The Impact of Postoperative Complications on Recovery of Health-Related Quality of Life and Functional Capacity after Pancreatectomy: Findings From a Prospective Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the extent to which postoperative complications impact on patient health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and survival after pancreatic surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Pancreatectomy is frequently associated with severe postoperative morbidity, which can affect patient recovery. Few and conflicting data are available regarding the effect of post-pancreatectomy complications on patient reported HRQoL. METHODS: This is an observational cohort study including consecutive patients enrolled in a prospective clinical trial (NCT04431076) who underwent elective pancreatectomy (2020-2022). Before surgery and on postoperative days (PODs) 15, 30, 90, 180, patients completed PROMIS-29 profile and Duke Activity Status Index questionnaires to assess their HRQoL and functional capacity. Mean differences in HRQoL scores were obtained using multivariable linear regression adjusting for preoperative scores and confounders. RESULTS: Of 528 patients, 370 (70%) experienced morbidity within 90 days, 154 (29%) severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade >2). Delayed gastric emptying had the greatest impact on HRQoL, showing decreased mental health up to POD90 and physical health up to POD180 compared to uncomplicated patients. An inverse relationship between complication severity grade and HRQoL was evident for most domains, with Clavien-Dindo grade 3b-4 patients showing worse HRQoL and functional capacity scores up to 6 months after surgery. In 235 pancreatic cancer patients, grade 3b and 4 complications were associated with reduced disease specific survival (median 25 versus 41 mo, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing pancreatic resection, postoperative complications significantly impact on all domains of patient quality of life with a dose-effect relationship between complication severity and impairment of HRQoL and functional capacity.

Recovery of health-related quality of life after laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Limited data comparing recovery of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after laparoscopic (LDP) versus open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) are available. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of laparoscopy on postoperative HRQOL after DP using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). METHODS: Data from consecutive patients who underwent DP (2020-2022) enrolled in a prospective clinical trial were reviewed. Patients completed PROMIS-29 plus 2 profile preoperatively, at postoperative day (POD) 15, 30, 90, and 180. Linear regression analysis adjusting for confounders including preoperative PROMIS scores, age, gender, ASA score, diagnosis, and multivisceral resection was used to estimate mean between-group differences (MD) in postoperative PROMIS domains T scores. RESULTS: Overall, 202 patients (118 laparoscopic, 86 open) underwent DP (median age 66 years, pancreatic cancer 41%, multivisceral resection 10%, median LOS 6 days). At POD15, LDP was associated with higher physical function (MD 5.6) and participation in social roles and activities scores (MD 3.8), reduced fatigue (MD - 2.7) and sleep disturbance (MD - 3.8) compared to ODP. At POD30, LDP patients had higher physical function (MD 5.2) and participation in social roles and activities scores (MD 6.0), reduced fatigue (MD - 3.5), and anxiety (MD - 4.0) compared to ODP. No between-group differences were found in HRQoL domains at POD90 and 180. Six months after surgery, the proportions of patients who had not recovered to preoperative physical function, participation in social roles and activities, fatigue, pain interference, sleep disturbance, cognitive function, depression, and anxiety were 31%, 31%, 28%, 20%, 15%, 14%, 8%, and 7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: According to PROMIS, LDP resulted in improved physical and social functioning and reduced anxiety and fatigue up to 30 days after surgery compared to ODP. At 6 months after surgery, recovery of physical domains is still incomplete in up to 30% of patients.

