Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Assunto principal
Tipo de documento
Ano de publicação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Feline Med Surg ; 26(8): 1098612X241274235, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39105658

RESUMO

PRACTICAL RELEVANCE: Acid-related disorders including esophagitis and gastroduodenal ulceration are uncommon in the cat. However, when they occur, they can have devastating consequences and require targeted intervention, including the use of gastroprotectants. Careful consideration of the causes of esophagitis and gastroduodenal ulceration can help the clinician to determine which gastroprotectant to use, and when to begin and end gastroprotective therapy. CLINICAL CHALLENGES: Gastroprotectants remain one of the most misused classes of drugs in veterinary and human medicine. There are very few studies evaluating the efficacy of gastroprotective agents in cats. Furthermore, goals for the degree of gastric acid suppression are extrapolated from studies performed in dogs and humans. AIMS: This review provides a foundation for the logical approach to the choice of gastroprotectant as indicated by the disease process, and is aimed at all veterinarians who prescribe gastroprotectants for use in cats. EVIDENCE BASE: The guidance provided in this review is supported by current literature, including consensus opinion from the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine. Gaps in evidence for use of gastroprotectants in cats are filled by extrapolations from studies performed in dogs and humans.


Assuntos
Doenças do Gato , Gatos , Animais , Doenças do Gato/tratamento farmacológico , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Antiulcerosos/uso terapêutico , Úlcera Péptica/veterinária , Úlcera Péptica/tratamento farmacológico , Esofagite/veterinária , Esofagite/tratamento farmacológico
2.
Front Vet Sci ; 9: 897760, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35968011

RESUMO

Background: The GI microbiome has not been characterized in dogs being medically managed for congenital portosystemic shunts (CPSS). Objectives: To characterize the fecal microbiome in a population of dogs being medically managed for CPSS. Animals: 27 client-owned dogs. Methods: Prospective cohort study enrollment of fecal samples was performed with follow-up data collected retrospectively. The overall fecal dysbiosis index (DI) and individual bacterial abundances were determined using real-time qPCR. Medical management, clinical findings, clinicopathologic, and outcome variables were collected, and logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate associations between these variables and overall DI and bacterial abundances. Numerical variables were evaluated with general linear models for normality and equal variance using Shapiro-Wilk test and Levene's test, respectively. Results: All dogs were administered a hepatic diet and lactulose, while antibiotics were used in 22 (81.5%) and acid suppressants in 7 (25.9%). Seventeen dogs (63.0%) had a DI >2. The median DI in this population was 3.02 (range 4.23-8.42), and the median DI in dogs receiving and not receiving antibiotics was 4.3 (range -4.23-8.42) and 1.52 (range -1.62-5.43), respectively. No significant association between any of the analyzed variables and the DI was identified. There was a significant association between the use of metronidazole and a larger abundance of E. coli (p = 0.024). Conclusions and Clinical Importance: Dysbiosis appears to be common in dogs that are being medically managed for CPSS, though the clinical significance remains unclear.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA