Return to Sports Rates in Pediatric Patients After Bilateral Versus Unilateral Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Patellofemoral instability commonly occurs during sports activities. The return to sports (RTS) rate for pediatric patients after bilateral medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) is unknown. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate RTS outcomes for pediatric patients undergoing bilateral MPFLR. It was hypothesized that (1) fewer pediatric patients would RTS after bilateral MPFLR compared with unilateral MPFLR and that (2) for those in the bilateral cohort who were able to RTS, fewer patients would attain the same level of play as or higher level than the preinjury level. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: We prospectively collected RTS data on retrospectively identified matched cohorts of patients aged ≤18 years who underwent unilateral and bilateral MPFLR. We matched each participant with bilateral MPFLR at a 1 to 2 ratio with a participant with unilateral MPFLR by concomitant procedure, age, and sex. Postoperative complications and preoperative imaging measurements were collected from medical records. Patient-reported outcomes were obtained using a current Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score collected at the time of primary outcome data. RESULTS: We matched 16 participants (mean age, 14 years) who underwent bilateral MPFLR to 32 participants (mean age, 14.3 years) in a corresponding unilateral MPFLR cohort. We found a significant decrease in RTS rates for pediatric patients after bilateral MPFLR when compared with unilateral MPFLR (69% vs 94%; P = .03). Among those who returned to sports, there was no difference in the level of play achieved. For participants who did not RTS or returned at a lower level of play after bilateral MPFLR, 57% cited fear of reinjury as the primary reason. There were no differences in postoperative complications or current Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores between cohorts. The bilateral cohort had a significantly higher Caton-Deschamps index compared with the unilateral cohort, although the absolute difference was small (1.3 vs 1.2; P = .005). CONCLUSION: We found that pediatric patients have a lower RTS rate after bilateral MPFLR when compared with a matched unilateral MPFLR cohort. No differences in the level of play were achieved among those who returned to sports. Fear of reinjury was a commonly cited reason for not returning to sports.

0.4% incidence of return to OR due to screw malposition in a large prospective adolescent idiopathic scoliosis database.

PURPOSE: In contrast to infection and curve progression, return to OR for implant malposition is potentially within the surgeon's control. With increasing surgeon familiarity with freehand/fluoroscopic pedicle screw placement, rates of return to OR due to malposition may have decreased over time. We sought to document the incidence and risk factors for return to OR due to screw malposition in a large cohort of patients with idiopathic scoliosis. METHODS: AIS patients enrolled in a multicenter prospective registry with minimum 2-year follow-up undergoing PSF between 2003 and 2017 were included. Surgeries with the use of intraoperative CT-guided navigation were excluded. Return to OR due to screw malposition over time was tabulated. Lenke class, age at surgery, year of surgery, height, weight, surgeon and site were evaluated. RESULTS: 2435 patients underwent PSF with non-navigated open pedicle screw instrumentation. Mean age was 14.6 years, mean thoracic curve magnitude was 53°, and mean lumbar was 40°. Patients did not routinely undergo intraoperative or postoperative CT evaluation. There were 10 returns to OR for screw malposition at a mean of 0.83 years postoperatively (range 0.1-3.4 years), for an overall incidence of 0.4%. Of the 14 screws, 10 were thoracic, 7 were left-sided. No association was found between screw malposition and curve size, enrolling site, surgeon, BMI, Lenke class, or age. Five patients had radiculopathy which improved after screw revision. Return to OR for screw malposition changed from 2003 to 2017 (1-0.2%) but this did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Although the incidence of asymptomatic malpositioned screws is unknown, the rate of return to the OR for implant malposition overall in this registry was 1 in 250 patients. Recent data suggest the rate has decreased to 1 in 500 patients. Further work may determine whether enabling technologies can reduce the rate, ideally to a "never event".

Inter- and intra-rater reliability and accuracy of Sanders Skeletal Maturity Staging System when used by surgeons performing vertebral body tethering.

