Bortezomib for acute antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation.

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is an uncommon, but challenging type of rejection after solid organ transplantation. We review three cases of AMR in ABO-compatible liver transplant recipients. These cases were characterized by severe acute rejection resistant to steroids and antithymocyte globulin, histologic evidence of plasma cell infiltrates, C4d positivity and high serum anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies. All three patients were treated with bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor effective in depleting plasma cells. After treatment, all patients had improved or normal liver function tests, resolution of C4d deposition and significant decline in their HLA donor-specific antibodies.

Chemosensitization of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells with cyclosporin A in post-liver transplant patient plasma.

We previously showed that combined neoadjuvant doxorubicin (DOX) treatment and orthotopic liver transplantation produced a 3-year tumor-free survival rate of 54% in stage II-IVa nonresectable hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). These patients received posttransplant immunosuppressive doses of cyclosporin A (CsA). CsA has been shown to modify the function of a membrane P-glycoprotein (Pgp) whose overexpression is associated with a multidrug-resistant (MDR1) phenotype. This study utilized HCC cell lines to characterize the in vitro chemomodulatory properties of CsA as found in posttransplant patient plasma to consider the hypothesis that CsA may prolong posttransplant survival by enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of DOX against multidrug-resistant hepatoma cells. We characterized Pgp expression in the HCC lines Hep3B, Hep G2, and SK-HEP-1 by immunohistochemistry and the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. The combined cytotoxicity of DOX + CsA was examined by [3H]thymidine uptake and flow cytometric drug-retention assays. Pgp expression was assessed further after prolonged (10-day) treatment with CsA. Hep3B and Hep G2 cells expressed low to moderate levels of Pgp. The effective DOX dose required for inhibiting MDR1(+) Hep3B and Hep G2 cell proliferation by 50% (DOX IC50) was 44.5 ng/ml and 43.5 microgram/ml, as compared with 10.7 ng/ml for Pgp-negative SK-HEP-1 cells. Optimal concentrations of CsA (0.8 micrometer) lowered DOX IC50 for Hep3B cells and Hep G2 cells by 6-fold and 4-fold, respectively. Similarly, plasma from patients containing immunosuppressive levels of CsA lowered DOX IC50 of the MDR1(+) Hep G2 cells by up to 4-fold. Prolonged exposure to CsA did not affect its chemosensitizing capacity or Pgp expression of HCC cells. PSC-833, a nonimmunosuppressive analogue of CsA, was equally effective in reducing the DOX IC50 of MDR1(+) HCC cells. CsA and PSC-833 increased drug retention by approximately 75%, but did not significantly affect hepatoma cell viability or Pgp expression. Pharmacological concentrations of cyclosporin analogues, including one nonimmunosuppressive form, enhance DOX cytotoxicity of MDR1(+) HCC cells by modulating drug retention. CsA as found in posttransplant patient plasma enhanced DOX cytotoxicity to human MDR1(+) hepatoma cells in vitro, albeit at less than optimal chemosensitizing concentrations. Prolonged exposure to CsA did not affect its chemosensitizing properties or block Pgp expression of HCC cells. These findings support our hypothesis that in vivo immunosuppressive levels of CsA may enhance DOX chemotherapeutic efficacy on MDR1(+) HCC cells.

Recurrent primary sclerosing cholangitis after orthotopic liver transplantation: is chronic rejection part of the disease process?

