Drug resistance factors in acute myeloid leukemia: a comparative analysis.

To compare the clinical relevance of drug resistance factors in de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML), we determined their relationship to both response to induction chemotherapy and survival of the patients in univariate as well as multivariate analyses. The drug resistance factors immunocytochemically studied in 111 patients at the time of diagnosis included the lung resistance protein (LRP), P-glycoprotein (P-gp), multidrug resistance protein (MRP1) and bcl-2. In the univariate analyses, age (P = 0.005), karyotype (P = 0.03), LRP (P = 0.003), P-gp (P = 0.02) and bcl-2 (P = 0.03) predicted for response to induction chemotherapy, whereas MRP1 had no predictive value. Age (P = 0.05), karyotype (P = 0.05) and LRP (P = 0.03) retained their predictive value in the multivariate logistic regression analyses. With regard to overall survival, age (P = 0. 008), karyotype (P = 0.006), LRP (P = 0.001) and P-gp (P = 0.01) were of prognostic value in the univariate Cox regression analyses but only age (P = 0.01), karyotype (P = 0.02) and LRP (P = 0.01) retained their prognostic significance in the multivariate analyses. A risk score based on the number of independent prognostic factors allowed division of patients into four groups with different outcome. In these groups, the complete remission rates were 93%, 75%, 47% and 33%, respectively, and median overall survival was 2.4, 1.2, 0.6 and 0.2 years, respectively. Thus, several drug resistance factors did predict outcome in the univariate analyses but LRP was the only drug resistance factor with independent predictive and prognostic significance. The proposed risk score might be useful for risk-adapted treatment in the future. Leukemia (2000) 14, 68-76.

Expression of the lung resistance protein predicts poor outcome in patients with multiple myeloma.

Expression of the lung resistance protein (LRP) is associated with resistance to various anticancer drugs including melphalan and, therefore, may affect the clinical outcome in multiple myeloma (MM). To determine the clinical significance of LRP, we have compared LRP expression in bone marrow plasma cells with clinical parameters including response to chemotherapy and survival of previously untreated patients with MM (n = 72). LRP expression immunocytochemically assessed by means of the LRP-56 monoclonal antibody was positive (> or =10% staining plasma cells) in 44 (61%) samples. There was no correlation between LRP expression and age, sex, type of the paraprotein, serum creatinine, stage, beta2-microglobulin, serum lactate dehydrogenase, or C-reactive protein. However, LRP expression was more frequently observed in patients with a p53 deletion than in those without such a deletion (P = 0.01). The overall response rate for all of the patients evaluable for response to induction chemotherapy (n = 58) was 67%. The response rate was 87% for patients without LRP expression but only 54% for patients with LRP expression (P = 0.01). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients with LRP expression had a shorter overall survival (median, 33 months) than those without LRP expression (median not reached; P = 0.04). These data show that LRP expression is an important marker for clinical drug resistance and predicts a poor outcome in MM.

Expression of folylpolyglutamyl synthetase predicts poor response to methotrexate therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: The enzyme folylpolyglutamyl synthetase (FPGS) is involved in the resistance to methotrexate in tumor cell lines. The aim of the present study was to determine the impact of FPGS mRNA expression on resistance to methotrexate therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We determined the expression of FPGS mRNA using the Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) in 141 patients with RA. All patients received methotrexate therapy. The primary outcome measures were disease activity as determined by a disease activity score (DAS) and response to therapy. RESULTS: Seventy-eight of 141 patients (55%) showed expression of FPGS mRNA. FPGS mRNA expression was not associated with age, sex, disease duration, white blood cell count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein (CRP), number of swollen joints, number of painful joints, and combined therapy with other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or additional corticosteroids. The response rate to methotrexate therapy was 44% for the total study population. Patients without FPGS mRNA expression showed a significantly higher response rate than patients with FPGS mRNA expression (57% versus 33%; p = 0.005). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that female sex (p = 0.009) and FPGS mRNA expression (p = 0.004) were independent predictive factors for failure to achieve a response to methotrexate therapy. CONCLUSION: FPGS mRNA expression is an independent predictive factor associated with poor response to methotrexate therapy in RA patients.

Expression of the lung resistance protein in primary colorectal carcinomas.

To assess whether the lung resistance protein (LRP) is of clinical significance in colorectal carcinomas, we immunohistochemically determined LRP expression of colorectal carcinoma specimens (n = 68) by means of the monoclonal antibody LRP-56 and compared this expression with clinical parameters. LRP expression was negative in 7 (10%), low in 36 (52%) and high in 25 (38%) carcinomas. LRP expression was independent of histological grade, tumor size, lymph node involvement and distant metastasis. Survival of the patients with LRP-positive tumors was similar to the survival of patients with LRP-negative tumors. However, patients with high LRP expression in their carcinomas had a prolonged survival. Thus LRP is frequently expressed in colorectal carcinomas and high expression might indicate improved survival.