PURPOSE: Pediatric orthopedic surgeons must accurately assess the skeletal stage of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients for selection and timing of optimal treatment. Successful treatment using vertebral growth modulation is highly dependent on skeletal growth remaining. We sought to evaluate the current-state use of the Sanders Skeletal Maturity System (SSMS) in regard to precision and accuracy. We hypothesized that pediatric orthopedic surgeons currently use SSMS with moderate precision and accuracy. METHODS: Eight practicing pediatric orthopedic surgeons who perform vertebral body tethering surgery without specific training in SSMS were asked to assign the SSMS stage for 34 de-identified hand radiographs from AIS patients. Precision was evaluated as inter-rater reliability, using both Krippendorff's α and Weighted Cohen's kappa statistics, and as intra-rater reliability, using only Weighted Cohen's kappa statistics. Surgeon accuracy was evaluated using Weighted Cohen's kappa statistics with comparison of surveyed surgeons' responses to the gold standard rating. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability across the surveyed surgeons indicated moderate to substantial agreement using both statistical methods (α = 0.766, κ = 0.627) with the majority of discord occurring when assigning SSMS stages 2 through 4. The surveyed surgeons displayed substantial accuracy when compared to the gold standard (κ = 0.627) with the majority of inaccuracy involving the identification of stage 3B. When re-surveyed, the surgeons showed substantial intra-rater reliability (κ = 0.71) with increased inconsistencies when deciding between SSMS stage 3A and stage 3B. CONCLUSION: The current-state use of SSMS across pediatric orthopedic surgeons for evaluation of AIS patients displays adequate but imperfect precision and accuracy with difficulties delineating SSMS stages 2 through 4, which correlate with adolescent growth periods germane to scoliosis growth modulation surgery. Centralized assessment of hand-bone age may help ensure standardized reporting for non-fusion scoliosis research.

Comparison of slot-scanning standing, supine, and fulcrum radiographs for assessment of curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: With the goal of reducing radiation dosing for patients, we sought to compare the results of slot-scanning (EOS) standing flexibility radiographs to supine bending and fulcrum radiographs for surgical planning in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). We hypothesized that slot-scanning standing bending radiographs provide similar mean curve flexibility as supine bending and fulcrum radiographs. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 224 AIS patients with concomitant upright standing and flexibility images. Curve flexibility, defined the percent change in Cobb angle from standing upright to flexibility images, was used to compare the results of slot-scanning standing, supine and fulcrum radiographs. Statistical analysis utilized ANOVA one-way tests and two-sample t tests to detail differences as indicated. RESULTS: A total of 256 imaging studies were included, 75 slot-scanning standing, 112 supine, and 69 fulcrum radiographs. Fulcrum images only investigated thoracic curves and were, therefore, excluded from proximal thoracic and lumbar flexibility comparisons. Relevant mean standing curve magnitudes were similar between the groups with some variance in thoracic curves between fulcrum and supine image series (p = 0.003). There was no statistical difference in curve flexibility for proximal thoracic curves (p = 0.389) and lumbar curves (p = 0.798). However, for thoracic curves, slot-scanning standing images result in less measured curve flexibility compared to supine (p = 1.00E-7) and fulcrum images (p = 2.84E-18). Furthermore, supine bending images resulted in less measured curve flexibility in comparison to fulcrum images (p = 2.85E-7). CONCLUSION: Slot-scanning standing bending films show comparable results in curve flexibility as supine bending films for proximal thoracic and lumbar curves but may show reduced flexibility for thoracic curves when compared to supine or fulcrum bending films. Given lower radiation dosing, slot-scanning films could be substituted for traditional supine films for assessment of proximal thoracic and lumbar curve flexibility.

Outcomes of pregnancy in operative vs. nonoperative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients at mean 30-year follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients who underwent surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) in childhood would have an increased C-section risk in adulthood. Although the impact of scoliosis on future pregnancy and child delivery is a common question for patients and parents, there is limited data regarding pregnancy outcomes following childhood treatment of AIS. METHODS: Between 1975 and 1992, 60 female patients underwent treatment for AIS with bracing, surgery, or observation and had data available regarding obstetrical history in the electronic medical record or in paper charts. In childhood, 28 had nonoperative treatment and 32 had fusion surgery. During the follow-up period, 2 nonoperative patients and 1 operative patient had fusion surgery in adulthood, but after childbearing years. Mean age at latest follow-up was 43 years (CI 38, 48). Meantime to follow-up since childhood treatment was 31 years (CI 26, 35). RESULTS: 29% of nonoperative patients had a C-section with at least one live birth compared to 38% of operative patients (p = 0.464). For surgical patients fused to L3 or lower, 46% required at least one C-section, compared to 32% of patients fused to L2 or higher (p = 0.40). Overall, 33% of the cohort of patients-including those with all scoliosis treatment methods-required at least one C-section, compared to the state weighted C-section rate of 20.5% (p = 0.014). The percentage of patients with operative treatment-including all levels of fusion-requiring at least one C-section was statistically different than the weighted state C-section rate (p = 0.020). CONCLUSION: In this long-term cohort of 60 US scoliosis patients, childhood operative fusion treatment was associated with a statistically significant increased incidence of C-section compared to the state incidence at both the patient level and the delivery level. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, comparative cohort study.