RESUMO
Empirical studies of genotype-phenotype-fitness maps of proteins are fundamental to understanding the evolutionary process, in elucidating the space of possible genotypes accessible through mutations in a landscape of phenotypes and fitness effects. Yet, comprehensively mapping molecular fitness landscapes remains challenging since all possible combinations of amino acid substitutions for even a few protein sites are encoded by an enormous genotype space. High-throughput mapping of genotype space can be achieved using large-scale screening experiments known as multiplexed assays of variant effect (MAVEs). However, to accommodate such multi-mutational studies, the size of MAVEs has grown to the point where a priori determination of sampling requirements is needed. To address this problem, we propose calculations and simulation methods to approximate minimum sampling requirements for multi-mutational MAVEs, which we combine with a new library construction protocol to experimentally validate our approximation approaches. Analysis of our simulated data reveals how sampling trajectories differ between simulations of nucleotide versus amino acid variants and among mutagenesis schemes. For this, we show quantitatively that marginal gains in sampling efficiency demand increasingly greater sampling effort when sampling for nucleotide sequences over their encoded amino acid equivalents. We present a new library construction protocol that efficiently maximizes sequence variation, and demonstrate using ultradeep sequencing that the library encodes virtually all possible combinations of mutations within the experimental design. Insights learned from our analyses together with the methodological advances reported herein are immediately applicable toward pooled experimental screens of arbitrary design, enabling further assay upscaling and expanded testing of genotype space.