Continuous low serum levels of advanced glycation end products and low risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes is associated with an increased risk of developing cardiovascular events. Previous studies have reported that advanced glycation end products (AGEs) were related to cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes. However, data on associations between long-term AGEs and cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes are lacking. This study aimed to determine whether a long-time shift in the levels of serum AGEs is associated with cardiovascular events in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Two-time serum methyl-glyoxal-hydroimidazoline (MG-H1) levels were measured in 138 patients with type 2 diabetes whose mean glycated hemoglobin level was 10.1%. We categorized patients whose serum MG-H1 levels were < 2.8 µg/mL at both times as the continuous low MG-H1 group. The primary endpoints of this study were combined cardiovascular events, which were defined as heart disease, peripheral arterial disease, stroke, and all-cause death. Hazard ratios (HRs) for combined cardiovascular events with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the Cox proportional hazard models to compare the outcomes between the continuous low MG-H1 group and others. RESULTS: The continuous low MG-H1 group was associated with a significantly lower risk than others in combined cardiovascular events after adjusting for possible confounders (HR: 0.50; 95% CI, 0.28-0.87; P = 0.02). Furthermore, the same relationship was observed in patients without a history of cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous low serum MG-H1 levels are associated with a low frequency of diabetes-related complications in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.

No beneficial effects of aspirin on secondary cardiovascular prevention in patients with type 2 diabetes using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

There is little evidence on whether non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and aspirin interact in secondary cardiovascular prevention in type 2 diabetic patients. This is an observational study using data from the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes and Follow-on studies. Hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models to compare time to death in patients using and not using aspirin who were simultaneously using or not using NSAIDs. A total of 3600 type 2 diabetic patients with cardiovascular disease were included. During a mean follow-up period of 8.8 years, 948 patients died. After adjustments, the risk of all-cause mortality in patients not using NSAIDs was significantly lower in those using aspirin than in those not using aspirin (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70-0.93; P = 0.004). The risk in patients using NSAIDs did not differ significantly between the two groups. There was a significant interaction between aspirin use and NSAIDs use. In type 2 diabetic patients with cardiovascular disease, aspirin use was not beneficial for those using NSAIDs.

Favourable changes in mortality in people with diabetes: US NHANES 1999-2010.

AIMS: Diabetes-related complications have declined during the past two decades. We aimed to examine whether mortality in people with diabetes improved over time in the 1999 to 2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study using 1999 to 2004 and 2005 to 2010 data from the NHANES. For primary analyses, we compared the unadjusted, age-adjusted and multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for mortality outcomes (total, cardiovascular, cardiac and cancer deaths) of the participants with diabetes with those without diabetes using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: For each mortality outcome, HR (95% confidence interval) in diabetic participants during the period 2005 to 2010 was lower than that during the period 1999 to 2004 (all-cause death, 2.76 [1.87-4.08] vs 4.23 [2.57-6.98]; cardiovascular death, 2.70 [1.20-6.04] vs 8.82 [3.28-23.70]; cardiac death, 2.45 [0.98-6.09] vs 15.55 [7.01-34.50]; cancer death, 2.33 [0.87-6.23] vs 3.03 [1.20-7.65]). Compared with mortality outcome during the period 1999 to 2004, greater declines in mortality during the period 2005 to 2010 were observed for cardiovascular (-54.0%) and cardiac deaths (-64.8%). In age-adjusted and multivariable-adjusted models, the cumulative event rates for total, cardiovascular and cardiac deaths were not significantly different between participants with and without diabetes during the period 2005-2010; this was not the case during the period 1999-2004. The leading cause of death was malignant neoplasm during the period 2005-2010. CONCLUSION: Considerably improved outcomes for total, cardiovascular and cardiac deaths were observed in people with diabetes during the 2005 to 2010 NHANES compared to the 1999 to 2004 NHANES.

Association between hyperinsulinemia and increased risk of cancer death in nonobese and obese people: A population-based observational study.

