Central venoplasty followed by 'double guidewire railroad technique' as a bailout strategy in difficult tunnelled dialysis catheter insertion.

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients frequently encounter challenges at the time of dialysis catheter insertion from concomitantly associated with thoracic central venous obstruction (TCVO). TCVO complicates the placement of tunnelled dialysis catheters (TDCs). In cases where TCVO is unexpectedly encountered and TDC insertion becomes difficult, central venoplasty followed by catheter reinsertion is required. This report details a novel technique to salvage a TDC that was trapped at the TCVO site after removal of the peel-away sheath. We describe the case of a 67-year-old diabetic male ESRD patient on haemodialysis since 2017, with history of multiple prior accesses, who presented with acute thrombosis of his arteriovenous fistula. TDC placement was attempted via the left internal jugular vein (IJV). Angiography revealed severe stenosis at the left brachiocephalic vein-superior vena cava confluence, necessitating venoplasty. Post-venoplasty, the TDC could not be advanced past the IJV venous entry site due to unfavourable catheter tip profile. Utilising a double guidewire railroad technique, the TDC was successfully reinserted, ensuring functional dialysis. The technique carries potential risks, which mandates careful hemodynamic monitoring and prophylactic measures. In conclusion, percutaneous placement of a TDC following a central venoplasty is at times life-saving in patients with exhausted peripheral vascular access and concomitant TCVO. In the absence of a peel-away sheath, TDC reinsertion using a double guidewire railroad technique is a helpful technique for salvaging the catheter, especially in financially-constrained settings.

Prevalence and Etiological Profile of Hypercalcemia in Hospitalized Adult Patients and Association with Mortality.

Background: The etiology of hypercalcemia varies according to the clinical setting. Hitherto, data on the prevalence and profile of hypercalcemia in hospitalized Asian-Indian patients are limited. Hence, we conducted a prospective observational study to determine the prevalence and etiological profile of hypercalcemia in hospitalized Asian-Indian patients and its association with 6-month mortality. Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study wherein all the patients (aged >12 years) admitted to the general medicine wards of a tertiary care hospital in North India between January 1, 2016, and June 30, 2017, were screened. Finally, patients with sustained hypercalcemia (defined as corrected serum total calcium ≥10.4 mg/dl documented twice at least 24 h apart) were included in this study. These patients were followed up throughout the hospital course and thereafter till 6 months from the date of discharge. Results: Out of 9902 patients, 150 patients had sustained hypercalcemia (prevalence 1.5%). The most common cause of hypercalcemia was malignancy (41.3%), followed by primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT, 32.7%). Vitamin D intoxication was responsible for hypercalcemia in 8.7% of patients; 2.7% of patients had hypercalcemia of advanced chronic liver disease. Nevertheless, a definite etiology could not be identified in 7.3% of the patients with hypercalcemia. At the end of 6 months of follow-up, the cumulative mortality rate was 28%. Underlying malignancy and higher calcium levels were the significant determinants of mortality. Conclusions: The prevalence of hypercalcemia in Asian-Indian patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital was 1.5%. The most common etiology was malignancy, followed by PHPT.

Challenges in Diagnosis and Management of Glomerular Disease in Resource-Limited Settings.

Introduction: Glomerular diseases are the leading drivers of nondiabetic chronic kidney disease disability-adjusted life years in resource-limited countries. Proper diagnosis and treatment relies on resources including kidney biopsy, ancillary testing, and access to evidence-based therapies. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional internet-based survey cascaded through society mailing lists among nephrologists in countries of Asia, Africa, and Eastern Europe. We collected the data on respondent demographics, their ability to perform and appropriately interpret a kidney biopsy, and their access to complementary investigations and treatment practices. Results: A total of 298 kidney care specialists from 33 countries (53.3% from Asia and 44.6% from Africa; 64% from academic or university hospitals) participated in the survey. Of these specialists, 85% performed kidney biopsy. About 61% of the respondents could not obtain a kidney biopsy in more than 50% of patients with suspected glomerular disease. About 43% of the respondents from Africa had access to only light microscopy. Overall, the inability to undertake and fully evaluate a biopsy and perform ancillary investigations were more profound in Africa than in Asia. Overall, 59% of participants reported that more than 75% of their patients meet the cost of diagnosis and treatment by out-of-pocket payments. Empirical use of immunosuppression was higher in Africa than in Asia. The main barriers for diagnosis and treatment included delayed presentation, incomplete diagnostic work-up, and high cost of treatment. Conclusion: Major system-level barriers impede the implementation of guideline-driven approaches for diagnosis and treatment of patients with glomerular disease in resource-limited countries.