Operative Repair of Aortopulmonary Window: A 25-Year Experience.

Background: Aortopulmonary window (APW) is a rare anomaly with variable morphology and associated cardiac anomalies. We evaluated impact of patient and operative factors on mid-term outcomes following APW repair. Methods: Twenty-nine patients underwent surgical APW repair at our institution from 1996 to 2022. Eight (28%) had simple APW, accompanied by only atrial septal defect or patent ductus arteriosus; 21 (72%) had complex APW with additional cardiovascular lesions, including nine with interrupted aortic arch. Median operative age was 19 days (range 2 days-1.5 years) via single-patch (n = 12, 41%), double-patch (n = 15, 52%), or ligation and division (n = 2, 7%). Results: The only mortality occurred in-hospital 1.4 years postoperatively following remote myocardial infarction. Factors associated with longer postoperative length of stay were complex APW (P = .003), genetic syndrome (P = .003), noncardiovascular comorbidities (P = .002), lower birth weight (P = .03), and lower operative weight (P = .03). Six patients (21%) with complex APW underwent unplanned cardiothoracic reintervention(s), including two with arch reintervention following arch advancement for interruption. Reintervention-free survival was similar for simple versus complex APW, operative age categories, and repair techniques. At median follow-up 5.5 years postoperatively, no patients had residual APW or persistent pulmonary hypertension, 1 (3%) had greater than mild ventricular dysfunction, and 25 (89% survivors) had NYHA class I functional status. Conclusions: Operative APW repair has excellent mid-term survival, durability, and functional status, regardless of operative age, cardiovascular comorbidities, or repair technique. Cardiac and noncardiac comorbidities may be associated with prolonged length of stay.

Pulmonary Artery Banding and Arch Repair vs Norwood for Unbalanced Atrioventricular Canal Defect.

BACKGROUND: The outcomes of single-ventricle palliation in unbalanced atrioventricular canal defect with coarctation of aorta (uAVC+CoA) have not been well studied. Systemic ventricle outflow tract obstruction has a propensity to develop in these patients after aortic arch repair with pulmonary artery banding (arch-PAB), which may adversely affect survival and Fontan candidacy. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent single-ventricle palliation for uAVC+CoA from 2000 to 2022. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on initial palliation: (1) arch-PAB and (2) Norwood procedure. Demographic and clinical characteristics were analyzed and compared along with survival data. RESULTS: Stage 1 palliation for uAVC+CoA was performed in 41 patients. Arch-PAB was performed in 14 infants and Norwood in 27 infants. Arch-PAB patients had more chromosomal abnormalities (28.6 vs 7.4%, P < .009) and less severe systemic ventricle outflow tract obstruction on baseline echocardiogram (0.0 vs 70.4%, P < .001). Survival to stage 3 palliation was lower for the arch-PAB group (28.6% vs 66.6%, P = .02). Arch-PAB remained a significant risk factor for mortality (hazard ratio, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.05-8.53; P = .04) after adjusting for chromosomal abnormalities and atrioventricular valve regurgitation. After arch-PAB, systemic ventricle outflow tract obstruction was diagnosed in 13 of 14 patients. Echocardiography underestimated the degree of outflow tract obstruction in 10 of 13 arch-PAB patients. CONCLUSIONS: Arch-PAB has worse outcomes than Norwood for uAVC+CoA. Systemic ventricle outflow tract obstruction develops in almost all patients after arch-PAB. Outflow tract obstruction is underestimated by the echocardiogram and requires a high index of suspicion, along with advanced imaging, to ensure timely diagnosis and management.

Managing Bilateral Discontinuous Pulmonary Arteries of Ductal Origin in Single-Ventricle Anatomy.

BACKGROUND: We describe outcomes and management strategies for single-ventricle and bilaterally discontinuous pulmonary arteries (PAs) originating from bilateral ductus arteriosus. METHODS: We reviewed 22 patients with aforementioned anatomy and PA centralization from 1995 to 2023, excluding those with biventricular repair. RESULTS: Median age at centralization was 9 days (minimum-maximum, 0 days-2 years). Centralization was performed with systemic-to-pulmonary shunt (n =20 [91%]; 2 after bilateral ductal stents) or bidirectional cavopulmonary connection (n = 2 [9%]) using pericardial roll (n = 14 [64%]), patch-augmented direct anastomosis (n = 7 [32%]), and interposition graft (n = 1 [5%]) techniques. Concurrent total anomalous pulmonary venous connection (TAPVC, n = 11 [50%]) was associated with significantly inferior survival (P = .01). Five patients (23%) died at a median of 59 days (minimum-maximum, 6-257 days) after centralization, all with noncardiac TAPVC. At the latest follow-up for 17 survivors (median, 13.5 years; minimum-maximum, 0.5-25.1 years after centralization), 12 completed Fontan, 4 completed second-stage palliation, and 1 received a transplant before second-stage palliation. PA reintervention was required in 14 patients (64%), including 3 with reoperations independent of staged palliation. Echocardiography from baseline to before the second stage demonstrated branch PA growth with significantly increased diameters (left, P = .0006; right, P = .0002); z-scores significantly increased for right (P = .004) but not left (P = .11). CONCLUSIONS: Successful single-ventricle palliation is possible, although high risk, for patients with bilateral discontinuous ductal PAs. Early postcentralization mortality remains substantial, particularly with associated noncardiac TAPVC. Many require reintervention to maintain PA growth, typically concurrently with staged palliation.

Choosing the Ideal Candidate for a Robotic Valve Intervention.

Robotic cardiac surgery addressing the mitral and tricuspid valves is a highly developed field offering multiple potential advantages regarding postoperative complications, valve repair rates, hospital length of stay, and rapid functional recovery compared with the conventional sternotomy approach for select patients. The unparalleled stereoscopic view within the heart and precision of robotic arms make robotic surgery a highly attractive minimally invasive approach, facilitating repair of even the most complex valvular pathology. Careful candidate selection and surgical planning are paramount to optimising the outcomes of those who undergo robotic valve surgery. As a team's experience grows, the technique can be applied to a wider range of patients that may derive even greater benefit, such as those with significant comorbid conditions, ventricular dysfunction, and previous sternotomy. The goal of this review is to provide clinicians with a practical overview of the factors influencing a patient's candidacy for robotic valve surgery. We discuss key issues such as preoperative diagnostic assessment, concerns regarding demographics and surgical pathology, and additional considerations relating to surgical exposure, cardiopulmonary bypass, and myocardial protection. Diligent patient assessment and a strong team-based approach are paramount to developing and maintaining a successful robotic valve surgery program, with the most seasoned teams being able to safely offer the technique to the vast majority of patients referred for mitral or tricuspid valve repair or replacement.