Attenuation correction for myocardial perfusion imaging. A comparison between SPECT and PET imaging by polar map analysis.

AIM: We investigated the impact of photon attenuation in myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT and PET in patients with coronary artery disease. In fact, the regional tracer distribution can be quantitatively assessed by polar map analysis if the effects of photon attenuation are accounted for. PET imaging permits accurate measurement of and correction for photon attenuation, whereas results of attenuation correction in SPECT imaging have been inconsistent. PATIENTS, METHODS: We compared photon attenuation in resting perfusion imaging studies with SPECT ((99m)Tc-sestamibi) and PET ((13)N-ammonia) from 21 patients. Transaxial images were reconstructed with and without attenuation correction and reoriented into short axis images. Polar map analysis was utilized to generate regional tracer uptake in six anatomical segments. RESULTS: Average segmental photon attenuation calculated as the ratio of counts in corrected and uncorrected images was 7.2 +/- 1.4 in SPECT and 14.0 +/- 3.1 in PET imaging (p < 0.01). This attenuation factor was significantly related to body mass index for both methods (p < 0.001). While attenuation correction for SPECT imaging did compensate for attenuation effects in the inferior wall (from -15% to +6% vs. PET), relative tracer uptake in the anterior wall in SPECT images was significantly reduced after attenuation correction (from -2% to -18% vs. PET, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Differential effects of attenuation correction for myocardial SPECT perfusion imaging need to be considered when algorithms designed to compensate effects of photon attenuation in SPECT imaging are employed in clinical practice.

Improved myocardial ischemic response and enhanced collateral circulation with long repetitive coronary occlusion during angioplasty: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of the study was to evaluate the progressive increase in ischemic threshold with multiple sequential transient coronary occlusions and to assess the role of the collateral circulation in adaptation to ischemia. BACKGROUND: It has been observed that the duration of balloon inflations during coronary angioplasty can be gradually prolonged during subsequent dilations with a reduction in patient symptoms and diminished ischemic electrocardiographic (ECG) changes. Although the mechanism has not been fully explained, recruitment of coronary collateral circulation induced by repeated coronary occlusion has been reported. The stimuli for recruitment and the natural history of coronary collateral circulation are not understood. METHODS: Seventeen patients with isolated stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery and a normal left ventricle were enrolled. Angioplasty consisted of five successive prolonged inflations. Sequential changes in clinical, intracoronary ECG and left ventricular indexes of myocardial ischemia were examined. Coronary collateral channels were evaluated during balloon inflations by ipsilateral and contralateral injections of contrast medium and hemodynamically by occlusion pressure. RESULTS: An improved tolerance to myocardial ischemia with repetitive coronary occlusions was demonstrated by a significant reduction of angina, ST segment deviation, left ventricular filling pressure and less impairment of ejection fraction. Left ventricular wall motion abnormalities remained unchanged. Collateral angiographic grade did not change in 7 patients and increased in 10. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms a progressive adaptation of myocardial ischemia to repetitive coronary occlusions and supports the concept that sequential episodes of myocardial ischemia are a stimulating factor for the recruitment of collateral channels in humans. These results also suggest that enhancement of recruitable collateral circulation might be an underlying mechanism of myocardial ischemic preconditioning.

Perioperative myocardial injury with different modes of antegrade and retrograde cardioplegic delivery.

The effect of three cardioplegic protocols on perioperative myocardial injury was studied in 62 coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients randomized into three groups with either antegrade or retrograde cold blood cardioplegia, or coronary sinus occlusion during antegrade supply. During the aortic cross-clamp time anterior and posterior septal temperatures were recorded, indicating the distribution of cardioplegic solution within the myocardium. Serum creatine kinase (CK), CK-isoenzyme MB and myoglobin as well as 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECG) were analyzed. Statistical analysis showed no effect of the cardioplegic protocol, whereas the patient's preoperative status, aortic cross-clamp time and intraoperative myocardial temperature had significant (P < 0.05) effects on immediate postoperative CK and CK-MB enzyme release. Creatine kinase-MB peak values were significantly increased in patients with major vessel disease and reduced left ventricular function (92 +/- 53 U/l versus 67 +/- 25 U/l). Both CK and CK-MB values were significantly higher in patients with aortic cross-clamp times of more than 1 h than in patients with shorter clamping times (661 +/- 188 and 78 +/- 40 U/l versus 500 +/- 200 and 57 +/- 24 U/l). Patients with 22 +/- 3 degrees C myocardial temperature before terminal cardioplegia had significantly elevated CK as compared to patients with temperatures of 15 +/- 2 degrees C (665 +/- 185 U/l versus 510 +/- 211 U/l). However, enzyme peak values had only poor predictive power for postoperative ECG changes, suggesting that enzyme peaks were not necessarily a sign of perioperative ischemia. Patients with major vessel disease and reduced myocardial function, with aortic cross-clamp time of more than 1 h and/or inadequate intraoperative myocardial cooling may be highly susceptible to global ischemia and operative procedures, and therefore show elevated peak enzyme levels shortly after surgery. In contrast, elevated myoglobin peaks within 1 h after aortic declamping were significantly correlated to perioperative signs of transient ischemia (P < 0.02).

