Does vaping affect the taste and smell perception? An exploratory study with New Zealand young adults.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to assess potential effects of vaping on individual taste and smell perception in a sample of young adult New Zealanders. DESIGN: This cross-sectional study measured taste and smell perception using intensity and hedonic ratings to two olfactory (i.e., vanillin, methional) and two gustatory stimuli (i.e., sucrose, monosodium glutamate), representing sweet and savoury flavours. Detection sensitivities to sucrose and vanillin were also assessed using a forced choice detection paradigm aligned with the signal detection framework. MANCOVAs were employed to compare sensory perception between groups based on vaping use frequency. Additional regression analyses were conducted to identify potential predictors of intensity and hedonic sensory ratings. SETTING: Participants were recruited from the University of Otago student population and surrounding neighbourhoods of Dunedin, New Zealand in 2023. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 213 university students (98 vapers and 115 non-vapers) RESULTS: We found a significant difference in hedonic ratings for vanillin, indicating a stronger preference among non-vapers. However, no other differences between the two groups were significant. Notably, the use of tobacco and mint flavours were emerged as significant predictors for hedonic responses to the savoury smell and sweet taste stimulus, respectively. No significant differences were observed between groups in the ability to detect weak stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that vape use, particularly with specific flavours, may be associated with alterations in hedonic responses to smells. This finding may have potential implications for how vaping affects on food preferences and dietary choices.

Nurses' use of 'wellness' supplements during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.

AIM: Quantify disparities and identify correlates and predictors of 'wellness' supplement use among nurses during the first year of the pandemic. DESIGN: Longitudinal secondary analysis of Nurses' Health Studies 2 and 3 and Growing Up Today Study data. METHODS: Sample included 36,518 total participants, 12,044 of which were nurses, who completed surveys during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic (April 2020 to April 2021). Analyses were conducted in March 2023. Modified Poisson models were used to estimate disparities in 'wellness' supplement use between nurses and non-healthcare workers and, among nurses only, to quantify associations with workplace-related predictors (occupational discrimination, PPE access, workplace setting) and psychosocial predictors (depression/anxiety, county-level COVID-19 mortality). Models included race/ethnicity, gender identity, age and cohort as covariates. RESULTS: Nurses were significantly more likely to use all types of supplements than non-healthcare workers. Lacking personal protective equipment and experiencing occupational discrimination were significantly associated with new immune supplement use. Depression increased the risk of using weight loss, energy and immune supplements. CONCLUSION: Nurses' disproportionate use of 'wellness' supplements during the COVID-19 pandemic may be related to workplace and psychosocial stressors. Given well-documented risks of harm from the use of 'wellness' supplements, the use of these products by nurses is of concern. IMPACT: 'Wellness' supplements promoting weight loss, increased energy, boosted immunity and cleansing of organs are omnipresent in today's health-focused culture, though their use has been associated with harm. This is of added concern among nurses given their risk of COVID-19 infection at work. Our study highlighted the risk factors associated with use of these products (lacking PPE and experiencing occupational discrimination). Findings support prior research suggesting a need for greater public health policy and education around the use of 'wellness' supplements. REPORTING METHOD: STROBE guidelines were followed throughout manuscript. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution was involved.

Pediatric healthcare professionals' attitudes and beliefs about weight stigma: A descriptive study.

PURPOSE: Children face weight-based stigma from their healthcare providers at a disconcerting rate, and efforts to mitigate this have been scant. This study aimed to quantify pediatric healthcare professionals' attitudes and beliefs about weight stigma and to determine stigma reduction interventions that are most supported by pediatric healthcare providers. DESIGN AND METHODS: Participants completed two validated instruments which measured implicit and explicit weight bias, respectively. They then completed a researcher-designed questionnaire to assess their attitudes and beliefs about weight stigma, and demographic questions. ANOVA models were used to examine associations between bias measures and participant characteristics, chi-square analyses were used to examine associations between questionnaire responses and participant characteristics, and Spearman's rank was used to determine correlations between weight bias and questionnaire responses. RESULTS: Participants exhibited moderate-to-high levels of implicit and explicit weight bias (mean Implicit Association Test score = 0.59, mean Crandall Anti-Fat Attitudes Score = 38.95). Associations were noted between implicit bias and years in practice (p < 0.05), and implicit bias and occupation (p < 0.05). There was a significant correlation between explicit bias and multiple questionnaire items, suggesting that healthcare providers with greater weight bias are aware of those biases and are ready to take action to address them. CONCLUSION: Though pediatric healthcare exhibit weight-based biases, they are invested in taking steps to mitigate these biases and their impact on patients. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The results of this study can inform the design of future interventions that aim to reduce healthcare-based weight bias, thus improving the quality of pediatric healthcare.