Obesity, metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes are associated with cancer-related mortality. We assessed whether hyperinsulinemia is a risk factor for cancer death in nonobese people without diabetes. We conducted a prospective cohort study using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2010 and followed up the participants until December 31, 2011. For the primary analysis of cancer mortality, we used Cox proportional hazard models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) in the participants with hyperinsulinemia and those without. Hyperinsulinemia was defined as a fasting insulin level of ≥10 µU/mL. To identify causes of deaths, the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes were used. This study included 9,778 participants aged 20 years or older without diabetes or a history of cancer: 6,718 nonobese participants (2,057 with hyperinsulinemia [30.6%]) and 3,060 obese participants (2,303 with hyperinsulinemia [75.3%]). A total of 99.9% completed follow-up. Among all study participants, cancer mortality was significantly higher in those with hyperinsulinemia than in those without hyperinsulinemia (adjusted HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.24-3.34, p = 0.005). Similarly, among nonobese participants, multivariable analysis showed that cancer mortality was significantly higher in those with hyperinsulinemia than in those without (adjusted HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.07-3.35, p = 0.02). Considering that nonobese people with hyperinsulinemia were at higher risk of cancer mortality than those without hyperinsulinemia, improvement of hyperinsulinemia may be an important approach for preventing cancer regardless of the presence or absence of obesity.

Effects of ß-blockers on all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary heart disease.

AIMS: To assess whether the use of beta-blockers influences mortality and the incidence of major cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes and coronary heart disease (CHD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using data from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes trial, we performed Cox proportional hazards analysis to assess the effects of ß-blockers on all-cause mortality in 2244 patients with type 2 diabetes who had stable CHD with and without a history of myocardial infarction (MI)/heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF). RESULTS: All-cause mortality in patients with MI/HFrEF was significantly lower in those receiving ß-blockers than in those not receiving ß-blockers (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-0.98; P = .04), whereas that in patients without MI/HFrEF did not significantly differ (adjusted HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.76-1.32; P = .64). Among patients with MI/HFrEF, all-cause mortality in those who received intensive medical therapy alone for CHD was significantly lower in those on ß-blockers than in those not on ß-blockers (adjusted HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.23-0.88; P = .02); however, mortality in patients who received early revascularization for CHD was not significantly lower in those on ß-blockers (adjusted HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.40-1.65; P = .57). The risk of major cardiovascular events in patients without MI/HFrEF was not significantly different between those on and those not on ß-blocker treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with diabetes and CHD, the use of ß-blockers was effective in reducing all-cause mortality in those with MI/HFrEF but not in those without MI/HFrEF.

Possible discrepancy of HbA1c values and its assessment among patients with chronic renal failure, hemodialysis and other diseases.

BACKGROUND: Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and glycated albumin (GA) are frequently used as glycemic control markers. However, these markers are influenced by alterations in hemoglobin and albumin metabolism. Thus, conditions such as anemia, chronic renal failure, hypersplenism, chronic liver diseases, hyperthyroidism, hypoalbuminemia, and pregnancy need to be considered when interpreting HbA1c or GA values. Using data from patients with normal albumin and hemoglobin metabolism, we previously established a linear regression equation describing the GA value versus the HbA1c value to calculate an extrapolated HbA1c (eHbA1c) value for the accurate evaluation of glycemic control. In this study, we investigated the difference between the measured HbA1c and the eHbA1c values for patients with various conditions. METHODS: Data sets for a total of 2461 occasions were obtained from 731 patients whose HbA1c and GA values were simultaneously measured. We excluded patients with missing data or changeable HbA1c levels, and patients who had received transfusions or steroids within the previous 3 months. Finally, we included 44 patients with chronic renal failure (CRF), 10 patients who were undergoing hemodialysis (HD), 7 patients with hematological malignancies and a hemoglobin level of less than 10 g/dL (HM), and 12 patients with chronic liver diseases (CLD). RESULTS: In all the groups, the eHbA1c values were significantly higher than the measured HbA1c values. The median difference was 0.75 % (95 % CI 0.40-1.10 %, P for the difference is <0.001) in the CRF group, 0.80 % (95 % CI 0.30-1.65 %, P for the difference is 0.041) in the HD group, 0.90 % (95 % CI 0.90-1.30 %, P for the difference is 0.028) in the HM group, and 0.85 % (95 % CI 0.40-1.50 %, P for the difference is 0.009) in the CLD group. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the measured HbA1c values were lower than the eHbA1c values in each of the groups.

