Socioeconomic disparity in the association between fine particulate matter exposure and papillary thyroid cancer.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exists suggesting that cumulative exposure to air pollution in the form of fine particulate matter (aerodynamic diameter ≤ 2.5 µm [PM2.5]) may be associated with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), although this relationship has not been widely established. This study aims to evaluate the association between PM2.5 and PTC and determine the subgroups of patients who are at the highest risk of PTC diagnosis. METHODS: Under IRB approval, we conducted a case-control study of adult patients (age ≥ 18) newly diagnosed with PTC between 1/2013-12/2016 across a single health care system were identified using electronic medical records. These patients were compared to a control group of patients without any evidence of thyroid disease. Cumulative PM2.5 exposure was calculated for each patient using a deep learning neural networks model, which incorporated meteorological and satellite-based measurements at the patients' residential zip code. Adjusted multivariate logistic regression was used to quantify the association between cumulative PM2.5 exposure and PTC diagnosis. We tested whether this association differed by gender, race, BMI, smoking history, current alcohol use, and median household income. RESULTS: A cohort of 1990 patients with PTC and a control group of 6919 patients without thyroid disease were identified. Compared to the control group, patients with PTC were more likely to be older (51.2 vs. 48.8 years), female (75.5% vs 46.8%), White (75.2% vs. 61.6%), and never smokers (71.1% vs. 58.4%) (p < 0.001). After adjusting for age, sex, race, BMI, current alcohol use, median household income, current smoking status, hypertension, diabetes, COPD, and asthma, 3-year cumulative PM2.5 exposure was associated with a 1.41-fold increased odds of PTC diagnosis (95%CI: 1.23-1.62). This association varied by median household income (p-interaction =0.03). Compared to those with a median annual household income <$50,000, patients with a median annual household income between $50,000 and < $100,000 had a 43% increased risk of PTC diagnosis (aOR = 1.43, 95%CI: 1.19-1.72), and patients with median household income ≥$100,000 had a 77% increased risk of PTC diagnosis (aOR = 1.77, 95%CI: 1.37-2.29). CONCLUSIONS: Cumulative exposure to PM2.5 over 3 years was significantly associated with the diagnosis of PTC. This association was most pronounced in those with a high median household income, suggesting a difference in access to care among socioeconomic groups.

Hyperparathyroidism at 1 year after kidney transplantation is associated with graft loss.

BACKGROUND: Hyperparathyroidism persists in many patients after kidney transplantation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between post-transplant hyperparathyroidism and kidney transplantation outcomes. METHODS: We identified 824 participants from a prospective longitudinal cohort of adult patients who underwent kidney transplantation at a single institution between December 2008 and February 2020. Parathyroid hormone levels before and after kidney transplantation were abstracted from medical records. Post-transplant hyperparathyroidism was defined as parathyroid hormone level ≥70 pg/mL 1 year after kidney transplantation. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios of mortality and death-censored graft loss by post-transplant hyperparathyroidism. Models were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, college education, parathyroid hormone level before kidney transplantation, cause of kidney failure, and years on dialysis before kidney transplantation. A Wald test for interactions was used to evaluate the risk of death-censored graft loss by age, sex, and race. RESULTS: Of 824 recipients, 60.9% had post-transplant hyperparathyroidism. Compared with non-hyperparathyroidism patients, those with post-transplant hyperparathyroidism were more likely to be Black (47.2% vs 32.6%), undergo dialysis before kidney transplantation (86.9% vs 76.6%), and have a parathyroid hormone level ≥300 pg/mL before kidney transplantation (26.8% vs 9.5%) (all P < .001). Patients with post-transplant hyperparathyroidism had a 1.6-fold higher risk of death-censored graft loss (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.60, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-2.49) compared with those without post-transplant hyperparathyroidism. This risk more than doubled in those with parathyroid hormone ≥300 pg/mL 1 year after kidney transplantation (adjusted hazard ratio = 4.19, 95% confidence interval: 1.95-9.03). The risk of death-censored graft loss did not differ by age, sex, or race (all Pinteraction > .05). There was no association between post-transplant hyperparathyroidism and mortality. CONCLUSION: The risk of graft loss was significantly higher among patients with post-transplant hyperparathyroidism when compared with patients without post-transplant hyperparathyroidism.

Quantifying geographic barriers to trauma care: Urban-rural variation in prehospital mortality.