Expression of the lung resistance protein (LRP) in primary breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: To determine the clinical significance of the lung resistance protein (LRP) in breast cancer, we have studied its expression in primary breast carcinomas (n = 99) and assessed the association of this expression with clinical parameters of the patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: LRP expression was immunohistochemically determined by means of the monoclonal antibody LRP-56 on frozen tumor sections. RESULTS: LRP expression was negative in 12%, low in 20%, intermediate in 47% and high in 21% of the carcinomas. LRP expression was independent of age of the patients, histology, tumor grade, estrogen receptor as well as progesterone receptor status, tumor size and lymph node involvement. Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed that both overall survival and disease-free survival were independent of the degree of LRP expression. CONCLUSIONS: LRP is frequently expressed in breast carcinomas, but is neither associated with known prognostic factors, nor a prognostic factor by itself.

Expression of the multidrug resistance protein (MRP1) in breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The multidrug resistance protein (MRP1) is expressed in human breast carcinomas but its clinical significance remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to determine the clinical significance of MRP1 in breast cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRP1 expression of primary carcinomas from 100 breast cancer patients was immunohistochemically determined by means of the monoclonal antibodies QCRL-1/QCRL-3. RESULTS: MRP1 was negative in 20 (20%) and positive in 80 (80%) breast carcinomas. MRP1 expression was more frequent in both estrogen receptor-negative carcinomas and progesterone receptor-negative carcinomas (p = 0.1 in both cases), but was independent of tumor size and lymph node involvement. Patients with MRP1-negative carcinomas had prolongations of overall survival (p = 0.01 for death due to any cause, p = 0.04 for breast cancer-related death) and disease-free survival (p = 0.07) as compared to those with MRP1-positive carcinomas. Also in subsets of patients (negative lymph nodes; positive lymph nodes; positive estrogen receptor; T1/T2 tumors), overall survival was longer for patients with MRP1-negative carcinomas. In univariate Cox regression analyses, MRP1 positivity was associated with relative risks of 4.9 (95% CI 1.2-20.6; p = 0.03) for death due to any cause, 6.4 (95% CI 0.9-48.0; p = 0.07) for breast cancer-related death and 3.5 (95% CI 0.8-14.9; p = 0.09) for relapse. In multivariate Cox regression analyses, MRP1 positivity had relative risks of 5.1 (95% CI 1.2-21.7; p = 0.03) for death due to any cause, 6.5 (95% CI 0.8-50.1; p = 0.07) for breast cancer-related death and 3.4 (95% CI 0.8-15.1; p = 0.1) for relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that MRP1 might be an important factor in breast cancer indicating excellent prognosis for patients with MRP1-negative carcinomas.

The lung resistance protein (LRP) predicts poor outcome in acute myeloid leukemia.

To determine the clinical significance of the lung resistance protein (LRP) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), we have studied LRP expression of leukemic blasts and its association with clinical outcome in patients with de novo AML. LRP expression of leukemic blasts was determined by immunocytochemistry by means of monoclonal antibody LRP-56. LRP expression at diagnosis was detected in 31 out of 86 (36%) patients and correlated with white blood cell count (p = 0.01). The complete remission rate of induction chemotherapy was 72% for all treated patients (n = 82). The complete remission rate was 81% for patients without LRP expression but only 55% for patients with LRP expression (p = 0.01). Overall survival and disease-free survival were estimated according to Kaplan-Meier in 82 and 59 patients, respectively. At a median follow-up of 16 months, median overall survival was 17 months for LRP-negative patients but only 8 months for LRP-positive patients (p = 0.006). Disease-free survival was 9 months for LRP-negative patients and 6 months for LRP-positive patients (p = 0.078). Thus LRP predicts for poor outcome indicating that the LRP gene is a clinically relevant drug resistance gene in AML.

MRP expression in acute myeloid leukemia. An update.

To determine the clinical significance of the multidrug resistance protein (MRP) in patients with de novo AML, we have studied MRP expression of leukemic cells at diagnosis and its association with clinical outcome in 127 patients. MRP expression was determined by immunocytochemistry by means of monoclonal antibodies QCRL-1/QCRL-3. MRP expression was low, intermediate and high in 30%, 46% and 24% of the patients, respectively. MRP expression was independent of age and sex of the patients, white blood cell count, FAB subtype, serum lactate dehydrogenase levels and karyotype aberrations. MRP expression had no impact no response to induction chemotherapy. The complete remission rates were 75%, 70% and 64% for patients with low, intermediate and high expression, respectively. Patients with intermediate or high MRP expression showed a trend toward shorter overall survival (p = 0.09) as compared to patients with low MRP expression. MRP does not predict for response to induction chemotherapy but intermediate or high MRP expression might be associated with shorter overall survival of the patients.