A newer conversion equation for the correlation between HbA1c and glycated albumin.

Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and glycated albumin (GA) are frequently used as glycemic control markers. These markers are influenced by either altered hemoglobin metabolism or albumin metabolism. We investigated the correlation between HbA1c and GA by collecting only data that had not been affected by the turnover of either HbA1c or GA and proposed a novel equation for accurately estimating the extrapolated HbA1c (eHbA1c) value based on the GA value. Data sets for a total of 2461 occasions were obtained from 731 patients (including non-diabetes patients) whose HbA1c and GA values were simultaneously measured. Data sets obtained from patients undergoing hemodialysis, patients with hematological malignancies, pregnancy, chronic liver diseases, hyperthyroidism, steroid treatment or a blood transfusion during the past 3 months, or patients without albumin, hemoglobin, eGFR, or urinary protein measurements and data sets with an eGFR of less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2), a hemoglobin level of less than 10 mg/dL, an albumin level of below 3.0 g/mL, or a urinary protein level of 3+ were excluded. Finally, we selected 284 data sets. We then analyzed these data sets, performed a scatter plot to examine the correlation between HbA1c and GA, and established an equation describing the resulting correlation. Based on all the data points, the resulting equation was HbA1c = 0.216 × GA + 2.978 [R(2) = 0.5882, P < 0.001].

Prediction of future insulin-deficiency in glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-positive patients with slowly-progressive type 1 diabetes.

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to identify risk factors that contribute to the progression of slowly-progressive type 1 diabetes by evaluating the positive predictive value (PPV) of factors associated with the progression to an insulin-dependent state. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We selected 60 slowly-progressive type 1 diabetes patients who tested positive for glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibodies (GADA) at diagnosis from the Japanese Type 1 Diabetes Database Study. GADA levels in these patients were concurrently measured using both radioimmunoassay (RIA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) techniques. RESULTS: Compared with the non-progressor group (fasting C-peptide [F-CPR] levels maintained ≥0.6 ng/mL), the progressor group showed a younger age at diagnosis, lower body mass index (BMI), lower F-CPR levels and a higher prevalence of insulinoma-associated antigen-2 autoantibodies (IA-2A). The PPV of RIA-GADA increased from 56.3 to 70.0% in the high titer group (≥10 U/mL), and further increased to 76.9, 84.2, 81.0 and 75.0% when combined with specific thresholds for age at diagnosis <47 years, BMI <22.6 kg/m2, F-CPR <1.41 ng/mL and IA-2A positivity, respectively. In contrast, the PPV of ELISA-GADA (71.8%) remained the same at 73.1% in the high titer group (≥180 U/mL), but increased to 81.8, 82.4 and 79.0% when evaluated in conjunction with age at diagnosis, BMI and F-CPR level, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that, unlike RIA-GADA, ELISA-GADA shows no association between GADA titers and the risk of progression to an insulin-dependent state. The PPV improves when age at diagnosis, BMI and F-CPR levels are considered in combination.

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor-related renal disease.