BACKGROUND: The possibility of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) recurrence after liver transplantation has been debated. The aim of this study is to examine whether recurrent PSC and chronic rejection (CR) are different expressions of the same disease process. METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients receiving 118 grafts for the diagnosis of PSC were reviewed and placed into three groups: group A, recurrent disease, as evidenced by cholangiographic and pathologic findings with radiographic arterial flow to the liver (n=18; 15.7%); group B, those who developed CR (n=15; 13.0%); and group C, all others (n=82; 71.3%). Cholangiograms and histopathologic specimens were examined in a blinded fashion. RESULTS: Demographic factors were similar, except for age, with a significantly younger age and more episodes of rejection in groups A and B (P<0.03). Group A had a higher incidence of cytomegalovirus hepatitis (P=0.008). Five-year graft survivals for A, B, and C were 64.6%, 33.3%, and 76.1%, respectively (P=0.0001), 5-year patient survivals were 76.2%, 66.7%, and 89.1%, respectively (P=0.0001), and repeat transplantation rates were 27.8%, 46.7%, and 8.5%, respectively (P=0.005). Radiographically, 90% of cholangiograms in patients with recurrent disease showed at least multiple intrahepatic strictures. Histopathologically, patients with recurrent disease and CR shared many features. CONCLUSIONS: We have described a high incidence of recurrent PSC and CR in patients who received transplants for PSC. Histopathologic analysis suggests that CR and recurrent PSC could represent a spectrum of indistinguishable disease. However, the distinct difference in clinical outcome, as evidenced by an increased repeat transplantation rate and lower graft and patient survival in the CR group, clearly suggests that they are two distinct entities that require very different treatment strategies.

Is liver transplantation indicated for cholangiocarcinoma?

Liver transplantation for unresectable primary liver cancer has met with skepticism due to early aggressive recurrences occurring in early series from many centers. The primary tumors for which transplantation has been performed have been hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. In an attempt to improve these poor results, we instituted a protocol with adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy after liver transplantation for cholangiocarcinoma. Between December 1984 and December 1992, 701 patients underwent 795 liver transplants. Seventeen patients had a diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma and form the basis of this review. Three patients were excluded from the study, two because of early postoperative deaths, and one because of an unknown bony metastasis present at the time of transplant. Eleven patients have experienced a recurrence, and 7 of these died secondary to their recurrence. Three patients are alive with no evidence of disease 44 months, 31 months, and 28 months, respectively, after transplant. The 1-year survival rate in these patients is 53%, and the disease-free survival rate is 40%. Patients were able to tolerate the adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy without apparent morbidity or mortality. Unfortunately, this protocol does not appear to provide significant benefit. Until a better adjuvant therapy protocol is developed, it is questionable whether unresectable cholangiocarcinoma should be considered an indication for liver transplantation.

Adenocarcinomas of the oral cavity: a clinicopathologic study of terminal duct carcinomas.

A clinico-pathologic study of 12 patients, each harboring a hitherto not delineated adenocarcinoma of salivary origin is presented. The authors have designated this histologically unique carcinoma as 'terminal duct adenocarcinoma' in deference not only to its light-optic appearance, but also to a putative origin from the reserve cells (epithelial and myoepithelial) of the intercalated duct. The tumors' local invasive properties with extension into nerves and adjacent bone suggest their biologic behavior is like that of adenoid cystic carcinomas.

Interobserver agreement in hepatitis C grading and staging and in the Banff grading schema for acute cellular rejection: the "hepatitis C 3" multi-institutional trial experience.

CONTEXT: Establishing adequate interobserver agreement is crucial not only for standardization of patient care but also to ensure validity of findings in multi-institutional trials. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate interobserver agreement in assessing chronic hepatitis C (HCV) and acute cellular rejection (ACR) among 17 hepatopathologists involved in the "Hepatitis C 3" trial. DESIGN: The trial is a randomized multicenter (17 institutions) study involving 312 patients undergoing transplantation for HCV. Patients are randomized to 3 treatment arms. For final data analysis, all biopsy specimens are reviewed by a central pathologist (G.J.N.). Recurrence of HCV is evaluated according to the Batts and Ludwig schema. The 1997 Banff schema is used to evaluate ACR. To assess interobserver agreement, hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections from 11 liver biopsy specimens (6 HCV and 5 ACR) were sent by the central pathologist to 16 local pathologists from 13 institutions. Statistical analysis was performed on raw ACR/HCV data as well as data grouped according to clinically significant primary endpoint cutoffs. RESULTS: Statistically significant agreement was found among all participating pathologists (P < .001). On kappa analysis, the degree of agreement was rated "moderate" for HCV grade and stage and ACR global grading (kappa = 0.30, 0.33, and 0.37, respectively). Interobserver agreement was weaker for rejection activity index scoring of ACR (kappa = 0.15). A stronger degree of agreement was found when scores were grouped based on endpoint cutoffs (kappa = 0.76 "almost perfect" for HCV and 0.62 "substantial" for ACR). CONCLUSIONS: An overall statistically significant interobserver agreement was found among 17 pathologists using the 1997 Banff schema and the Batts and Ludwig schema.