The unintended consequences of school-based health and nutrition policies: a systematic review.

Background: Significant funding and attention are directed toward school-based health and nutrition interventions. Less attention is given to the potential unintended consequences of these policies, especially those that target children and adolescents. This systematic review aimed to elucidate the unintended consequences of school-based health and nutrition policies in the United States. Methods: We conducted a systematic review, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, to analyze quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research conducted between January 2013 and September 2023. The search strategy encompassed three databases, identifying 11 articles that met the inclusion criteria. Results: Unintended consequences were organized into four themes: disordered weight control behaviors, parental discomfort or encouragement of disordered weight control behaviors, eating disorder triggers, and financial losses. The analysis of disordered weight control behaviors indicates limited impact on youth, and we noted limited consensus in the assessment of these behaviors. We observed parent concerns about BMI screening and reporting as well as apprehensions about privacy and efficacy. There were fewer articles addressing eating disorder antecedents, although there was evidence that some youths with eating disorders considered school health class a trigger of their disorder. One study was identified that found an increase in food waste following replacement of sugar-sweetened beverages. Implications: Findings underscore the importance of comprehensive evaluation and consideration of unintended consequences in the development and implementation of school-based health policies. Recommendations include further longitudinal research, integrating obesity prevention with eating disorder prevention, and de-implementation when unintended consequences potentially outweigh benefits, such as in BMI screening and surveillance.Systematic Review Registration: Identifier CRD42023467355. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=467355.

Perisylvian and Hippocampal Anomalies in Individuals With Pathogenic GRIN2A Variants.

Background and Objectives: Pathogenic variants in GRIN2A are associated with a spectrum of epilepsy-aphasia syndromes (EASs). Seizures as well as speech and language disorders occur frequently but vary widely in severity, both between individuals and across the life span. The link between this phenotypic spectrum and brain characteristics is unknown. Specifically, altered brain networks at the root of speech and language deficits remain to be identified. Patients with pathogenic variants in GRIN2A offer an opportunity to interrogate the impact of glutamate receptor dysfunction on brain development. Methods: We characterized brain anomalies in individuals with pathogenic GRIN2A variants and EASs, hypothesizing alterations in perisylvian speech-language regions and the striatum. We compared structural MRI data from 10 individuals (3 children and 7 adults, 3 female) with pathogenic GRIN2A variants with data from age-matched controls (N = 51 and N = 203 in a secondary analysis). We examined cortical thickness and volume in 4 a priori hypothesized speech and language regions (inferior frontal, precentral, supramarginal, and superior temporal) and across the whole brain. Subcortical structures (hippocampus, basal ganglia, thalamus) and the corpus callosum were also compared. Results: Individuals with pathogenic GRIN2A variants showed increased thickness and volume in the posterior part of Broca's area (inferior frontal gyrus, pars opercularis). For thickness, the effects were bilateral but more pronounced in the left (large effect size, η2 = 0.37) than the right (η2 = 0.12) hemisphere. Both volume and thickness were also higher in the bilateral superior temporal region while the supramarginal region showed increased thickness only. Whole-brain analyses confirmed left-sided thickness increases in Broca's area, with additional increases in the occipital and superior frontal cortices bilaterally. Hippocampal volume was reduced in the left hemisphere. There were no age-dependent effects or corpus callosum group differences. Discussion: Anomalies in perisylvian regions, with largest differences in Broca's area, suggest an altered development of classical speech-language networks in GRIN2A-related EAS. Left hippocampal reduction suggests a role for this structure in early speech and language development and is consistent with GRIN2A gene expression in that region. Overall, elucidating the neural correlates of EAS provides insights into the impact of GRIN2A dysfunction, opening avenues for targeted intervention in developmental syndromes with compromised speech-language development.