BACKGROUND: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are widely used to treat type 2 diabetes (T2D). Lowering blood glucose is expected also to reduce the progression of diabetic nephropathy. We experienced a patient with T2D who achieved good glycemic control with a DPP-4 inhibitor but experienced rapid deterioration of renal function. Therefore, we performed a retrospective study of similar patients treated at our hospital. METHODS: Out of 56 patients with biopsy-proven diabetic nephropathy who underwent native kidney biopsy at Toranomon Hospital from January 2018 through December 2022, we selected 22 patients who had been receiving DPP-4 inhibitors for at least 9 months at the time of kidney biopsy. Of these patients, we evaluated 16 diagnosed with class IIa diabetic nephropathy according to Tervaert's pathologic classification. The yearly estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) slope in the 16 patients was arranged from the highest to the lowest slope. Ten patients with a large eGFR slope had thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA)-like lesions characterized by glomerular endothelial cell proliferation and GBM duplication on kidney biopsy (group A), whereas the remaining 6 patients did not have TMA-like lesions (group B). RESULTS: Group A had a median (interquartile range [IQR]) eGFR of 18.2 (16.2, 26.2) and a yearly median (IQR) eGFR slope of -11.2 (-17.6, -9.2) mL/min/1.73 m2 after of DPP-4 administration, whereas group B had a median (IQR) eGFR of 31.5 (21.9, 34.8) mL/min/1.73 m2 and a yearly median (IQR) eGFR slope of -1.6 (-3.1, -0.3). Renal function declined significantly more rapidly in group A than in group B, and proteinuria was higher in group A than in group B (median [IQR], 3.4 [2.6, 4.4] g/day vs 0.8 [0.4, 1.3] g/day, respectively). Five patients in group A progressed to dialysis during follow-up, but none of the patients in group B did. Median (IQR) hemoglobin A1c was 6.2 % (6.0 %, 6.6 %) in group A and 5.8 % (5.7 %, 6.6 %) in group B. CONCLUSION: DPP-4 inhibitors promote vascular endothelial regeneration, but when this effect occurs in the glomerulus, glomerular endothelial cell proliferation leads to TMA-like lesions, which may cause an increase in proteinuria and rapid decline in renal function.

Left Hemiplegia Possibly Due to Glucose Reperfusion Injury after Recovery of Severe Hypoglycemia in a Woman with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

A 79-year-old woman with type 2 diabetes receiving insulin was rushed to our hospital due to severe hypoglycemia. Glucose was administered, and the consciousness disturbance was promptly improved. A few hours later, conjugate deviation of the eyes to the right and left hemiplegia occurred at a normal glucose level. Cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed hyperintensities of the right posterior limb of the internal capsule and the medial thalamus on diffusion-weighted imaging sequences. However, the changes observed using MRI disappeared completely on the third day, and her symptoms subsequently improved. This may have been a case of glucose reperfusion injury.

Japanese Type 1 Diabetes Database Study (TIDE-J): rationale and study design.

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is classified into three subtypes: acute-onset, slowly progressive, and fulminant T1D, according to the heterogeneity of clinical course in Japan. Although several cross-sectional databases of T1D have been reported, prospective longitudinal databases to investigate clinical outcomes are lacking in our country. Therefore, we herein construct multi-center prospective longitudinal database of the three subtypes of T1D, accompanied with genetic information and biobanking, which is named Japanese Type 1 Diabetes Database Study (TIDE-J). Inclusion criteria of this study are as follows: (1) the duration of T1D was less than 5 years, (2) the patients had one or more islet-related autoantibodies and/or fasting serum C-peptide levels were less than 1.0 ng/mL, (3) the patients could clearly understand the study consent in writing. In the TIDE-J, clinical data, including glycemic control, endogenous insulin secretion, islet-related autoantibodies, diabetic complications, and treatment, are collected annually using electric data collection system, which is named REDCap. Furthermore, HLA genotypes of each participant were analyzed at entry and the blood samples were stored for assessing exploratory markers and further genetic analysis annually. The TIDE-J certainly helps in revealing distinct clinical course of each T1D subtype. Moreover, this database may help in identifying novel markers for diagnosing each subtype of T1D and predicting clinical outcomes (including pancreatic beta cell function and disease severity) in patients.

Four-Year Screening Interval and Vision-Threatening Retinopathy in Type 2 Diabetes Patients With Good Glycemic Control.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether vision-threatening retinopathy developed after 4 years in patients with type 2 diabetes with good glycemic control during follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using data from the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes and Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Follow-on studies (conducted from January 1, 2001, to October 14, 2014), we investigated the incidence of vision-threatening retinopathy after 4 years in patients with type 2 diabetes with good or poor glycemic control. Patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy at baseline were excluded. Vision-threatening retinopathy was defined as severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, laser photocoagulation, or vitrectomy. Good and poor glycemic control was defined as mean glycated hemoglobin level less than 7% and 7% or greater during follow-up, respectively. RESULTS: This study included 2285 patients. Among patients with no retinopathy at baseline, the 4-year incidence of vision-threatening retinopathy was 0% (0 of 386) and 0.8% (6 of 721) in those with good and poor glycemic control, respectively (P=.54). Similarly, severe retinopathy was not observed at 8 years in patients who did not have retinopathy at 4 years. Among patients with mild to moderate nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy at baseline, the 4-year incidence of vision-threatening retinopathy was significantly higher in those with poor glycemic control than in those with good glycemic control (9.7% [77 of 790] vs 4.4% [13 of 297]; P=.004). Additionally, the remission rate of diabetic retinopathy was low in patients with a long duration of diabetes. Four-year incidences of vision-threatening retinopathy were higher in patients with retinopathy at baseline who had poorer glycemic control and longer durations of diabetes. CONCLUSION: It may be safe to extend screening intervals for diabetic retinopathy to 4 years or longer in patients with type 2 diabetes with no retinopathy.

Urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio within normal range and all-cause or cardiovascular mortality among U.S. adults enrolled in the NHANES during 1999-2015.

PURPOSE: Urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) is one of the important diagnostic markers of chronic kidney disease. We aimed to investigate the association between UACR within normal range and cardiovascular or all-cause mortality. METHODS: This study included a nationally representative sample of 31,413 U.S. adults aged greater than or equal to 20 years enrolled in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2014. Mortality was ascertained through 2015. We used multivariable Cox proportional models to investigate the association of UACR with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Stratum-specific analyses were conducted by age, sex, race, education status, and comorbidities (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and chronic kidney disease). RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 7.6 years, 2854 all-cause deaths and 454 cardiovascular deaths were identified. Higher UACR (per 10 mg/g) was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.29, 95% confidence interval = 1.22-1.37) and cardiovascular mortality (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.34, 95% confidence interval = 1.17-1.55). The association was larger among women for both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, and among younger and highly educated participants only for all-cause mortality. The association did not differ by the presence of comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated UACR within normal range was associated with higher all-cause and cardiovascular mortality risk across almost all subgroups including participants without comorbidities. Our findings suggest the importance of the early detection of albuminuria and careful evaluation of UACR even within normal range to reduce mortality risk.

Spironolactone Use and Improved Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction With Resistant Hypertension.

Background Resistant hypertension is a salt-retaining condition possibly attributable to inappropriate aldosterone secretion. Methods and Results This study was a secondary analysis of the TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist) trial. Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with (n=1004) and without (n=2437) resistant hypertension were included. Resistant hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥130 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥80 mm Hg in a patient with hypertension, despite the concurrent use of a renin-angiotensin system blocker (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker), a calcium channel blocker, and a diuretic; or as those patients using ≥4 classes of antihypertensive medication. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, aborted cardiac arrest, or heart failure hospitalization. We analyzed hazard ratios (HRs) for outcomes with 95% CIs in the spironolactone group and compared them with the placebo group using Cox proportional hazard models. The risk of primary outcome events in patients with HFpEF with resistant hypertension was significantly lower in the spironolactone group than in the placebo group (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.53-0.91; P=0.009), whereas the risk of primary outcome events in patients with HFpEF without resistant hypertension was not significantly different between the 2 groups (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.83-1.20; P=0.97). There was a significant interaction between spironolactone use and resistant hypertension (P=0.03). Similar associations were also observed in patients with HFpEF from the Americas (United States, Canada, Brazil, and Argentina) only. Conclusions Spironolactone may be an effective add-on medication for patients with HFpEF with resistant hypertension taking angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, and diuretics.