Comparison of transesophageal Doppler coronary flow reserve measurements with thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography imaging in assessment of left anterior descending artery stenoses.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Recent studies demonstrate the feasibility of coronary flow reserve measurements by transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) Doppler recordings of coronary sinus or left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery flow velocity for detecting stenoses of the LAD artery. This study compares coronary flow reserve measurements by Doppler TEE with thallium-201 (201Tl) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in patients with proximal single-vessel LAD stenosis. METHODS: Nineteen patients with various degrees of LAD stenosis (mean area stenosis 71 +/- 24%; range 24-96%) were studied. Area stenosis by quantitative coronary angiography was < 75% in 7 patients and > 75% in 12 patients. Transesophageal LAD and coronary sinus Doppler measurements were performed at baseline and after intravenous dipyridamole. Coronary flow reserve was calculated as the ratio of hyperemic to baseline average peak velocities. Predefined coronary flow reserve cut-off values of 1.8 for the coronary sinus method and of 2.0 for the LAD method were used for diagnosis of significant LAD stenosis. Results were compared with qualitative 201Tl dipyridamole SPECT. RESULTS: Overall predictive accuracy for diagnosis of > 75% LAD stenosis was 79% for 201Tl SPECT, 77% for the transesophageal LAD and 79% for the transesophageal coronary sinus technique. Concordant results between 201Tl SPECT and the LAD and coronary sinus Doppler methods were observed in 79% and 71% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Thallium-201 SPECT and transesophageal Doppler assessment of coronary flow reserve have similar accuracy for diagnosing significant proximal LAD stenosis. Therefore, both transesophageal Doppler techniques might constitute another widely available, noninvasive method for assessment of left coronary artery disease, if disease location is proximal.

Local anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia for cardioverter-defibrillator implantation.

AIMS: Cardioverter-defibrillators are conventionally implanted under general anaesthesia. However, implantation under conscious sedation is being increasingly used. It has been shown that cardioverter-defibrillators can be implanted in a more pacemaker-like approach: under local anaesthesia for the surgical procedure, and with mild sedation for defibrillation threshold testing only. The aim of the present study was to compare local and general anaesthesia in defibrillation threshold testing and implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty patients were assigned to two groups: in the first 20 consecutive patients the cardioverter-defibrillator was implanted under general anaesthesia (GA), and in the subsequent 20 patients under local anaesthesia (LA). There was no significant difference between the two groups in regard of age, body weight, underlying disease, left ventricular ejection fraction, and NYHA classification. The defibrillation threshold was 13.7 +/- 5.5 J under local anaesthesia versus 10.7 +/- 4.7 J under general anaesthesia (n.s.). For defibrillation threshold testing 7.9 +/- 3.6 shocks had to be applied in patients under general anaesthesia versus 6.2 +/- 1.3 shocks under local anaesthesia (n.s.). Mean heart rate, arterial oxygen saturation and mean arterial blood pressure remained stable throughout defibrillation threshold testing, irrespective of the type of anaesthesia used. The duration of the surgical procedure was 62 +/- 16 min under GA and 60 +/- 14 min under LA (n.s.), however, the entire implantation procedure was significantly longer in patients under general anaesthesia than in those under local anaesthesia (124 +/- 24 min and 97 +/- 22 min, respectively, p < 0.005). There were no complications in either group and the procedure was well tolerated. With the use of local anaesthesia the cost of anaesthesia were reduced by 72%. CONCLUSION: Local anaesthesia in combination with mild sedation is as safe and well tolerated as general anaesthesia in cardioverter-defibrillator implantation. Lidocaine used for local anaesthesia does not adversely affect the defibrillation threshold. Device implantation in a pacemaker-like approach results in a significant reduction in total procedure time and costs, and facilitates scheduling of the procedure.