporary published evidence-based data and expert opinions recommend MRI for treatment planning as it provides critical diagnostic information on tumor size and depth, extent of myometrial and cervical invasion, extrauterine extent, and lymph node status, all of which are essential in choosing the most appropriate therapy. Multiparametric MRI using a combination of T2-weighted sequences, diffusion-weighted imaging, and multiphase contrast-enhanced imaging is the mainstay for imaging assessment of endometrial cancer. Identification of important prognostic factors at MRI improves both treatment selection and posttreatment follow-up. MRI also plays a crucial role for fertility-preserving strategies and in patients who are not surgical candidates by helping guide therapy and identify procedural complications. This review is a product of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Uterine and Ovarian Cancer Disease-Focused Panel and reflects a multidisciplinary international collaborative effort to summarize updated information highlighting the role of MRI for endometrial cancer depiction and delineation, treatment planning, and follow-up. The article includes information regarding dedicated MRI protocols, tips for MRI reporting, imaging pitfalls, and strategies for image quality optimization. The roles of MRI-guided radiation therapy, hybrid PET/MRI, and advanced MRI techniques that are applicable to endometrial cancer imaging are also discussed. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2022.

Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Node Biopsy in High-Grade Uterine Cancers.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping has been adopted as an acceptable method of lymph node evaluation in the surgical staging for low-grade endometrial cancer. In this review, we analyze the literature on the utility of SLN mapping in high-grade endometrial cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: SLN mapping in high-grade endometrial cancer demonstrates similar high detection rates and diagnostic accuracy as seen in low-grade endometrial cancers. However, obtaining sufficient operator experience (at least 30 cases) and following SLN mapping algorithm continues to be essential to preserving diagnostic accuracy. Although limited in retrospective study design and short-term follow-up, current studies have not demonstrated inferior survival outcomes of SLN mapping compared to traditional lymphadenectomy. SLN mapping is an acceptable and accurate method of lymph node evaluation in high-grade endometrial cancer. Future prospective studies are needed to evaluate long-term oncologic outcomes between SLN mapping and systematic lymphadenectomy in this patient population.

Impact of treatment modality on pelvic floor dysfunction among uterine cancer survivors.

OBJECTIVE: Pelvic floor dysfunction is a common adverse effect of uterine cancer treatment. In this study we compared patient-reported outcomes regarding pelvic floor dysfunction among uterine cancer survivors after hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, surgery and brachytherapy, or surgery and external beam radiotherapy with or without brachytherapy versus women who had a hysterectomy for benign indications. METHODS: We used the validated 20-item Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory to assess lower urinary distress, colorectal distress, and pelvic organ prolapse dysfunction in each treatment group. Pelvic floor dysfunction-related quality of life in these domains was compared across treatment modalities using the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7. Treatment type, body mass index, comorbidities, and number of vaginal births were obtained from medical records. A zero-inflated negative binomial regression model was used to assess the association of treatment regimens and covariates relative to the non-cancer cohort. RESULTS: A total of 309 surveys were analyzed. The median age of the patients at surgery was 58 years (range 20-87) and the median age at survey completion was 66 years (range 34-92). Most participants reported experiencing at least one symptom of pelvic floor dysfunction (76% by Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-2). The type of treatment had no effect on overall pelvic floor dysfunction on multivariate analysis (all p>0.05). Worse urinary-related symptoms were associated with higher body mass index at surgery (OR 1.41), higher age at time of survey (OR 1.07), and higher numbers of vaginal births (OR 1.43) (all p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, pelvic floor dysfunction did not significantly vary by treatment modality. Our findings suggest complex interactions among age, body mass index, and parity as to how uterine cancer treatment affects pelvic floor quality of life, which should be considered in the choice of treatment strategy and patient counseling.

