Serum biomarkers correlated with liver stiffness assessed in a multicenter study of pediatric cholestatic liver disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Detailed investigation of the biological pathways leading to hepatic fibrosis and identification of liver fibrosis biomarkers may facilitate early interventions for pediatric cholestasis. APPROACH AND RESULTS: A targeted enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-based panel of nine biomarkers (lysyl oxidase, tissue inhibitor matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) 1, connective tissue growth factor [CTGF], IL-8, endoglin, periostin, Mac-2-binding protein, MMP-3, and MMP-7) was examined in children with biliary atresia (BA; n = 187), alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (A1AT; n = 78), and Alagille syndrome (ALGS; n = 65) and correlated with liver stiffness (LSM) and biochemical measures of liver disease. Median age and LSM were 9 years and 9.5 kPa. After adjusting for covariates, there were positive correlations among LSM and endoglin ( p = 0.04) and IL-8 ( p < 0.001) and MMP-7 ( p < 0.001) in participants with BA. The best prediction model for LSM in BA using clinical and lab measurements had an R2 = 0.437; adding IL-8 and MMP-7 improved R2 to 0.523 and 0.526 (both p < 0.0001). In participants with A1AT, CTGF and LSM were negatively correlated ( p = 0.004); adding CTGF to an LSM prediction model improved R2 from 0.524 to 0.577 ( p = 0.0033). Biomarkers did not correlate with LSM in ALGS. A significant number of biomarker/lab correlations were found in participants with BA but not those with A1AT or ALGS. CONCLUSIONS: Endoglin, IL-8, and MMP-7 significantly correlate with increased LSM in children with BA, whereas CTGF inversely correlates with LSM in participants with A1AT; these biomarkers appear to enhance prediction of LSM beyond clinical tests. Future disease-specific investigations of change in these biomarkers over time and as predictors of clinical outcomes will be important.

Clinical research reactivation during the COVID-19 pandemic: An academic center process and lessons for the future.

Background: Clinical research is a central mission of the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (CU-Anschutz). On March 18, 2020, due to rising COVID-19 rates and personal protective equipment (PPE) shortages, an emergency approval process for critical research essential to the care and safety of patients, including COVID-19 trials, was enacted. All other clinical research studies requiring face-to-face visits were placed on hold to protect participant and staff safety. Methods: A clinical research TaskForce was rapidly assembled, consisting of a cross- section of campus clinical research operations leaders, including affiliate hospitals. This group developed a guidance document and process where the primary prioritization factor was positive therapeutic benefit/risk (Groups 2-5). A REDCap form demarcating items including research visit types and safety plans was designed. A separate Space Plan Committee approval was required to gauge environmental health and safety. Results: A total of 654 protocols were approved over 31 weeks using this process. Group 2 review and approvals occurred within 5 days of campus reactivation, and 65 days after original clinical research hold. Groups 3 through 5 were opened for submission and review in a phased approach. The majority proactively submitted IRB protocol amendments to minimize face-to-face participant/staff contact. There were no cases of COVID-19 outbreak in research participants. Conclusion: Clinical research reactivation was rapidly implemented in a transparent, collaborative, broadly supported, and efficient process of staged reactivation while prioritizing the health and safety of participants and staff at CU-Anschutz. This model is practical and easily generalizable to other medical research campuses.