Implementing protocol-based relaparoscopy for severe complications in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopy has demonstrated growing applications for either primary colorectal resections or reoperations, no standardized criteria for implementing laparoscopy in revisional surgery have been reported. This study analyzes a single-center series of major complications after laparoscopic colorectal surgery, undergoing laparoscopic (LR), or open reoperations in compliance with a hemodynamics-based institutional management. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzes a series of consecutive patients who primarily underwent either laparoscopic left colectomy or low anterior resection in a tertiary referral center between 2016 and 2021. Major complications requiring reoperation (MCR) were managed through an interdisciplinary protocol and submitted to reoperation according to patient hemodynamics and intra-abdominal contamination. A cohort analysis primarily assessed treatment failure rates (i.e., 90-day mortality and need for further surgery), while postoperative morbidity was secondarily examined. RESULTS: Out of 1137 laparoscopic colorectal resections, 497 patients met eligibility criteria, while 45 (9.1%) developed MCRs were managed according to the standardized interdisciplinary protocol. Revisional surgery was performed through either LR (66.7%) or (33.3%). Treatment failure was 13.3% overall, including additional surgery (11.1%) and 90-day mortality (6.6%) after reoperation. In both overall and anastomotic leak-specific MCRs, relaparoscopy resulted in minimized length of hospital stay, postoperative morbidity, and intensity of care. CONCLUSIONS: Relaparoscopy for MCR preserves clinical benefits related to minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Further studies should investigate applicative determinants and impediments related to the center volume.

Validation of the PROMIS-29 Questionnaire as a Measure of Recovery After Pancreatic Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To contribute evidence for the reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29 (PROMIS-29) profile questionnaire as a measure of recovery after pancreatic surgery. BACKGROUND: PROMIS questionnaires have been recommended to evaluate postdischarge recovery after surgery. Evidence supporting their measurement properties in pancreatic surgery is missing. METHODS: An observational validation study designed according to the COSMIN checklist was conducted including data from a prospective clinical trial. Patients undergoing pancreatectomy completed PROMIS-29 preoperatively and on postoperative days (PODs) 15, 30, 90, and 180. Reliability was assessed by internal consistency using Cronbach α. Construct validity was assessed by known-groups comparison. Responsiveness was evaluated hypothesizing that scores would be higher (1) preoperatively versus POD15, (2) on POD30 versus POD15, (3) on POD90 versus POD30, and (4) on POD180 versus POD90. RESULTS: Overall, 510 patients were included in the study. Reliability was good to excellent (α values ranged from 0.82 to 0.97). Data supported 4 of 5 hypotheses tested for construct validity for 5 domains (physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and ability to participate in social roles) at most time points. Responsiveness hypotheses 1, 2, and 3 were supported by the data for physical function, fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain interference, and ability to participate in social roles domains. CONCLUSIONS: PROMIS had excellent reliability, discriminated between most groups expected to have different recovery trajectories and was responsive to the expected trajectory of recovery up to 90 days after surgery. Our findings support the use of PROMIS-29 profile as a patient-reported outcome measure of postdischarge recovery after pancreatectomy.

Development of a predictive model for unplanned intensive care unit admission after pancreatic resection within an enhanced recovery pathway.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether routine postoperative admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) can improve outcomes for patients undergoing elective pancreatic surgery. Aim of the study was to determine preoperative and intraoperative predictors of unplanned ICU access in patients undergoing pancreatectomy treated within an established enhanced recovery pathway (ERP) and compare outcomes between direct and late ICU admission. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted on adult patients who underwent pancreatic resection (2015-2019) within an ERP. Patients with preoperatively planned ICU admission were excluded from the study. Multiple multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to verify the association of preoperative and intraoperative variables with study outcomes. RESULTS: The study included 1486 consecutive patients (cancer diagnosis 60%, pancreaticoduodenectomy 60%; laparoscopic approach 20%; vascular resection 9%). Sixty-six (4.4%) patients had an unplanned ICU admission. Direct admission occurred in 22 (33%) patients and late ICU admission in 44 (67%) patients. Mortality was significantly lower in direct admission group (n = 3, 14%) compared to late admission (n = 25, 57%; p > 0.001). A comprehensive model including preoperative and intraoperative variables identified ASA score ≥ 3 (OR 5.59, p value < 0.001), history of hypertension (OR 2.29, p = 0.029), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 3.05, p = 0.026), proximal pancreatic resection (OR 2.79, p value 0.046), multivisceral resection (OR 8.86, p value < 0.001), high intraoperative blood loss (OR 1.01 per ml, p < 0.001), and increased serum lactate at the end of surgery (OR 1.25, p = 0.017) as independent factors associated with ICU admission. Area under the ROC curve was 0.891. CONCLUSION: Patient comorbidities, surgical complexity, and lactic acidosis at the end of surgery were associated with unplanned postoperative ICU admission. Late ICU admission had very high mortality rates compared to direct admission. Our findings suggest that patients with a combination of preoperative and intraoperative risk factors could benefit from upfront postoperative ICU admission to potentially improve postoperative outcomes.

