The epidemiology of alopecia areata: a population-based cohort study in UK primary care.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of population-based information on the disease burden and management of alopecia areata (AA). OBJECTIVES: To describe the epidemiology of AA, focusing on incidence, demographics and patterns of healthcare utilization. METHODS: Population-based cohort study of 4·16 million adults and children, using UK electronic primary care records from the Oxford-Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Research and Surveillance Centre (RSC) network database, 2009-2018. The incidence and point prevalence of AA were estimated. Variation in AA incidence by age, sex, deprivation, geographical distribution and ethnicity was examined. Patterns of healthcare utilization were evaluated in people with incident AA. RESULTS: The AA incidence rate was 0·26 per 1000 person-years. AA point prevalence in 2018 was 0·58% in adults. AA onset peaked at age 25-29 years for both sexes, although the peak was broader in females. People of nonwhite ethnicity were more likely to present with AA, especially those of Asian ethnicity [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 3·32 (95% confidence interval 3·11-3·55)]. Higher AA incidence was associated with social deprivation [IRR most vs. least deprived quintile 1·47 (1·37-1·59)] and urban living [IRR 1·23 (1·14-1·32)]. People of higher social deprivation were less likely to be referred for specialist dermatology review. CONCLUSIONS: By providing the first large-scale estimates of the incidence and point prevalence of AA, our study helps to understand the burden of AA on the population. Understanding the variation in AA onset between different population groups may give insight into the pathogenesis of AA and its management.

Frontal fibrosing alopecia: survey of severity assessment methods in routine clinical practice and validation of the International Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia Cooperative Group measurement guidance.

BACKGROUND: The lack of validated and responsive outcome measures in the management of frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) significantly limits assessment of disease progression and treatment response over time. AIM: To understand how FFA extent and progression is currently assessed in UK specialist centres, to validate components of the International FFA Cooperative Group (IFFACG) statement on FFA assessment, and to identify pragmatic advice to improve FFA management in clinic. METHODS: Consultant dermatologists with a specialist interest in hair loss (n = 17) were invited to take part. Preferred FFA assessment methods were explored using questionnaires and clinical scenarios. Participants were asked to identify and mark the current hairline in 10 frontal and 10 temporal hairline images (Questionnaire 1), with assessment repeated 3 months later to assess intraindividual variability (Questionnaire 2) and 12 months later to test whether interindividual accuracy could be improved with simple instruction (Questionnaire 3). RESULTS: All 17 clinicians (100%) completed the questionnaire at each time interval. We identified a wide variation in assessment techniques used by our experts. Measurements were perceived as the most accurate method of assessing frontal recession whereas photography was preferred for temporal recession. Inter-rater reliability between clinicians measuring the frontal hairline scenarios indicated a moderate strength of agreement [intraclass coefficient (ICC) = 0.61; 95% CI 0.40-0.85], yet intrarater reliability was found to be poor with wide limits of agreement (-8.71 mm to 9.92 mm) on follow-up. Importantly, when clear guidance was provided on how the hairline should be identified (Questionnaire 3), inter-rater reliability improved significantly, with ICC = 0.70, suggesting moderate agreement (95% CI 0.51-0.89; P < 0.001). A similar pattern was seen with temporal hairline measurements, which again improved in accuracy with instruction. CONCLUSION: We found that accuracy of measurements in FFA can be improved with simple instruction and we have validated components of the IFFACG measurement recommendations.

Clinical features and WNT10A mutations in seven unrelated cases of Schöpf-Schulz-Passarge syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Schöpf-Schulz-Passarge syndrome (SSPS) is an autosomal recessive form of ectodermal dysplasia resulting from mutations in WNT10A. OBJECTIVES: To document the spectrum of clinical features and search for pathogenic mutations in seven unrelated cases of SSPS. METHODS: Clinical examination of patients and Sanger sequencing of genomic DNA spanning the coding exons and flanking spice sites of WNT10A. RESULTS: Most subjects had bilateral eyelid cysts and some degree of palmoplantar keratoderma, although nail, hair, and teeth abnormalities were variably present. Bi-allelic pathogenic mutations in WNT10A were found in all seven subjects. New mutations comprised p.Glu390*, p.Ser270Arg, and p.Cys362Arg; the recurrent mutations were p.Cys107* and p.Ala131Thr. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals the range of ectodermal pathology in cases of SSPS that result from WNT10A mutations. Eyelid cysts provide a useful clinical clue to diagnosing SSPS which may be less rare than is currently appreciated.