BACKGROUND: Few studies of trauma care access and quality account for prehospital injury mortality. Little is known about geographic variation in prehospital mortality or the impact of prehospital care on injury disparities. METHODS: Using the Centers for Disease Control Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database, we queried county-level incidence of prehospital injury mortality from 1999 to 2016. We linked mortality incidence with county-level urban-rural classifications from the National Center for Health Statistics and population data from the US Census Bureau. We used negative binomial regression to estimate the relationship between rurality and prehospital injury mortality, adjusting for county-level distribution of race, sex, age, income, and insurance coverage. Models were then stratified by injury mechanism (motor vehicle traffic [MVT] vs. penetrating) to determine if prehospital mortality rates varied by type of injury. RESULTS: Prehospital injury mortality rates were elevated for all urban-rural county classes, relative to large central metro counties, with incidence rate ratios (IRR) ranging from 1.25 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-1.35) for fringe metro counties to 1.69 (95% CI, 1.58-1.82) for noncore counties. For MVT injury, IRRs for urban-rural classes compared with large central metro counties ranged from 2.02 (95% CI, 1.85-2.21) for fringe metro counties to 3.02 (95% CI, 2.76-3.30) to noncore counties. Incidence of prehospital mortality from penetrating injury was 14% higher for noncore counties compared to large central metro counties (IRR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.23). CONCLUSION: There is substantial geographic variation in prehospital injury mortality in the United States, with risk of prehospital death increasing with rurality. Patterns of prehospital death associated with penetrating and MVT injuries suggest that improvements to both trauma center access, prehospital care, and primary injury prevention are essential to reduce preventable injury deaths. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective ecological analysis, level III.

Surgeon-driven variability in emergency general surgery outcomes: Does it matter who is on call?

BACKGROUND: Hospital-level variation has been found to influence outcomes in emergency general surgery. However, whether the individual surgeon plays a role in this variation is unknown. METHODS: We performed an analysis of the Florida State Inpatient Database (2010-2014), which is linked to the American Hospital Association's Annual Survey Database, including patients who emergently underwent 1 or more of 7 procedures (laparotomy, adhesiolysis, small bowel resection, colectomy, repair of a perforated gastric ulcer, appendectomy, or cholecystectomy). We used multilevel random effects modeling to quantify the amount of variation in mortality, complications, and 30-day readmissions attributable to surgeons. Patient clinical and demographic factors, as well as hospital-level factors, were introduced into the model in a forward stepwise fashion, and the percent of the variation attributable to surgeons was derived. RESULTS: Our study included 2,149 surgeons across 224 hospitals, with a total of 569,767 emergency general surgery cases. The overall unadjusted mortality rate was 3.8%, and the complication and readmission rates were 12.7% and 27.7%, respectively. Surgeon-level variation had the greatest impact on mortality, explaining 32.77% of the overall variability in mortality risk compared with 0.08% and 2.28% for complications and readmissions, respectively. Peptic ulcer disease operations were most susceptible to surgeon-level variation in mortality and readmissions, whereas appendectomies and cholecystectomies were least susceptible to surgeon-level variation for all outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeon-level variation contributes to a significant portion of mortality in EGS. This variation is most pronounced in surgery for peptic ulcer disease, a high-risk, low-frequency surgical condition. Programs to reduce mortality in emergency general surgery should address reducing variability in practice with attention to high-risk, low-frequency procedures.

Qualitative Analysis of a Cultural Dexterity Program for Surgeons: Feasible, Impactful, and Necessary.

OBJECTIVES: Ineffective cross-cultural communication contributes to adverse outcomes for minority patients. To address this, the authors developed a novel curriculum for surgical residents built on the principle of cultural dexterity, emphasizing adaptability to clinical and sociocultural circumstances to tailor care to the needs of the individual patient. This study's objective was to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and perception of this program upon conclusion of its first year. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The curriculum was implemented at 3 general surgery programs. The flipped classroom model combined independent study via e-learning modules with interactive role-playing sessions. Sessions took place over 1 academic year. Four focus groups were held, each with 6 to 9 participants, to gain feedback on the curriculum. Focus groups were recorded and transcribed, and the data were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Five major themes emerged: (1) Role modeling from senior colleagues is integral in developing communication/interpersonal skills and attitudes toward cultural dexterity. (2) Cultural dexterity is relevant to the provision of high-quality surgical care. (3) Barriers to providing culturally dexterous care exist at the system level. (4) "Buy-in" at all levels of the institution is necessary to implement the principles of cultural dexterity. (5) The shared experience of discussing the challenges and triumphs of caring for a diverse population was engaging and impactful. CONCLUSION: Early implementation of the curriculum revealed that the tension between surgical residents' desire to improve their cultural dexterity and systemic/practical obstacles can be resolved. Combining surgically relevant didactic materials with experiential learning activities can change the paradigm of cross-cultural training.