Biopsy Marker Standardization: What's in a Name?

OBJECTIVE. The purposes of this study were to compile mammographic images in various projections showing commercially available breast biopsy site markers and to provide a standardized nomenclature and marker guide to improve physician communication and patient care. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective review of all breast biopsy markers encountered at one institution was conducted from January 2012 to January 2018. Markers placed at the facility and those placed at outside institutions with the patient subsequently referred to the study institution were included. Additional drawings and photographs and biopsy marker information were compiled from manufacturers and the literature. Intrinsic properties, features, pitfalls, and biopsy marker mimics were recorded from the institution's experience and the literature. RESULTS. Thirty-eight different biopsy marker shapes available from six manufacturers were identified, and mammograms of 37 were compiled and organized by manufacturer. Nomenclature was compiled on the basis of the manufacturer names of each marker. Potential pitfalls and mimics were identified. Manufacturer-reported marker material composition and carrier properties were summarized, including decreased marker migration, enhanced ultrasound visibility, and varying MRI susceptibility. CONCLUSION. Variability in the appearance and nomenclature of breast biopsy site markers may contribute to misinterpretation, miscommunication, and possibly removal of the incorrect lesion. A comprehensive guide to breast biopsy marker nomenclature is clinically useful, and standardization is necessary.

Innovations in image-guided preoperative breast lesion localization.

Screening mammography increases detection of non-palpable breast lesions requiring image-guided localization prior to surgery. Accurate preoperative localization is crucial for successful surgical outcomes. Wire-guided localization is currently the most widely used localization method for non-palpable breast lesions; however, this technique has multiple disadvantages including patient discomfort, possible wire transection and migration, suboptimal surgical incision placement due to wire location and limited scheduling flexibility decreasing operating room efficiency. As a result, promising new techniques including radioactive seed localization, non-radioactive radar localization and magnetic seed localization have been developed as alternatives. In this article, we provide an overview of these techniques and discuss their advantages, drawbacks and currently available outcome data.

Safety and efficacy of radioactive seed localization with I-125 prior to lumpectomy and/or excisional biopsy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of pre-operative I-125 radioactive seed localization (RSL) as an alternative to wire localization (WL). METHODS: A waiver was granted by the institutional review board for this HIPAA compliant study. Review of 356 consecutive single site nonpalpable mammographic and ultrasound guided I-125 RSLs done between November 2011 and April 2012 was conducted. Preoperative mammograms and specimen radiographs were reviewed for seed-target distance, lesion location, and target/seed removal. During a brief surgical training period, 35 of 356 women had both RSL and wire localization (WL) of the same lesion. Chi-square and single sample t-tests were used to compare margin status and duration of procedures. RESULTS: Of the 356 RSLs, 303 (85.1%) were performed ≥ 1 day before surgery. Mammographic guidance was used in 330 (93%) and ultrasound in 26 (7%). Mean seed to target distance was 1mm (range 0-20mm); all targeted lesions were retrieved. In 31 women in whom mammographic guidance was used for both RSL and WL, median procedure time was not significantly different (RSL 9.0 min; WL 7.0 min; p=0.91), and median seed migration distance was <1mm (range 0-15 mm). No difference was detected between margin status with RSL alone versus WL (p=0.40 and p=0.65 for positive and <1mm margins, respectively). Two adverse events occurred requiring an additional wire/surgery. CONCLUSION: RSL ≥ 1 day before surgery is a safe effective procedure for pre-operative localization, with few adverse events and surgical outcomes comparable to those achieved with wire localization.

Fast MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial experience.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a new method for performing MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in a study of lesions that had subsequent surgical excision. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Twenty women scheduled for MRI-guided needle localization and surgical biopsy were prospectively entered in the study. MRI-guided biopsy was performed with a vacuum-assisted probe, followed by placement of a localizing clip, and then needle localization for surgical excision. Vacuum-assisted biopsy and surgical histology were correlated. RESULTS: Vacuum-assisted biopsy was successfully performed in 19 (95%) of the 20 women. The median size of 27 MRI-detected lesions that had biopsy was 1.0 cm (range, 0.4-6.4 cm). Cancer was present in eight (30%) of 27 lesions and in six (32%) of 19 women; among these eight cancers, five were infiltrating and three were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Among these 27 lesions, histology was benign at vacuum-assisted biopsy and at surgery in 19 (70%), cancer at vacuum-assisted biopsy in six (22%), atypical ductal hyperplasia at vacuum-assisted biopsy and DCIS at surgery in one (4%), and benign at vacuum-assisted biopsy with surgery showing microscopic DCIS that was occult at MRI in one (4%). The median time to perform vacuum-assisted biopsy of a single lesion was 35 min (mean, 35 min; range, 24-48 min). Placement of a localizing clip, attempted in 26 lesions, was successful in 25 (96%) of 26, and the clip was retrieved on specimen radiography in 22 (96%) of 23. One complication occurred: a hematoma that resolved with compression. CONCLUSION: MRI-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy is a fast, safe, and accurate alternative to surgical biopsy for breast lesions detected on MRI.