Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Parasitol ; 70(2): 81-90, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39136614

RESUMO

Regular monitoring of malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for the management of uncomplicated malaria in healthcare facilities is a key factor in improving diagnostic quality and ensuring better case management. This study aimed to assess the performance of five RDTs (Standard Q Malaria P.f Ag and Standard Q Malaria P.f/Pan (SD Biosensor, Korea), One Step Malaria HRP2/pLDH (P.f/Pan) (Guangzhou Wondfo Biotech Co., Ltd., China), Malaria Pf/Pan (B&O Pharm, France), and Malaria test P.f/pan (Das Labor, Germany)) in two healthcare facilities in Abidjan. This cross-sectional study was conducted between September and October 2022. Overall, 250 patients suffering from uncomplicated malaria were included with a predominance of female patients (56.6%). The mean age was 22.3 years (SD = 20.6; range, 0.17-73). Of the patients tested, forty-six (46) tested positive for thick smears, reflecting a prevalence of 18.5%. Plasmodium falciparum was the most commonly detected species (93.5%). The geometric mean parasitemia was 6,111.80 parasites/µl (SD = 80,026.93) (range: 116-412461). The sensitivity ranged from 95.24% to 95.65%, whereas the specificity ranged from 93.07 to 94.09% for all five tests evaluated. The false positive rate of the tests was less than 10%. No invalid test results were reported. Two-thirds of P. malariae cases detected by microscopy showed also positive results with all the RDTs. All five RDTs showed 100% sensitivity at low parasitemia levels (< 1,000 parasites/µl blood) including three cases of parasites < 200 parasites/µl blood. This study demonstrated the importance of monitoring the performance of RDTs in clinical samples.


Assuntos
Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina , Malária , Humanos , Côte d'Ivoire/epidemiologia , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Masculino , Estudos Transversais , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Malária/diagnóstico , Lactente , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Idoso , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Instalações de Saúde , Testes de Diagnóstico Rápido
2.
Trop Med Infect Dis ; 9(1)2023 Dec 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38251206

RESUMO

The combinations of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ) are used as first-line treatments for uncomplicated malaria in the Ivory Coast. Different studies document the efficacy of two artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) (AL and ASAQ) in the Ivory Coast. However, there is no meta-analysis examining the data set of these studies. The purpose of this work was to determine the prevalence of malaria treatment failure cases in randomized control trials with two artemisinin-based combination therapies (AL versus ASAQ) in the Ivory Coast between 2009 to 2016. This study is a meta-analysis of data from the results of four previous multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial studies evaluating the clinical and parasitological efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine and artesunate-amodiaquine conducted between 2009 and 2016 following World Health Organization (WHO) protocol at sentinel sites in the Ivory Coast. These drug efficacy data collected between 2009 and 2016 were analyzed. During these studies, to distinguish between recrudescence and new infection, molecular genotyping of genes encoding merozoite surface protein 1 and 2 was carried out using nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR). A total of 1575 patients enrolled in the four studies, including 768 in the AL arm and 762 in the ASAQ arm, which were fully followed either for 28 days or 42 days according to WHO protocol. The adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR) was higher than 95% in the two groups (intention to treat (ITT): AL = 96.59% and ASAQ = 96.81; Per Protocol (PP): AL = 99.48% and ASAQ = 99.61%) after PCR correction at day 28. Aggregate data analysis (2009-2016) showed that at day 28, the proportions of patients with recurrent infection was higher in the AL group (ITT: 3.79%, PP: 3.9%) than in the ASAQ group (ITT: 2.17%, PP: 2.23%). After PCR correction, most treatment failures were classified as new infections (AL group (ITT: 0.13%, PP: 0.13%); ASAQ group (ITT: 0.39%, PP: 0.39%). The recrudescent infections rate was high, at 0.39% compared to 0.13% for ASAQ and AL, respectively, for both ITT and PP, no significant difference. However, the Kaplan-Meier curve of cumulative treatment success showed a significant difference between the two groups after PCR from 2012-2013 (p = 0.032). Overall, ASAQ and AL have been shown to be effective drugs for the treatment of uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in the study areas, 14 years after deployment of these drugs.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA