Resolution of hyperlipidemia after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Hyperlipidemia is an established risk factor for development of coronary artery disease. The aim of our study was to examine the changes in serum lipid profiles of morbidly obese patients complicated by hyperlipidemia, who underwent laparoscopic gastric bypass. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 95 morbidly obese patients with documented hyperlipidemia who underwent laparoscopic gastric bypass. Mean duration of hyperlipidemia was 44+/- 56 months. Hyperlipidemia was defined as an elevated level of triglycerides (> 150 mg/dL) or total cholesterol (> 200 mg/dL). Changes in lipid profile of a subset of patients with subnormal levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( 130 mg/dL), and very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (> 40 mg/dL) were also examined. Fasting lipid profiles were measured preoperatively and at 3-month intervals. RESULTS: There were 68 women (72%) with a mean age of 43 +/- 10 years. Mean body mass index was 47+/- 5 kg/m2. Mean percentage of excess body weight loss at 12 months postoperatively was 66%. One year after gastric bypass, mean total cholesterol levels decreased by 16%; triglyceride levels decreased by 63%; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels decreased by 31%; very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased by 74%; total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol risk ratio decreased by 60%, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels increased by 39%. Also, within 1 year, 23 of 28 (82%) patients requiring lipid-lowering medications preoperatively were able to discontinue their medications. CONCLUSIONS: Weight loss after laparoscopic gastric bypass substantially improves lipid profiles in morbidly obese patients who have hyperlipidemia. Improvement in lipid profiles was observed as early as 3 months postoperatively and was sustained at 1 year. Improvement of lipid profiles after laparoscopic gastric bypass can reduce health risks associated with high levels of atherogenic lipoproteins.

Retrocecal appendix location and perforation at presentation.

Retrocecal appendicitis has been theorized to follow a more insidious course than other anatomic variants. To determine the influence of retrocecal anatomy on clinical course of appendicitis, 200 adult patients treated at a major university medical center with the diagnosis of appendicitis from 2001 to 2004 were retrospectively studied. Computed tomography (CT) scans of adult patients with an ultimate diagnosis of appendicitis were analyzed to determine an association between retrocecal appendix and perforation of the appendix at presentation. A higher perforation rate in the retrocecal group would imply patient delay in presentation from more tolerable symptoms. CT scans were examined for retrocecal location and perforation. No significant association was found between retrocecal anatomy and perforation rates at presentation (chi-square = 2.1, P = 0.15, odds ratio = 1.6, 95% confidence interval [0.8-3.0]). However, the risk of perforation was 60 per cent higher in the retrocecal group. By regression analysis, age and the presence of a fecalith on CT scan were predictors of appendix perforation. Appendix location was not. In this study, we found no significant association between retrocecal appendix anatomy and perforation at presentation.

Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy: technique and discussion.

Minimally invasive surgery has undergone rapid development over the last 20 years and has greatly impacted the field of General Surgery. Removal of the appendix and gallbladder by way of laparoscopic means has become standard in surgical training and care. More complex procedures also are becoming incorporated into surgical resident education and routine clinical practice. Colon cancer operations, previously performed by an open approach to ensure adequate resection of the specimen and draining lymph nodes, are currently being performed laparoscopically by experienced surgeons with equivalent recurrence, morbidity, and overall mortality rates. In this chapter, the technique of laparoscopic colectomy is described and advantages and disadvantages are discussed. The literature is reviewed and this technique compared with the open procedure. The authors contend that laparoscopic colectomy is a suitable, and perhaps preferable, alternative to open procedures for benign or malignant colon disease, with acceptable long-term results.

Does reoperation predispose to postoperative wound infection in women undergoing operation for breast cancer?

Reoperations for breast cancer predispose to a higher risk of postoperative wound infections than primary procedures. We accomplished a retrospective chart review of 320 women who underwent multiple breast cancer procedures between 10/97 and 8/02. The mean number of procedures was 2.4 (range, 2-5). The overall incidence of wound infection was 6.1 per cent. Wound infections developed, on average, 12 days after surgery (range, 2-30). There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of wound infection comparing the initial procedure versus the subsequent operation (1.6% vs. 9.4%, P < 0.001). This was also seen with reoperation after an operative biopsy compared to operation after a core biopsy (11.1% vs. 9.7%, P < 0.01). The incidence was increased to 22.0 per cent when the initial operation involved lymph node dissection (sentinel lymph node biopsy or complete axillary lymph node dissection). Wire localization did not increase the incidence of postoperative wound infections, and prophylactic antibiotics were associated with a decreased incidence of wound infection in the reoperative setting. The incidence of wound infection is increased with reoperation after operative biopsy compared to operation after core biopsy and is further increased when the initial biopsy involved lymph node dissection.

Evaluation of safety of increased time interval between chemoradiation and resection for rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is increasingly used for rectal cancer, with resection typically performed 6 weeks after completion of radiotherapy. We observed in our practice that further delay after radiotherapy led to increased downsizing. We performed this retrospective analysis to evaluate the safety of this approach. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 48 patients with distal or mid-rectal cancer who were operated on 8 weeks or less after chemoradiation ended (group 1, n = 16), and more than 8 weeks later (group 2, n = 32). We looked at the effect of delaying surgery on intraoperative blood loss, operative and hospital duration, postoperative complications, readmissions, and mortality. RESULTS: The median interval between radiation and operation was 7 weeks in group 1 and 11 weeks in group 2. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, or readmissions. Length of operation and length of stay were slightly longer for group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Delaying surgery after neoadjuvant treatment appears safe, with morbidity and mortality similar to that seen with surgery performed less than 8 weeks after chemoradiation.

Laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is a commonly performed procedure for the treatment of morbid obesity. Esophagectomy in patients with a history of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass presents a difficult technical challenge for the surgeon. In this report we describe a technique of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy in a patient who had had an open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Minimally invasive esophagectomy was performed with resection of the Roux limb using the gastric remnant as the conduit for gastrointestinal reconstruction.