Time to Disability Milestones and Annualized Relapse Rates in NMOSD and MOGAD.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate accumulation of disability in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) in a changing treatment landscape. We aimed to identify risk factors for the development of disability milestones in relation to disease duration, number of attacks, and age. METHODS: We analyzed data from individuals with NMOSD and MOGAD from the German Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group registry. Applying survival analyses, we estimated risk factors and computed time to disability milestones as defined by the Expanded Disability Status Score (EDSS). RESULTS: We included 483 patients: 298 AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD, 52 AQP4-IgG-/MOG-IgG- NMOSD patients, and 133 patients with MOGAD. Despite comparable annualized attack rates, disability milestones occurred earlier and after less attacks in NMOSD patients than MOGAD patients (median time to EDSS 3: AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD 7.7 (95% CI 6.6-9.6) years, AQP4-IgG-/MOG-IgG- NMOSD 8.7) years, MOGAD 14.1 (95% CI 10.4-27.6) years; EDSS 4: 11.9 (95% CI 9.7-14.7), 11.6 (95% lower CI 7.6) and 20.4 (95% lower CI 14.1) years; EDSS 6: 20.1 (95% CI 16.5-32.1), 20.7 (95% lower CI 11.6), and 37.3 (95% lower CI 29.4) years; and EDSS 7: 34.2 (95% lower CI 31.1) for AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD). Higher age at onset increased the risk for all disability milestones, while risk of disability decreased over time. INTERPRETATION: AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD, AQP4-IgG-/MOG-IgG- NMOSD, and MOGAD patients show distinctive relapse-associated disability progression, with MOGAD having a less severe disease course. Investigator-initiated research has led to increasing awareness and improved treatment strategies appearing to ameliorate disease outcomes for NMOSD and MOGAD. ANN NEUROL 2024;95:720-732.

Apheresis therapies in MOGAD: a retrospective study of 117 therapeutic interventions in 571 attacks.

BACKGROUND: Incomplete attack remission is the main cause of disability in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD). Apheresis therapies such as plasma exchange and immunoadsorption are widely used in neuroimmunology. Data on apheresis outcomes in MOGAD attacks remain limited. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all apheresis treated attacks occurring in patients with MOGAD between 2008 and 2023 at 18 Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group centres. Treatment response was categorised as complete, partial or no remission. Preattack and follow-up Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and visual Functional System Scores (FSS) were used to calculate absolute outcomes (ΔEDSS/Δvisual FSS). Predictors of complete remission were analysed using a generalised linear mixed model. RESULTS: Apheresis was used for 117/571 (20.5%) attacks in 85/209 (40.7%) patients. Attacks with simultaneous optic neuritis and myelitis were treated more often with apheresis (42.4%, n=14) than isolated myelitis (25.2%, n=35), cerebral manifestation (21.0%, n=17) or isolated optic neuritis (17.6%, n=51). Apheresis was initiated as first-line therapy in 12% (4.5 (IQR 0-11) days after attack onset), second-line therapy in 62% (15 (IQR 6.75-31) days) and third-line therapy in 26% (30 (IQR 19-42) days). Complete remission was achieved in 21%, partial remission in 70% and no remission in 9% of patients. First-line apheresis (OR 2.5, p=0.040) and concomitant disease-modifying therapy (OR 1.5, p=0.011) were associated with complete remission. Both parameters were also associated with a favourable ΔEDSS. No differences in outcomes were observed between the apheresis types. CONCLUSION: Apheresis is frequently used in MOGAD attacks. An early start as first-line therapy and concomitant disease-modifying therapy predict full attack recovery.

Serum neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein for predicting response to apheresis in steroid-refractory multiple sclerosis relapses.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The predictive value of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) and serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) for apheresis outcome in steroid-refractory multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse has not yet been evaluated. METHODS: We used pre- and postapheresis serum samples from 38 participants of the IAPEMS trial (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02671682), which investigated the use of immunoadsorption versus plasma exchange for the treatment of steroid-refractory MS attacks. Response to apheresis was classified based on improvement on (i) the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), (ii) the affected functional system scores (FSS) of the EDSS, or (iii) the visual acuity for patients with optic neuritis, 4 weeks postapheresis. sNFL and sGFAP were measured by single molecule arrays. RESULTS: Preprocedural sGFAP levels could discriminate between responders and nonresponders, determined by FSS improvement (p = 0.017). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, younger age (odds ratio [OR] = 0.781, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.635-0.962, p = 0.020) and lower sGFAP levels (OR = 0.948, 95% CI = 0.903-0.995, p = 0.031) could predict response to apheresis in the overall cohort. We could observe a trend towards a favourable apheresis outcome with higher sNfL levels (OR = 1.413, 95% CI = 0.965-2.069, p = 0.076). Analysis of the sNfL-to-sGFAP ratio showed an OR of 1.924 (95% CI = 1.073-3.451, p = 0.028) for predicting apheresis response. The ratio showed a better predictive value than the individual parameters. Neither biomarker was affected by the number of steroid cycles preapheresis. CONCLUSIONS: Lower sGFAP levels, a higher sNfL-to-sGFAP ratio, and younger age are associated with a favourable apheresis outcome.

Prospective study validating a multidimensional treatment decision score predicting the 24-month outcome in untreated patients with clinically isolated syndrome and early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, the ProVal-MS study.

INTRODUCTION: In Multiple Sclerosis (MS), patients´ characteristics and (bio)markers that reliably predict the individual disease prognosis at disease onset are lacking. Cohort studies allow a close follow-up of MS histories and a thorough phenotyping of patients. Therefore, a multicenter cohort study was initiated to implement a wide spectrum of data and (bio)markers in newly diagnosed patients. METHODS: ProVal-MS (Prospective study to validate a multidimensional decision score that predicts treatment outcome at 24 months in untreated patients with clinically isolated syndrome or early Relapsing-Remitting-MS) is a prospective cohort study in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) or Relapsing-Remitting (RR)-MS (McDonald 2017 criteria), diagnosed within the last two years, conducted at five academic centers in Southern Germany. The collection of clinical, laboratory, imaging, and paraclinical data as well as biosamples is harmonized across centers. The primary goal is to validate (discrimination and calibration) the previously published DIFUTURE MS-Treatment Decision score (MS-TDS). The score supports clinical decision-making regarding the options of early (within 6 months after study baseline) platform medication (Interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl/diroximel fumarate, teriflunomide), or no immediate treatment (> 6 months after baseline) of patients with early RR-MS and CIS by predicting the probability of new or enlarging lesions in cerebral magnetic resonance images (MRIs) between 6 and 24 months. Further objectives are refining the MS-TDS score and providing data to identify new markers reflecting disease course and severity. The project also provides a technical evaluation of the ProVal-MS cohort within the IT-infrastructure of the DIFUTURE consortium (Data Integration for Future Medicine) and assesses the efficacy of the data sharing techniques developed. PERSPECTIVE: Clinical cohorts provide the infrastructure to discover and to validate relevant disease-specific findings. A successful validation of the MS-TDS will add a new clinical decision tool to the armamentarium of practicing MS neurologists from which newly diagnosed MS patients may take advantage. Trial registration ProVal-MS has been registered in the German Clinical Trials Register, `Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien` (DRKS)-ID: DRKS00014034, date of registration: 21 December 2018; https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00014034.