Biliary Disorders, Anomalies, and Malignancies in Children.

Biliary abnormalities in children are uncommon, and the spectrum of biliary disorders is broader than in adult patients. Unlike in adults, biliary disorders in children are rarely neoplastic and are more commonly rhabdomyosarcoma rather than cholangiocarcinoma. Pediatric biliary disorders may be embryologic or congenital, such as anatomic gallbladder anomalies, anomalous pancreaticobiliary tracts, various cholestatic processes, congenital cystic lesions, or genetic conditions. They may also be benign, such as biliary filling anomalies, biliary motility disorders, and biliary inflammatory and infectious disorders. Distinguishing these entities with a single imaging modality is challenging. US is the primary imaging modality for initial evaluation of biliary abnormalities in children, due to its wide availability, lack of ionizing radiation, and low cost and because it requires no sedation. Other examinations such as MRI, CT, and nuclear medicine examinations may provide anatomic and functional information to narrow the diagnosis further. Hepatobiliary-specific contrast material with MRI can provide better assessment of biliary anatomy on delayed images than can traditional MRI contrast material. MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) allows visualization of the intra- and extrahepatic biliary ducts, which may not be possible with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Suspected biliary atresia requires multiple modalities for diagnosis and timely treatment. Determining the type of choledochal cyst calls for a combination of initial US and MRCP. Many benign and malignant biliary masses require biopsy for definitive diagnosis. Knowledge of the imaging appearances of different pediatric biliary abnormalities is necessary for appropriate imaging workup, providing a diagnosis or differential diagnosis, and guiding appropriate management. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Evaluation of low-contrast detectability for iterative reconstruction in pediatric abdominal computed tomography: a phantom study.

BACKGROUND: Iterative reconstruction is offered by all vendors to achieve similar or better CT image quality at lower doses than images reconstructed with filtered back-projection. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the dose-reduction potential for pediatric abdominal CT imaging when using either a commercially available hybrid or a commercially available model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm from a single manufacturer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A phantom containing four low-contrast inserts and a uniform background with total attenuation equivalent to the abdomen of an average 8-year-old child was imaged on a CT scanner (IQon; Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, OH). We reconstructed images using both hybrid iterative reconstruction (iDose4) and model-based iterative reconstruction (Iterative Model Reconstruction). The four low-contrast inserts had circular cross-section with diameters of 3 mm, 5 mm, 7 mm and 10 mm and contrasts of 14 Hounsfield units (HU), 7 HU, 5 HU and 3 HU, respectively. Helical scans with identical kilovoltage (kV), pitch, rotation time, and collimation were repeated on the phantom at volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) of 2.0 milligrays (mGy), 3.0 mGy, 4.5 mGy and 6.0 mGy. We measured the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in each rod across scans. Additionally, we collected sub-images containing each rod and sub-images containing the background and used them in two-alternative forced choice observer experiments with four observers (two radiologists and two physicists). We calculated the dose-reduction potential of both iterative reconstruction algorithms relative to a scan performed at 6 mGy and reconstructed with filtered back-projection. RESULTS: We calculated dose-reduction potential by either matching average equal observer performance in the two-alternative forced choice experiments or matching CNR. When matching CNR, the dose-reduction potential was 34% to 45% for hybrid iterative reconstruction and 89% to 95% for model-based iterative reconstruction. When matching average observer performance, the dose-reduction potential was 9% to 30% for hybrid iterative reconstruction and 57% to 74% for model-based iterative reconstruction. The range in dose-reduction potential depended on the rod size and contrast level. CONCLUSION: Observer performance in this phantom study indicates that the dose-reduction potential indicated by an observer study is less than that of CNR; extrapolating the results to clinical studies suggests that the dose-reduction potential would also be less.

Comparing Fourth Generation Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique to Standard Filtered Back Projection in Pediatric Head Computed Tomography Examinations.

OBJECTIVE: Although advanced statistical iterative reconstruction (IR) techniques are valued in pediatric computed tomography (CT) imaging, there is little published data on how these techniques affect image quality and radiation dose in the pediatric population. This is particularly true in the context of pediatric head CT examinations. This study analyzed the differences in image quality and several standard metrics of radiation dose on multidetector pediatric head CT examinations performed using standard filtered back projection (FBP) with reconstructions using iDose, a fourth-generation statistical iterative reconstruction technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a retrospective review of 282 pediatric head CT examinations, we compared how iDose fared against FBP for effects on several standard metrics of radiation dose and qualitative and quantitative assessment of image quality. RESULTS: Our assessment revealed that examinations obtained using low-dose protocols reconstructed using iDose, when compared with standard-dose examinations reconstructed using FBP, resulted in significant radiation dose reduction while performing equally or better in quantitative image quality parameters. For most qualitative image quality parameters, the iDose group demonstrated equal performance to standard filtered back technique with a few notable exceptions. In the parameter of image sharpness in the 1.5 to 7 year olds, iDose fared better than FBP. However, FBP outperformed iDose in the qualitative parameters of decreased image graininess/noise in patients older than 13 years, improved image sharpness in patients aged between 7 and 13 years, and improved visibility of small parts for those aged 7 to 13 years. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that iDose is effective at allowing significant radiation dose reduction while maintaining or, rarely, even improving quantitative image quality compared with FBP in the setting of pediatric head CT examinations. However, for certain qualitative image quality parameters in older-aged children, the use of iDose resulted in a poorer performance compared with FBP.

Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma in an Adolescent Male With BAP1 Deletion.

Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesotheliomas in children are uncommon, aggressive tumors with a grave prognosis. We herein report the clinical, radiologic, and pathologic findings of a 16-year-old male. The adolescent presented with a history of abdominal pain, nausea and daily, nonbilious, nonbloody emesis for 3 weeks. Radiographic imaging suggested small bowel obstruction. The diagnostic work-up and differential diagnoses are discussed. Histologically, the tumor was composed of epithelioid cells with a papillary and glandular architectural pattern. A few glands appeared to produce mucinous material. Histochemistry revealed PAS diastase resistant mucin, an inconspicuous finding in diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. An extensive immunohistochemistry panel (calretinin, WT-1, D2-40, CK 7, CAM 5.2, CK 5/6, CEA, B72.3, CK 20, CD10, CD30, CD15, CD117, PLAP, S100, TFE3, and EMA) confirmed the diagnosis. Of special interest, BAP1 staining was cytoplasmic and consistent with 3p deletion detected by conventional cytogenetics. The ultrastructural analysis demonstrated long microvilli, desmosomes, and intercellular junctions which further supported the diagnosis.