Toxicity and efficacy of the combination of pembrolizumab with recommended or reduced starting doses of lenvatinib for treatment of recurrent endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: We reviewed our institutional data to evaluate toxicity and efficacy outcomes of pembrolizumab/lenvatinib in recurrent endometrial cancer in a "real-world" clinical setting and to compare the impact of reduced lenvatinib starting dose on outcomes. METHODS: Retrospectively, we reviewed toxicity, treatment responses, and survival outcomes of patients with recurrent endometrial cancer who received ≥1 cycle of pembrolizumab/lenvatinib. We compared subgroups based on lenvatinib starting dose (recommended [20 mg] vs reduced [<20 mg]) and histologic type. RESULTS: We analyzed 70 patients (recommended dose cohort, n = 16; reduced dose cohort, n = 54). The most common starting dose was 14 mg daily. Compared to the reduced dose cohort, the recommended dose cohort had a significantly higher mean number of lenvatinib dose reductions due to side effects (1.1 vs. 0.4; p = 0.003) and significantly shorter median time to treatment toxicity (1.3 vs. 3.7 days; p = 0.0001). Response rates did not differ significantly between the recommended and reduced dose cohorts (28.6% vs. 38.3%, respectively; p = 0.752). Two patients, both in the reduced dose cohort, had complete responses. Patients with carcinosarcoma histology had response and clinical benefit rates of 25% (3 of 12) and 58.3% (7 of 12), respectively. There were no differences between the 2 dose cohorts with respect to progression-free (p = 0.245) or overall survival (p = 0.858). CONCLUSION: In clinical practice, a lower starting dose of lenvatinib (14 mg daily) in combination with pembrolizumab was safe and efficacious in recurrent endometrial cancer. The combination produced responses in endometrial carcinosarcomas. Larger studies are required to validate these findings.

Endometrial cancer: A society of gynecologic oncology evidence-based review and recommendations, part II.

In 2014, the Society of Gynecologic Oncology's Clinical Practice Committee published a clinical update reviewing the treatment of women with endometrial cancer. At that time, there had been significant advances in the diagnosis, work-up, surgical management, and available treatment options allowing for more optimal care of affected women. This manuscript, Part II in a two-part series, includes specific recommendations on treatment of recurrent disease, post treatment surveillance and survivorship, considerations for younger women, and special situations. Part I covered histopathology and molecular pathology, risk factors, presentation and diagnostic approach, surgical approach and adjuvant therapy.

Endometrial cancer: A society of gynecologic oncology evidence-based review and recommendations.

INTRODUCTION: In 2014, the Society of Gynecologic Oncology's Clinical Practice Committee published a clinical update reviewing the treatment of women with endometrial cancer. At that time, there had been significant advances in the diagnosis, work-up, surgical management, and available treatment options allowing for more optimal care of affected women. Despite these advances, the incidence of endometrial cancer as well as the deaths attributable to the disease have continued to rise; from 1987 to 2014 there has been a 75% increase in cases and almost 300% increase in endometrial cancer deaths. Fortunately, since then, there has been progress in the treatment of patients with endometrial cancer with increased utilization of molecular pathology, greater understanding of genetic predisposition, enhanced methods for lymph node assessment, a broader understanding of the efficacy of radiation and chemotherapy, and a more efficient approach to survivorship and surveillance. The purpose of this document is to present a comprehensive review of this progress. MANUSCRIPT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS: The authors reviewed the available evidence, contributed to the development of this manuscript, provided critical review of the guidelines, and finalized the manuscript recommendations. The review was also presented to and approved by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) Clinical Practice Committee, SGO Publications Committee, and the SGO board members prior to submission for publication. The recommendations for this manuscript were developed by a panel of gynecologic oncologists who were members of the SGO Clinical Practice and Education Committees. Panelists reviewed and considered evidence from current uterine cancer literature. The terminology used in these guidelines was adopted from the ASCCP management guidelines [1] using a two-part rating system to grade the strength of recommendation and quality of evidence (Table 1). The rating for each recommendation is given in parentheses.