Left ventricular long axis strain: a new prognosticator in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy?

BACKGROUND: Long axis strain (LAS) has been shown to be a fast assessable parameter representing global left ventricular (LV) longitudinal function in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). However, the prognostic value of LAS in cardiomyopathies with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) has not been evaluated yet. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 146 subjects with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM, LVEF ≤45 %) LAS was assessed retrospectively from standard non-contrast SSFP cine sequences by measuring the distance between the epicardial border of the left ventricular apex and the midpoint of a line connecting the origins of the mitral valve leaflets in end-systole and end-diastole. The final values were calculated according to the strain formula. The primary endpoint of the study was defined as a combination of cardiac death, heart transplantation or aborted sudden cardiac death and occurred in 24 subjects during follow-up. Patients with LAS values > -5 % showed a significant higher rate of cardiac events independent of the presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). The multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that LVEDV/BSA (HR: 1.01, p < 0.05), presence of LGE (HR: 2.51, p < 0.05) and LAS (HR: 1.28, p < 0.05) were independent predictors for cardiac events. In a sequential cox regression analysis LAS offered significant incremental information (p < 0.05) for the prediction of outcome in addition to LGE and LVEDV/BSA. Using a dichotomous three point scoring model for risk stratification, including LVEF <35 %, LAS > -10 % and the presence of LGE, patients with 3 points had a significantly higher risk for cardiac events than those with 2 or less points. CONCLUSION: Assessment of long axis function with LAS offers significant incremental information for the prediction of cardiac events in NIDCM and improves risk stratification beyond established CMR parameters.

A patient-centered perspective of treating depressive symptoms in chronic heart failure: What do patients prefer?

OBJECTIVE: To date, very little is known about the specific needs of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) who must cope with depression. We therefore questioned CHF patients reporting depressive symptoms about their concerns and preferences regarding various psychosocial treatment options. After three-month, we determined how many patients had actually participated in a treatment. METHODS: 85 patients with CHF fulfilling the criteria of a depressive disorder according to the PHQ-9 were investigated. Data were analyzed using descriptive and frequency, as well as logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: 64.7% of the sample reported that they could envision adhering to supportive talks at longer intervals, whereas only 34.1% would accept an antidepressant. After three months, 24.7% of the patients had actually participated in a treatment. Generalized anxiety severity (GAD-7) was very closely associated with treatment preferences and treatment utilization: The higher the generalized anxiety severity, the more likely was the patients' disposition to begin an antidepressant and/or psychotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The most favoured treatment option was a low-threshold service with supportive talks. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Future studies investigating the improvement of patient-centred care in CHF patients should include measurements of generalized anxiety.

Assessment of myocardial deformation with cardiac magnetic resonance strain imaging improves risk stratification in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.

AIMS: To investigate the prognostic impact of left-ventricular (LV) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) deformation imaging in patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) compared with late-gadolinium enhancement (LGE) quantification and LV ejection fraction (EF). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 210 subjects with DCM were examined prospectively with standard CMR including measurement of LGE for quantification of myocardial fibrosis and feature tracking strain imaging for assessment of LV deformation. The predefined primary endpoint, a combination of cardiac death, heart transplantation, and aborted sudden cardiac death, occurred in 26 subjects during the median follow-up period of 5.3 years. LV radial, circumferential, and longitudinal strains were significantly associated with outcome. Using separate multivariate analysis models, global longitudinal strain (average of peak negative strain values) and mean longitudinal strain (negative peak of the mean curve of all segments) were independent prognostic parameters surpassing the value of global and mean LV radial and circumferential strain, as well as NT-proBNP, EF, and LGE mass. A global longitudinal strain greater than -12.5% predicted outcome even in patients with EF < 35% (P < 0.01) and in those with presence of LGE (P < 0.001). Mean longitudinal strain was further investigated using a clinical model with predefined cut-offs (EF < 35%, presence of LGE, NYHA class, mean longitudinal strain greater than -10%). Mean longitudinal strain exhibited an independent prognostic value surpassing that provided by NYHA, EF, and LGE (HR = 5.4, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: LV longitudinal strain assessed with CMR is an independent predictor of survival in DCM and offers incremental information for risk stratification beyond clinical parameters, biomarker, and standard CMR.

Clinical characteristics, morbidity, and prognostic value of concomitant coronary artery disease in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (dCMP) might present coronary artery disease (CAD) concomitant to dCMP and prognostic differences between ischemic heart disease and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy have been described. Clinical characteristics and prognostic implications of concomitant CAD in patients with dCMP are largely unknown. METHODS: A total of 1,263 patients with chronic systolic dysfunction from dCMP-of these 67.1 % (n = 847; 72.3 % men) without and 32.9 % (n = 416; 80.8 % men) with concomitant CAD were included and baseline clinical characteristics noted. They were followed prospectively for 36.3 (20.8-65.0) months, representing 5,168 patient-years. All-cause mortality was the primary endpoint; and decompensation requiring hospitalisation as well as the combined endpoint thereof were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Independent significant predictors of CAD were smoking status (current smoker: OR 2.68, 95 % CI 1.61-4.46; p < 0.001; past smoker: OR 2.52, 95 % CI 1.40-4.52; p < 0.005; each vs. non-smoker), presence of dyslipidemia (OR 3.46, 95 % CI 2.23-5.35; p < 0.001), age (OR 1.06, 95 % CI 1.04-1.08; p < 0.001), and female sex (OR 0.49, 95 % CI 0.29-0.81; p = 0.005). The presence of CAD was not a significant predictor of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 0.74, 95 % CI 0.36-1.54; p = 0.42), morbidity (adjusted HR 1.48, 95 % CI 0.55-3.99; p = 0.44), or the combined endpoint (HR 0.65, 95 % CI 0.24-1.78; p = 0.40). CONCLUSION: Concomitant CAD is common in patients with dCMP. Clinical predictors of its presence are largely coincident with classic risk factors in the general population. The presence of concomitant CAD appears not to be associated with adverse prognosis (morbidity or mortality) in patients with dCMP.