RESUMO
The Food and Drug Administration Egg Safety Rule requires producers with >3000 layer hens to register a Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis (SE) prevention plan for production, storage, and transport of shell eggs. Since its implementation began in 2010, four outbreaks of egg-associated salmonellosis have occurred in Tennessee. We reviewed state health department records from each outbreak and described them in the context of the Egg Safety Rule. The outbreaks were linked to three farms that did not meet the criteria for regulation and one farm that was operating in violation of the rule. This regulatory gap poses a food safety risk in Tennessee and nationally. Additional measures at the state and federal level should be considered to address the risk of SE in shell eggs from farms not currently regulated by the Egg Safety Rule.
Assuntos
Galinhas , Surtos de Doenças/veterinária , Ovos/normas , Doenças das Aves Domésticas/epidemiologia , Infecções por Salmonella/epidemiologia , Salmonella enteritidis , Animais , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Fazendas , Feminino , Microbiologia de Alimentos , Doenças das Aves Domésticas/microbiologia , Risco , Tennessee/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , United States Food and Drug AdministrationRESUMO
Pet ownership is the most common form of human-animal interaction, and anecdotally, pet ownership can lead to improved physical and mental health for owners. However, scant research is available validating these claims. This study aimed to review the recent peer reviewed literature to better describe the body of knowledge surrounding the relationship between pet ownership and mental health. A literature search was conducted in May 2020 using two databases to identify articles that met inclusion/exclusion criteria. After title review, abstract review, and then full article review, 54 articles were included in the final analysis. Of the 54 studies, 18 were conducted in the general population, 15 were conducted in an older adult population, eight were conducted in children and adolescents, nine focused on people with chronic disease, and four examined a specific unique population. Forty-one of the studies were cross-sectional, 11 were prospective longitudinal cohorts, and two were other study designs. For each of the articles, the impact of pet ownership on the mental health of owners was divided into four categories: positive impact (n = 17), mixed impact (n = 19), no impact (n = 13), and negative impact (n = 5). Among the reviewed articles, there was much variation in population studied and study design, and these differences make direct comparison challenging. However, when focusing on the impact of pet ownership on mental health, the results were variable and not wholly supportive of the benefit of pets on mental health. Future research should use more consistent methods across broader populations and the development of a pet-ownership survey module for use in broad, population surveys would afford a better description of the true relationship of pet ownership and mental health.