Malignant histiocytosis in a patient presenting with hepatic dysfunction and peliosis hepatis.

In this article, we report the case of a 36-yr-old patient presenting with manifestations of portal hypertension, hepatic dysfunction, and fever who proved to have peliosis hepatis on liver biopsy. A thorough work-up revealed no obvious etiology. At autopsy, malignant histiocytosis of the liver and bone marrow was diagnosed. This case represents the first report of the association of peliosis hepatis with this rare histiocytic neoplasm and exemplifies the need for persistence in the search for malignancy, particularly hematological malignancy, in the patient with unexplained peliosis. The clinical similarity of peliosis hepatis associated with hematological malignancy and bacillary peliosis is also discussed.

Rejection in liver transplantation.

One hundred four liver transplant recipients were retrospectively reviewed for the incidence of liver allograft rejection, the response to antirejection therapy and the impact of rejection on graft and patient survival. Liver biopsies were performed weekly during episodes of graft dysfunction and to follow response to treatment. Baseline immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine and low-dose prednisolone. Rejection was treated with steroids and with OKT3 as rescue. Azathioprine was given to patients with preoperative or perioperative renal insufficiency and was added to patients' treatment after the first sign of rejection. Seven complications were observed in approximately 1,100 liver biopsies, only one necessitating surgery. We found that 39.4% of the patients never experienced acute rejection, and 60.6% had at least one episode of acute rejection. Overall, 42.3% of the patients had only one episode of acute rejection, 13.5% had two, 3.8% had three and 1% had five episodes of acute rejection. Sixty of 63 first acute rejection episodes occurred within 21 days of transplant. Primary disease, sex or patient age had no significant influence on the incidence of rejection. There was a lower incidence of rejection (p less than 0.005) in patients transplanted after October, 1986, despite lower mean cyclosporine levels. Mean cyclosporine level during the first postoperative month was 679 ng per ml vs. a mean level of 910 ng per ml prior to October, 1986, when the immunosuppressive protocol was altered. Antirejection therapy was very effective in that only two of the 63 patients had graft failure due to acute rejection. Both of these patients were subsequently retransplanted.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Intraobserver and interobserver variation in the histopathological assessment of liver allograft rejection. The Liver Transplantation Database (LTD) Investigators.

A study to determine the reproducibility of histopathological findings and diagnoses of rejection was carried out on a series of 42 liver allograft needle biopsy specimens by five pathologists practicing at four liver transplant centers. Pathologists from each of the four centers read each slide independently on two different occasions and were asked to assess 12 histopathological features and render a diagnosis. For all histological variables, the intrarater agreement was higher than the interrater agreement. Moderate to excellent agreement occurred among the pathologists about all histological variables thought to be important in establishing the diagnosis of acute rejection (i.e., portal tract inflammation, subendothelial inflammation and bile duct damage). Other variables such as lobular disarray, bile duct proliferation and particularly arteritis, however, were only fairly or poorly reproducible. Surprisingly, the diagnosis of acute rejection was more reproducible than the individual histopathological findings that were thought to be the basis for the diagnosis. The agreement for the diagnosis of chronic rejection, however, varied according to observer. We noted that relatively inexperienced observers within this group had some difficulties agreeing with more experienced observers in establishing a diagnosis of chronic rejection. These findings demonstrate that the histopathological diagnosis of acute cellular liver allograft rejection is highly reproducible within a group of experienced pathologists and that this diagnosis can be pooled in a common data base with confidence.