Global target profile of the kinase inhibitor bosutinib in primary chronic myeloid leukemia cells.

The detailed molecular mechanism of action of second-generation BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors, including perturbed targets and pathways, should contribute to rationalized therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or in other affected diseases. Here, we characterized the target profile of the dual SRC/ABL inhibitor bosutinib employing a two-tiered approach using chemical proteomics to identify natural binders in whole cell lysates of primary CML and K562 cells in parallel to in vitro kinase assays against a large recombinant kinase panel. The combined strategy resulted in a global survey of bosutinib targets comprised of over 45 novel tyrosine and serine/threonine kinases. We have found clear differences in the target patterns of bosutinib in primary CML cells versus the K562 cell line. A comparison of bosutinib with dasatinib across the whole kinase panel revealed overlapping, but distinct, inhibition profiles. Common among those were the SRC, ABL and TEC family kinases. Bosutinib did not inhibit KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor, but prominently targeted the apoptosis-linked STE20 kinases. Although in vivo bosutinib is inactive against ABL T315I, we found this clinically important mutant to be enzymatically inhibited in the mid-nanomolar range. Finally, bosutinib is the first kinase inhibitor shown to target CAMK2G, recently implicated in myeloid leukemia cell proliferation.

Expression of resistance markers to methotrexate predicts clinical improvement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Methotrexate is transported into the cell by the reduced folate carrier (RFC) and out of the cell by members of the multidrug resistance protein family (MRP). Transport proteins may affect the therapeutic efficacy of this drug in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential benefit of the presence of RFC and the absence of functional MRP for the efficacy of methotrexate treatment. METHODS: The study involved 163 patients (116 female, 47 male; mean age 59.5 years) on methotrexate (mean weekly dose 12.2 mg). RFC was determined using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, and MRP function by flow cytometry, using a calcein acetoxymethylesther/probenecid assay. Clinical response to methotrexate was evaluated by the EULAR response criteria and the ACR 20% improvement criteria. The clinical data were obtained at the beginning of methotrexate treatment and at the time of blood sampling during ongoing therapy. Patients were divided into four groups according to the presence (+) or absence (-) of RFC and functional (f) MRP. RESULTS: fMRP+/RFC+ and fMRP-/RFC- patients more often had good EULAR response rates (60%, p = 0.014, and 53%, p = 0.035, respectively) in comparison with the fMRP-/RFC+ group (29%); fMRP+/RFC- patients had a low frequency of good disease activity responses. CONCLUSIONS: Absence of fMRP plus presence of RFC did not prove to be related to beneficial effects of methotrexate, but the lack or the presence of both fMRP and RFC led to a significantly better therapeutic outcome. Determination of these markers may predict responsiveness to methotrexate.

Expression of the lung resistance protein predicts poor outcome in de novo acute myeloid leukemia.

The 110-kD lung resistance protein (LRP) is overexpressed in P-glycoprotein-negative multidrug-resistant cell lines and most likely involved in the multidrug resistance (MDR) of these cell lines. To determine the clinical significance of LRP, we have studied LRP expression of leukemic blasts and its association with clinical outcome in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML). LRP expression of leukemic blasts obtained from peripheral blood or bone marrow of previously untreated patients (n = 86) was determined by immunocytochemistry by means of monoclonal antibody LRP-56. LRP expression at diagnosis was detected in 31 (36%) patients. LRP expression was independent of age and sex of the patients, French-American-British subtype, cytogenetic abnormalities, and lactate dehydrogenase levels, but correlated with white blood cell count (P = .01). Eighty-two patients received standard induction chemotherapy that included cytarabine and MDR drugs (daunorubicin in most patients, additional etoposide in the majority of patients). The complete remission rate of induction chemotherapy was 72% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 61% to 82%) for the total study population. The complete remission rate was 81% (95% CI = 67% to 91%) for patients without LRP expression but only 55% (95% CI = 36% to 74%) for patients with LRP expression (P = .01). Overall survival and disease-free survival were estimated according to Kaplan-Meier in 82 and 59 patients, respectively. Overall survival was significantly longer in patients without LRP expression than in patients with LRP expression. At a median follow-up of 16 months, median overall survival was 17 months (95% CI = 12 to 38 months) for LRP-negative patients but only 8 months (95% CI = 4 to 12 months) for -positive patients (P = .006). Disease-free survival was 9 months (95% CI = 7 to 11 months) for LRP-negative patients and 6 months (95% CI = 5 to 8 months) for -positive patients (P = .078). Outcome was best in patients lacking both LRP and P-glycoprotein expression. In conclusion, LRP predicts for poor outcome and thus the LRP gene appears to be another clinically relevant drug resistance gene in AML.