Thiazide Use and Decreased Risk of Heart Failure in Nondiabetic Patients Receiving Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment.

The SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) study reported that intensive blood pressure (BP) treatment with a systolic BP target of <120 mm Hg decreased the risks of cardiovascular events. However, it remains unknown whether specific medications can further improve cardiovascular outcome in patients receiving intensive BP treatment. This study examined whether thiazide use improves cardiovascular outcome in patients receiving intensive BP treatment. We used data of nondiabetic patients receiving intensive BP treatment in the SPRINT study. The primary outcome was a composite end point of myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, heart failure, or cardiovascular death. We analyzed hazard ratios for outcomes with 95% CIs in patients taking thiazides compared with those not taking thiazides using Cox proportional hazard models. This study included 2847 patients and the mean follow-up period was 3.3 years. The risk of primary outcome events was significantly lower in patients taking thiazides than in those not taking thiazides in both entire and propensity score-matched cohorts. Particularly, heart failure risk was significantly lower in those taking thiazides. These associations were also observed in various subgroups. In addition, thiazide use was associated with decreased risk of all-cause mortality. Hypokalemia occurred more frequently in patients taking thiazides than in those not taking thiazides. Thiazide use decreased risk of cardiovascular events, particularly heart failure, in nondiabetic high-risk patients receiving intensive BP treatment.

Thiazide Use and Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Well-Controlled Blood Pressure.

Evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of thiazides in patients with well-controlled and relatively low blood pressure (BP) is lacking. This study aimed to assess whether thiazide use is effective and safe in type 2 diabetic patients with well-controlled BP and whether intensive BP control leads to decreased risk of cardiovascular events depending on thiazide use. We performed an observational cohort study using data from the ACCORD study (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes). The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), which was a composite end point including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Hazard ratios for primary and secondary outcomes with 95% CIs were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models. We included 10 011 type 2 diabetic patients. The overall mean follow-up period was 7.7 years, and 1776 patients experienced MACE. Mean systolic BP at baseline in patients taking and not taking thiazides was 137.2 and 135.7 mm Hg, respectively. Thiazide use was associated with increased risk of MACE, particularly stroke (hazard ratio, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.18-1.88]). In addition, thiazide use was significantly associated with higher risks of MACE and stroke in patients receiving intensive BP control but not in those receiving standard BP control. Similar associations were observed in analyses using propensity score matching. Intensive BP control reduced the risks of MACE and stroke in patients not taking thiazides but not in patients taking thiazides. Thiazide use may be harmful in type 2 diabetic patients with relatively low BP.

Optimal cardiac strategy based on the history of myocardial infarction in type 2 diabetic patients with coronary artery disease.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between the cardiac treatment strategy and cardiac event risk in type 2 diabetic patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) based on the history of myocardial infarction. Using Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial data, a Cox proportional hazard model was used for calculating hazard ratios (HRs) for major cardiac events in patients receiving early revascularization or intensive medical therapy. Patients without (n = 1,557) and with myocardial infarction (n = 736) were separately analyzed. In patients without myocardial infarction, risk of major cardiac events was similar for percutaneous coronary intervention and intensive medical therapy groups, whereas it was significantly lower in the coronary artery bypass grafting group than in the intensive medical therapy group (HR: 0.48, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 0.30-0.76, P = 0.002). Conversely, in patients with myocardial infarction, risk of major cardiac events was significantly higher in the early revascularization group than in the intensive medical therapy group (HR: 1.47, 95%CI: 1.03-2.11, P = 0.03). In type 2 diabetic patients with CAD, benefits of early revascularization were observed only in those without previous myocardial infarction. For patients with previous myocardial infarction, intensive medical therapy exerted superior benefits.