Early biochemical predictors of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: a role for serum amylase and C-reactive protein.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that pancreatic inflammation plays a pivotal role in the occurrence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy but few data are available for distal pancreatectomy (DP). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of early biochemical markers on the occurrence of CR-POPF after DP. METHODS: Clinical and laboratory data for 432 consecutive DP patients were reviewed. Serum amylase was evaluated on postoperative day (POD) 1, and drain fluid amylase (DFA) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were evaluated on POD 2 and 3. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were performed for all biochemical markers and an area under the curve (AUC) was computed. Multivariable regression analyses to identify the factors associated with CR-POPF and severe postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3) were performed. RESULTS: At 90 days after surgery, CR-POPF occurred in 155 (36%) patients, severe complications in 66 (15%) patients. ROC curve analyses showed that DFA on POD2 had the largest AUC (0.753, p < 0.001), followed by serum amylase on POD 1 (0.651, p < 0.001), serum CRP on POD3 (0.644, p < 0.001), and CRP change between POD 2 and POD 3 (0.644, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis identified male gender (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.36-3.86; p = 0.002), DFA ≥ 1500 U/L on POD2 (OR 4.63, 95% CI 2.72-7.89; p < 0.001), serum amylase ≥ 100 U/L on POD 1 (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.01-2.93; p = 0.046), and CRP increase by at least 25 mg/L on POD 3 compared to the previous day (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.11-3.21; p = 0.019) as independent predictors of CR-POPF, yielding a valid regression model (AUC 0.765, 95% CI 0.714-0.816, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative serum amylase and CRP trajectory represent useful early biochemical markers for CR-POPF in addition to DFA. Our findings suggest that these laboratory tests should be incorporated into clinical practice to aid postoperative patient and drain management.

The impact of preoperative anemia on pancreatic resection outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative anemia is a risk factor for blood transfusions and delayed postoperative recovery, but few data are available for pancreatic surgery. Aim of the study was to analyze the impact of preoperative anemia on outcomes after pancreatic resection. METHODS: Retrospective review of 1107 patients resected at San Raffaele Hospital (2015-2018). Preoperative anemia was defined as hemoglobin lower than 130 g/L for men and 120 g/L for women. Primary outcome was 90-day comprehensive complication index (CCI). Analysis was stratified according to type of surgery; proximal resections (pancreaticoduodenectomy and total pancreatectomy) versus distal pancreatectomy. RESULTS: In 776 proximal resection patients, preoperative anemia was associated with increased CCI (24 ± 25 vs. 19 ± 23, p = 0.018) and perioperative allogenic blood transfusions (n = 124, 46% vs. n = 129, 26%; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that anemia was associated with a 7% (95%CI 0.02-0.57 p = 0.047) increase in CCI, and was an independent factor associated with perioperative blood transfusion (OR 2.762, 95%CI 1.72-4.49, p < 0.001). In 331 distal pancreatectomies, anemia was not associated to increased morbidity but only to an increased risk of perioperative blood transfusion. CONCLUSION: Preoperative anemia is an independent risk factor for increased complication severity and blood transfusion in patients undergoing major pancreatic resection.