Prospective Validation of the Preschool Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU to Screen for Delirium in Infants Less Than 6 Months Old.

OBJECTIVES: ICU delirium is a predictor of greater morbidity and higher mortality in the pediatric population. The diagnostic obstacles and validity of delirium monitoring among neonates and young infants have yet to be fully delineated. We sought to validate the Preschool Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU in neonates and young infants and determine delirium prevalence in this young population. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study to validate the Preschool Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU for the assessment of ICU delirium in neonates and young infants compared with the reference standard, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. SETTING: Tertiary medical center PICU, including medical, surgical, and cardiac patients. PARTICIPANTS: Infants less than 6 months old admitted to the PICU regardless of admission diagnosis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We enrolled 49 patients with a median age of 1.8 months (interquartile range, 0.7-4.1 mo), 82% requiring mechanical ventilation. Enrolled patients were assessed for delirium in blinded-fashion by the research team using the Preschool Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU and independently assessed by the psychiatry reference rater using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 criteria. A total of 189 paired assessments were completed, and the Preschool Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU performed with a sensitivity of 95% (95% CI, 89-100%), specificity of 81% (68-90%), "negative and positive predictive values" of 97% (94-100%) and 69% (55-79%), respectively, compared with the reference rater. Delirium prevalence was 47%, with higher rates of 61% observed among neonates (< 1 mo old) and 39% among infants 1-6 months old. CONCLUSIONS: The Preschool Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU is a valid screening tool for delirium monitoring in infants less than 6 months old. Delirium screening was feasible in this population despite evolving neurocognition and arousal architecture. ICU delirium was prevalent among infants. The consequence of acute brain dysfunction during crucial neurocognitive development remains unclear. Future studies are necessary to determine the long-term impact of ICU delirium and strategies to reduce associated harm in critically ill infants.

Positive Predictive Value of ICD-10 Codes to Identify Acute Suicidal and Self Harm Behaviors.

OBJECTIVE: The accuracy of diagnosis codes to identify suicidal behaviors, including suicide ideation (SI) and self-harm (SH) events, is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision codes to identify SI/SH events that may be used in studies using administrative and claims data. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study of children 5 to 17 years of age hospitalized at 2 US children's hospitals with a discharge diagnosis of a neuropsychiatric event, including an SI or SH event. A true International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision SI or SH diagnosis was defined as SI or SH present on admission and directly related to hospitalization as compared with physician record review. PPV with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated overall and stratified by diagnosis order and age (5 to 11 years vs 12 to 17 years). RESULTS: There were 376 children or adolescents with a discharge diagnosis of an SI or SH event. The median age was 14 years, and the majority of individuals were female (58%), non-Hispanic White (69%), and privately insured (57%). A total of 332 confirmed SI/SH cases were identified with a PPV of 0.88 (95% CI 0.85-0.91). PPVs were similar when stratified by diagnosis order: primary 0.94 (95% 0.88-0.97) versus secondary 0.86 (95% CI 81-90). PPVs were also similar in adolescents (0.89, CI 0.85-0.92) compared with children (0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: The use of these validated code sets to identify SI or SH events may minimize misclassification in future studies of suicidal and self-harm hospitalizations.

Characteristics Associated With Serious Self-Harm Events in Children and Adolescents.

OBJECTIVES: To identify patterns of psychiatric comorbidity among children and adolescents with a serious self-harm event. METHODS: We studied children aged 5 to 18 years hospitalized with a neuropsychiatric event at 2 children's hospitals from April 2016 to March 2020. We used Bayesian profile regression to identify distinct clinical profiles of risk for self-harm events from 32 covariates: age, sex, and 30 mental health diagnostic groups. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% credible intervals (CIs) were calculated compared with a reference profile with the overall baseline risk of the cohort. RESULTS: We included 1098 children hospitalized with a neuropsychiatric event (median age 14 years [interquartile range (IQR) 11-16]). Of these, 406 (37%) were diagnosed with a self-harm event. We identified 4 distinct profiles with varying risk for a self-harm diagnosis. The low-risk profile (median 0.035 [IQR 0.029-0.041]; OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.04-0.15) was composed primarily of children aged 5 to 9 years without a previous psychiatric diagnosis. The moderate-risk profile (median 0.30 [IQR 0.27-0.33]; reference profile) included psychiatric diagnoses without depressive disorders. Older female adolescents with a combination of anxiety, depression, substance, and trauma disorders characterized the high-risk profile (median 0.69 [IQR 0.67-0.70]; OR 5.09, 95% CI 3.11-8.38). Younger males with mood and developmental disorders represented the very high-risk profile (median 0.76 [IQR 0.73-0.79]; OR 7.21, 95% CI 3.69-15.20). CONCLUSIONS: We describe 4 separate profiles of psychiatric comorbidity that can help identify children at elevated risk for a self-harm event and subsequent opportunities for intervention.

Identifying Acute Neuropsychiatric Events in Children and Adolescents.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to develop and validate an approach to accurately identify incident pediatric neuropsychiatric events (NPEs) requiring hospitalization by using administrative data. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional, multicenter study of children 5 to 18 years of age hospitalized at two US children's hospitals with an NPE. We developed and evaluated 3 NPE identification algorithms: (1) primary or secondary NPE International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision diagnosis alone, (2) NPE diagnosis, the NPE was present on admission, and the primary diagnosis was not malignancy- or surgery-related, and (3) identical to algorithm 2 but without requiring the NPE be present on admission. The positive predictive value (PPV) of each algorithm was calculated overall and by diagnosis field (primary or secondary), clinical significance, and NPE subtype. RESULTS: There were 1098 NPE hospitalizations included in the study. A total of 857 confirmed NPEs were identified for algorithm 1, yielding a PPV of 0.78 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-0.80). Algorithm 2 (n = 846) had an overall PPV of 0.89 (95% CI 0.87-0.91). For algorithm 3 (n = 938), the overall PPV was 0.86 (95% CI 0.83-0.88). PPVs varied by diagnosis order, NPE clinical significance, and subtype. The PPV for critical clinical significance was 0.99 (0.97-0.99) for all 3 algorithms. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a highly accurate method to identify neuropsychiatric adverse events in children and adolescents. The use of these approaches will improve the rigor of future studies of NPE, including the necessary evaluations of medication adverse events, infections, and chronic conditions.